比特叔
六零后的区块链新粉
315 Following
204 Followers
46 Liked
4 Shared
All
Quotes
See original
Chen Zhi Ting, hold on
Sudden escalation!
The conflict at the Thai-Cambodian border has entered its eighth day, and the situation has developed far beyond expectations — what initially started as localized friction has now completely escalated into a full-scale war, and the intensifying situation is beyond anyone's imagination. Previously, at the request of Cambodia, President Trump of the United States intervened to mediate a ceasefire, claiming to have called the leaders of both Thailand and Cambodia, with both sides agreeing to ceasefire. However, this ceasefire declaration was immediately met with a direct “slap in the face” from Thailand. Thailand specifically issued a statement angrily criticizing Cambodia: “Do not think that by courting leaders of other countries to pressure us will force us to ceasefire; Thailand will never cease military action until our goals are achieved.” This statement undoubtedly serves as a public and firm response to Cambodia. After mediation failed, Cambodia began to “plead for sympathy,” stating: “If Thailand's military actions are not stopped, Asia may fall into a dangerous situation of ‘big countries bullying small countries’ in the future.” Clearly, Cambodia has assumed a “small nation posture” at this time, attempting to garner international sympathy.
Behind this phenomenon lies a thought-provoking clue: after the outbreak of war, Cambodia did not prioritize seeking mediation within ASEAN, but instead sought help from the United States, far away, hoping Trump could suppress Thailand. As an Asian country, it is evident that Cambodia's actions touch upon the taboos of regional diplomacy by entrusting its national security to an external power. Perhaps someone might ask: Why has Cambodia fallen into conflict this time? Aside from Trump's transoceanic call for a ceasefire and ASEAN's involvement, why are there no other countries willing to step forward to mediate? One should note that Cambodia previously had close relations with the Eastern powers; why has this influential Eastern power in the region not made a firm statement this time?
Firstly, both Thailand and Cambodia are friendly neighbors and partners to China, and China will not deal with this situation as simply as it would with the India-Pakistan conflict, but will maintain an objective and just stance. Secondly, during Hun Sen's administration, Cambodia's relationship with the Eastern powers was termed “ironclad,” even referred to as “Cambodian Iron” by outsiders — Cambodia maintained synchronization with China on many diplomatic and domestic issues, and China has provided significant assistance in economic and military fields, with Chinese cooperation marks visible throughout Cambodia. However, since Hun Sen’s son, Hun Manet, who was educated in the U.S., was elected as the new prime minister, the situation has quietly changed: although Cambodia still claims to “adhere to the friendly policy toward China,” its diplomatic direction has begun to tilt towards the West, and Hun Manet’s government has clearly adopted a posture of “betting on both sides.” The most notable example is the key cooperation project heavily advocated by China — the canal project has faced numerous setbacks, and several Chinese investment projects have also encountered obstacles.
Moreover, it is worth noting that after the Sino-U.S. tariff dispute, Cambodia was one of the first Asian countries to compromise with the United States, an act tantamount to presenting a “token of loyalty” to America. After the first outbreak of conflict between Thailand and Cambodia, Cambodia's choices once again confirmed its diplomatic inclination: it neither sought an internal ASEAN solution nor asked its neighboring “big brother” for help, but instead directly reported to Trump. Trump once forcibly pressured both sides to ceasefire, threatening to impose high tariffs on both countries otherwise. In the first confrontation, Thailand gave Trump some face, and both sides temporarily ceased fire — this led Cambodia to mistakenly believe that Trump was “all-powerful,” and even former Prime Minister Hun Sen publicly stated: “We will release more insider information about Thai officials.” This statement undoubtedly infuriated Thailand.
One should know that Hun Sen had previously used methods such as wiretapping to bring down the former Thai Prime Minister, who referred to him as “uncle,” and now threatens Thailand with “exposures,” which naturally triggered strong dissatisfaction from Thailand. Therefore, after the outbreak of this war, Thailand was evidently well-prepared and struck very hard. Seeing Thailand's offensive becoming increasingly intense, Cambodia found it difficult to resist and could only make another transoceanic call, pleading with Trump to continue pressuring Thailand for a ceasefire. But this time, Thailand directly ignored Trump's ceasefire call, leaving the American president with the door shut. As a result, a rather peculiar scene emerged in Asia: various countries quietly watched Cambodia being “beaten” by Thailand, especially as Thailand focused its firepower on the numerous casinos and online fraud parks in Cambodia's border regions, launching a fierce bombardment.
Surprisingly, there emerged voices from multiple Asian countries online cheering for Thailand — investigating the reasons, it can be seen that online fraudsters are no longer limited to targeting China but have set their sights on the entire Asia as a target for their crimes. Thailand's direct firepower coverage of Cambodia's online fraud parks is tantamount to carrying the banner of “acting for justice,” which naturally pleases many. Until this moment, Cambodia finally remembered to seek mediation from Asian countries, but whether it was ASEAN or regional powers, they only issued statements calling for both sides to cease fire and stop fighting without getting too involved in the grievances between the two countries. This time, Cambodia undoubtedly needs to learn a good lesson. One must recall the previous rampant online fraud in Myanmar:
The Myanmar military government had turned a blind eye to online fraud activities, and even participated secretly, leading Myanmar to become a “disaster zone” for online fraudsters, ultimately triggering the wrath of major powers. The subsequent developments are well-known: internal turmoil suddenly erupted in Myanmar, with local armed forces taking action under the banner of “cracking down on online fraud,” catching the Min Aung Hlaing military government off guard. Afterwards, the Myanmar military government dared not to condone online fraud any longer and began to vigorously crack down on this black industry. And those online fraudsters who could not establish themselves in Myanmar subsequently swarmed to Cambodia to “set up camp.” Tempted by immense profits, Cambodia actually turned a blind eye to and condoned these fraudsters to continue their evil deeds, forming a seamless service chain of “online fraud - gambling - money laundering.”
This black industry has seemingly become Cambodia's “little treasury,” and its actions have long triggered strong dissatisfaction from neighboring countries. On one hand, it has condoned online fraud, angering its neighbors, and on the other hand, after the outbreak of war, it attempts to cling to Trump’s support, relying on external pressure to ceasefire, entrusting national security to external countries — Cambodia has undoubtedly committed the dual heavy taboo this time. Indeed, Thailand's crackdown on Cambodia may have its own interest considerations, but just based on the banner of “cracking down on online fraud,” it has already occupied the moral high ground. If this war continues, the situation will only become increasingly unfavorable for Cambodia, and it may even deal a significant blow to the governance foundation of Hun Sen and his son. To this day, if Hun Sen and his son still fail to recognize the fundamental reasons for Cambodia's “beating” and continue to fantasize about relying on America's protection and Trump's pressure to make Thailand back down, then what awaits Cambodia may be an even greater disaster.
The conflict at the Thai-Cambodian border has entered its eighth day, and the situation has developed far beyond expectations — what initially started as localized friction has now completely escalated into a full-scale war, and the intensifying situation is beyond anyone's imagination. Previously, at the request of Cambodia, President Trump of the United States intervened to mediate a ceasefire, claiming to have called the leaders of both Thailand and Cambodia, with both sides agreeing to ceasefire. However, this ceasefire declaration was immediately met with a direct “slap in the face” from Thailand. Thailand specifically issued a statement angrily criticizing Cambodia: “Do not think that by courting leaders of other countries to pressure us will force us to ceasefire; Thailand will never cease military action until our goals are achieved.” This statement undoubtedly serves as a public and firm response to Cambodia. After mediation failed, Cambodia began to “plead for sympathy,” stating: “If Thailand's military actions are not stopped, Asia may fall into a dangerous situation of ‘big countries bullying small countries’ in the future.” Clearly, Cambodia has assumed a “small nation posture” at this time, attempting to garner international sympathy.
Behind this phenomenon lies a thought-provoking clue: after the outbreak of war, Cambodia did not prioritize seeking mediation within ASEAN, but instead sought help from the United States, far away, hoping Trump could suppress Thailand. As an Asian country, it is evident that Cambodia's actions touch upon the taboos of regional diplomacy by entrusting its national security to an external power. Perhaps someone might ask: Why has Cambodia fallen into conflict this time? Aside from Trump's transoceanic call for a ceasefire and ASEAN's involvement, why are there no other countries willing to step forward to mediate? One should note that Cambodia previously had close relations with the Eastern powers; why has this influential Eastern power in the region not made a firm statement this time?
Firstly, both Thailand and Cambodia are friendly neighbors and partners to China, and China will not deal with this situation as simply as it would with the India-Pakistan conflict, but will maintain an objective and just stance. Secondly, during Hun Sen's administration, Cambodia's relationship with the Eastern powers was termed “ironclad,” even referred to as “Cambodian Iron” by outsiders — Cambodia maintained synchronization with China on many diplomatic and domestic issues, and China has provided significant assistance in economic and military fields, with Chinese cooperation marks visible throughout Cambodia. However, since Hun Sen’s son, Hun Manet, who was educated in the U.S., was elected as the new prime minister, the situation has quietly changed: although Cambodia still claims to “adhere to the friendly policy toward China,” its diplomatic direction has begun to tilt towards the West, and Hun Manet’s government has clearly adopted a posture of “betting on both sides.” The most notable example is the key cooperation project heavily advocated by China — the canal project has faced numerous setbacks, and several Chinese investment projects have also encountered obstacles.
Moreover, it is worth noting that after the Sino-U.S. tariff dispute, Cambodia was one of the first Asian countries to compromise with the United States, an act tantamount to presenting a “token of loyalty” to America. After the first outbreak of conflict between Thailand and Cambodia, Cambodia's choices once again confirmed its diplomatic inclination: it neither sought an internal ASEAN solution nor asked its neighboring “big brother” for help, but instead directly reported to Trump. Trump once forcibly pressured both sides to ceasefire, threatening to impose high tariffs on both countries otherwise. In the first confrontation, Thailand gave Trump some face, and both sides temporarily ceased fire — this led Cambodia to mistakenly believe that Trump was “all-powerful,” and even former Prime Minister Hun Sen publicly stated: “We will release more insider information about Thai officials.” This statement undoubtedly infuriated Thailand.
One should know that Hun Sen had previously used methods such as wiretapping to bring down the former Thai Prime Minister, who referred to him as “uncle,” and now threatens Thailand with “exposures,” which naturally triggered strong dissatisfaction from Thailand. Therefore, after the outbreak of this war, Thailand was evidently well-prepared and struck very hard. Seeing Thailand's offensive becoming increasingly intense, Cambodia found it difficult to resist and could only make another transoceanic call, pleading with Trump to continue pressuring Thailand for a ceasefire. But this time, Thailand directly ignored Trump's ceasefire call, leaving the American president with the door shut. As a result, a rather peculiar scene emerged in Asia: various countries quietly watched Cambodia being “beaten” by Thailand, especially as Thailand focused its firepower on the numerous casinos and online fraud parks in Cambodia's border regions, launching a fierce bombardment.
Surprisingly, there emerged voices from multiple Asian countries online cheering for Thailand — investigating the reasons, it can be seen that online fraudsters are no longer limited to targeting China but have set their sights on the entire Asia as a target for their crimes. Thailand's direct firepower coverage of Cambodia's online fraud parks is tantamount to carrying the banner of “acting for justice,” which naturally pleases many. Until this moment, Cambodia finally remembered to seek mediation from Asian countries, but whether it was ASEAN or regional powers, they only issued statements calling for both sides to cease fire and stop fighting without getting too involved in the grievances between the two countries. This time, Cambodia undoubtedly needs to learn a good lesson. One must recall the previous rampant online fraud in Myanmar:
The Myanmar military government had turned a blind eye to online fraud activities, and even participated secretly, leading Myanmar to become a “disaster zone” for online fraudsters, ultimately triggering the wrath of major powers. The subsequent developments are well-known: internal turmoil suddenly erupted in Myanmar, with local armed forces taking action under the banner of “cracking down on online fraud,” catching the Min Aung Hlaing military government off guard. Afterwards, the Myanmar military government dared not to condone online fraud any longer and began to vigorously crack down on this black industry. And those online fraudsters who could not establish themselves in Myanmar subsequently swarmed to Cambodia to “set up camp.” Tempted by immense profits, Cambodia actually turned a blind eye to and condoned these fraudsters to continue their evil deeds, forming a seamless service chain of “online fraud - gambling - money laundering.”
This black industry has seemingly become Cambodia's “little treasury,” and its actions have long triggered strong dissatisfaction from neighboring countries. On one hand, it has condoned online fraud, angering its neighbors, and on the other hand, after the outbreak of war, it attempts to cling to Trump’s support, relying on external pressure to ceasefire, entrusting national security to external countries — Cambodia has undoubtedly committed the dual heavy taboo this time. Indeed, Thailand's crackdown on Cambodia may have its own interest considerations, but just based on the banner of “cracking down on online fraud,” it has already occupied the moral high ground. If this war continues, the situation will only become increasingly unfavorable for Cambodia, and it may even deal a significant blow to the governance foundation of Hun Sen and his son. To this day, if Hun Sen and his son still fail to recognize the fundamental reasons for Cambodia's “beating” and continue to fantasize about relying on America's protection and Trump's pressure to make Thailand back down, then what awaits Cambodia may be an even greater disaster.
yes
Quoted content has been removed
yes
Quoted content has been removed
BTC
Quoted content has been removed
1
Quoted content has been removed
Yes
GAYLE_
--
IF SPACE X GOES PUBLIC FOR $1.6 TRILLION NEXT YEAR
ELON MUSK WOULD BE WORTH ABOUT $1 TRILLION
I CAN'T EVEN FATHOM HOW MUCH $1 BILLION IS 🤣
IT'S A DIZZYING AMOUNT
ELON MUSK WOULD BE WORTH ABOUT $1 TRILLION
I CAN'T EVEN FATHOM HOW MUCH $1 BILLION IS 🤣
IT'S A DIZZYING AMOUNT
See original
Why don't other countries that allow openness have the situation you mentioned? Are Chinese people relatively foolish?
What would happen if China allowed RMB stablecoins and virtual currency trading?
Imagine if China suddenly announced - that domestic trading of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and even the issuance of a RMB stablecoin would be allowed, with funds able to transfer across borders freely, no longer limited by annual quotas. Many would be excited to think, 'Finally, we can invest abroad freely,' but the reality may be far more complex and even somewhat dangerous.
First, capital outflow is almost inevitable. Once the RMB stablecoin is launched, residents and enterprises can bypass banks and the foreign exchange bureau, directly converting their funds into USDT, USD assets, or even overseas stocks. The speed of capital outflow is astonishing, far exceeding the control of bank approvals and annual quotas. There may be a massive sell-off of RMB and a surge in demand for USD in a short period, putting severe depreciation pressure on the RMB exchange rate. Although foreign exchange reserves may still appear on the books, the ability to support the exchange rate has been almost weakened.
First, capital outflow is almost inevitable. Once the RMB stablecoin is launched, residents and enterprises can bypass banks and the foreign exchange bureau, directly converting their funds into USDT, USD assets, or even overseas stocks. The speed of capital outflow is astonishing, far exceeding the control of bank approvals and annual quotas. There may be a massive sell-off of RMB and a surge in demand for USD in a short period, putting severe depreciation pressure on the RMB exchange rate. Although foreign exchange reserves may still appear on the books, the ability to support the exchange rate has been almost weakened.
See original
A good leader who truly serves the people
American children have investment accounts from birth: starting with a million at 18
This is not science fiction, but a recently implemented reality policy sensation.
On December 2, President Trump officially announced the launch of 'Trump Accounts' at the White House as part of his Working Families Tax Cuts Act.
This innovative children's IRA (Individual Retirement Account) is open to all children in the United States under the age of 18, but particularly offers additional benefits for babies born between 2025 and 2028: the U.S. Treasury will make a one-time deposit of $1,000 to help them start accumulating wealth from infancy.
Even more exciting is that on the same day, Dell Technologies founder Michael Dell and his wife quickly responded by announcing a record donation of $625 million (approximately 4.4 billion RMB), which will be directly injected into the accounts of 25 million American children, providing each with an additional $250 in seed funding. This massive charity— the largest direct donation benefiting American children in history— will prioritize children under 10 living in low- to middle-income zip code areas (with a median income below $150,000), reaching as high as 80%.
On December 2, President Trump officially announced the launch of 'Trump Accounts' at the White House as part of his Working Families Tax Cuts Act.
This innovative children's IRA (Individual Retirement Account) is open to all children in the United States under the age of 18, but particularly offers additional benefits for babies born between 2025 and 2028: the U.S. Treasury will make a one-time deposit of $1,000 to help them start accumulating wealth from infancy.
Even more exciting is that on the same day, Dell Technologies founder Michael Dell and his wife quickly responded by announcing a record donation of $625 million (approximately 4.4 billion RMB), which will be directly injected into the accounts of 25 million American children, providing each with an additional $250 in seed funding. This massive charity— the largest direct donation benefiting American children in history— will prioritize children under 10 living in low- to middle-income zip code areas (with a median income below $150,000), reaching as high as 80%.
See original
A good leader who truly serves the people
American children have investment accounts from birth: starting with a million at 18
This is not science fiction, but a recently implemented reality policy sensation.
On December 2, President Trump officially announced the launch of 'Trump Accounts' at the White House as part of his Working Families Tax Cuts Act.
This innovative children's IRA (Individual Retirement Account) is open to all children in the United States under the age of 18, but particularly offers additional benefits for babies born between 2025 and 2028: the U.S. Treasury will make a one-time deposit of $1,000 to help them start accumulating wealth from infancy.
Even more exciting is that on the same day, Dell Technologies founder Michael Dell and his wife quickly responded by announcing a record donation of $625 million (approximately 4.4 billion RMB), which will be directly injected into the accounts of 25 million American children, providing each with an additional $250 in seed funding. This massive charity— the largest direct donation benefiting American children in history— will prioritize children under 10 living in low- to middle-income zip code areas (with a median income below $150,000), reaching as high as 80%.
On December 2, President Trump officially announced the launch of 'Trump Accounts' at the White House as part of his Working Families Tax Cuts Act.
This innovative children's IRA (Individual Retirement Account) is open to all children in the United States under the age of 18, but particularly offers additional benefits for babies born between 2025 and 2028: the U.S. Treasury will make a one-time deposit of $1,000 to help them start accumulating wealth from infancy.
Even more exciting is that on the same day, Dell Technologies founder Michael Dell and his wife quickly responded by announcing a record donation of $625 million (approximately 4.4 billion RMB), which will be directly injected into the accounts of 25 million American children, providing each with an additional $250 in seed funding. This massive charity— the largest direct donation benefiting American children in history— will prioritize children under 10 living in low- to middle-income zip code areas (with a median income below $150,000), reaching as high as 80%.
See original
Bullish to one dollar
DOGEUSDT
Perp
16X
Opening Long
Unrealized PNL
+4.76USDT
6
GN
1000 USDT🧧🧧🧧
During his speech at the White House, Trump said that we have narrowed down the candidates for the Federal Reserve Chairman to one, and I guess the potential Federal Reserve Chairman is here. I can tell you, he is a respected person. Thank you, Kevin.
#BinanceBlockchainWeek #ETH巨鲸增持 #Token2049新加坡 #ETH巨鲸增持
1000 USDT🧧🧧🧧
During his speech at the White House, Trump said that we have narrowed down the candidates for the Federal Reserve Chairman to one, and I guess the potential Federal Reserve Chairman is here. I can tell you, he is a respected person. Thank you, Kevin.
#BinanceBlockchainWeek #ETH巨鲸增持 #Token2049新加坡 #ETH巨鲸增持
See original
Prohibition is power, regulation is ability
Prohibition is a blockage! Regulation is pricing power!
Today, the global attitude towards virtual currencies is like having a 'high-risk snack stall' opened downstairs in your community: prohibiting it means there's no risk of getting an upset stomach, but you also miss out on potentially delicious new flavors; regulation means making the stall owner wear gloves and clearly pricing their items, which may be a hassle, but allows you to try new things while minimizing pitfalls.
Currency has always been the 'hard signboard' of national sovereignty — using Renminbi or US dollars means there is national credit backing it. If virtual currencies are not controlled, it would be like a bunch of 'wild coins' popping up outside, and the government would be unable to manage inflation or stabilize exchange rates, effectively relinquishing the 'steering wheel' of the economy. So I choose not to participate + not to take risks, while the state worries about capital outflow, money laundering, gray markets, and excessive uncertainty, so I simply won't play this game.
Currency has always been the 'hard signboard' of national sovereignty — using Renminbi or US dollars means there is national credit backing it. If virtual currencies are not controlled, it would be like a bunch of 'wild coins' popping up outside, and the government would be unable to manage inflation or stabilize exchange rates, effectively relinquishing the 'steering wheel' of the economy. So I choose not to participate + not to take risks, while the state worries about capital outflow, money laundering, gray markets, and excessive uncertainty, so I simply won't play this game.
Ok
Quoted content has been removed
Yes
GAYLE_
--
A whale just picked up 75,000 ETH worth around $267 million today.
Big money is still buying Ethereum, looks like they know what’s coming...
Big money is still buying Ethereum, looks like they know what’s coming...
See original
The longer it lasts, the harder it falls
Crypto Scholar: Is Ethereum's southward trend set in stone on 11.12? Where are you getting on board? Latest market analysis and short-term strategy reference
The current price of Ethereum is 3480, and it's currently 2 AM Beijing time. Many crypto friends can't hold on as prices go south. My advice is to exit in batches to secure profits in advance; if the main force continues to decline, it will only be a bonus for us. Now we need to see if the support at the 3460 level is strong enough. If it breaks, continue to hold; if it holds, we can add back what we've reduced after a pullback, as long as we don’t break the previous high defense point, we can strictly follow our trading plan.
Before the publication, the daily K-line reached a high of 3647 and a low of 3463. The EMA trend indicator is continuing to expand the bearish momentum downwards. The EMA15 resistance point has reached 3610. The K-line is trying to impact the 0.786 support level at 3460. MACD is shrinking and moving upward; the DIF and DEA golden cross have not yet formed. The K-line is encountering resistance at 3719 in the Bollinger Bands and is beginning to retract. If the daily line closes as a bearish line in the morning, the market is likely to trend south in the following days. Before any positive news comes out, fluctuating around the 100,000 mark is quite normal.
The four-hour K-line has reached the horizontal support point of the ascending triangle at 3460, which is also the support point of the 0.786 level. The MACD volume has ended, and the dead cross formed by the DIF and DEA indicates that this support level is likely to hold. Southward movement can continue to hold. The Bollinger Bands have also lost the support of 3510. Now the middle track support has turned into resistance. Pay attention to the lower track at 3340. The short-term is oversold, the medium-term is still bearish, and the long-term is also bearish. Look for big moves in small increments. Those who haven't entered yet should wait for a pullback to get on board for the southward trend, while being cautious about the northward trend.
Short-term reference:
Southward trial entry point is between 3500 and 3550, with a defense at 3600, stop loss at 50 points, target looking at 3450 to 3400, and if broken, look at 3350 to 3300.
Northward trial entry point is between 3250 and 3200, with a defense at 3150, stop loss at 50 points, target looking at 3300 to 3350, and if broken, look at 3400 to 3450.
Specific operations are based on real-time market data. For more information, you can consult the author. There may be delays in article publication, and the suggestions are for reference only; risks are borne by the reader.
$ETH
{future}(ETHUSDT)
#ETH合约 #ETH #ETH走势分析 #ETH（二饼）
The current price of Ethereum is 3480, and it's currently 2 AM Beijing time. Many crypto friends can't hold on as prices go south. My advice is to exit in batches to secure profits in advance; if the main force continues to decline, it will only be a bonus for us. Now we need to see if the support at the 3460 level is strong enough. If it breaks, continue to hold; if it holds, we can add back what we've reduced after a pullback, as long as we don’t break the previous high defense point, we can strictly follow our trading plan.
Before the publication, the daily K-line reached a high of 3647 and a low of 3463. The EMA trend indicator is continuing to expand the bearish momentum downwards. The EMA15 resistance point has reached 3610. The K-line is trying to impact the 0.786 support level at 3460. MACD is shrinking and moving upward; the DIF and DEA golden cross have not yet formed. The K-line is encountering resistance at 3719 in the Bollinger Bands and is beginning to retract. If the daily line closes as a bearish line in the morning, the market is likely to trend south in the following days. Before any positive news comes out, fluctuating around the 100,000 mark is quite normal.
The four-hour K-line has reached the horizontal support point of the ascending triangle at 3460, which is also the support point of the 0.786 level. The MACD volume has ended, and the dead cross formed by the DIF and DEA indicates that this support level is likely to hold. Southward movement can continue to hold. The Bollinger Bands have also lost the support of 3510. Now the middle track support has turned into resistance. Pay attention to the lower track at 3340. The short-term is oversold, the medium-term is still bearish, and the long-term is also bearish. Look for big moves in small increments. Those who haven't entered yet should wait for a pullback to get on board for the southward trend, while being cautious about the northward trend.
Short-term reference:
Southward trial entry point is between 3500 and 3550, with a defense at 3600, stop loss at 50 points, target looking at 3450 to 3400, and if broken, look at 3350 to 3300.
Northward trial entry point is between 3250 and 3200, with a defense at 3150, stop loss at 50 points, target looking at 3300 to 3350, and if broken, look at 3400 to 3450.
Specific operations are based on real-time market data. For more information, you can consult the author. There may be delays in article publication, and the suggestions are for reference only; risks are borne by the reader.
$ETH
{future}(ETHUSDT)
#ETH合约 #ETH #ETH走势分析 #ETH（二饼）
Ok
When the sky has feelings
See original
Charge, charge, charge, mindlessly charge
#ETH走势分析 $ETH Brothers' Explosive Prophecy: Trump's Son Prince Brother Claims Ethereum Will Surge to $8000 to $10000 in Two Months?
Did you guys catch this big scoop? Trump's son just dropped a nuclear-level prophecy: Ethereum (ETH) is expected to reach $8000 to $10000 within two months!
This news has completely blown up the community! This is not just some ordinary influencer making a call, but a member of the Trump family stepping in personally. Think about it, consider it deeply; does this hint at something? Is there a macro layout or big funds moving that we don't know about?
You should know that the Trump faction is increasingly favorable towards cryptocurrencies now. If this prophecy comes true, ETH could double right off the bat, igniting the entire bull market!
The community is already in an uproar:
· 🚀 Bullish Joy: They feel this is an epic positive signal, and traditional funds are about to FOMO into the market!
· 🤔 Calm Dissenters: Cautioning everyone not to get too excited, reminding that the market ultimately depends on real skills, and be careful not to be swayed by rumors.
What do you think? Is this "Prince's Prophecy" a harbinger of wealth secrets, or just a pure sensational gimmick? Dare to make a post as proof, and let's dig up and verify together in two months!$ETH #以太坊暴涨
Did you guys catch this big scoop? Trump's son just dropped a nuclear-level prophecy: Ethereum (ETH) is expected to reach $8000 to $10000 within two months!
This news has completely blown up the community! This is not just some ordinary influencer making a call, but a member of the Trump family stepping in personally. Think about it, consider it deeply; does this hint at something? Is there a macro layout or big funds moving that we don't know about?
You should know that the Trump faction is increasingly favorable towards cryptocurrencies now. If this prophecy comes true, ETH could double right off the bat, igniting the entire bull market!
The community is already in an uproar:
· 🚀 Bullish Joy: They feel this is an epic positive signal, and traditional funds are about to FOMO into the market!
· 🤔 Calm Dissenters: Cautioning everyone not to get too excited, reminding that the market ultimately depends on real skills, and be careful not to be swayed by rumors.
What do you think? Is this "Prince's Prophecy" a harbinger of wealth secrets, or just a pure sensational gimmick? Dare to make a post as proof, and let's dig up and verify together in two months!$ETH #以太坊暴涨
1
$SOL 100% Win rate giant whale strikes again! 275 million long positions restart, turns out to be playing 'high sell low buy'?
In the early morning, with one sentence from 'Teacher Bao', it directly facilitated the completion of more than half of the giant whale's BTC orders! Subsequently, he took advantage of the heat to open ETH long positions, and currently the positions in the three major cryptocurrencies are in place. Although there is a temporary floating loss of 2.02 million USD, looking back at yesterday's performance, just closing BTC+ETH positions alone raked in 3.04 million USD. Is this operation accurately doing T?
▶︎ BTC long position: Holding 1,030.02 coins, opening price $110,123, corresponding value approximately 1.134 billion USD (Note: the original text 11.3 thousand USD is a data error)
▶︎ SOL long position: Holding 560,839.53 coins, opening price $198.43, value 108 million USD
▶︎ ETH long position: Holding 13,419.12 coins, opening price $3,889, value 52.45 million USD
In the early morning, with one sentence from 'Teacher Bao', it directly facilitated the completion of more than half of the giant whale's BTC orders! Subsequently, he took advantage of the heat to open ETH long positions, and currently the positions in the three major cryptocurrencies are in place. Although there is a temporary floating loss of 2.02 million USD, looking back at yesterday's performance, just closing BTC+ETH positions alone raked in 3.04 million USD. Is this operation accurately doing T?
▶︎ BTC long position: Holding 1,030.02 coins, opening price $110,123, corresponding value approximately 1.134 billion USD (Note: the original text 11.3 thousand USD is a data error)
▶︎ SOL long position: Holding 560,839.53 coins, opening price $198.43, value 108 million USD
▶︎ ETH long position: Holding 13,419.12 coins, opening price $3,889, value 52.45 million USD
See original
is not
Is the dealer a person?
6
Quoted content has been removed
Login to explore more contents