Binance Square
Parkly
937 Posts

Parkly

x.com 推特同步:@parkly 歡迎互關 一起賺一起進步。
Open Trade
BNB Holder
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
5.7 Years
354 Following
329 Followers
172 Liked
Posts
Portfolio
·
--
See translation
宇树科技中一签赚20万元? 宇树科技中一签赚20万元? 宇树科技中一签赚20万元? 我有看错吗?
宇树科技中一签赚20万元?
宇树科技中一签赚20万元?
宇树科技中一签赚20万元?
我有看错吗?
·
--
See translation
听说发标题 "竹知了是一千万内最好的玩具" +配图 就会神秘力量封号?
听说发标题 "竹知了是一千万内最好的玩具" +配图 就会神秘力量封号?
·
--
See translation
這年代繁體字真的成為少數語種了,我的年輕內地朋友真的看不懂一丁點繁體字。 很現實的情況,以前懂繁體字的人成長時大多是看香港電視台,香港電影,香港八卦雜誌或者玩台灣的RPG遊戲等等學到的。沒記錯初代仙劍也是繁體字的吧。 現在以上這些都沒落了,沒有了這些文化輸出,年輕一輩還怎麼可能懂繁體字呢。
這年代繁體字真的成為少數語種了,我的年輕內地朋友真的看不懂一丁點繁體字。
很現實的情況,以前懂繁體字的人成長時大多是看香港電視台,香港電影,香港八卦雜誌或者玩台灣的RPG遊戲等等學到的。沒記錯初代仙劍也是繁體字的吧。
現在以上這些都沒落了,沒有了這些文化輸出,年輕一輩還怎麼可能懂繁體字呢。
·
--
See translation
台风海豚 威力真大,这边不是风大,是这高温度还让人活吗? 高温破纪录了吧?
台风海豚 威力真大,这边不是风大,是这高温度还让人活吗? 高温破纪录了吧?
·
--
See translation
Premium+会员的,有比我更低更惨不忍睹的吗?8.9k
Premium+会员的,有比我更低更惨不忍睹的吗?8.9k
·
--
See translation
总捐款45亿港元(政府3亿+外界42亿)的香港宏福苑火灾终于出最终调查报告了。 希望逝者安息 根据香港大埔宏福苑火灾独立委员会报告: **起火原因**:极有可能是烟头意外点燃宏昌阁104-105室外平台上堆积的易燃杂物(安全网、发泡胶板、纸箱等)。已排除其他起火可能。 **火势迅速蔓延**:光井产生强烈烟囱效应,加上使用非阻燃安全网和发泡胶板,导致火势在短时间内垂直和横向快速扩散。 **伤亡主因**:烟雾迅速涌入楼梯及走廊,火警系统被关闭,居民几乎没有逃生时间。多数死者因吸入烟雾致死。 报告认定属意外事故,但多重安全措施失效加剧了悲剧。
总捐款45亿港元(政府3亿+外界42亿)的香港宏福苑火灾终于出最终调查报告了。
希望逝者安息
根据香港大埔宏福苑火灾独立委员会报告:
**起火原因**:极有可能是烟头意外点燃宏昌阁104-105室外平台上堆积的易燃杂物(安全网、发泡胶板、纸箱等)。已排除其他起火可能。
**火势迅速蔓延**:光井产生强烈烟囱效应,加上使用非阻燃安全网和发泡胶板,导致火势在短时间内垂直和横向快速扩散。
**伤亡主因**:烟雾迅速涌入楼梯及走廊,火警系统被关闭,居民几乎没有逃生时间。多数死者因吸入烟雾致死。
报告认定属意外事故,但多重安全措施失效加剧了悲剧。
·
--
See translation
买高铁票时选了一个带"静"图标的班次,果然兑现了,比普通高铁的车窗多了个牌子
买高铁票时选了一个带"静"图标的班次,果然兑现了,比普通高铁的车窗多了个牌子
·
--
See translation
蛮赞成这次新的创作者收益计划,回归"创作"本质,泛流量,蹭热帖回覆都死翘翘了。 但不用担心,我相信开班教学的老师们很快有新方法
蛮赞成这次新的创作者收益计划,回归"创作"本质,泛流量,蹭热帖回覆都死翘翘了。
但不用担心,我相信开班教学的老师们很快有新方法
·
--
See translation
考虑去澳门找女友吗? 澳门女多男少
考虑去澳门找女友吗? 澳门女多男少
·
--
See translation
黎彼得逝世 一路走好 转自无线新闻台 不说不知道, 原来 "半斤八两" , "财神到" , "学生哥" , "梨渦浅笑" , "浪子心声" 那句「命裡有時終須有,命裡無時莫強求」全部出自他的填词. 非常有才华
黎彼得逝世 一路走好 转自无线新闻台
不说不知道, 原来 "半斤八两" , "财神到" , "学生哥" , "梨渦浅笑" , "浪子心声" 那句「命裡有時終須有,命裡無時莫強求」全部出自他的填词. 非常有才华
·
--
See translation
好消息,好消息,也就是理论上可以用龙虾同步X 长文,X推文图片到币安广场了。
好消息,好消息,也就是理论上可以用龙虾同步X 长文,X推文图片到币安广场了。
·
--
I always believed that cold wallets are the safest and unbreakable. Today Coldcard has had an incident—looks like we need to learn from Koreans about using physical dice-rolling to generate mnemonic phrases. I’m using a Ledger cold wallet now; I didn’t realize the official one also has an offline tool. I should set it up as soon as I can. According to Beincrypto, the Coldcard vulnerability incident was caused by a flaw in the random number generator (RNG) of the Coldcard hardware wallet, which allowed the vulnerability to be exploited. A total of more than 1,596 bitcoins (about $130 million) were stolen from roughly 7,300 addresses. Korean community situation Even though experienced Bitcoin holders in Korea widely use Coldcard, there have been almost no reports of direct losses from that community. The core reasons Korean holders are avoiding risk DIY randomness (Entropy): The Korean community has long advocated not relying on any single vendor’s internal randomness generator. Entity-generated mnemonics: Users create true randomness by tossing dice or coins (e.g., 128 or 256 tosses) and export the BIP39 mnemonic completely offline. Strict physical isolation: Use a paper-based BIP39 single-word table for verification, and only compute the checksum (Checksum) via offline tools like SeedSigner; meanwhile, add an extra layer of protection with a passphrase generated from the dice. Differences in how information is shared within communities Limitations of the English community: The English community relies too heavily on KOLs and influencers, and some influencers and the manufacturer Coinkite have sponsorship or interest ties—leading to trust being amplified within the same echo chamber and independent verification being overlooked. Independence of the Korean community: Korean community leaders tend to remain neutral, with no commercial entanglements, allowing them to provide more objective risk assessments and security advice. Key takeaways The principle of “Don’t trust, verify” for Bitcoin should not be applied only to code, but also to information sources. Any RNG preset in a hardware wallet should be considered untrusted. It’s recommended to generate randomness in a physical way yourself whenever possible.
I always believed that cold wallets are the safest and unbreakable. Today Coldcard has had an incident—looks like we need to learn from Koreans about using physical dice-rolling to generate mnemonic phrases. I’m using a Ledger cold wallet now; I didn’t realize the official one also has an offline tool. I should set it up as soon as I can.
According to Beincrypto, the Coldcard vulnerability incident was caused by a flaw in the random number generator (RNG) of the Coldcard hardware wallet, which allowed the vulnerability to be exploited. A total of more than 1,596 bitcoins (about $130 million) were stolen from roughly 7,300 addresses.
Korean community situation
Even though experienced Bitcoin holders in Korea widely use Coldcard, there have been almost no reports of direct losses from that community.
The core reasons Korean holders are avoiding risk
DIY randomness (Entropy): The Korean community has long advocated not relying on any single vendor’s internal randomness generator.
Entity-generated mnemonics: Users create true randomness by tossing dice or coins (e.g., 128 or 256 tosses) and export the BIP39 mnemonic completely offline.
Strict physical isolation: Use a paper-based BIP39 single-word table for verification, and only compute the checksum (Checksum) via offline tools like SeedSigner; meanwhile, add an extra layer of protection with a passphrase generated from the dice.
Differences in how information is shared within communities
Limitations of the English community: The English community relies too heavily on KOLs and influencers, and some influencers and the manufacturer Coinkite have sponsorship or interest ties—leading to trust being amplified within the same echo chamber and independent verification being overlooked.
Independence of the Korean community: Korean community leaders tend to remain neutral, with no commercial entanglements, allowing them to provide more objective risk assessments and security advice.
Key takeaways
The principle of “Don’t trust, verify” for Bitcoin should not be applied only to code, but also to information sources. Any RNG preset in a hardware wallet should be considered untrusted. It’s recommended to generate randomness in a physical way yourself whenever possible.
·
--
See translation
可怕,在澳门銀河酒店门口,有女人在车内被砍,酒店保安拦不住都受伤了,车内染红,小红书上已经有多个版本故事了。
可怕,在澳门銀河酒店门口,有女人在车内被砍,酒店保安拦不住都受伤了,车内染红,小红书上已经有多个版本故事了。
·
--
See translation
做父母的共勉之吧
做父母的共勉之吧
·
--
See translation
传说鲜奶头, 是个什么鬼? 让你这样简写的吗?
传说鲜奶头, 是个什么鬼? 让你这样简写的吗?
·
--
See translation
国际足联FIFA主席因凡蒂诺连任悬了, 早知今日, 何必当初呢. 听说传闻打电话找特朗普求救, 想保住主席位置, 但被拒听几次电话
国际足联FIFA主席因凡蒂诺连任悬了, 早知今日, 何必当初呢. 听说传闻打电话找特朗普求救, 想保住主席位置, 但被拒听几次电话
·
--
Another expert is bullish on $BTC today. He said it could reach $1 million or even higher. This guy is Arthur Hayes, a well-known crypto entrepreneur in the industry, a former investment banker, and co-founder of the crypto derivatives trading platform BitMEX. Yes, the BitMEX that is set to stop operating. According to Cointelegraph, Hayes believes the debt-driven AI infrastructure boom could trigger a credit crisis similar to 2008. And the government’s liquidity-infusion rescue measures that follow would ultimately push Bitcoin (BTC) to $1 million or higher. Key thesis (a credit crisis, not an internet bubble) Hayes argues that the AI wave is more like “2008 credit risk” rather than the “2000 internet bubble.” Investors mistakenly treat data-center and power-infrastructure investment as high-growth tech investment, when in essence it’s closer to highly leveraged real estate. Bitcoin and Ethereum price outlook Before the credit cycle evolves and liquidity is released, Bitcoin could stay in the $60,000 to $70,000 range, with a pullback dipping toward $50,000. Then, it would surge as policy-driven rescue efforts boost liquidity. In addition, he predicts that Ethereum (ETH) will reach $5,000 by year-end. The worry stemming from massive lease commitments and leverage differences Microsoft, Meta, Oracle, Amazon, and Alphabet have already locked in about $1.09 trillion in data-center lease agreements that have not yet taken effect. Even though these expenditures are spread over many years and can’t simply be viewed as direct liabilities, the financial strain on each of these giants varies—Oracle, for example, has a debt/EBITDA ratio of 4.3x, and there is a maturity-mismatch risk between its data-center leases lasting 15–19 years and customer contracts that are only about 5 years.
Another expert is bullish on $BTC today. He said it could reach $1 million or even higher.
This guy is Arthur Hayes, a well-known crypto entrepreneur in the industry, a former investment banker, and co-founder of the crypto derivatives trading platform BitMEX. Yes, the BitMEX that is set to stop operating.
According to Cointelegraph, Hayes believes the debt-driven AI infrastructure boom could trigger a credit crisis similar to 2008. And the government’s liquidity-infusion rescue measures that follow would ultimately push Bitcoin (BTC) to $1 million or higher.
Key thesis (a credit crisis, not an internet bubble)
Hayes argues that the AI wave is more like “2008 credit risk” rather than the “2000 internet bubble.” Investors mistakenly treat data-center and power-infrastructure investment as high-growth tech investment, when in essence it’s closer to highly leveraged real estate.
Bitcoin and Ethereum price outlook
Before the credit cycle evolves and liquidity is released, Bitcoin could stay in the $60,000 to $70,000 range, with a pullback dipping toward $50,000. Then, it would surge as policy-driven rescue efforts boost liquidity. In addition, he predicts that Ethereum (ETH) will reach $5,000 by year-end.
The worry stemming from massive lease commitments and leverage differences
Microsoft, Meta, Oracle, Amazon, and Alphabet have already locked in about $1.09 trillion in data-center lease agreements that have not yet taken effect. Even though these expenditures are spread over many years and can’t simply be viewed as direct liabilities, the financial strain on each of these giants varies—Oracle, for example, has a debt/EBITDA ratio of 4.3x, and there is a maturity-mismatch risk between its data-center leases lasting 15–19 years and customer contracts that are only about 5 years.
·
--
A new EIP-8361 proposal for Ethereum has sparked widespread controversy in the community. Aave founder Stani Kulechov was the first to strongly question and oppose the proposal. His reason: low staking yields are bad for DeFi projects—but in the long run, they may be favorable for ETH’s price. Of course, the new proposal is a double-edged sword; it depends on how to balance things. Without the ETH ecosystem, the price would still be unable to stand firm. According to content introduced by Fxstreet: EIP-8361 Proposal Content and Purpose Background: Ethereum’s staking rate exceeded one-third of total supply in April. The development team predicts that, if no restrictions are added, the total staked amount could surpass 70 million ETH by January 2028 (more than 55% of total supply). Mechanism: The proposal suggests introducing a “SATURATION_BALANCE” parameter (about 50% of total supply). When the staking ratio approaches 50%, the system will gradually deduct and burn validator rewards, causing the net staking yield rate to decrease toward zero, thereby keeping the staking ratio below 50%. Goal: Control ETH’s growth rate, prevent network security risks caused by excessive staking (such as retail validators being pushed out and institutions monopolizing validation activities), and reduce the inflation-dilution cost borne by non-staking holders. Aave Founder’s Opposition Stani Kulechov believes the proposal is harmful to Ethereum’s network development. Damaging institutional and retail participation: The uncertainty of rewards would reduce staking returns, severely affecting institutional investors and independent validators (Solo Stakers) willingness to participate. Hitting the DeFi ecosystem: Removing staking rewards of more than 50% would weaken ETH’s lending strategies, undermine application scenarios within the DeFi system, and may cause capital to flow toward stablecoins and other yield-bearing assets. He argues that “Ethereum should not be punished for its normal growth,” and believes the proposal should not be approved.
A new EIP-8361 proposal for Ethereum has sparked widespread controversy in the community. Aave founder Stani Kulechov was the first to strongly question and oppose the proposal. His reason: low staking yields are bad for DeFi projects—but in the long run, they may be favorable for ETH’s price. Of course, the new proposal is a double-edged sword; it depends on how to balance things. Without the ETH ecosystem, the price would still be unable to stand firm.
According to content introduced by Fxstreet:
EIP-8361 Proposal Content and Purpose
Background: Ethereum’s staking rate exceeded one-third of total supply in April. The development team predicts that, if no restrictions are added, the total staked amount could surpass 70 million ETH by January 2028 (more than 55% of total supply).
Mechanism: The proposal suggests introducing a “SATURATION_BALANCE” parameter (about 50% of total supply). When the staking ratio approaches 50%, the system will gradually deduct and burn validator rewards, causing the net staking yield rate to decrease toward zero, thereby keeping the staking ratio below 50%.
Goal: Control ETH’s growth rate, prevent network security risks caused by excessive staking (such as retail validators being pushed out and institutions monopolizing validation activities), and reduce the inflation-dilution cost borne by non-staking holders.
Aave Founder’s Opposition
Stani Kulechov believes the proposal is harmful to Ethereum’s network development.
Damaging institutional and retail participation: The uncertainty of rewards would reduce staking returns, severely affecting institutional investors and independent validators (Solo Stakers) willingness to participate.
Hitting the DeFi ecosystem: Removing staking rewards of more than 50% would weaken ETH’s lending strategies, undermine application scenarios within the DeFi system, and may cause capital to flow toward stablecoins and other yield-bearing assets.
He argues that “Ethereum should not be punished for its normal growth,” and believes the proposal should not be approved.
·
--
Samsung is embracing crypto, too—and while big manufacturers usually aren’t optimistic about doing so, for example see SONY. According to a report from the website Pymnts, Samsung is further positioning itself in the digital-asset space by supporting stablecoins and acquiring a stake in a cryptocurrency exchange. The main highlights are as follows: Native stablecoin integration: At the Galaxy Unpacked event, Samsung announced native stablecoin support for Samsung Wallet, aiming to build a connected financial ecosystem spanning Galaxy devices and services, and to enhance the experience of quick and convenient value transfers. Stake in crypto exchange Dunamu: Samsung’s three affiliated companies (Samsung Securities, Samsung Bank/Samsung Card, and Samsung SDS) collectively invest KRW 612.8 billion (about $408 million) to acquire a 4% stake in Dunamu, the parent company that operates Upbit, South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, thereby entering the digital-asset infrastructure sector. Planning for regulation and the future market: As South Korea moves to advance the “Digital Asset Basic Act” to regulate trading, custody, and stablecoin issuance, analysts say Samsung’s series of initiatives will leave it well prepared for the promotion and issuance of USD and KRW stablecoins. $USDC $USDT
Samsung is embracing crypto, too—and while big manufacturers usually aren’t optimistic about doing so, for example see SONY.
According to a report from the website Pymnts, Samsung is further positioning itself in the digital-asset space by supporting stablecoins and acquiring a stake in a cryptocurrency exchange. The main highlights are as follows:
Native stablecoin integration: At the Galaxy Unpacked event, Samsung announced native stablecoin support for Samsung Wallet, aiming to build a connected financial ecosystem spanning Galaxy devices and services, and to enhance the experience of quick and convenient value transfers.
Stake in crypto exchange Dunamu: Samsung’s three affiliated companies (Samsung Securities, Samsung Bank/Samsung Card, and Samsung SDS) collectively invest KRW 612.8 billion (about $408 million) to acquire a 4% stake in Dunamu, the parent company that operates Upbit, South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, thereby entering the digital-asset infrastructure sector.
Planning for regulation and the future market: As South Korea moves to advance the “Digital Asset Basic Act” to regulate trading, custody, and stablecoin issuance, analysts say Samsung’s series of initiatives will leave it well prepared for the promotion and issuance of USD and KRW stablecoins.
$USDC
$USDT
·
--
See translation
http:// AIW3.ai 最近太火了,大手笔地向众多KOL大撒空投, KOL们也礼貌地感谢项目方等等, 但甚少介绍这个项目到底干什么的, 而且我发现大部分都是到手代币, 纸手就卖了 用Surf AI深挖了一下: http:// AIW3.ai 是近期因 KOL 空投曝光度上升的 $AIW3 項目,官方定位是 Web3 AI Agent-as-a-Service 交易執行平台,核心敘事是用 AI agent 協助用戶完成行情分析、策略生成、回測、風控與鏈上 / 交易所自動執行。官網提到的產品模組包括 AIW3 CLAW、Skills、Strategy、Airdrop、Referral、Statistics 等,使用流程包含安裝 Skills、配置 AIW3 API key、用自然語言查行情、下單、生成 MACD / RSI 策略、回測並部署到實盤交易。 代幣方面,$AIW3 官方合約為 0x37e94fc028903e74275478b65160d6d2c0e8880b,部署於 BNB Chain,BscScan 顯示合約名為 AIW3Token,標準為 BEP-20,最大供應量 1,000,000,000 AIW3。官方 Tokenomics 中列出的分配包括:Initial Airdrop 12%、Trading Incentives 20%、Agent Incentives 20%、Team 15%、Treasury 15%、Early Investors 10.5%,剩餘部分為 Exchanges & Market Makers。 融資資料方面,AIW3 官方曾宣布完成 $2,000,000 Seed round,由 Buffalo Capital 領投,GalaXin Capital、Three-stones Ventures 參投;資料庫中另顯示 2026-05-25 有一輪 Strategic,投資方包含 LD Capital。官方社群資料顯示 X 帳號為 @aiw3_official ,約 55.5K followers。 鏈上分布方面,截至查詢時,Top 1 holder 持有約 805,000,000 AIW3,佔總供應 80.5%;Top 3 holders 合計約 94.1%;PancakeSwap V3 pool 約持有 1.65%。90 日轉帳數據顯示,$AIW3 有 38,006 筆 transfer,約 21,140 個接收地址、13,506 個發送地址;首筆大額供應出現在 2026-07-29 04:46 UTC,從 Null Address 產生 1B AIW3。8 月 3 日單日轉帳約 28,666 筆,對應 TGE / claim / 空投分發期。 市場數據方面,$AIW3 在 BNB Chain DEX 的 24h 價格從約 $0.0572 回落到約 $0.0436,跌幅約 23%+。以總供應 10 億枚粗算,該價格對應 FDV 約 $43.6M。KOL 曬出的 13,333.33 AIW3,若按當時約 $0.052 附近價格估算,約等於 $690–700,與社群中「700U 空投」敘事大致吻合。
http://
AIW3.ai 最近太火了,大手笔地向众多KOL大撒空投, KOL们也礼貌地感谢项目方等等, 但甚少介绍这个项目到底干什么的, 而且我发现大部分都是到手代币, 纸手就卖了
用Surf AI深挖了一下:
http://
AIW3.ai 是近期因 KOL 空投曝光度上升的 $AIW3 項目,官方定位是 Web3 AI Agent-as-a-Service 交易執行平台,核心敘事是用 AI agent 協助用戶完成行情分析、策略生成、回測、風控與鏈上 / 交易所自動執行。官網提到的產品模組包括 AIW3 CLAW、Skills、Strategy、Airdrop、Referral、Statistics 等,使用流程包含安裝 Skills、配置 AIW3 API key、用自然語言查行情、下單、生成 MACD / RSI 策略、回測並部署到實盤交易。
代幣方面,$AIW3 官方合約為 0x37e94fc028903e74275478b65160d6d2c0e8880b,部署於 BNB Chain,BscScan 顯示合約名為 AIW3Token,標準為 BEP-20,最大供應量 1,000,000,000 AIW3。官方 Tokenomics 中列出的分配包括:Initial Airdrop 12%、Trading Incentives 20%、Agent Incentives 20%、Team 15%、Treasury 15%、Early Investors 10.5%,剩餘部分為 Exchanges & Market Makers。
融資資料方面,AIW3 官方曾宣布完成 $2,000,000 Seed round,由 Buffalo Capital 領投,GalaXin Capital、Three-stones Ventures 參投;資料庫中另顯示 2026-05-25 有一輪 Strategic,投資方包含 LD Capital。官方社群資料顯示 X 帳號為
@aiw3_official
,約 55.5K followers。
鏈上分布方面,截至查詢時,Top 1 holder 持有約 805,000,000 AIW3,佔總供應 80.5%;Top 3 holders 合計約 94.1%;PancakeSwap V3 pool 約持有 1.65%。90 日轉帳數據顯示,$AIW3 有 38,006 筆 transfer,約 21,140 個接收地址、13,506 個發送地址;首筆大額供應出現在 2026-07-29 04:46 UTC,從 Null Address 產生 1B AIW3。8 月 3 日單日轉帳約 28,666 筆,對應 TGE / claim / 空投分發期。
市場數據方面,$AIW3 在 BNB Chain DEX 的 24h 價格從約 $0.0572 回落到約 $0.0436,跌幅約 23%+。以總供應 10 億枚粗算,該價格對應 FDV 約 $43.6M。KOL 曬出的 13,333.33 AIW3,若按當時約 $0.052 附近價格估算,約等於 $690–700,與社群中「700U 空投」敘事大致吻合。
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs