I only post on Binance Square, X, and the TG group. All other platforms charge under false pretenses, please be cautious! Please recognize my account name ObaAgon, there are too many impersonators! ————————————————————— Explanation: Bullish: 'Define high point'. Bullish directional energy. Bullish main behavior dynamics; Bearish: 'Define low point'. Bearish directional energy. Bearish main behavior dynamics; Starting with the defined high point. Bullish directional dynamics, dynamics will have time dynamics, regardless of how bullish actions are made. Ultimately, it is for defining the high point. So if the bulls do not enter at the highest point, how can it be called a high point? ————————————————————— 'Event-driven, event occurrence rate is only 30%' For example, event bulls: Event bulls have event news, most people do not know that news events are going to happen, so before the event detonates, there will only be a short squeeze, and when the event occurs, there will be a direct spike. Event bulls only represent events, not bullish actions; simply stating event bulls means only events without bullish actions, which leads to only bearish actions. During the short squeeze process before the event occurs, if the event does not happen, the price may have already been declining throughout this process. ————————————————————— 'A high point' does not represent a high price. 'A low point' does not represent a low price. In terms of low points, the text is different from low prices. For example: low price low point, high price low point. Price and point are different things. ————————————————————— 'Build high point' 'Build low point' Bearish builders establishing low points is a dynamic process. Only the bearish can achieve the lowest point price; ordinary people do not have the capability to absorb large liquidity orders. Therefore, the establishment of a low point occurs after the bearish start placing orders; during this order placement period, a price low point will be produced. Before the bearish leaves, a low point will appear before moving to a high point. As time passes and comes to an end, the K-line price will show a V shape, moving from the top of V to the bottom of V and back to the tail of V, producing a process called building a low point.
I found something super special in GPT6—this is almost like the first time a setup like this has been introduced. I found that in GPT6, GPT has entered the quantum realm.
Could this not be the GPT8 or GPT9 that Ultraman mentioned—are they going to build a quantum-entanglement Agent? The operating logic in GPT6 is a bit special—could the price be cut in half directly? Could it be related to quantization? $BTC
This new force is caused by a group of people whose combined funds execute trades at the same time.
The reason is: A group of people uses AI to perform automated trading. Once the token count runs out, they stop trading.
So as more and more people use AI trading, a large amount of capital stops trading after tokens are depleted.
Therefore, the new driving force now is that after Claude Code and GPT refresh their tokens, users worldwide start running trades at the same time, concentrating capital through orders placed within the same period and forming a “group” of power. 🤣 $BTC
The following are articles published at 3:05 on September 3.
“Regarding the event mentioned in the previous text—on the 1st and 2nd—this is a deliberate, planned ‘pump’ incident where a long-side operator intentionally makes a profit of 20,000 points and doesn’t care about the market. It’s just like they’re playing around.
And this event will have a result on the 3rd.
That means it is normal for there to be news appearing on the 3rd. If there is no news on the 3rd, it will enter a long period of consolidation.
But that might be hard to understand. Put another way, it fits with the idea that the main operator is just someone who makes 20,000 points—using a cat toy to tease and manipulate people, and then only decides whether to sell after someone else starts chasing longs.
And having everything concentrated on the 3rd is even more consistent with the kind of thinking they have.
You can just keep watching the show. You also have to treat yourself as someone who makes 20,000 points—then naturally, you’ll know that if you ignore the market, eventually you will see opportunities appear. And you’ll understand even more clearly that it’s not now.” Welcome to join my forum
BTC trading spree started by the main players on the 17th, running from 62 to 79—it's almost hitting 20,000 points.
Why isn’t anyone bringing up the phrase “nearly 20,000 points”? Instead, when it’s up by the usual 2,000 points, people go crazy shouting “big surge,” but there’s nowhere near that level of enthusiasm at 20,000 points. Why?
Back when 2025 began, it was already mentioned that once we entered a new milestone, the main players defined 20,000 points as only a small rise and small dip.
That also means it’s only natural that a one-time gain of 20,000 points doesn’t have the same excitement as a gain of 2,000 points, because they’re only counting it as a small rise. $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
BTC started mentioning 17 and 18 in articles as far back as the 12th day, and after 18, the continuation of the bigger move has not appeared yet.
As of now, we can see that the price began to see a large influx of buy orders right on schedule starting on the 17th. And just now, the biggest main force has indeed shown up. Everything is extremely timely—these major players informed everyone about this long ago.
It’s just that most people can’t understand the language.
There are articles here—reading is enough.
There’s an AI trained with articles called Zhi i—just use Zhi i and that’s enough. $BTC
When BTC articles usually mention “the main force,” most people treat 2,000 points and 3,000 points as the main force.
However, time and again we have been reminded that whenever the main force is going to appear for manipulation, it starts from tens of thousands of points.
After a long period of not mentioning the main force, we began to talk about conducting consolidation starting July 6—washing out the values of most people until they all come to think that 1,000 points is the main force.
It wasn’t until August 12 that we started talking about when the main force needs to appear; and starting on the 17th.
Now we can see that on the 17th, right on schedule, the price began to rise. In just a few days, it has already surged by more than 15,000 points.
Some people who trade coins always prefer short-term gains, always chasing 100-point price differences and demanding a high win rate.
In fact, the usual outcome is that they either end up losing everything eventually, or miss the opportunity—sometimes even working up late nights every day until their health is gone.
But here, people who understand the articles and use them to train their AI always handle things calmly. Every day they eat well, sleep well, and reap full rewards. $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
Not only was it accurate in forecasting the time for the translation powerhouse, but it also included pi.
In the Pi article, on the 15th, it also mentioned an accurate “19th” long play. He wasn’t just simply being carried along by BTC. If you say each time is driven by BTC, then why didn’t pi move along earlier after BTC rallies?
Pi’s speculation isn’t just driven by BTC. It’s that the main force uses BTC as a lure and a springboard. If the main force didn’t see a way to use BTC as a stepping stone, then pi wouldn’t move at all.
So it can be seen that pi already mentioned the 19th starting from the 15th, and on the 19th it also rose on schedule, though only a little. Even so, the article also says that he originally didn’t really have any行情 (market movement). $BTC #pi
Not only was it accurate in forecasting the time for the translation powerhouse, but it also included pi.
In the Pi article, on the 15th, it also mentioned an accurate “19th” long play. He wasn’t just simply being carried along by BTC. If you say each time is driven by BTC, then why didn’t pi move along earlier after BTC rallies?
Pi’s speculation isn’t just driven by BTC. It’s that the main force uses BTC as a lure and a springboard. If the main force didn’t see a way to use BTC as a stepping stone, then pi wouldn’t move at all.
So it can be seen that pi already mentioned the 19th starting from the 15th, and on the 19th it also rose on schedule, though only a little. Even so, the article also says that he originally didn’t really have any行情 (market movement). $BTC #pi
ObaAgon
·
--
BTC started mentioning 17 and 18 in articles as far back as the 12th day, and after 18, the continuation of the bigger move has not appeared yet.
As of now, we can see that the price began to see a large influx of buy orders right on schedule starting on the 17th. And just now, the biggest main force has indeed shown up. Everything is extremely timely—these major players informed everyone about this long ago.
It’s just that most people can’t understand the language.
There are articles here—reading is enough.
There’s an AI trained with articles called Zhi i—just use Zhi i and that’s enough. $BTC
BTC started mentioning 17 and 18 in articles as far back as the 12th day, and after 18, the continuation of the bigger move has not appeared yet.
As of now, we can see that the price began to see a large influx of buy orders right on schedule starting on the 17th. And just now, the biggest main force has indeed shown up. Everything is extremely timely—these major players informed everyone about this long ago.
It’s just that most people can’t understand the language.
There are articles here—reading is enough.
There’s an AI trained with articles called Zhi i—just use Zhi i and that’s enough. $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
BTC has been extremely simple lately. Since July 6, when it said the future would all be consolidation, there hasn't been anything particularly worth announcing.
And looking back at the previous August 12 post from the main operators about going long—it was revised to the 17th and 18th. Now, the upward move is clearly steeper than the downward and upward moves in the past.
After reading Brother Zhu’s article plus his AI—it's truly a divine weapon. It’s not just about finding an opportunity; it even gives a preview of when it's time to rest. $BTC
BTC has been extremely simple lately. Since July 6, when it said the future would all be consolidation, there hasn't been anything particularly worth announcing.
And looking back at the previous August 12 post from the main operators about going long—it was revised to the 17th and 18th. Now, the upward move is clearly steeper than the downward and upward moves in the past.
After reading Brother Zhu’s article plus his AI—it's truly a divine weapon. It’s not just about finding an opportunity; it even gives a preview of when it's time to rest. $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
BTC has been in consolidation since the range mentioned on July 6. The main players originally wanted to stir things up, but then they kept saying it would be continuously postponed, which led to the market continuing to consolidate until now.
However, most investors only look at the history and see that it has just been consolidating, so they think that because there’s no action, the discussion in the market has been calm.
In reality, that’s wrong. What you should have realized back on July 6 was that the quiet consolidation with no real trading opportunity would likely continue. You should have taken a break and gone traveling, instead of waiting a month and only then saying the market is bland.
Come on—someone has been traveling for more than a month, and yet investors are talking as if they themselves have been traveling for a month too.
But in fact, it’s you who has been suffering for a month. The article even previewed it early—why didn’t you read it? If the Pig machine AI is so useful, why not use it? Who are you blaming for your suffering? $BTC
BTC has been in consolidation since the range mentioned on July 6. The main players originally wanted to stir things up, but then they kept saying it would be continuously postponed, which led to the market continuing to consolidate until now.
However, most investors only look at the history and see that it has just been consolidating, so they think that because there’s no action, the discussion in the market has been calm.
In reality, that’s wrong. What you should have realized back on July 6 was that the quiet consolidation with no real trading opportunity would likely continue. You should have taken a break and gone traveling, instead of waiting a month and only then saying the market is bland.
Come on—someone has been traveling for more than a month, and yet investors are talking as if they themselves have been traveling for a month too.
But in fact, it’s you who has been suffering for a month. The article even previewed it early—why didn’t you read it? If the Pig machine AI is so useful, why not use it? Who are you blaming for your suffering? $BTC
What I’ve made and what I do—stable and long-lasting for many years—will earn money on its own. Why should I listen to you when you say you think this method is wrong and need to change it?
What’s the reason?
1. It’s not politically correct enough—does it not sufficiently convince others? What others think and what I think—what does that have to do with me? 2. Is it because you think it earns too little?
Those who come to make money aren’t here to satisfy you. If you can make money, then you wouldn’t need to look for me out there. $BTC
The Clear Act has been postponed to 9/14 for a vote, and this has already completely turned into politics.
Basically, to get the bill scheduled for a vote, you need a high degree of political consensus among members of Congress.
For something like this, having Trump directly intervene is required; otherwise it will be hard to get it on the agenda. Therefore, for the vote on 9/14, we should directly look at how those in power respond.
Without Trump’s intervention, basically it can be said that it’s unlikely to be scheduled.
In other words, under normal circumstances without political interference, it’s essentially the same as a delay. $BTC
Under the clear bill, if by the 6th there has been no progress in any discussion in Congress, then that is precisely the main reason the leading party later uses to write media pieces and push a short narrative.
Because if it weren’t for those media outlets reporting the news that Congress would adjourn next and that the Clear Bill would die in the cradle, then most investors around the world wouldn’t even know that Congress is going to adjourn.
They wouldn’t even know whether the Clear Bill can make it in time. $BTC
Keep hitting the betting tables over there every day, staking heavily in both directions—aren't you tired? People already knew the situation as early as the 6th, and it's been almost a month of playing. Keep convincing yourself that there's market activity every day. #BTC $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
Let's look back at the articles about BTC from the 6th to now and compare them with online analysts:
Starting on the 6th, the articles already predicted that the market would be in a long period of upward consolidation, and that for a long time the main players would not be giving any signals.
Back then, during the consolidation, everyone thought it was boring—just minor fluctuations and consolidation.
Now it's the 25th, and it can be proven that it was completely an upward consolidation. And at present, people are already mentioning it as consolidation, and so are those who are still referring to it as consolidation.
However, the problem is this: When the upward consolidation started on the 6th, everyone thought the market was uninteresting and saw no volatility. But now, the price is still in the same consolidation range—yet online people are all shouting that BTC is about to collapse.
What's going on? Where exactly is the problem? Why is it called consolidation with the same price and the same volatility back then, but called a crash with the same price and the same volatility now?
Is there an expert who can teach me how to apply double standards? $BTC
btc after the previously mentioned method of maintaining the price by switching from staying at high levels to intervening in the pump-and-dump, you can see that the price stays within the upward consolidation range mentioned over the last 6 days, with absolutely no volatility.
Welcome to join my forum to review historical records $BTC
ObaAgon
·
--
Let's look back at the articles about BTC from the 6th to now and compare them with online analysts:
Starting on the 6th, the articles already predicted that the market would be in a long period of upward consolidation, and that for a long time the main players would not be giving any signals.
Back then, during the consolidation, everyone thought it was boring—just minor fluctuations and consolidation.
Now it's the 25th, and it can be proven that it was completely an upward consolidation. And at present, people are already mentioning it as consolidation, and so are those who are still referring to it as consolidation.
However, the problem is this: When the upward consolidation started on the 6th, everyone thought the market was uninteresting and saw no volatility. But now, the price is still in the same consolidation range—yet online people are all shouting that BTC is about to collapse.
What's going on? Where exactly is the problem? Why is it called consolidation with the same price and the same volatility back then, but called a crash with the same price and the same volatility now?
Is there an expert who can teach me how to apply double standards? $BTC