ObaAgon

I only post on Binance Square, X, and the TG group. All other platforms charge under false pretenses, please be cautious!
Please recognize my account name ObaAgon, there are too many impersonators!
—————————————————————
Explanation:
Bullish: 'Define high point'. Bullish directional energy. Bullish main behavior dynamics;
Bearish: 'Define low point'. Bearish directional energy. Bearish main behavior dynamics;
Starting with the defined high point. Bullish directional dynamics, dynamics will have time dynamics, regardless of how bullish actions are made. Ultimately, it is for defining the high point.
So if the bulls do not enter at the highest point, how can it be called a high point?
—————————————————————
'Event-driven, event occurrence rate is only 30%'
For example, event bulls: Event bulls have event news, most people do not know that news events are going to happen, so before the event detonates, there will only be a short squeeze, and when the event occurs, there will be a direct spike. Event bulls only represent events, not bullish actions; simply stating event bulls means only events without bullish actions, which leads to only bearish actions.
During the short squeeze process before the event occurs, if the event does not happen, the price may have already been declining throughout this process.
—————————————————————
'A high point' does not represent a high price.
'A low point' does not represent a low price.
In terms of low points, the text is different from low prices.
For example: low price low point, high price low point. Price and point are different things.
—————————————————————
'Build high point' 'Build low point'
Bearish builders establishing low points is a dynamic process. Only the bearish can achieve the lowest point price; ordinary people do not have the capability to absorb large liquidity orders. Therefore, the establishment of a low point occurs after the bearish start placing orders; during this order placement period, a price low point will be produced. Before the bearish leaves, a low point will appear before moving to a high point. As time passes and comes to an end, the K-line price will show a V shape, moving from the top of V to the bottom of V and back to the tail of V, producing a process called building a low point.

#BTC

BTC has been in consolidation since the range mentioned on July 6. The main players originally wanted to stir things up, but then they kept saying it would be continuously postponed, which led to the market continuing to consolidate until now.

However, most investors only look at the history and see that it has just been consolidating, so they think that because there’s no action, the discussion in the market has been calm.

In reality, that’s wrong. What you should have realized back on July 6 was that the quiet consolidation with no real trading opportunity would likely continue. You should have taken a break and gone traveling, instead of waiting a month and only then saying the market is bland.

Come on—someone has been traveling for more than a month, and yet investors are talking as if they themselves have been traveling for a month too.

But in fact, it’s you who has been suffering for a month. The article even previewed it early—why didn’t you read it?
If the Pig machine AI is so useful, why not use it? Who are you blaming for your suffering?
$BTC

What I’ve made and what I do—stable and long-lasting for many years—will earn money on its own. Why should I listen to you when you say you think this method is wrong and need to change it?

What’s the reason?

1. It’s not politically correct enough—does it not sufficiently convince others? What others think and what I think—what does that have to do with me?
2. Is it because you think it earns too little?

Those who come to make money aren’t here to satisfy you. If you can make money, then you wouldn’t need to look for me out there.
$BTC

The Clear Act has been postponed to 9/14 for a vote, and this has already completely turned into politics.

Basically, to get the bill scheduled for a vote, you need a high degree of political consensus among members of Congress.

For something like this, having Trump directly intervene is required; otherwise it will be hard to get it on the agenda. Therefore, for the vote on 9/14, we should directly look at how those in power respond.

Without Trump’s intervention, basically it can be said that it’s unlikely to be scheduled.

In other words, under normal circumstances without political interference, it’s essentially the same as a delay.
$BTC

Under the clear bill, if by the 6th there has been no progress in any discussion in Congress, then that is precisely the main reason the leading party later uses to write media pieces and push a short narrative.

Because if it weren’t for those media outlets reporting the news that Congress would adjourn next and that the Clear Bill would die in the cradle, then most investors around the world wouldn’t even know that Congress is going to adjourn.

They wouldn’t even know whether the Clear Bill can make it in time.
$BTC

Honestly, I have no time to deal with how AI trades on BTC.
Sometimes when I come back to look, it’s really impressive.

These buy/sell points are truly 👍
$BTC

Keep hitting the betting tables over there every day, staking heavily in both directions—aren't you tired?
People already knew the situation as early as the 6th, and it's been almost a month of playing.
Keep convincing yourself that there's market activity every day.
#BTC
$BTC

p I continues to publish previews in advance that on the 29th there will be things supported by a systematic framework.

Now it can be seen that the project team, PCT, has issued an update-date announcement for V26 and V27.

What’s the point of not reading the important article previews and looking at something else instead?
#pi

btc after the previously mentioned method of maintaining the price by switching from staying at high levels to intervening in the pump-and-dump, you can see that the price stays within the upward consolidation range mentioned over the last 6 days, with absolutely no volatility.

Welcome to join my forum to review historical records
$BTC

Over the past few days, I’ve seen several exchanges shut down their operations in succession—Bitmart and Bitmex.

According to the allegations in the indictment, Bitmex runs a system specifically designed to hunt down other people’s positions. Whatever position others take, and where they place their stop-loss, it directly harvests them.

In my explanation posts, I always end up talking about these kinds of things.

So what exactly is “the main force”? Where does it come from?

Is it really the case that the direction of price action is determined by the main force through professional project development or market trend judgments?

In reality, the main force doesn’t just appear out of nowhere. A more accurate way to put it is: what you (the retail trader) do is what calls the main force in to eat you.

But after explaining this for years to so many investors about where price action will go—not “the main force,” but what you do to attract the main force—how the direction will unfold depends entirely on what you “think.”

Most people find it extremely hard to understand what it means that only “your own assumptions” bring the main force into the picture.

That’s why most investors always ask: what will the direction be next?

The problem is that each time, the explanation isn’t about what the direction will be next—it’s about what you’re going to do next. Only after you do it does the main force come. This is something everyone keeps misunderstanding because when trading crypto, people only want to make money, so they never really get it.

The main force is there because it’s watching what you decide to do—then it shows up.

Why doesn’t the main force set a schedule?

Because you’re waiting for the main force you think of.

The result is: the main force is waiting for your judgment. So if you don’t make a judgment, the main force will create someone for you—someone you think is the main force—to judge and show you.
$BTC

A question that every investor needs to constantly reflect on.

Up to this day, facts have proven that the “main force” messages are scarce, the price gaps from market volatility are also low, yet online is always filled with daily “moon or crash” talk. For example, not long ago, many KOLs claimed that MicroStrategy was definitely going to fall, and their judgments were said to inevitably affect a BTC crash.

But now there’s been no sound—most of it has been quickly pushed down and buried by a flood of articles. Or they use phrases like “someone else got proven wrong,” making people think they’re right; but in the end, the reality is that they themselves were the ones proven wrong.

The main issue remains: just like for a while now, the main force’s messaging hasn’t been as active as before, because—nothing’s happening, basically.

And as of today, it’s clear that there’s not much volatility. But many investors blame analysts for the lack of movement, thinking that analysts just don’t analyze, and that since analysts don’t call the market, prices don’t move.

That’s where the problem shows up. Coinbase is right: if the market has no derivatives and no speculation and traders to churn it, then the market will just die.

But the impact of that line isn’t about what analysts say—it’s about whether the “main force” is willing to speculate.

Conclusion: Don’t always assume that because you’re watching the charts, you should have price movement—and that others should guide you to buy correctly. This mindset means everything is controlled by the main force in the first place, which leads to you getting constantly harvested.
$BTC

Brothers, it seems ChatGPT has had a major crash.
Has anyone seen GPT showing an error: 503? This is because the OpenAI servers have crashed.
Has anyone else run into the same situation?
$BTC

Let's look back at the articles about BTC from the 6th to now and compare them with online analysts:

Starting on the 6th, the articles already predicted that the market would be in a long period of upward consolidation, and that for a long time the main players would not be giving any signals.

Back then, during the consolidation, everyone thought it was boring—just minor fluctuations and consolidation.

Now it's the 25th, and it can be proven that it was completely an upward consolidation. And at present, people are already mentioning it as consolidation, and so are those who are still referring to it as consolidation.

However, the problem is this:
When the upward consolidation started on the 6th, everyone thought the market was uninteresting and saw no volatility.
But now, the price is still in the same consolidation range—yet online people are all shouting that BTC is about to collapse.

What's going on? Where exactly is the problem? Why is it called consolidation with the same price and the same volatility back then, but called a crash with the same price and the same volatility now?

Is there an expert who can teach me how to apply double standards?
$BTC

The article mentioned on the 19th at 23:00 that after reaching the high point, it has continued to decline all the way until the 24th.

Each time, the article accurately mentions the actions of the main force.
#pi

Most people who trade crypto are very professional; they know to use technical indicators and historical price action to understand how the next wave of price movements will play out.

Therefore, using the same line of reasoning, we can conclude that:
By checking historical records, it can be seen that Qin Shihuang will be crowned again.
$BTC

Telling the truth is not the same as telling the future

Telling the future is not the same as one’s own future
*(the future itself is not one’s own future)*

Telling the real future is called “leaking secrets of heaven,” and it will cause an immediate collapse

$BTC

In the future, when humanity truly enters the quantum realm and becomes able to control quantum and energy forms with its own consciousness, all of today’s human physical sciences will turn out to be pseudoscience.

In the end, it will be discovered that so-called physical science is merely the matter that must be produced within the environment designed by ourselves.

When humans can control quantum entanglement and various energy forms directly through their own consciousness, then these so-called phones have no real purpose at all—they can only be called things that, under the rules of physical parameters, could be done in the first place.

Just like “life”: the existence of life in this universe has no meaning. Life is only a result produced necessarily by the physical conditions in this universe.

Consciousness creates history and the future. When you control consciousness, you’ll also come to know the material conditions that can be controlled to create the so-called chips within that spacetime—thus becoming the so-called creator. But actually, this creator is not the one from faith. It is consciousness that creates a false universe.

Therefore, believing in science is actually just something people use as an excuse to convince themselves—because of the limitations they can’t overcome. What they call “science.”
$BTC

In the article on the 14th, Pi mentioned that it was time to start building the low point, and also noted that on the 15th, U.S. time, there were important events related to the system. Later, it was seen that at 10:00 on the 16th Eastern Zone time, a super historical massive contract trading volume suddenly erupted.

This definitely means there was a major turnover.

What I currently see is that the 14th is the current lowest point, which matches the article that gave advance notice.
#pi

In the beginning of the BTC article, it mentions that after choosing to go long with “Dai Zhuo Mi Zhu” (彌主), then you see that the AI also starts trading, so you follow suit and do it too, ignoring “S”.

From what it looks like now, the article comes first, and the AI is used as a position-pointing assistant to place orders—looks absolutely amazing 👍
$BTC

From the perspective of PI, it appears that the bill must be passed as soon as possible.
From the current information, these attributes all seem to indicate that PI is being used by certain individuals to evade international sanctions, such as Iran sanctions.

So why is this related to PI?
Because some supplier platforms secretly make money from this. Since the price of PI is still relatively high, they can use PI provided by suppliers to help the other party evade sanctions, allowing them to sell PI on major platforms and transfer funds out.

The main reason is that the price of PI corresponds to its market value, and there is sufficient liquidity to move money for the maximum value.

The above is the attribute information displayed.
#pi