赢自在-100X -GEMS

BNC changes CEOs—what should shareholders really be watching?

BNC has a new CEO and is also preparing to ring the Nasdaq opening bell on October 26. The new CEO, Alex Odagiu, was previously an investment partner at YZi Labs. But what I’m more interested in is whether he can do one thing going forward: make each BNC share represent more net BNB.

First, let’s clarify the basics. BNC is the U.S.-listed company behind BNB Standard. The company disclosed that its BNB treasury holdings stood at 515,544 coins as of July 31. These assets give shareholders indirect exposure to BNB’s price movements.

So why study BNC instead of simply buying BNB directly? In my view, any added value depends on three things.

First, can the treasury holdings generate net income? On October 19, the company announced plans to operate its own BNB Chain validator nodes. If they go live and generate income after operating and other related costs, that could increase the assets attributable to each share. For now, this is still at the planning stage, so the income cannot be counted in advance.

Second, can buying more coins genuinely increase the value of each share? The company buying more BNB doesn’t necessarily mean existing shareholders get a larger share. If the purchases are funded by issuing new shares, and the share count grows faster than the BNB holdings, BNB per share could actually fall. So I would consider debt, expenses, and potential dilution together, and keep an eye on changes in net BNB per share.

The new CEO’s incentive structure is also worth watching: of the proposed performance-based portion of his equity award upon joining, 35% is tied to the share price denominated in BNB, 35% to net BNB per share, and 30% to the revenue coverage ratio. My read is that the tests are already being framed around outcomes that matter to shareholders. Now it comes down to execution.

Third, will the market apply a smaller discount? In a snapshot on the company’s website at 15:31 on October 21, the share price referenced on the page was $5.10, based on the October 20 close. Compared with adjusted net asset value of about $7.26 per share, that works out to roughly 0.70x.

That discount is worth examining, but it doesn’t mean the stock is simply 30% off. The $7.26 figure is based on the company’s non-GAAP methodology, and some of the underlying data is still as of July 31. Shares also cannot be redeemed at that net asset value. The management-fee dispute, loans, and future dilution are all factors the market has to account for.

My take on this leadership change: it’s worth following the company again, but it’s too early to treat expectations as results. The next things to watch are new disclosures on its BNB holdings, net income once the nodes are operational, and whether net BNB per share can keep increasing.

How much BNB rises reflects changes in the treasury holdings; how much more ultimately remains for each share is the real test for management.

$BNB #BNC #BNBStandard

Data compiled from company disclosures and a snapshot of the company website on October 21, 2026. This is not investment advice.

The buzz around Agent ID has reached this .ai token

After Binance Wallet launched Agent ID, Agentic Inu (.ai) appeared on BSC. The name easily brings the official product to mind, but what I’m more interested in is: how much of a connection between the two can actually be verified?

This time, I found something concrete: the token contract’s nftContract() does point to an on-chain NFT contract named “SPACE ID Agent ID.” However, neither an address reference nor a name proves a partnership. In a read-only simulation, an address without that NFT could also receive tokens transferred from a trading pair, so the claim that “you must claim an Agent ID before you can buy” cannot be treated as a universal rule.

It now has a .ai/WBNB trading pool on PancakeSwap V2. Looking at the market, at 11:13 on October 21, the Binance Web3 interface showed a price of about $0.001148, a market cap of about $1.148 million, liquidity of about $125,900, and a 37.39% drop over the previous four hours. Over the same period, sell volume exceeded buy volume by about $18,400. These are snapshot figures, and market cap is not cash that can be sold at any time.

This data makes me more inclined to view it as a small-cap narrative token driven by the Agent ID buzz. The story may attract traders, but whether that lasts depends on future buying pressure and liquidity. So far, there is little evidence that this token is a required payment method for the official service or that it can share in related revenue.

Two scan results also shouldn’t be overlooked: the source code is unverified, and a third-party provider has flagged it as a risk. The contract reference offers one more research lead than simply choosing the same name; there is still a long way to go before there’s enough evidence to claim “official benefits.”

BSC contract: 0x7ffcf7b3b52adcc00c76f50ce2e37bf3c7e215dc

#AgentID #Binance Wallet

Data and risk scans are for research purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.

ACU Has a $100,000 Trading Competition—but Does That Mean Buyers Are in Control?

Binance Alpha is hosting an ACU trading competition that ends on October 23 at 21:00. The announcement headline says the rewards are worth $100,000, but the detailed allocation goes to the top 2,000 traders by buy volume, with 556 ACU per person. Rewards are denominated in tokens, so their dollar value will fluctuate with the price. Competition rules: https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/9ed4e714ad6045bb8fbe7a0f9f1ebe55

The event is worth watching, but I wouldn’t translate it directly into “money is rushing in to accumulate.”

At 18:02 today, a check of Binance’s Web3 interface showed ACU trading at about $0.09788 on BNB Chain, down 4.6% over the past 24 hours. The same interface reported about $423,500 in 24-hour trading volume, including roughly $206,600 in buys and $216,900 in sells. By this buy/sell classification, selling exceeded buying by about $10,300.

This is a snapshot for one chain, within the scope covered by that interface—not ACU’s total market volume. Nor can the difference between buy and sell volume be equated directly with net outflows from the project. What it can tell us is limited: in this sample, there is no clear sign of buying pressure outweighing selling pressure.

It’s also important to distinguish between two kinds of “trading volume.” The competition ranks participants by buy volume and offers an early-bird bonus. Counting only the early-bird portion, $10,000 in qualifying buys during the first two days can count as $30,000 in effective volume, while $10,000 on the final day counts as $10,000. This figure is used to calculate rankings; it doesn’t mean an extra $20,000 was actually traded in the market.

Rewards change participants’ behavior. Some may research the project and be willing to hold for the long term; others may mainly be calculating the trade-off between rankings, slippage, and rewards. Both types of buying show up in trading data, but their willingness to hold afterward may differ significantly. Trading volume alone can’t tell them apart.

At the snapshot price of about $0.09788, 556 ACU is worth approximately $54.42. That’s only a valuation at the current price. It doesn’t guarantee a place among the winners, account for participation costs, or represent a guaranteed return when rewards are distributed.

What I’d rather watch is what happens after the event ends on October 23: whether trading volume quickly falls off, whether liquidity remains, and whether the price holds up as the reward incentive fades. If the data still shows support, the case for sustained demand will be more convincing.

For now, the conclusion is that ACU has a clear event-driven catalyst, but this single-chain snapshot doesn’t support a claim of “strong buying pressure.” We’ll need comparable data from before and after the event to verify that—not a single screenshot of a surge in attention.

Data cross-check: Acurast official contract documentation: https://docs.acurast.com/discover/acurast-token/. BNB Chain contract: 0x6ef2ffb38d64afe18ce782da280b300e358cfeaf.

The Square is starting to reward genuine discussion. I’m more interested in how that money will be distributed

On October 19, Binance Square upgraded its content mining program. The point I’m most interested in is this: even if readers don’t trade after reading an article, genuine comments, likes, and follows may still earn the author engagement rewards.

This gives research-focused content another way to generate income. An article that clearly explains an announcement or points out a problem with a set of data may not prompt readers to trade immediately, but it can leave them with questions they want to keep exploring. Official announcement: https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/d9c84b68e9ab4ef29bee0cc53dfdabd2

That said, it’s too early to start calculating “how much money can I make from a certain number of likes?” The announcement doesn’t disclose the specific size of the weekly reward pool or the full weighting for different types of engagement. For now, nobody can produce a reliable price list for likes.

The original base trading commission remains 20%, calculated on eligible net fees. Here’s a purely arithmetic example: if the platform recognizes 1 USDC as an eligible net fee, 20% would be 0.2 USDC. You can’t calculate it by multiplying the reader’s trading principal by 20%.

I think one consequence of this change is worth watching: will authors have an incentive to write articles that are more worth discussing?

For example, if an article about a coin’s rise only gives the percentage gain and a target price, it’s hard for readers to continue the conversation. But if it explains where the buying pressure is coming from, which markets the data covers, and what evidence would disprove the thesis, the comments section has a chance to surface new information. For research-focused authors, readers’ questions can directly inspire the next article.

Of course, engagement rewards could also encourage people to stir up controversy. Whether the platform can distinguish thoughtful discussion from emotional arguments will depend on how rewards are actually distributed. We can’t declare that “good content will definitely earn more” based on the rules alone.

I’ll keep it simple: leave one question in each article that I genuinely haven’t figured out, or that people disagree about, then keep researching replies backed by evidence. I’ll track the income separately and check back in a few weeks to see which articles both kept readers engaged and earned genuine rewards.

What kind of content would make you keep following an author: a clear explanation of something, or someone willing to come back later and test their own judgment?

📊 Alpha contract movement | 2026-08-12 01:08 UTC

📈 Movement
• AIN 0.0786 (+9.5%, OI change: not provided) — A continuation segment after a period of increasing volume and a rising trend; price keeps pushing higher, and short-term longs are still actively attacking
• VELVET 0.5769 (+33.3%, OI change: not provided) — A rapid rebound after a prior sharp breakdown; the single-day gain far exceeds other assets, and it is more a high-volatility repair than a trend confirmation

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 0.9610 (-31.1%, OI change: not provided) — Accelerated selloff after the late-stage ramp-up; the structure has already weakened, and the shorts are swallowing the earlier gains

The most important risk right now is that BEAT accelerates and breaks down the structure; combined with VELVET’s sharp surge and historical distribution (dumping) background, volatility risk is the highest.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #On-chain data

📊 Alpha contract movements | 2026-08-11 21:05 UTC

📈 Movement
• AIN 0.0806 (+10.4%) — Continued volume expansion and an upward move; short-term longs keep adding positions; OI change: not provided
• VELVET 0.6463 (+51.3%) — Sharp pull away from the prior low; part of an oversold rebound acceleration phase; OI change: not provided
• TRADOOR 0.6095 (+4.6%) — Continued surge followed by consolidation at the highs; the flow of funds remains relatively bullish; OI change: not provided

📉 Retracement
• BEAT 1.1330 (-35.7%) — Plunged then rebounded, but the structure remains weak; bears dominate; OI change: not provided
• SIREN 0.0308 (-7.3%) — Weakness continues; rebounds lack follow-through; OI change: not provided

Main focus today: AIN and VELVET are strongly rising, and BEAT’s sharp drop risk has not been eliminated; OI data was not injected—these views are based on price and funding rates.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #on-chain data

📊 Alpha contract movement | 2026-08-11 13:01 UTC

📈 Movement
• VELVET 0.7058 (+55.7%, OI change: not returned) — After a sharp 24h surge, it remains in a high-volatility zone; the funding rate is 0.024%, and the rise hasn’t been confirmed by any on-chain cluster alert.
• POWER 0.0961 (+4.5%, OI change: not returned) — A mild upward move; the funding rate is 0.005%, which looks more like a market rebound rather than a breakout with confirmed volume.

📉 Retracement
• BEAT 0.8635 (-64.5%, OI change: not returned) — A cliff-like drop; the structure at the end of the rally has been broken, and the funding rate falling back to 0.005% can’t undo the downside momentum.
• COAI 0.3768 (-7.1%, OI change: not returned) — Continued pullback from a high level; the short-term structure is weak.

No on-chain alerts this round; BEAT’s extreme drop and VELVET’s sudden surge are the main risks. The OI interface wasn’t returned this round—don’t misinterpret price moves as position changes.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #On-chain data

📊 Alpha Contract Volatility | 2026-08-11 08:58 UTC

📈 Volatility
• POWER 0.0938 (+1.4%) — After a continued decline, it saw a slight rebound; OI change: not returned this round
• FOLKS 1.8170 (+0.3%) — Bounced back within a weak range; no structural reversal formed yet; OI change: not returned this round

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 1.0810 (-59.5%) — A 24-hour cliff-like drop; rapid profit-taking near the end of the move; OI change: not returned this round
• SIREN 0.0310 (-6.2%) — Continued weakness after a failed rebound; OI change: not returned this round
• TRADOOR 0.5994 (-3.4%) — After consecutive downward pressure, it still hasn’t recovered the prior high; OI change: not returned this round

On-chain cluster scan: 0 alerts.
The cliff-like selloff in BEAT is the main risk of this round; weakness may spread to up to a few watchlist assets.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #on-chain data

📊 Alpha contract changes | 2026-08-11 04:56 UTC

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 1.3730 (-47.8%, OI change: not returned) — A single-day deep selloff; the weak structure continues breaking down. Funding rate reverted to 0.005%; after a crowded high-level, the liquidation is still being digested.
• COAI 0.3767 (-9.6%, OI change: not returned) — After the prior rally, it accelerated into a selloff. The short-term structure turned weaker, and rebounds failed to find support.
• RAVE 0.3143 (-4.4%, OI change: not returned) — Continued decline and fell back into the previous consolidation range. The weak structure has not yet been repaired.

On-chain scan: 0 alerts this round.
BEAT remains the biggest risk; the single-day deep selloff indicates the long structure has been damaged. The rest of the smaller coins are mainly seeing pullbacks.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #on-chain data

📊 Alpha contract changes | 2026-08-11 00:54 UTC

📈 Volatility
• SIREN 0.0322 (+0.9%) — Rate warning at 0.054%; down from the prior high, but long positions remain crowded and the bullish pressure has not eased. OI (24h): not returned
• COAI 0.3927 (+1.8%) — Up for multiple consecutive rounds; the gain narrowed from +2.5% to +1.8%, indicating slowing upside momentum. OI (24h): not returned

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 1.4180 (-51.8%) — Massive selloff across multiple consecutive rounds. After the last few rounds fell by -56.4% and -58.0%, it still hasn’t recovered; the weak structure persists. OI (24h): not returned
• STBL 0.0234 (-5.4%) — Continued declines over multiple rounds; after the drop widened, it’s now consolidating at low levels, with weakness unchanged. OI (24h): not returned
• AIN 0.0718 (-3.8%) — Retracement after consecutive gains; short-term breakout momentum has weakened. OI (24h): not returned

Key risk: BEAT has been in a continuous crash, and SIREN has a crowded high-fee situation. No alerts found in this round’s on-chain cluster scanning.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #On-chain data

📊 Alpha contract activity change | 2026-08-10 20:53 UTC

📈 Movement
• SIREN 0.0335 (+3.2%) — Rate surges to an extreme 0.114%, with crowded longs; OI: data not provided
• COAI 0.3855 (+2.5%) — Continues upward; short-term structure remains bullish; OI: data not provided
• AIA 0.0691 (+1.4%) — Low-level rebound, still has not reclaimed the 0.070 cost line; OI: data not provided

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 1.5580 (-58.0%) — A one-day accelerated crash; the late-stage structure has already been broken; OI: data not provided
• TRADOOR 0.5827 (-10.9%) — Heavy volume decline; short-term weakness continues; OI: data not provided
• STBL 0.0234 (-7.1%) — After a failed rebound, it retraced; weak structure unchanged; OI: data not provided

Today’s key points: BEAT accelerated and broke down; SIREN’s rate is extremely elevated, increasing the risk of crowded longs; AIA remains below the cost line.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #on-chain data

📊 Alpha contract volatility | 2026-08-10 16:51 UTC

📈 Volatility
• SIREN 0.0346（+5.4%，OI change: not reported）— Up alongside an extreme funding rate of 0.164%, crowded longs, and rising market risk
• COAI 0.4025（+4.7%，OI change: not reported）— Strength despite the trend; short-term momentum is still there, but missing OI confirmation

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 1.9490（-45.1%，OI change: not reported）— Accelerated selloff; the late-stage structure has already been broken
• TRADOOR 0.5756（-11.7%，OI change: not reported）— Deep drop in one day; weakness continues
• VELVET 0.4371（-5.2%，OI change: not reported）— Continued weakness after a prior breakdown; the rebound structure has not been repaired

This round of on-chain cluster scanning found 0 alerts; the biggest risks are BEAT’s accelerated retracement and SIREN’s extreme funding rate. OI data was not reported—interpret with caution.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #On-chain data

📊 Alpha Contract Movement | 2026-08-10 12:49 UTC

📈 Movement
• COAI 0.4008（+7.8%，OI change: not returned）— Upward continuation; funding rate is only 0.014%; no extreme long crowding yet
• SIREN 0.0338（+6.0%，OI change: not returned）— Upward move alongside an extremely positive funding rate of 0.126%; leveraged long crowding; market is fragile

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 2.3960（-27.3%，OI change: not returned）— Accelerated sell-off; late-stage distribution signals; strong bearish pressure
• AIN 0.0728（-5.3%，OI change: not returned）— First retracement after a sharp surge; funding rate warning at 0.057%; long crowding begins to loosen
• TRADOOR 0.6023（-5.9%，OI change: not returned）— Weakening after a rebound; pullback expands; short-term structure breaks

No on-chain alerts for this round.
Most important risk: SIREN’s extremely positive funding rate appears at the same time as BEAT’s accelerated sell-off; the contract side is in a high-volatility deleveraging phase.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #On-chain data

📊 Alpha contract fluctuations | 2026-08-10 08:47 UTC

📈 Fluctuation
• COAI 0.3904 (+10.3%) — Upward breakout on increased volume; bulls dominate; OI has not returned
• SIREN 0.0328 (+7.4%) — Funding rate extremely high, up to 0.130%; crowded by longs; OI has not returned
• AIA 0.0683 (+2.1%) — Rebound did not break the 0.078 confirmation level; still a range repair; OI has not returned

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 2.6260 (-20.0%) — Accelerated drop; late-stage correction continues; OI has not returned
• RAVE 0.3219 (-7.4%) — Weakness continues; no bottoming structure seen; OI has not returned
• STBL 0.0241 (-4.1%) — Pullback expands; short-term turns weaker; OI has not returned

No HIGH on-chain alerts. COAI is the strongest; BEAT’s deep drop and SIREN’s extreme funding rate are the main risks.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 # on-chain data

📊 Alpha contract movement | 2026-08-10 08:47 UTC

📈 Movement
• COAI 0.3904（+10.3%）— Upward on increased volume; short-term bulls regain dominance. OI has not returned, so the rise is not yet attributed to new positions
• SIREN 0.0328（+7.4%）— Rise accompanied by an extremely positive funding rate of 0.130%; crowding risk for longs has emerged. OI has not returned
• AIA 0.0683（+2.1%）— A rebound, but still has not broken above the 0.078 confirmation level; the structure remains within a range correction. OI has not returned

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 2.6260（-20.0%）— Accelerated sell-off; the late-stage adjustment continues. OI has not returned
• RAVE 0.3219（-7.4%）— Weakness persists; no bottoming structure has appeared yet. OI has not returned
• STBL 0.0241（-4.1%）— Pullback expands; short-term structure weakens. OI has not returned

No HIGH-chain alerts in this round. The strongest upside is concentrated in COAI. The biggest risk is BEAT’s deep drop and SIREN’s extreme funding rate. Data source: contract order book; OI did not return in this round.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #on-chain data

📊 Alpha Contract Movement | 2026-08-10 04:45 UTC

📈 Movement
• COAI 0.4133 (+17.4%) — Momentum continues to accelerate upward; compared with the previous round, +7.4% is clearly amplified; OI: not returned
• SIREN 0.0317 (+3.0%) — After pushing to a high, it remains in the high-fee region of 0.053%; chasing rallies is crowded; OI: not returned

📉 Pullback
• BEAT 2.6280 (-11.6%) — After the previous round’s +38.6%, it quickly gave back; the short-term structure turns weaker; OI: not returned
• TRADOOR 0.6062 (-6.9%) — Continued weakness; still drifting lower versus the 0.65 line; OI: not returned
• AIN 0.0742 (-3.7%) — Steady decline; the pullback after the strong phase has not yet stabilized; OI: not returned

The most important trend right now: COAI’s strong momentum accelerating is diverging from BEAT’s sharp drop, while SIREN’s funding rate has risen to the warning line. This round’s OI data has not returned; market judgment relies on price and funding rate.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #On-chain data

📊 Alpha contract fluctuations | 2026-08-10 00:43 UTC

📈 Fluctuations
• COAI 0.3842 (+6.9%, OI +10.32%) — Price moved up with higher volume and positions increased in sync; long-side add-ons pushed the breakout, and short-term crowding has risen
• BEAT 3.0060 (+2.3%, OI +17.29%) — Price rose moderately while OI surged quickly; leveraged funds chased higher, putting it in a risk zone late in the upswing
• AIA 0.0699 (+2.0%, OI -1.84%) — Price rebounded but OI fell; short-side reduced positions and is leading the move, and no new long trend has formed yet

📉 Pullback
• TRADOOR 0.6355 (-7.6%, OI -4.38%) — Decline accompanied by shrinking open interest; leverage pulled back, and weakness persists
• RAVE 0.3329 (-6.1%, OI -10.87%) — Price accelerated downward while OI dropped noticeably; deleveraging is in progress; funding rate remains +0.057%, longs are under pressure
• AIN 0.0744 (-4.2%, OI -4.99%) — After an upswing, the pullback came with a decline in OI; earlier longs are closing positions, and the short-term structure is weakening

Today’s key point: COAI and BEAT rose at the same time, attracting leveraged capital and increasing crowding risk; RAVE showed a synchronized weakness in price, OI, and the positive funding rate.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #on-chain data

📊 Alpha Contract Volatility | 2026-08-09 20:41 UTC

📈 Move
• BEAT 3.6880 (+29.8%) — A sudden spike within the day; short-term momentum has strengthened significantly. OI change: monitored output did not return.
• COAI 0.3783 (+4.6%) — Steady upward move; a strong breakout has not yet formed. OI change: monitored output did not return.

📉 Pullback
• AIA 0.0682 (-2.6%) — Fell below the cost line of 0.070; positional protection risk is rising. OI change: monitored output did not return.
• AIN 0.0740 (-4.4%) — The first clear retracement after consecutive high-volume gains; short-term momentum is cooling off. OI change: monitored output did not return.
• TRADOOR 0.6523 (-1.6%) — Price is pulling back, but the funding rate has risen to 0.055%, increasing the risk of crowded long positions. OI change: monitored output did not return.

Today’s focus: BEAT’s strong push upward and AIA breaking below the cost line occur at the same time, and market differentiation is intensifying. With the OI field missing, no inference on position increases/decreases will be made for now.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #On-chain data

📊 Alpha contract movement | 2026-08-09 16:39 UTC

📈 Movement
• BEAT 3.5310 (+31.8%) — The sharp rally continues; 24h OI +16.2%. New contract positions are added to chase the move; the fee rate is only 0.005%. Volume/price expands, but liquidity is crowded at high levels.
• COAI 0.3841 (+6.0%) — The rebound continues; the market still looks bullish. This monitoring round did not provide OI change, so we cannot treat the gain as confirmation of new capital yet.

📉 Pullback
• POWER 0.0938 (-9.4%) — Ongoing weakness; the downtrend comes with OI -1.0%, which is closer to longs exiting than to new shorts pressing the market.
• RAVE 0.3271 (-8.1%) — Sell-off accelerates; OI -10.1%. The reduction in open interest confirms the structure turning weaker.

The most important trend this round: BEAT’s strong surge runs in parallel with fresh high-level positioning; POWER and RAVE pull back alongside OI contraction, making the weak structure clearer.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #on-chain data

📊 Alpha contract movement | 2026-08-09 12:37 UTC

📈 Movement
• BEAT 3.2950 (+32.7%) — Leading the 24h gainers; after a continuous strong push it remains at a high level, with a fee rate of 0.005%. OI change: this round did not output.
• COAI 0.3715 (+2.7%) — After a prior pullback, it has recovered; short-term strength has resumed. OI change: this round did not output.

📉 Retracement
• TRADOOR 0.6395 (-4.6%) — Continued weakness; no rebound structure has formed, and it remains in the retracement phase. OI change: this round did not output.
• SIREN 0.0317 (-5.4%) — Downtrend continues; fee rate 0.036%, with heavy short-side pressure. OI change: this round did not output.

BEAT’s strong push exists alongside weakness in TRADOOR and SIREN. This round’s on-chain scanning found no alerts. OI data was not output by the script—be cautious not to judge based on price alone.

#BinanceAlpha #合约 #on-chain data