The masterpiece of Cucumber Cat, the best article I've read recently https://x.com/0xPickleCati/status/2016059049729458207
The most resonant part is the dissection of consensus within it
"Narrative is a story shared by many. Consensus is the action taken collectively by many.
Narratives are spoken, consensus is acted upon. Events attract attention, consensus retains crowds.
The way people collaborate and allocate funds has changed forever, this is what is called 'consensus upgrade'.
Be it the ICO of 2017, DeFi of 2020, NFT of 2022, or prediction markets of 2025, all are the same
This reminds me of the article 'This Thing Once Released, the World Cannot Return to the Way It Was Before' by Li Xiaolai that I saw when I first entered the circle, and later I can't recall if it was Old Cat or Wang Chuan who wrote a similar viewpoint, stating that in investment, it is best to find those 'once this thing is invented, the world cannot return to the way it was before'.
Essentially, this is all about the change in people's thoughts and behaviors due to consensus.
Where is the next consensus? I see Cucumber Cat saying she already has ideas, and I am quite looking forward to it.
As for my own judgment, the next major consensus may be an extension based on the current prediction markets, combined with AI, forming a 'Probability Infra' built jointly by humans and AI, or a foundational 'Probability as a Service'. It can serve various needs in insurance, governance, and any place requiring decision-making. More like a decision-making hub + probability layer.
Using Cucumber Cat's diagram, I added a section and created a new one.
It sounds somewhat cold, but with the help of stablecoins and AI, it indeed has the potential to become the first public infrastructure where human judgment on reality reaches consensus with AI agents and money. In the future, many human actions, even when you go out on a date with a newly acquainted girl today, you might ask this Infra, what is the probability of successfully inviting her to the hotel after dinner?
Don't laugh, as I've been chatting with GPT more and more over the past two months, I've found that it truly understands me better, often perfectly anticipating my thoughts and preferences, even my behavioral patterns. When AI understands everyone sufficiently, this kind of probability can theoretically be modeled. In a few days, I'll write a separate piece titled 'AI is Not Just Your CoPilot, It is Also a Mirror for You'.
People in their twenties now cannot realize how lucky they are. Because they do not realize it, they do not dance with joy, do not lose sleep at night, and do not understand that they are standing on the cracks of history.
They go to class, take exams, and intern in a step-by-step manner, giving their parents an explanation; They waste time in games, social networks, and cheap entertainment; after countless meaningless gatherings, they are left with a vague and empty sense of the future.
People cannot simultaneously read the Bitcoin white paper, understand that 'the private key is sovereignty', and yet completely give up control over their own lives.
Kaito is dead, should we burn paper for him? I don't think so.
Waking up in the morning and seeing a message from Kaito API is quite bittersweet. @KaitoAI, as the pioneer of the InfoFi track, has made significant contributions to the industry.
As a holder of sKaito, I personally have never been very interested in the idea of mouth-pulling; I rarely participate in it myself. When I first saw mouth-pulling, I felt that it was extremely similar to Axis's Play2Earn or StepN's Move2Earn from back in the day.
The original intention is good. Play-to-Earn: making players = shareholders.
Kaito mouth-pulling: making content contributors = value capturers.
The essence is all about trying to monetize 'behavior'.
Although the recent wave of Chinese memes has brought a surge of enthusiasm and profit opportunities, reviving the previously dull atmosphere, we still need to remind everyone to stay defensive and set stop-losses. The market crash that followed the previous boom of Chinese memes a few days ago is still too vivid in our memories.
We hope this time is different, but hope is not enough—let's keep our guard up.
Yesterday I said that once the top Perp projects all launch their tokens, the real competition will officially begin. After all, this round of on-chain Perp DEXs and prediction markets belong to the main赛道, on par with the previous DeFi and NFT waves.
I just finished checking the recent performance data of Lighter and edgeX on Defillama, and today I came across an interesting Perp project to share with everyone.
Why do I find it interesting? It reminds me of when Uniswap was at its peak. Back then, several major Layer2s launched one after another, and people thought there was no room for competition in the Dex space—Uniswap would simply deploy on every chain and dominate the market.
In the past few years, whenever panic enters the range of 10-15, it usually indicates a phase of bottoming out. It doesn't mean that prices will rise immediately, but if you DCA some mainstream coins or altcoins that you believe in within this range, the odds are generally favorable.
For example, a few days ago on X, I saw Allora being widely promoted by top VCs, with a total financing of 35 million, a TGE grand slam, and cooperation with Alibaba Cloud... Of course, some say it's just a rehash of a failed project. This morning, I looked and saw the FDV is only 200 million left; this could be a point to buy a little and bet on a rebound, with a stop-loss in place, since the loss won't be significant anyway, and the potential for an increase could be substantial, even doubling. Otherwise, how will the market continue to hype the narrative of DEAI?
The $Ore that dropped to $180 in the morning might be a good bottom fishing target. A few days ago, it surged to $600, and the protocol's revenue has consistently ranked among the top five on the Solana chain during this period. Recently, a bunch of influential figures overseas have been shilling it like crazy. It has currently rebounded back to $230
However, we need to keep an eye on their revenue chart; if there is a continuous decline over one or two days, we need to consider pulling out.
Protocol profitability is 2-3 times that of MMT, with an FDV only 1/10 of MMT's ???
Either $MMT is severely overvalued, or $Blue is severely undervalued
Sui, a public chain with an FDV of 20 billion, has the Protocol that has ranked first in revenue for a long time, a super application combining Dex and lending derivatives, crazy buybacks of tokens every month, and is now collaborating with companies like SuiG that have close ties to the Sui Foundation, stepping half a foot into the Wall Street circle, FDV 60M?
Then either this chain of Sui will never take off, or Bluefin's market value is bound to rise by an order of magnitude, with no third possibility
Last night, Plasma showed the market a face full of shock, and the next object everyone will FOMO into should be @Stable.
After all, Tether has only invested in these two, whether it’s a horse race or raising a spirit, the targets are just these two.
Currently, Stable is lagging behind Plasma in all aspects, from ecosystem development to testnet/mainnet progress, but that doesn’t matter. Just like Arb and OP, whoever goes online first, the other one is likely to "try" to benchmark against you when they launch, at least they won’t be off by an order of magnitude.
Let’s briefly talk about the similarities and differences between these two.
Similarities: 1. Both are EVM compatible, 0Gas to U, high performance, and can both be considered POS chains (although Plasma is a BTC sidechain, it is essentially still a POS).
2. Both are backed by Tether and Bitfinex.
Differences: 1. Investment institutions (apart from Bitfinex) - Plasma is backed by Framework and Founders Fund, while Stable is backed by Hack and Franklin Templeton - Plasma is better.
2. Main style - Plasma obviously leans towards a To C style, with cooperation with Binance, early entry of major DeFi blue chips like AAVE, Plasma One card design, etc. Stable, on the other hand, operates on both To B and To C legs, and various materials clearly show friendliness towards institutions. Recently, the cooperation with Paypal to introduce PYUSD into Stable is the best example.
So currently, it seems that Plasma leans towards To C, Stable combines BC, Tempo leans towards To B, and Arc… it’s hard to say, too early, but it’s likely to be more similar to Tempo and lean more towards To B.
Blindly guessing that @Stable's TGE and mainnet will be around the end of the year.
Looking at it now, Pros & Shill obviously have the upper hand.
Although I have high hopes for $XPL, it was indeed unexpected that it broke 10 billion directly on the opening day. I only bought a small position of 0.7 before sleep, and after waking up, I could only stare blankly and slap my thigh. 😑 What I wrote a few days ago is here - With the imminent launch of @PlasmaFDN, there have been quite a few Pros & Cons, Shills, and Fuds.
What the market is most concerned about is - whether the stablecoin public chain is a tremendously imaginative track that can overturn Tron.
Compared to @trondao, Plasma has two obvious advantages - Pros.
Discussing ETH's Current 'Predicament' from the Perspective of the Primary Market
Since Jason's article on the 'frustration of its own competition' regarding ETH has fermented, there have been many discussions online about the ETH and Solana rivalry in recent days, and I don't intend to repeat or elaborate. I would like to add a perspective (not Fud), that is, from the angle of innovation and financing in the primary market. After all, many of these projects have not yet entered the public eye and are still being actively arranged.
In the past two years, I have discussed over 1,000 projects in ABCDE. Although it certainly does not cover the overall situation of the primary market, the sample size should not be small either. My feeling in 2023 is that ETH and Solana are developing separately in the primary market, and even because of the expectations of Eigenlayer and the entire Restaking + LRT ecosystem, ETH is still leading in the primary market.
An alternative perspective on the Layer2 OP and ZK debate
Short-term OP, long-term ZK?
Because V God said this sentence, it is considered by many people to be a "golden rule". However, the actual situation is much more complicated.
The common comparisons are already bad on the Internet - that is, OP is based on gaming < ZK is based on mathematics; OP1 has a two-week withdrawal period < ZK has a withdrawal period of only a few minutes to a few hours; OP's EVM compatibility is better > ZK has compatibility There is a long way to go... No more nonsense, V God’s short-term and long-term remarks are generally based on the above three fundamentals.
However, gaming VS mathematics - users can’t experience any difference at all, and they don’t care at all; two-week withdrawal period VS minutes or hours - these differences are all smoothed out; EVM compatibility - the OP is indeed better now, But as ZK slowly develops, this will eventually be smoothed out.