Hamidkakar

Shares of TeraWulf (WULF) edged higher in early-morning trade on Friday, despite an earnings miss, after the company reported that its data center business now accounted for a larger share of revenue than its Bitcoin (BTC) mining business.
TeraWulf had zero revenue from high-performance computing (HPC) a year ago. In the first quarter (Q1) of 2026, the company said HPC lease revenue from Core42 accounted for $21 million of its $34 million total. This means 62% of TeraWulf’s revenue now comes from its pivot toward data center infrastructure.
Digital asset revenue, meanwhile, collapsed to $13 million from $34.4 million year-over-year (YoY). Total revenue remained flat, but beat Wall Street’s estimate of $33 million, according to Koyfin data. Loss per share of $1.01 came in worse than the $0.23 loss per share expected by analysts.
WULF’s stock dropped as much as 2.5% in pre-market trade and was among the top trending tickers on Stocktwits. Retail sentiment on the platform around the company trended in ‘bullish’ territory, accompanied by ‘high’ levels of chatter.
Get updates to this developing story directly on Stocktwits.

Bitcoin has gone from panic liquidation to constructive recovery, and the chart is beginning to reflect that shift. The current price action suggests that we are in the transition from forced selling to accumulation.
There are also early macro signs working in its favor as the U.S. dollar softened and markets responded positively to signs of easing Middle East tensions. At the same time, institutional demand appears to be returning, with U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs taking in $2.44 billion of net inflows in April, the strongest month of 2026, according to CoinGlass. Reuters also reported that Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and Citi are expanding bitcoin ETF, trading, custody and lending services — highlighting how embedded bitcoin has become in mainstream financial infrastructure.
Against that backdrop, the recovery in bitcoin looks increasingly credible rather than reflexive.
Trade timing & outlook
Bitcoin's recent move is notable not just for the bounce, but for the structure. The breakout above $75,000 and the successful retest of that level now point to a recovery pattern with $90,000 as the next upside objective and $108,000 above that if momentum continues. On IBIT, those same levels roughly translate to a breakout and retest around $42 and an upside target near $52.

Breakout confirmation: Bitcoin has reclaimed its prior breakout level and held it on the retest, which is often the clearest sign that sellers are losing control.Relative strength improvement: IBIT has begun outperforming the S&P 500 again, suggesting institutional capital is rotating back toward the trade.
Macro backdrop
Dollar softening: Bitcoin's recent rally has been supported by a softer U.S. dollar and improving risk appetite as Middle East tensions eased.ETF demand: U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs saw $2.44 billion in net inflows in April, nearly double March's $1.32 billion, according to CoinGlass data.Institutionalization: Major financial firms including Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and Citi are expanding into bitcoin ETFs and related services, reinforcing the asset's integration into traditional finance.
Options trade
To express a bullish view with defined risk, consider Buying the June 18, 2026 $47 / $52 Call Vertical @ $1.57 Debit. This entails:
Buy the June 18 $47 CallSell the June 18 $52 CallMaximum risk: $157 per contract if IBIT is below $47 at expirationMaximum reward: $343 per contract if IBIT is at or above $52 at expirationBreakeven: $48.57

View this Trade on OptionsPlay for Updated Pricing.
Summary
Bitcoin's recent recovery is beginning to look more durable than the typical relief rally. The chart has improved, ETF inflows have returned, and the macro backdrop is starting to accommodate as the dollar softens and markets respond to easing geopolitical stress. For investors looking to position for a continued move higher in bitcoin through an ETF vehicle, IBIT offers a straightforward way to express that view with defined risk.
THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR.Click here for the full disclaimer.

Cardano price action is currently trading within a clear apex structure, where tightening price movement signals that a breakout is approaching. This compression zone is formed by a descending dynamic resistance and a well-defined horizontal support, creating a key area of inflection.

- Apex Formation 🔺 — Compression between resistance and support
- Inflection Zone ⚠️ — Decision point for next major move
- Volume Confirmation Needed 📊 — Breakout must be supported by strength

From a technical perspective, apex formations typically lead to strong expansion once price breaks out of the range. As volatility contracts, pressure builds within the structure, increasing the likelihood of a decisive move in either direction.

The key factor to monitor is volume. A valid breakout—whether to the upside or downside—must be supported by increasing volume to confirm strength and avoid false moves. Without this, price may continue to chop within the range or produce a fake breakout.

Given the tightening structure, this consolidation phase is unlikely to persist for much longer. A breakout is imminent, and traders should be prepared for increased volatility.
Overall, Cardano is approaching a critical moment where the next move will likely define short-term direction.

Bitcoin’s May setup is drawing fresh attention after two consecutive green months, with Trader_XO pointing to seasonality data that leaves BTC on the edge of a rare three-month streak. The question is whether the historical pattern has real market weight this time, or whether the latest geopolitical shock has already complicated the signal.
Bitcoin Eyes Rare Three-Month Winning Streak
The Coinglass data shared by Trader_XO shows Bitcoin’s monthly returns by year, with 2026 so far marked by a sharp early-year drawdown followed by a recovery phase. BTC fell 10.17% in January and another 14.94% in February, before turning higher with a 1.81% gain in March and an 11.87% advance in April. May is shown up 3.18% so far, keeping the month positive at the time of the snapshot.
“Bitcoin seasonality, with context,” Trader_XO wrote. “May stats: Positive ~60% of the time (8/13 years). Avg return: ~+8%. Median return: ~+3%. Only once has BTC had March, April, May all green (2019). This year so far: March: +1.81%. April: +11.87%. May opened at 76.3s. Does May end up being positive by month end?”

The Coinglass table gives the seasonal argument some structure. Its visible average row lists May at +7.82%, making it one of Bitcoin’s stronger months historically, behind October, November and April in the displayed data. The median row shows May at +6.34%, while the broader table highlights how uneven the month has been: May delivered outsized gains in 2017 and 2019, both above 52%, but also saw deep losses in 2021 and 2022, at -35.31% and -15.6%.
That dispersion matters. May’s green bias is not the same as a reliable monthly trade. The chart shows positive May returns in eight of the past 13 completed years, but the losses, when they arrived, were large enough to make context more important than a simple seasonal read.
That was also the point raised in the replies. StrongHedge argued that “context matters alongside data,” noting that in 2019 the market had “pico bottomed” and was beginning a new uptrend. Trader_XO agreed, responding: “Yep — exact same thoughts.” The comparison is important because 2019 remains the only year in the dataset where Bitcoin posted gains in March, April and May in sequence.
For 2026, the market is now testing whether the same three-month pattern can repeat after a very different start to the year. The rebound from February’s drawdown has been strong enough to restore upside momentum, but not clean enough to remove macro and geopolitical risk from the equation.
That became clear in Monday’s price action. Bitcoin climbed above $80,000 for the first time since late January, reaching an intraday high around $80,529, after Donald Trump announced “Project Freedom,” a US effort tied to the Strait of Hormuz. Reuters reported that the US deployed Navy guided-missile destroyers to help escort commercial vessels, while AP reported that CENTCOM said two American-flagged merchant ships transited the strait with Navy support.
The relief move did not hold. Later, Iran’s Fars news agency reported that missiles had hit a US warship near Jask Island after it ignored Iranian warnings, while US officials denied that any Navy vessel had been struck. Bitcoin quickly lost the $80,000 breakout and slipped back toward the high-$78,000s.
At press time, BTC traded at $78,755.

A New York federal court has complicated Arbitrum DAO's plan to compensate victims of last month's $292 million Kelp DAO exploit.
On May 1, lawyers for the plaintiffs served Arbitrum DAO, through a forum post, with a restraining notice barring the DAO from moving the 30,766 ETH (~$71.1 million) that the Arbitrum Security Council froze on April 20 after tracing the funds to addresses controlled by the Kelp DAO exploiter. LayerZero attributed the bridge breach to the North Korean state-sponsored Lazarus Group, the same collective tied to the 2022 Ronin Network and 2025 Bybit hacks. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York authorized the service of the notice.
The plaintiffs, victims of terrorism, were not affected by the Kelp incident, but they instead hold older default judgments against the DPRK that have gone unpaid for years. The notice names Arbitrum DAO as a garnishee and treats the frozen ether as property in which North Korea has an interest, on the theory that the funds were stolen by Lazarus on Pyongyang's behalf.
The action was filed by Gerstein Harrow LLP on behalf of Han Kim and Yong Seok Kim, U.S. nationals whose family member, Reverend Kim Dong-shik, was abducted in China and killed by North Korean agents. A 2015 ruling by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, on remand from the D.C. Circuit, produced a roughly $330 million default judgment against the DPRK in that case.
The restraining notice also bundles two additional unsatisfied judgments against North Korea: Kaplan v. DPRK (about $169 million, predicated on alleged DPRK material support for Hezbollah rocket attacks on northern Israel during the 2006 Lebanon war), and Calderon-Cardona v. DPRK ($378 million, tied to the 1972 Lod Airport attack carried out by Japanese Red Army operatives that killed 26 people, including 17 Puerto Rican Christian pilgrims). The combined face value across all three judgments exceeds $877 million, plus more than a decade of post-judgment interest in the older cases.
The legal theory rests on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, which together allow judgment creditors of a state sponsor of terrorism to attach property held by the regime or its agencies and instrumentalities. The notice names APT-38 and the Lazarus Group as DPRK instrumentalities.
DeFi United vote sees major support
Arbitrum DAO opened the Snapshot temperature check on April 30 on a proposal authored by Aave Labs, with co-authors Kelp DAO, LayerZero, EtherFi, and Compound, to send the frozen ETH to DeFi United, a cross-protocol relief fund organized after the hack. Voting concludes on May 7.
The proposal would direct the funds to a 3-of-4 Gnosis Safe co-signed by Aave, Kelp DAO, EtherFi, and onchain security firm Certora, designated solely to receive recovered ETH and apply it toward restoring rsETH's economic backing. Over 99% of votes are currently in favor of the proposal as of publication time.
The Aave proposal also includes an uncapped indemnification clause from Aave Labs covering the Arbitrum Foundation, Offchain Labs, and individual Security Council members for any claims arising out of the freeze or release. Whether that private indemnification has any force against an active restraining notice appears to be an open question.
Restraining notice draws criticism
Blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had sharp words for the plaintiffs on X. "This is a predatory US law firm with a strategy that is pure evil," ZachXBT wrote Friday night. "Whenever there’s a new Lazarus Group victim after an exploit and crypto assets get frozen. These clowns come in say they have a claim for an alleged DPRK victim from 26 years ago that has zero relation to crypto or exploits/hacks. Seems they tried it for the Harmony, Bybit, etc [...] When all they did is read my posts after I did the difficult part of gathering evidence to support the freeze."
Yearn contributor banteg argued in a separate post that the DAO would be within its rights to ignore the order outright, since the funds have a clean provenance to Kelp and LayerZero hack victims. He urged Aave and other parties drafting recovery proposals to "skip any intermediate multisigs and move funds to the recovery contracts directly," sidestepping potential pressure on individual signers.
Gerstein Harrow has run versions of this strategy before. The firm has argued in prior litigation that DAOs should be treated as unincorporated associations whose individual members can be held liable for the entity's conduct, and at least one federal judge has allowed claims to proceed on that theory.
The legal posture leaves two open questions for Arbitrum's delegate base over the next four days. The first is whether ARB holders who vote yes on the DeFi United proposal can in fact be held personally liable for any subsequent transfer. The second is precedential: in a recovery scenario where stolen crypto is traceable to both immediate exploit victims and a sanctioned state sponsor with prior unsatisfied judgments, which set of creditors has the better claim.
Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.
© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Hello There,

welcome to my new analysis about INJUSD on the weekly timeframe perspective. In recent times I have spotted interesting cryptocurrency gems in the cryptocurrency market. These gems have a lot of potential to show higher volatility than the rest of the market. Therefore, they offer interesting setups to consider for a surplus profit. One of them, which I share today, is $INJ USDt. The coin is forming an interesting constellation, which is likely to turn into an exceptional market phase.

As when looking at my chart, we can watch there how INJUSD is trading in this prolonged ascending channel formation. The lower boundary marked in green in my chart shows a substantial support area. INJUSD already bounced several times within this area. Now INJUSD entered this area again and is about to form the next bullish double bottom reversal formation as marked in my chart.

The double bottom fractal formation was already the origin of a large upward expansion, with INJUSD shooting into the upper boundary. Right now, INJUSD is forming a very similar formation. The double bottom is going to confirm with a breakout above the grey-marked neckline. When the bullish MA crossover with the 35-MA marked in green crossing above the 65-MA marked in blue forms again, this additionally confirms the double bottom.

Once the final double bottom has completed, INJUSD will have the target zone in the upper boundary of the ascending channel again. It will also complete the wave count. In such situations it is always necessary to consider potential turning points in the cryptocurrency market and adjust accordingly. I will monitor the situation closely.

Thank you a lot for watching!
What do you think about INJUSD at the moment? Which altcoin should I analyze next?
Let us know in the comments!

Introduction – The Scale of Today's Crypto Market
The cryptocurrency market has matured significantly. With a total market capitalization of approximately $2.5 trillion and consistently high trading volume, it is no longer a niche asset class that can be easily moved by individual interests. This is a crucial point that every trader must understand.

Individual Interests vs. Market Purpose
Individuals such as Donald Trump, his affiliates, or even Elon Musk – despite their wealth and public influence – do not define the purpose or direction of the crypto market. Their total assets are minuscule compared to the $2.5 trillion market cap. In relative terms, they are like insects trying to move an elephant. They cannot sustainably push the market up or down with real or fake news.

Historical Parallel – Elon Musk and Dogecoin
This behavior is not new. In previous years, Elon Musk used his Twitter (now X) influence to pump and dump Dogecoin (DOGE) for his own interests. His tweets caused sharp price movements, but those effects were temporary. Over time, the market learned to ignore or quickly fade such news. The power of his influence diminished with each tweet.

Current Case – Trump and the Crypto Market
Now, similar behavior is observed from Trump and his circle. However, there is a critical difference: the market is now even larger and more liquid. Each time Trump tweets about crypto, his power to move the market decreases – just like what happened with Elon Musk.

The Real Problem – Insider Activity and Retail Losses
What is more concerning is the observable pattern of anonymous whale wallets opening massive, strong positions before Trump's tweets are published on social media. These wallets appear to have advanced knowledge of the news.

As a result:
Retail traders rush in after seeing the news, driven by FOMO (fear of missing out).
These retail traders get rekt (liquidated) when the price reverses shortly after.
Meanwhile, the anonymous whales close their positions at a profit, using retail liquidity as their exit.
This is a classic "buy the rumor, sell the news" pattern, but with an extra layer of insider advantage.

Why Their Power Is Decreasing
Two main reasons:
Market Cap Difference – Their total assets are too small relative to the $2.5 trillion crypto market. They cannot sustain a directional move.

Trader Adaptation – Traders who rush into positions based on celebrity or political news are repeatedly getting liquidated. Over time, the market learns. Fewer traders react, and those who do lose capital and stop.

What Should You Do?
This is the most important part of this educational post:
1.Turn off your trading setup whenever such individuals post something that can shake the market.
2.Do nothing – Avoid the temptation to chase the news.
3.Understand the real game – The profit belongs to those who open their high-volume positions 4.After the news is released. They need your liquidity to close their positions with profit.
Stay away from news-driven volatility.
5.Stick to your own trading plan – Do not let external noise dictate your entries and exits. Your 6.plan, based on your analysis and risk tolerance, is your only reliable guide.

Final Educational Takeaway
The crypto market is now too large for any single individual or family to control. Each tweet or news event loses power over time. The ones who profit are the anonymous whales who position themselves before the news. The ones who lose are retail traders who react emotionally. Protect your capital: ignore the noise, follow your plan.

$BTC $ETH $BNB

The latest holder data from Santiment shows that crypto adoption is still increasing, even as prices are without a clear bullish trend across the market. Bitcoin is approaching a major wallet milestone, XRP has continued to grow its user base, and Ethereum is dominating the field by a wide margin.
Numbers Reveal A Surge In Adoption
New figures from on-chain analytics platform Santiment show that cryptocurrencies are witnessing intense adoption across the board. This data is particularly gotten from the holder count from Santiment, which looks at the number of addresses with non-empty balances. Of the bunch, Bitcoin, XRP, and Ethereum are posting numbers that are noteworthy.
Bitcoin’s holder count is now one of the clearest signs of adoption across the crypto industry. Santiment’s latest data shows Bitcoin is currently at about 59.08 million non-empty wallets, bringing the network close to the 60 million mark. This means Bitcoin has built one of the largest ownership bases in crypto despite several months of difficult price action and correction from its 2025 price peak.
The timing of Bitcoin’s wallet growth is important because it is coming at the same time institutional demand is starting to improve again. Data from SoSoValue shows that Spot Bitcoin ETF flows witnessed positive flows in March and April, after four straight months of net outflows from late November 2025 through February 2026 that totaled about $4 billion.
Santiment’s data places XRP’s non-empty wallet count at 7.8 million. That figure, when viewed in isolation, is somewhat modest against Bitcoin’s tally. However, when viewed in context, it reflects a network that has increased in adoption with unusual consistency over the past 18 months since it started trading in the US again. This growth is also notable because XRP has not had the kind of price performance that would usually be expected to accompany a rising holder base.
A Broader Market In Expansion
The Santiment snapshot is not limited to only Bitcoin and XRP, and it places the cryptocurrencies in context compared to the rest of the market. According to Santiment, Ethereum is nearing 190 million non-empty wallets for the first time in its history, putting it far ahead of every other large-cap crypto asset tracked in the dataset. Ethereum’s 189.5 million non-empty wallets is itself a headline number, one that places it at 3.2 times Bitcoin’s holder count.
XRP’s 7.8 million non-empty wallets place it below Dogecoin’s 8.25 million and Tether’s 13.61 million on Ethereum, but above USDC’s 6.76 million, Cardano’s 4.63 million, and Chainlink’s 870,720 non-empty wallets.
These holder numbers show how far crypto adoption has grown. Research estimates that about 559 million people now own cryptocurrency in 2026, representing a 9.9% global adoption rate, with further growth expected when clearer regulations take shape in the US and other major jurisdictions.

Ethereum and Solana are once again under close watch as fresh data reveals how both networks are performing, with recent fee metrics and on-chain activity offering a clearer picture of where momentum currently sits.
Ethereum Vs. Solana: Fee Dominance And Growing Activity
Recent figures directly address how both networks compare, showing Ethereum building a clear lead in economic activity. Data shared on April 24, 2026, by @ETH_Daily revealed that Ethereum had been generating more total fees than Solana for over a week. In the most recent 24-hour snapshot, Ethereum recorded approximately $2.7 million in fees, while Solana produced about $70,000. This 40 times gap highlights a sustained difference rather than a short-term fluctuation.
The fee chart tied to this update provides further clarity. Ethereum’s fee levels, which had been moving within moderate ranges earlier in the period, surged sharply toward nearly $2.75 million. In contrast, Solana’s fees fluctuated within a tighter band before declining significantly, eventually approaching minimal levels.
Beyond fees, on-chain data adds another layer to the comparison. On April 27, 2026, @CryptoQuant reported that Ethereum’s active addresses had climbed to record highs even as its price moved lower. The dataset, attributed to CryptoOnchain, shows activity nearing 600,000 addresses while price levels remain below previous peaks near $4,000 and closer to around $2,300. This divergence between rising participation and softer price action suggests that Ethereum’s usage is expanding independently of market valuation.
The combination of strong fee generation and increasing address activity points to growing demand, particularly in areas involving higher-value transactions and decentralized finance. The fact that users continue to transact despite higher costs indicates that Ethereum is capturing a larger share of meaningful economic activity.
Ethereum Vs. Solana: Usage Patterns And Market Signals
Looking at the same period, Solana’s performance reflects a different activity structure. The network’s lower fee output suggests that transaction values are comparatively smaller or that overall high-value usage has declined. This does not diminish its role in the market, but it does highlight a gap when measured by revenue generated from network use.
The contrast becomes more defined when aligning both fee data and on-chain signals. Ethereum’s sustained lead in fees over more than a week indicates consistent demand for its block space, while Solana’s lower figures point to a network where activity is either less monetized or concentrated in lower-cost transactions. This difference is significant because fees are often viewed as a direct reflection of how much value users are moving across a blockchain.
At the same time, the divergence identified by CryptoQuant reinforces Ethereum’s position, with rising active addresses during a period of price weakness signaling sustained engagement. No comparable signal appears for Solana in the same dataset, leaving Ethereum with clearer indicators of growing usage. Overall, the data shows Ethereum with stronger underlying activity and higher economic throughput, while Solana reflects more moderately monetized usage during this period.

Reflecting on some of his biggest trades, macro investor and hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones referred to bitcoin (BTC) as one of the "knockout opportunities," calling it "unequivocally, the best inflation hedge that there is."
Speaking with Patrick O'Shaughnessy on the Invest Like the Best podcast on Tuesday, the founder and chief investment officer of Tudor Investment Corp. said big moves typically occur when markets become stretched, imbalances persist, or policymakers make mistakes.
"So you're looking for something that's underowned, undervalued, way out of whack, people have gotten complacent on it, and you're looking for that catalytic moment," he said.
Jones first made the case for owning bitcoin as a hedge against central bank money printing in 2020, confirming he had between 1% and 2% of his assets in bitcoin at the time. A year later, he said that he liked bitcoin as a portfolio diversifier and wanted to allocate 5% of his assets into the cryptocurrency.
In 2020, following substantial fiscal intervention by both the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury, "you just knew that the inflation trades were going to take off," Jones said in the Tuesday interview. "And what was, of all of them, what was the best one at that point in time? It was bitcoin."
Jones argued that bitcoin remains a better inflation hedge than gold due to its fixed supply, capped at 21 million BTC, with less than 1 million BTC left that can be mined.
"Gold increases supply every year by a couple of percent. Bitcoin, there's a finite amount that can be mined. It's decentralized. And so in that sense, it has the greatest scarcity value of anything," he said.
Risks remain
However, Jones said bitcoin's weakness as an inflation hedge would emerge in a "kinetic" conflict involving cyber warfare, where "anything that you have to deal with electronically is going down, including Bitcoin."
Jones also flagged quantum computing as a longer-term risk.
"Who knows if and when, with AI advancing as fast as it is, we may actually have quantum computing, where someone can come in and can hack any bank and hack anything they want to," he said.
Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.
© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Major cryptocurrencies trade higher after yesterday's pullback sent bitcoin below the $76k mark. It appears that the move is done, at least until the Federal Reserve puts out its statement on interest rates and the U.S. economy. Markets are practically certain that the Fed will not move interest rates, so investors are watching for how the Fed describes the economy in the midst of an ongoing war, says Bitfinex in a note. The firm adds that the implied volatility of bitcoin options are at their lowest level in three months — with investors keen to see what a Kevin Warsh-led Fed does in the coming months. Bitcoin rises 1% to $77,210 this morning.