Bitcoin Latinoamérica
8.8k Posts
Bitcoin Latinoamérica
Noticias, información, análisis y educación sobre criptomonedas, empresas, tecnología, economía y mercados financieros y tendencias que transforman la economía.
310 Following
1.3K+ Followers
6.7K+ Liked
Posts
All
Quotes
PINNED
I was reviewing the rewards distribution table for @Dusk y and there was a detail about the burn mechanism that especially caught my attention.
The block generator receives directly 70% of each block reward, plus up to an additional 10% associated with so-called certificate credits. What’s interesting is that any portion of that extra 10% that isn’t claimed is burned instead of being redistributed.
And here comes my main question: the documentation doesn’t clearly define what exactly is considered a «certificate credit». I checked again to see if there was any additional reference, but the section just mentions it and continues with the distribution.
This gap seems relevant.
A burn tied to an engagement metric that isn’t fully defined works quite differently from the programmed burns or burns activated via governance that we usually see in other projects.
The rest of the distribution is much simpler:
10% → development fund
5% → validation
5% → ratification
As for emissions, Dusk uses a 36-year decay schedule, with halvings every four years, and it also provides for up to an additional 500 million DUSK on top of the initial 500 million supply.
Against that emissions curve, the amounts burned per block may seem small.
But when we’re talking about thousands of blocks and potentially inconsistent participation in certificate credits, the accumulated magnitude starts to become a variable that deserves tracking.
I don’t think this detail changes my stance on $DUSK . But it does change something more important: which metrics I want to observe in the rewards data from now on.
The follow-up question I’d keep a close eye on is how much DUSK ends up being effectively claimed and how much ends up being removed from the supply through this mechanism.
#dusk
The block generator receives directly 70% of each block reward, plus up to an additional 10% associated with so-called certificate credits. What’s interesting is that any portion of that extra 10% that isn’t claimed is burned instead of being redistributed.
And here comes my main question: the documentation doesn’t clearly define what exactly is considered a «certificate credit». I checked again to see if there was any additional reference, but the section just mentions it and continues with the distribution.
This gap seems relevant.
A burn tied to an engagement metric that isn’t fully defined works quite differently from the programmed burns or burns activated via governance that we usually see in other projects.
The rest of the distribution is much simpler:
10% → development fund
5% → validation
5% → ratification
As for emissions, Dusk uses a 36-year decay schedule, with halvings every four years, and it also provides for up to an additional 500 million DUSK on top of the initial 500 million supply.
Against that emissions curve, the amounts burned per block may seem small.
But when we’re talking about thousands of blocks and potentially inconsistent participation in certificate credits, the accumulated magnitude starts to become a variable that deserves tracking.
I don’t think this detail changes my stance on $DUSK . But it does change something more important: which metrics I want to observe in the rewards data from now on.
The follow-up question I’d keep a close eye on is how much DUSK ends up being effectively claimed and how much ends up being removed from the supply through this mechanism.
#dusk
PINNED
Verified
While reviewing the documentation for @Dusk , I found a detail that significantly changes how to understand its privacy narrative.
In Dusk, confidentiality does not mean that all transactions are private by default. The architecture allows a smart contract to choose to use protected transactions, while the standard path remains public and transparent.
That nuance matters.
$DUSK is presented as privacy-oriented infrastructure and regulated finance, but privacy appears to be designed as a selective capability rather than mandatory anonymity across the entire network.
And, from an institutional point of view, that makes a lot of sense: a company that moves regulated assets likely needs to control which information stays confidential and which information can be audited or shared with specific counterparties.
That’s why I see two different experiences within the same ecosystem:
→ Regular user: public transactions by default.
→ Contracts that require confidentiality: can use Dusk’s privacy capabilities.
This also changes an idea that often gets lost in the token narrative.
Having $DUSK does not automatically mean you are using the network’s advanced privacy functions. The real potential may appear when developers, institutions, and integrators start building applications that need that confidentiality.
The question that now seems most interesting to me is not whether Dusk has privacy, but:
How many real contracts, institutions, and assets will end up using that privacy as the ecosystem matures?
That’s where the narrative of «confidential finance» could begin turning into real adoption.
#dusk $DUSK
In Dusk, confidentiality does not mean that all transactions are private by default. The architecture allows a smart contract to choose to use protected transactions, while the standard path remains public and transparent.
That nuance matters.
$DUSK is presented as privacy-oriented infrastructure and regulated finance, but privacy appears to be designed as a selective capability rather than mandatory anonymity across the entire network.
And, from an institutional point of view, that makes a lot of sense: a company that moves regulated assets likely needs to control which information stays confidential and which information can be audited or shared with specific counterparties.
That’s why I see two different experiences within the same ecosystem:
→ Regular user: public transactions by default.
→ Contracts that require confidentiality: can use Dusk’s privacy capabilities.
This also changes an idea that often gets lost in the token narrative.
Having $DUSK does not automatically mean you are using the network’s advanced privacy functions. The real potential may appear when developers, institutions, and integrators start building applications that need that confidentiality.
The question that now seems most interesting to me is not whether Dusk has privacy, but:
How many real contracts, institutions, and assets will end up using that privacy as the ecosystem matures?
That’s where the narrative of «confidential finance» could begin turning into real adoption.
#dusk $DUSK
🚨 THE AI BOOM HAS A MASSIVE PROBLEM NOBODY IS FACTORING INTO THEIR PRICING
OpenAI has just cut GPT-5.6 Luna by 80%, from $1 to $0.20 per million input tokens.
Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its main model.
Pricing for leading US models has dropped nearly 25% since mid-July.
Chinese open models forced the issue.
DoorDash and Airbnb have already changed to reduce their bills, and DeepSeek V4 Flash now matches OpenAI Luna’s performance at half the cost per task.
Every AI valuation assumes these companies will eventually be able to charge enough to cover what they’re spending.
Nvidia alone has just secured $500 billion in funding for AI infrastructure.
Prices falling 80% in a month doesn’t pay for that.
And both OpenAI and Anthropic are planning IPOs with trillion-dollar valuations while doing it.
OpenAI has just cut GPT-5.6 Luna by 80%, from $1 to $0.20 per million input tokens.
Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its main model.
Pricing for leading US models has dropped nearly 25% since mid-July.
Chinese open models forced the issue.
DoorDash and Airbnb have already changed to reduce their bills, and DeepSeek V4 Flash now matches OpenAI Luna’s performance at half the cost per task.
Every AI valuation assumes these companies will eventually be able to charge enough to cover what they’re spending.
Nvidia alone has just secured $500 billion in funding for AI infrastructure.
Prices falling 80% in a month doesn’t pay for that.
And both OpenAI and Anthropic are planning IPOs with trillion-dollar valuations while doing it.
BlackRock is selling
Fidelity is selling
Saylor is selling
Miners are selling
DATs are selling
So does $BTC s stay above $62,000?
The fund is close.
Fidelity is selling
Saylor is selling
Miners are selling
DATs are selling
So does $BTC s stay above $62,000?
The fund is close.
URGENT: A massive crisis in global food supply could begin next year due to a shortage of fertilizers, according to JPMorgan.
Unlike oil, there is no strategic reserve for fertilizers.
Unlike oil, there is no strategic reserve for fertilizers.
🚨Caution🚨
Bitcoin volatility has fallen to historic lows 🤯‼️
The next few months are going to be VERY INTERESTING 👀
Bitcoin volatility has fallen to historic lows 🤯‼️
The next few months are going to be VERY INTERESTING 👀
BREAKING NEWS: OpenAI dissolves the team tasked with assessing whether its AI models could pose “catastrophic risks,” according to the FT.
URGENT: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 According to former representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, White House officials would be discussing the use of nuclear weapons against Iran in strategic meetings.
Greene said: «It’s real. I’m not speculating, I know».
Greene said: «It’s real. I’m not speculating, I know».
URGENT: OpenAI has apparently disbanded its “Preparedness” team, which was responsible for assessing catastrophic risks of its AI models.
The team’s work in biosafety and cybersecurity is being reassigned to existing groups.
The team’s work in biosafety and cybersecurity is being reassigned to existing groups.
$ZEC shows a strong bullish breakout on the 1h chart, recovering all key moving averages with the MA7 crossing above the MA99. With RSI(6) at 70.07 on the 15m chart, the immediate momentum supports a continuation toward the resistance level 495.56.
Buy $ZEC at current levels.
Entry zone: 490.37 - 492.83
Take partial profit 1: 515.38
Take partial profit 2: 534.40
Risk cut: 475.66
Trade here 👇👇👇
Buy $ZEC at current levels.
Entry zone: 490.37 - 492.83
Take partial profit 1: 515.38
Take partial profit 2: 534.40
Risk cut: 475.66
Trade here 👇👇👇
Adding to my short position of $DUSK .
Operation entry: 0.073 - 0.075
Profit target 1: 0.0695
Profit target 2: 0.0659
Risk level: 0.07800
$DUSK is severely overextended with the 1h RSI(6) at 95.29, indicating a blow-off parabola-style peak near the resistance 0.07430. A mean-reversion reversal scalp is favored, as the 15m chart shows initial distribution signals and a loss of momentum below the recent high.
Click here to trade 👇👇👇
Operation entry: 0.073 - 0.075
Profit target 1: 0.0695
Profit target 2: 0.0659
Risk level: 0.07800
$DUSK is severely overextended with the 1h RSI(6) at 95.29, indicating a blow-off parabola-style peak near the resistance 0.07430. A mean-reversion reversal scalp is favored, as the 15m chart shows initial distribution signals and a loss of momentum below the recent high.
Click here to trade 👇👇👇
$PUMP shows a sharp rejection at the support level of 0.002687, forming a bullish engulfing candle on the 15m chart. With RSI(6) at 63.71 and the price recovering the MA7, the average short-term reversal toward the MA25 at 0.002759 is the most probable path.
Take advantage of it and take some $PUMP Longs now!
Entry zone: 0.00270 - 0.00272
Partial sell 1: 0.002838
Partial sell 2: 0.002940
Risk cut: 0.002619
Click here to trade 👇👇👇
Take advantage of it and take some $PUMP Longs now!
Entry zone: 0.00270 - 0.00272
Partial sell 1: 0.002838
Partial sell 2: 0.002940
Risk cut: 0.002619
Click here to trade 👇👇👇
Bet in SHORT on $BTW here. 📉
Execution Zone: 0.33865 - 0.34610
Exit Target 1: 0.3220
Exit Target 2: 0.3057
Protection: 0.35994
The asset is severely overstretched, with an RSI(6) on 1h of 88.59 and an RSI(6) on 15m of 90.14, indicating extreme exhaustion near the 0.35000 resistance. I’m looking for a mean-reversion scalp, since the price has trouble sustaining the momentum above the recent parabolic phase.
Trade here 👇👇👇
Execution Zone: 0.33865 - 0.34610
Exit Target 1: 0.3220
Exit Target 2: 0.3057
Protection: 0.35994
The asset is severely overstretched, with an RSI(6) on 1h of 88.59 and an RSI(6) on 15m of 90.14, indicating extreme exhaustion near the 0.35000 resistance. I’m looking for a mean-reversion scalp, since the price has trouble sustaining the momentum above the recent parabolic phase.
Trade here 👇👇👇
SHORT scalp activated for $ADA ! ⚡
Entry: 0.177 - 0.178
TP 1: 0.1689
TP 2: 0.1620
SL: 0.1833
$ADA remains in a clear downtrend with price currently testing the MA(99) resistance on the 15m chart at 0.1770. With the 1h RSI(12) at 45.99 and the price struggling to reclaim the 0.1778 level, the path of least resistance remains lower toward the 0.1753 support.
Trade here 👇👇👇
Entry: 0.177 - 0.178
TP 1: 0.1689
TP 2: 0.1620
SL: 0.1833
$ADA remains in a clear downtrend with price currently testing the MA(99) resistance on the 15m chart at 0.1770. With the 1h RSI(12) at 45.99 and the price struggling to reclaim the 0.1778 level, the path of least resistance remains lower toward the 0.1753 support.
Trade here 👇👇👇
Time for LONG $BEAT ! 🎯
Market entry: 0.360 - 0.368
Main target: 0.3950
Secondary target: 0.4198
Stop level: 0.3250
The 15m RSI is deeply oversold at 10.11, indicating extreme short-term exhaustion after the sharp drop from 0.4670. I’m looking for a mean-reversion scalp while price tests the support level 0.3290 with a high probability of a relief bounce.
Trade here 👇👇👇
Market entry: 0.360 - 0.368
Main target: 0.3950
Secondary target: 0.4198
Stop level: 0.3250
The 15m RSI is deeply oversold at 10.11, indicating extreme short-term exhaustion after the sharp drop from 0.4670. I’m looking for a mean-reversion scalp while price tests the support level 0.3290 with a high probability of a relief bounce.
Trade here 👇👇👇
$SUI está showing a constructive short-term recovery since the price recovered the confluence of the MA25 and the MA99 of 15m at 0.6785. With the RSI(6) of 15m at 66.12 and a clear series of higher lows from the base of 0.6723, the momentum favors a test of the resistance level 0.6837.
Enter LONG at $SUI here. 📈
Open: 0.6749 - 0.6783
Target One: 0.7093
Target Two: 0.7355
Risk Limit: 0.6547
Trade here 👇👇👇
Enter LONG at $SUI here. 📈
Open: 0.6749 - 0.6783
Target One: 0.7093
Target Two: 0.7355
Risk Limit: 0.6547
Trade here 👇👇👇
Bitcoin surpassed 20.07 million coins mined by August 2026, leaving only a 4.4% increase in supply.
I would estimate that 10–20% of existing bitcoins are lost/stuck/unrecoverable. It’s a deflationary asset.
I would estimate that 10–20% of existing bitcoins are lost/stuck/unrecoverable. It’s a deflationary asset.
Log in to explore more content