Bitcoin Latinoamérica
8.5k Posts
Bitcoin Latinoamérica
Noticias, información, análisis y educación sobre criptomonedas, empresas, tecnología, economía y mercados financieros y tendencias que transforman la economía.
300 Following
1.3K+ Followers
6.6K+ Liked
Posts
All
Quotes
PINNED
Verified
While reviewing the documentation for @Dusk , I found a detail that significantly changes how to understand its privacy narrative.
In Dusk, confidentiality does not mean that all transactions are private by default. The architecture allows a smart contract to choose to use protected transactions, while the standard path remains public and transparent.
That nuance matters.
$DUSK is presented as privacy-oriented infrastructure and regulated finance, but privacy appears to be designed as a selective capability rather than mandatory anonymity across the entire network.
And, from an institutional point of view, that makes a lot of sense: a company that moves regulated assets likely needs to control which information stays confidential and which information can be audited or shared with specific counterparties.
That’s why I see two different experiences within the same ecosystem:
→ Regular user: public transactions by default.
→ Contracts that require confidentiality: can use Dusk’s privacy capabilities.
This also changes an idea that often gets lost in the token narrative.
Having $DUSK does not automatically mean you are using the network’s advanced privacy functions. The real potential may appear when developers, institutions, and integrators start building applications that need that confidentiality.
The question that now seems most interesting to me is not whether Dusk has privacy, but:
How many real contracts, institutions, and assets will end up using that privacy as the ecosystem matures?
That’s where the narrative of «confidential finance» could begin turning into real adoption.
#dusk $DUSK
In Dusk, confidentiality does not mean that all transactions are private by default. The architecture allows a smart contract to choose to use protected transactions, while the standard path remains public and transparent.
That nuance matters.
$DUSK is presented as privacy-oriented infrastructure and regulated finance, but privacy appears to be designed as a selective capability rather than mandatory anonymity across the entire network.
And, from an institutional point of view, that makes a lot of sense: a company that moves regulated assets likely needs to control which information stays confidential and which information can be audited or shared with specific counterparties.
That’s why I see two different experiences within the same ecosystem:
→ Regular user: public transactions by default.
→ Contracts that require confidentiality: can use Dusk’s privacy capabilities.
This also changes an idea that often gets lost in the token narrative.
Having $DUSK does not automatically mean you are using the network’s advanced privacy functions. The real potential may appear when developers, institutions, and integrators start building applications that need that confidentiality.
The question that now seems most interesting to me is not whether Dusk has privacy, but:
How many real contracts, institutions, and assets will end up using that privacy as the ecosystem matures?
That’s where the narrative of «confidential finance» could begin turning into real adoption.
#dusk $DUSK
Bitcoin surpassed 20.07 million coins mined by August 2026, leaving only a 4.4% increase in supply.
I would estimate that 10–20% of existing bitcoins are lost/stuck/unrecoverable. It’s a deflationary asset.
I would estimate that 10–20% of existing bitcoins are lost/stuck/unrecoverable. It’s a deflationary asset.
116-year-old American grandmother shares her secret to a long life:
"I'm waiting for $10K $ETH ."
"I'm waiting for $10K $ETH ."
BREAKING NEWS: Elon Musk says "I hope the AI is kind to us."
URGENT: The Gulf states have apparently lost confidence in the Trump administration, with some now considering canceling major U.S. military bases, according to WaPo.
BREAKING NEWS: Billionaire Mark Cuban says that computer chips "will be the new crypto."
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Binance founder, CZ, warns crypto users after it was reported that a logistics data leak from Trezor exposed the personal information of approximately 11,700 users.
⚠️ Private keys and wallet infrastructure were not compromised, but the leaked names, emails, phone numbers, and addresses could enable phishing, social engineering, and even threats of physical security.
🔐 CZ: “It’s not a very good month for hardware wallets.”
Stay alert against targeted scams that pretend to be Trezor or crypto companies.
👉Please BUY $BNB here👇
⚠️ Private keys and wallet infrastructure were not compromised, but the leaked names, emails, phone numbers, and addresses could enable phishing, social engineering, and even threats of physical security.
🔐 CZ: “It’s not a very good month for hardware wallets.”
Stay alert against targeted scams that pretend to be Trezor or crypto companies.
👉Please BUY $BNB here👇
Hal Finney executed $BTC just after Satoshi. He mined a block of the 70-odd. The first person to receive a Bitcoin transaction — 10 coins, a test send from Satoshi.
They wrote by email for days, back and forth. Hal reported errors, and Satoshi corrected them.
That’s it. No exaggeration, no vision pitch. Just two people making it work.
That’s the kind of patient, unglamorous start that built something lasting. It reminds you that real progress doesn’t look like progress at the time — it looks like bug reports and test transactions.
Just buy Bitcoin. Hold it. Let time do its work.
They wrote by email for days, back and forth. Hal reported errors, and Satoshi corrected them.
That’s it. No exaggeration, no vision pitch. Just two people making it work.
That’s the kind of patient, unglamorous start that built something lasting. It reminds you that real progress doesn’t look like progress at the time — it looks like bug reports and test transactions.
Just buy Bitcoin. Hold it. Let time do its work.
I’m gradually building a large short position in $AKE
I made a mistake with LAB, but not this time; I know what I’m doing.
This bomb scheme has metrics similar to LAB. It started exactly a month ago and, within those 30 days, it exploded approximately 3800%.
I’m not joking. It all began on July 13 and now a month has already passed.
Just like the story of $LAB , I think it will slowly go to zero.
I made a mistake with LAB, but not this time; I know what I’m doing.
This bomb scheme has metrics similar to LAB. It started exactly a month ago and, within those 30 days, it exploded approximately 3800%.
I’m not joking. It all began on July 13 and now a month has already passed.
Just like the story of $LAB , I think it will slowly go to zero.
$CYS $4 is coming.
Keep the current price until $1.14
Take profits above $4.
Maximum opportunity for wealth.
It’s going to move soon.
$LAB $ACE
Keep the current price until $1.14
Take profits above $4.
Maximum opportunity for wealth.
It’s going to move soon.
$LAB $ACE
🚨 CRYPTO: 1 YEAR AGO VS TODAY
This is how prices have changed in just 12 months 👇
₿ BTC: $124,474 → $62,631 🔻 -49.7%
Ξ ETH: $4,788 → $1,866 🔻 -61.0%
✕ XRP: $3.35 → $1.00 🔻 -70.1%
◎ SOL: $210 → $75.21 🔻 -64.2%
A brutal year for the crypto market. 💀
Is this a historic opportunity or is there still more pain ahead? 👀
This is how prices have changed in just 12 months 👇
₿ BTC: $124,474 → $62,631 🔻 -49.7%
Ξ ETH: $4,788 → $1,866 🔻 -61.0%
✕ XRP: $3.35 → $1.00 🔻 -70.1%
◎ SOL: $210 → $75.21 🔻 -64.2%
A brutal year for the crypto market. 💀
Is this a historic opportunity or is there still more pain ahead? 👀
I’m buying $SWARMS on the spot around $0.008.
The setup reminds me of $EDEN before its 150% move. The weekly chart looks interesting here. The price has been building a base after the big correction, and now we’re starting to see a move back upward.
My main target is $0.05. If $SWARMS breaks the $0.01 area, I think we could see a much bigger move.
That would be almost 5x from here.
I’m buying on the spot and giving it time. If the setup plays out, this could be something big.
The setup reminds me of $EDEN before its 150% move. The weekly chart looks interesting here. The price has been building a base after the big correction, and now we’re starting to see a move back upward.
My main target is $0.05. If $SWARMS breaks the $0.01 area, I think we could see a much bigger move.
That would be almost 5x from here.
I’m buying on the spot and giving it time. If the setup plays out, this could be something big.
$ONDO es another that is on shaky ground and if Bitcoin takes another hit it will fall hard all the way to the $0.26 node, which is a very important zone in the long term ⚠️ #ONDO
Log in to explore more content