I would like to express my deep gratitude to the Square team for honoring me with the Best Analyst trophy. Receiving this award is a precious recognition of my efforts and dedication over the past years. Since 2018, the journey has been fraught with challenges, but each obstacle overcome has strengthened my determination and expertise. This trophy symbolizes not only a personal achievement but also the unwavering support of my colleagues and management.
I also want to acknowledge the path I have traveled, marked by moments of doubt and unexpected obstacles. These trials have been opportunities for growth and learning, allowing me to develop essential skills and forge a resilient spirit. This recognition is a source of inspiration and motivation for me to continue to surpass myself and actively contribute to the excellence of our team. I am deeply grateful to all those who have believed in me and supported me throughout this journey.
Binance Square's outstanding winners for the #TrendingTopic Challenge from Feb 20 - Feb 27!
Congratulations to the accounts below 🎉
1. Altcoin Market Cap still on track by @Eternel insatisfait
2. BTC Update by @NoMA_effect
3. UNI 消息 by @Square-Creator-49d666686
Have you joined the campaign yet? Participate now and you could be one of the winners next week! 🔥
*The list is not ranked in any particular order. *Media & Project partners are not considered in this selection. *Submissions are evaluated by the Binance Square team, and the final interpretation right belongs to Binance Square.
This is what happens when you underestimate what big players can do with a low-cap Binance Alpha token like $BTW .
What actually drove the move from around $0.40 all the way to $0.70+ was a clear fundamental catalyst: Binance Wallet launched Earn Booster Season 5 for Bitway on August 19, offering a $200K $BTW reward pool for depositing into the U vault. On a relatively low-cap Alpha name, that kind of incentive is serious fuel.
But there was another interesting part of the move: the short trap.
Before the rally, the chart looked bearish and was setting up for a breakdown. That attracted shorts. Instead of breaking down, price reversed sharply. This is one way liquidity gets trapped: make the breakdown look convincing, bring in the shorts, then reverse the move and squeeze them.
We took a small loss here after the 1H candle closed above $0.3920, invalidating the setup. Loss was roughly 3.2% - 9.5%, depending on the entry.
This is also a reminder that Binance Alpha tokens don’t move on TA alone.
Fundamentals play a massive role. We entered based on the technical picture and paid the price for ignoring the catalyst that was sitting right in front of us. On these names, you need both. Ignore either side and you get run over.
Another reminder: respect your stop-loss rules when the setup is invalidated.
$STAR just printed a classic blow-off top after surging into resistance
Price got aggressively rejected near $0.1515 and immediately rolled over, signaling that buyers have run out of steam and sellers are stepping in to absorb liquidity.
$AKE dumped 5 days before its last unlock in April.
We're now 5 days out from the next one. August 21. Roughly 2.1 billion $AKE hitting the market.
History loves to repeat itself in this game.
But this time feels different. The market's had time to price this one in. Everybody who watched April knows what's coming. That alone changes the setup.
Still, time is ticking. 5 days is close enough that anyone holding should be paying attention, not hoping.
Would I short right now? Nah. Not without confirmation on a real breakdown.
Do you see $AKE dumping before the 21st, or do you think it will pull another rally to trick shorts and trap buyers?
In the first week of August, I shared a setup I identified on $BEAT , specifically highlighting $0.2628 as a potential demand zone where I expected price could eventually drop to as the larger structure developed.
But our immediate focus was different: we wanted to catch the higher-timeframe bearish move toward $1.00 first, before looking for the much larger downside toward $0.2628.
However, price spiked sharply to $3.70 to sweep liquidity, taking us out of our short before turning around and dumping over 90% directly into our $0.2628 macro target.
Direction was 100% right, but our timing got squeezed.
Sometimes the market grabs extra liquidity just to knock tight stops out before making the real move. It ruins our initial entry, but it doesn't change where price is ultimately headed.
How to play it next time: Wait for the fake pump to cool down, let lower timeframes turn bearish again, and re-enter.
Right now, the price of $HAEDAL isn't far from its all-time low. The token recently touched around 0.0141$, and despite that, the team keeps building within the SUI ecosystem.
That's exactly what interests me.
Because a project can be near its bottom, not make much noise on the market, yet keep developing solid products behind the scenes.
And that's the case with Haedal Protocol. Personally, I prefer to look at what's being built rather than just staring at the chart. The market can ignore a project for a while, and then at any moment, the project can wake up. A new integration, a new product, a new narrative around SUI… and everything can change quickly. I'm not saying $HAEDAL is necessarily going to explode. This isn't investment advice.
But I'm keeping an eye on it. Because sometimes, the projects we take lightly today are the ones everyone will be talking about tomorrow.
The market makers really are the Wild West of crypto. 😂
$VELVET finally delivered the massive breakout we were targeting.
However, as many of you know, our trade was stopped out before this expansion took place.
What actually happened? This was a textbook liquidity grab. Market makers drove price down into the $0.48 - $0.53 demand zone to sweep all the tight resting stops sitting below $0.60 before launching the real rally.
Our macro invalidation was $0.42, but giving a trade 40% downside just to avoid getting wicked out makes zero sense.
The analysis and setup direction were spot on. The only thing that wasn’t correct was thinking market makers would play fair.
And here's the lesson:
Getting stopped out by a liquidity sweep doesn't mean the setup was wrong. If price comes back and reclaims the zone on the lower timeframe, that's usually your cleaner re-entry, same target as before.
Also watching $CAP for a possible re-entry. My bearish bias remains intact.
Imagine buying heavily into what was sold as the next generation blockchain, back when the promises were big and the token was hot. You decided to hold until the next bull run. HODL was the deal. That word became the lie sold to people who believed in a future the builders may never have believed in themselves.
But the real nightmare was never the failed promises. It was watching your moonbag bleed out year after year while the myth of the next super-cycle kept you holding on. There were moments you could have cut your losses. But the promise of "just one more cycle" kept you in.
Then, before you even got the chance to face that truth, the protocol holding your bag got exploited. Four billion tokens minted out of nothing in a matter of hours. The coin you bought near its $0.38 all-time high crashed to under a tenth of a cent. Almost wiped out completely, and not from a bear market this time, but from a breach.
So when do you finally move on? Is holding still faith, or is it denial wearing a prettier name? And if you do sell now, is a fraction of a cent still worth calling an exit?
So many people in crypto are living this exact cycle right now. It's heartbreaking watching a promising project turn into a painful lesson. Hopefully we take the lesson with us.