Binance Square
Salar_Ghazi
5.2k Posts

Salar_Ghazi

407 Following
19.7K+ Followers
4.2K+ Liked
Posts
·
--
Bullish
$CFG Long Watch — Strong breakout, now waiting for a controlled pullback before continuation. Entry: 0.1240–0.1280 Target 1: 0.1384 Target 2: 0.1500 Stop Loss: 0.1170 #Write2Earn {future}(CFGUSDT)
$CFG Long Watch — Strong breakout, now waiting for a controlled pullback before continuation.
Entry: 0.1240–0.1280
Target 1: 0.1384
Target 2: 0.1500
Stop Loss: 0.1170
#Write2Earn
·
--
Bullish
$ORCA is showing strong bullish momentum, with the structure building up nicely. Entry: 1.55–1.59 Target 1: 1.667 Target 2: 1.738 Target 3: 1.759 Target 4: 1.820 Stop Loss: 1.480 ORCA broke strongly out of its consolidation zone and is holding above the breakout area. If buyers maintain control, another push toward the recent high and beyond could develop. {future}(ORCAUSDT)
$ORCA is showing strong bullish momentum, with the structure building up nicely.
Entry: 1.55–1.59
Target 1: 1.667
Target 2: 1.738
Target 3: 1.759
Target 4: 1.820
Stop Loss: 1.480
ORCA broke strongly out of its consolidation zone and is holding above the breakout area. If buyers maintain control, another push toward the recent high and beyond could develop.
·
--
Bullish
Guys, don’t ignore this setup buyers are stepping back in. $CATI is showing strong bullish momentum, with the structure building up nicely. Long Watch — Market Context Entry: 0.0575–0.0580 Target 1: 0.0598 Target 2: 0.0650 Target 3: 0.0690 Stop Loss: 0.0545 Price has reclaimed the 0.0546 area and is pushing back toward the key 0.0598 resistance. A clean breakout could open the way toward 0.0650 and potentially 0.0690. {future}(CATIUSDT) {future}(ORCAUSDT)
Guys, don’t ignore this setup buyers are stepping back in.

$CATI is showing strong bullish momentum, with the structure building up nicely.
Long Watch — Market Context
Entry: 0.0575–0.0580
Target 1: 0.0598
Target 2: 0.0650
Target 3: 0.0690
Stop Loss: 0.0545

Price has reclaimed the 0.0546 area and is pushing back toward the key 0.0598 resistance. A clean breakout could open the way toward 0.0650 and potentially 0.0690.
🎙️ Crypto market updates exchange; new user Q&A ✅ Build the Binance Square together 🦅 Spread the spirit of free ideas! Maintain ecological balance!
cover
End
03 h 11 m 06 s
10.3k
32
75
Join Dali’s live, everyone! 🔥
Join Dali’s live, everyone! 🔥
大丽7613
·
--
[Replay] 🎙️ Let's talk about the recent market trend and DCA into BNB
02 h 28 m 22 s · 17.3k listens
join guys
join guys
Quoted content has been removed
join everyone
join everyone
超人不会飞2020
·
--
[Replay] 🎙️ Superman 100U DCA Bitcoin Day 20
03 h 28 m 21 s · 11.9k listens
join guys
join guys
Quoted content has been removed
🎙️ Day 20 of 100U DCA into BTC
cover
End
03 h 28 m 21 s
11.5k
19
24
Everyone Join Dali’s live,🔥
Everyone Join Dali’s live,🔥
大丽7613
·
--
[Replay] 🎙️ Invest in BNB Regularly
02 h 33 m 13 s · 16.2k listens
🎙️ Invest in BNB regularly
cover
End
02 h 33 m 13 s
15.6k
45
46
🎙️ Build the Binance Square, hold BNB|On Thursday, BTC is again around 78,000, fluctuating back and forth. Tonight the nonfarm payrolls data will be released—do you think it will affect the market? Let's discuss~
cover
End
05 h 02 m 37 s
9.7k
45
51
·
--
Bullish
Guys, this one could move fast. $HEMI is showing strong bullish momentum with the structure building up nicely. Long Watch — Market Context Entry: 0.01485 Target 1: 0.01509 Target 2: 0.01561 Target 3: 0.01602 Target 4: 0.01614 Stop Loss: 0.01435 HEMIhas bounced strongly from the 0.01363 low and is holding above the recent support zone. A clean break above 0.01509 could open the way toward the higher resistance levels. $ZKC $HEMI {future}(HEMIUSDT) {future}(ZKCUSDT)
Guys, this one could move fast.
$HEMI is showing strong bullish momentum with the structure building up nicely.
Long Watch — Market Context
Entry: 0.01485
Target 1: 0.01509
Target 2: 0.01561
Target 3: 0.01602
Target 4: 0.01614
Stop Loss: 0.01435
HEMIhas bounced strongly from the 0.01363 low and is holding above the recent support zone. A clean break above 0.01509 could open the way toward the higher resistance levels.
$ZKC
$HEMI
·
--
Bullish
🚨 CRYPTO MARKET IS BLEEDING… BUT HERE’S WHAT’S INTERESTING 👀 $BTC : -0.26% $BNB : -1.12% $ETH : -1.09% $SOL : -2.39% $XRP : -2.25% Almost everything is flashing red 🔴 But the real question is… Is this just another dip — or the start of something bigger? 👀📉 Watch these levels closely. #Write2Earn‬
🚨 CRYPTO MARKET IS BLEEDING… BUT HERE’S WHAT’S INTERESTING 👀
$BTC : -0.26%
$BNB : -1.12%
$ETH : -1.09%
$SOL : -2.39%
$XRP : -2.25%
Almost everything is flashing red 🔴
But the real question is…
Is this just another dip — or the start of something bigger? 👀📉

Watch these levels closely.
#Write2Earn‬
🎙️ Superman 100U DCA Bitcoin Day 17
cover
End
03 h 42 m 23 s
14.2k
24
23
·
--
Bullish
#dusk @Dusk_Foundation Something I kept circling back to while looking at $DUSK architecture is the XSC standard and why it exists as a separate contract layer at all. Most blockchains let you issue tokens. XSC Confidential Security Contract is designed for something narrower regulated securities. Not generic tokens. Stocks, bonds, tokenized financial instruments that legally require investor eligibility checks, transfer restrictions, and audit trails. What makes it structurally different from something like an ERC-20 is where compliance logic sits. On a standard chain, compliance is enforced off-chain someone manually checks a whitelist before approving a transfer. On Dusk, XSC embeds that logic directly into the contract. Eligibility, transfer restrictions, disclosure rules all enforced at execution, not after the fact. The privacy piece is where it gets unusual. XSC transactions use the Phoenix model underneath amounts and counterparty details stay shielded from public view. But the issuer retains selective disclosure capability. A regulator can be granted visibility into specific transaction data without that data becoming publicly visible on-chain. That's the design intent private to the market, auditable to authority. What I genuinely can't confirm right now how many XSC-based securities are actually live and trading on mainnet today. The standard exists. The infrastructure is built. But public data on active XSC deployments is thin. A compliance-first token standard with no publicly visible live issuances is that a timing problem or an adoption problem? $ONG {future}(ONGUSDT) $BMT {future}(BMTUSDT) XSC on Dusk: timing or adoption?
#dusk @Dusk Something I kept circling back to while looking at $DUSK architecture is the XSC standard and why it exists as a separate contract layer at all.

Most blockchains let you issue tokens. XSC Confidential Security Contract is designed for something narrower regulated securities. Not generic tokens. Stocks, bonds, tokenized financial instruments that legally require investor eligibility checks, transfer restrictions, and audit trails.

What makes it structurally different from something like an ERC-20 is where compliance logic sits. On a standard chain, compliance is enforced off-chain someone manually checks a whitelist before approving a transfer. On Dusk, XSC embeds that logic directly into the contract. Eligibility, transfer restrictions, disclosure rules all enforced at execution, not after the fact.

The privacy piece is where it gets unusual. XSC transactions use the Phoenix model underneath amounts and counterparty details stay shielded from public view. But the issuer retains selective disclosure capability. A regulator can be granted visibility into specific transaction data without that data becoming publicly visible on-chain. That's the design intent private to the market, auditable to authority.

What I genuinely can't confirm right now how many XSC-based securities are actually live and trading on mainnet today. The standard exists. The infrastructure is built. But public data on active XSC deployments is thin.

A compliance-first token standard with no publicly visible live issuances is that a timing problem or an adoption problem?
$ONG
$BMT

XSC on Dusk: timing or adoption?
Timing
0%
Adoption
100%
Both
0%
Too early
0%
1 votes • Voting closed
·
--
Bullish
$BTC is flashing a setup traders won’t want to ignore the next move could come fast. $BTC is showing strong bullish momentum, with the structure building up nicely. Long Watch — Market Context Entry: $80,500–$80,700 Target 1: $81,000 Target 2: $81,270 Target 3: $81,600 Target 4: $82,000 Stop Loss: $80,100 $BTC has bounced strongly from the $80.1K area and is reclaiming the $80.5K zone. If buyers push through $81.27K, the upside structure could accelerate. #Write2Earn {future}(BTCUSDT)
$BTC is flashing a setup traders won’t want to ignore the next move could come fast.

$BTC is showing strong bullish momentum, with the structure building up nicely.

Long Watch — Market Context

Entry: $80,500–$80,700
Target 1: $81,000
Target 2: $81,270
Target 3: $81,600
Target 4: $82,000
Stop Loss: $80,100

$BTC has bounced strongly from the $80.1K area and is reclaiming the $80.5K zone. If buyers push through $81.27K, the upside structure could accelerate.
#Write2Earn
·
--
Bullish
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation for a few hours and the thing that keeps pulling my attention isn't the ZK architecture or the RWA narrative it's what the August 16th bridge incident actually revealed about how the network is being used. Monitoring flagged suspicious behavior on a team-managed wallet tied to bridge operations. The team paused bridge services, recycled the affected addresses, and coordinated with Binance after identifying that part of the flow touched their platform. What struck me isn't the incident itself bridge ops getting flagged is almost routine in 2026 it's what it implies about the current architecture. The team was quick to clarify this was not a protocol-level issue on DuskDS, and that mainnet continued operating normally. Meaning the network held, but the operational layer the bridge wallet was the weak point. That's a meaningful distinction. My small surprise Dusk markets itself heavily on institutional-grade compliance and privacy, yet the bridge is still relying on team-managed wallets for operational flow. That feels like a temporary design choice they haven't fully replaced yet. Bridge services remain temporarily paused while a broader hardening pass is completed. I don't know the full scope of what that means whether it's a quick patch or a structural redesign. Which raises the question I can't answer: how much of Dusk's cross-chain volume was flowing through this single bridge operational wallet, and what does that concentration say about how decentralized the infrastructure actually is right now? $PROM $ONG Team-managed bridge wallets acceptable for an "institutional-grade" project?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk for a few hours and the thing that keeps pulling my attention isn't the ZK architecture or the RWA narrative it's what the August 16th bridge incident actually revealed about how the network is being used.

Monitoring flagged suspicious behavior on a team-managed wallet tied to bridge operations. The team paused bridge services, recycled the affected addresses, and coordinated with Binance after identifying that part of the flow touched their platform.

What struck me isn't the incident itself bridge ops getting flagged is almost routine in 2026 it's what it implies about the current architecture. The team was quick to clarify this was not a protocol-level issue on DuskDS, and that mainnet continued operating normally. Meaning the network held, but the operational layer the bridge wallet was the weak point. That's a meaningful distinction.

My small surprise Dusk markets itself heavily on institutional-grade compliance and privacy, yet the bridge is still relying on team-managed wallets for operational flow. That feels like a temporary design choice they haven't fully replaced yet.
Bridge services remain temporarily paused while a broader hardening pass is completed. I don't know the full scope of what that means whether it's a quick patch or a structural redesign.

Which raises the question I can't answer: how much of Dusk's cross-chain volume was flowing through this single bridge operational wallet, and what does that concentration say about how decentralized the infrastructure actually is right now?
$PROM
$ONG

Team-managed bridge wallets acceptable for an "institutional-grade" project?
Yes, it's transitional
100%
No, it's a red flag
0%
Depends on timeline
0%
Neutral
0%
1 votes • Voting closed
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation the actual node client behind Dusk, not the marketing page version. Back in May, a Rusk release quietly shipped something called http.policy ACL rules, endpoint-class rate limits, a whole framework for the node to deny or throttle specific traffic at the protocol level. Read as a spec line, it looked like boring ops hygiene. Then on August 16, Dusk's team flagged suspicious activity on a bridge linked wallet and, within hours, spun up a Web Wallet recipient blocklist to stop transfers to flagged addresses same mechanism, live, under pressure.That's the part that stuck. $DUSK gets marketed as "privacy + compliance," future tense, coming soon. But the actual first real-world use of that enforcement layer wasn't a user-facing privacy feature it was the team protecting the bridge. Infrastructure built for regulators ended up serving as an incident response tool before it ever touched an end user's shielded transaction. Not a complaint, just noticing the order things unlock in. I went in expecting Rusk to be "the VM," came out thinking of it more as a policy engine that happens to also run consensus.who else gets access to that blocklist logic before it's ever documented publicly.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk the actual node client behind Dusk, not the marketing page version.

Back in May, a Rusk release quietly shipped something called http.policy ACL rules, endpoint-class rate limits, a whole framework for the node to deny or throttle specific traffic at the protocol level. Read as a spec line, it looked like boring ops hygiene.

Then on August 16, Dusk's team flagged suspicious activity on a bridge linked wallet and, within hours, spun up a Web Wallet recipient blocklist to stop transfers to flagged addresses same mechanism, live, under pressure.That's the part that stuck. $DUSK gets marketed as "privacy + compliance," future tense, coming soon. But the actual first real-world use of that enforcement layer wasn't a user-facing privacy feature it was the team protecting the bridge.

Infrastructure built for regulators ended up serving as an incident response tool before it ever touched an end user's shielded transaction.

Not a complaint, just noticing the order things unlock in. I went in expecting Rusk to be "the VM," came out thinking of it more as a policy engine that happens to also run consensus.who else gets access to that blocklist logic before it's ever documented publicly.
·
--
Bullish
Guys, $XRP is setting up for a move don’t ignore this zone. $XRP is showing strong bullish momentum, with the structure building up nicely. Entry: $1.47–$1.49 Target 1: $1.52 Target 2: $1.55 Target 3: $1.60 Target 4: $1.65 Stop Loss: $1.43 XRP is holding above the $1.45 area after a strong consolidation phase, while buyers are starting to push back toward the $1.50 resistance. A clean break above $1.50 could open the way toward the higher targets. #Write2Earn {future}(XRPUSDT) {future}(PORTALUSDT)
Guys, $XRP is setting up for a move don’t ignore this zone.

$XRP is showing strong bullish momentum, with the structure building up nicely.

Entry: $1.47–$1.49
Target 1: $1.52
Target 2: $1.55
Target 3: $1.60
Target 4: $1.65
Stop Loss: $1.43

XRP is holding above the $1.45 area after a strong consolidation phase, while buyers are starting to push back toward the $1.50 resistance. A clean break above $1.50 could open the way toward the higher targets.
#Write2Earn

Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs