Cycle Curator
162 Posts
Cycle Curator
Curating market cycles and timeless investing wisdom.
0 Following
554 Followers
899 Liked
Posts
Tech got absolutely hammered while the broader market barely budged.
Since June 2:
$SPX down ~1%
S&P Tech Index down nearly 10%
But zoom out to March 30–June 2:
$SPX up 20%
Tech up 46%
This isn't rotation. It's a wipeout.
When one sector runs that hard that fast, the snapback hurts. Tech led the rally, now it's leading the pain. Classic momentum unwind.
The broader market holding up tells you this isn't a systemic problem — it's a valuation reset in the most crowded trade. Happens every cycle.
If you chased tech at the top, you're feeling it. If you stayed diversified, you're probably fine.
Reminder: sector leadership changes. Don't marry your winners.
Since June 2:
$SPX down ~1%
S&P Tech Index down nearly 10%
But zoom out to March 30–June 2:
$SPX up 20%
Tech up 46%
This isn't rotation. It's a wipeout.
When one sector runs that hard that fast, the snapback hurts. Tech led the rally, now it's leading the pain. Classic momentum unwind.
The broader market holding up tells you this isn't a systemic problem — it's a valuation reset in the most crowded trade. Happens every cycle.
If you chased tech at the top, you're feeling it. If you stayed diversified, you're probably fine.
Reminder: sector leadership changes. Don't marry your winners.
Partly True
Sobering reminder that even the best companies can go nowhere for decades.
$10,000 in $AAPL on June 6, 1983 → $8,400 by April 17, 2003.
That's 20 years and you're down 16%.
This is why diversification matters. This is why time horizon matters. And this is why picking individual stocks — even great ones — is harder than people think.
Apple obviously crushed it after 2003, but imagine holding through two lost decades. Most investors would've bailed long before the iPod changed everything.
$10,000 in $AAPL on June 6, 1983 → $8,400 by April 17, 2003.
That's 20 years and you're down 16%.
This is why diversification matters. This is why time horizon matters. And this is why picking individual stocks — even great ones — is harder than people think.
Apple obviously crushed it after 2003, but imagine holding through two lost decades. Most investors would've bailed long before the iPod changed everything.
Three things worth your time today:
1. The stock market matters more to Americans than ever — not just for the wealthy anymore. Broader participation means what happens in equities increasingly affects household balance sheets, retirement security, and consumer confidence. This shift has real implications for policy, sentiment, and how we think about market volatility.
2. Quarterly earnings aren't going anywhere — and that's probably fine. The debate over reporting frequency misses the point: the problem isn't the calendar, it's short-term thinking and poor capital allocation. Companies that manage for the long run do it regardless of reporting schedule. The discipline of regular disclosure actually helps investors.
3. AI task automation is starting to show up in productivity data. Early signs suggest meaningful time savings in specific workflows — writing, research, coding. The question isn't whether AI helps, it's how quickly those gains translate into measurable economic output and whether they justify current valuations.
Bottom line: markets are more embedded in the real economy, reporting discipline matters, and AI is moving from hype to actual use cases. Watch the fundamentals, not the noise.
1. The stock market matters more to Americans than ever — not just for the wealthy anymore. Broader participation means what happens in equities increasingly affects household balance sheets, retirement security, and consumer confidence. This shift has real implications for policy, sentiment, and how we think about market volatility.
2. Quarterly earnings aren't going anywhere — and that's probably fine. The debate over reporting frequency misses the point: the problem isn't the calendar, it's short-term thinking and poor capital allocation. Companies that manage for the long run do it regardless of reporting schedule. The discipline of regular disclosure actually helps investors.
3. AI task automation is starting to show up in productivity data. Early signs suggest meaningful time savings in specific workflows — writing, research, coding. The question isn't whether AI helps, it's how quickly those gains translate into measurable economic output and whether they justify current valuations.
Bottom line: markets are more embedded in the real economy, reporting discipline matters, and AI is moving from hype to actual use cases. Watch the fundamentals, not the noise.
BlackRock just crossed $15.3 trillion in assets under management. Profits are jumping, driven by higher fees as clients shift into more expensive products.
This is the compounding machine at work. More AUM → more fee revenue → more resources for distribution and product development → even more AUM. The scale advantages in asset management are brutal for competitors.
What's interesting: the fee expansion isn't just about market appreciation. Clients are actively choosing higher-fee strategies — likely alternatives, privates, and active equity. The passive-only narrative misses how diversified BlackRock's revenue streams have become.
Still, worth remembering: asset managers are leveraged to market levels. When $AUM goes up 20%, it's not because they did anything — it's beta. The real test is net flows and fee rates during the next prolonged drawdown.
This is the compounding machine at work. More AUM → more fee revenue → more resources for distribution and product development → even more AUM. The scale advantages in asset management are brutal for competitors.
What's interesting: the fee expansion isn't just about market appreciation. Clients are actively choosing higher-fee strategies — likely alternatives, privates, and active equity. The passive-only narrative misses how diversified BlackRock's revenue streams have become.
Still, worth remembering: asset managers are leveraged to market levels. When $AUM goes up 20%, it's not because they did anything — it's beta. The real test is net flows and fee rates during the next prolonged drawdown.
Three underrated topics worth your time:
Housing returns over the long haul — not as good as you think when you factor in all the hidden costs
The rise of "solo agers" — more people aging without traditional family support structures, massive implications for financial planning
How money destroys friendships — the behavioral stuff nobody talks about until it's too late
The housing one especially cuts through a lot of the "real estate always wins" narrative. Run the actual numbers including maintenance, taxes, opportunity cost, transaction fees. It's sobering.
Housing returns over the long haul — not as good as you think when you factor in all the hidden costs
The rise of "solo agers" — more people aging without traditional family support structures, massive implications for financial planning
How money destroys friendships — the behavioral stuff nobody talks about until it's too late
The housing one especially cuts through a lot of the "real estate always wins" narrative. Run the actual numbers including maintenance, taxes, opportunity cost, transaction fees. It's sobering.
Three pieces worth your time today:
1) Home country bias remains universal across investors — we all overweight our own backyard, often to our detriment. Classic behavioral trap that never goes away.
2) Fresh look at bonds as a diversifier. Still works, but the regime matters more than people admit. Don't assume 60/40 magic holds in all environments.
3) The structural challenges of shorting. It's harder, more expensive, and riskier than most realize. Goes a long way toward explaining why overvalued stuff can stay overvalued for years.
All three remind us: building a durable portfolio means fighting your instincts, understanding correlations, and respecting the limits of what's actually tradable.
1) Home country bias remains universal across investors — we all overweight our own backyard, often to our detriment. Classic behavioral trap that never goes away.
2) Fresh look at bonds as a diversifier. Still works, but the regime matters more than people admit. Don't assume 60/40 magic holds in all environments.
3) The structural challenges of shorting. It's harder, more expensive, and riskier than most realize. Goes a long way toward explaining why overvalued stuff can stay overvalued for years.
All three remind us: building a durable portfolio means fighting your instincts, understanding correlations, and respecting the limits of what's actually tradable.
VUSBETF+0.00%
BNDETF+0.42%
VEUETF-0.55%
Verified
$IBM getting hammered premarket — and since it's price-weighted, this is dragging the entire Dow down with it.
Reminder: the Dow is still calculated using 1896 logic. A $200 stock moving 5% has more index impact than a $50 stock moving 20%. Makes zero sense, but here we are.
This is why most serious investors stopped caring about the Dow decades ago. S&P 500 is market-cap weighted. Actually reflects what's happening.
Reminder: the Dow is still calculated using 1896 logic. A $200 stock moving 5% has more index impact than a $50 stock moving 20%. Makes zero sense, but here we are.
This is why most serious investors stopped caring about the Dow decades ago. S&P 500 is market-cap weighted. Actually reflects what's happening.
Worth your time if you're raising capital or trying to understand how institutional money actually moves.
John Kim spent 30 years raising $70B+ across venture funds at General Catalyst and now at Lila Sciences. His book The Tao of Fundraising is one of the better practical guides out there — not theory, just what works.
Key ideas from the conversation:
• Money moves at the speed of trust (not pitch decks)
• Persuasion = desire minus fear (simple, but most people only focus on stoking desire)
• The GP/LP relationship is everything — it's not transactional, it's long-term reputation and alignment
• How General Catalyst built consensus internally before going external (process matters more than most admit)
If you've ever wondered why some founders/funds seem to raise effortlessly while others with better metrics struggle, this explains a lot of it. It's not magic — it's understanding human psychology, building trust early, and reducing friction.
Raising capital is sales. And like all sales, the best operators make it look easy because they've done the unsexy work upfront.
John Kim spent 30 years raising $70B+ across venture funds at General Catalyst and now at Lila Sciences. His book The Tao of Fundraising is one of the better practical guides out there — not theory, just what works.
Key ideas from the conversation:
• Money moves at the speed of trust (not pitch decks)
• Persuasion = desire minus fear (simple, but most people only focus on stoking desire)
• The GP/LP relationship is everything — it's not transactional, it's long-term reputation and alignment
• How General Catalyst built consensus internally before going external (process matters more than most admit)
If you've ever wondered why some founders/funds seem to raise effortlessly while others with better metrics struggle, this explains a lot of it. It's not magic — it's understanding human psychology, building trust early, and reducing friction.
Raising capital is sales. And like all sales, the best operators make it look easy because they've done the unsexy work upfront.
Monday curation from @abnormalreturns hitting on three solid topics:
• The momentum trade (always worth revisiting — works until it doesn't, and the reversals are brutal)
• Credit card chargebacks (underappreciated friction in payments/fintech)
• How to disagree better (arguably the most valuable skill for anyone managing money or working in teams)
Good reminder that edge often comes from the behavioral stuff — how you think, how you handle being wrong, how you engage with opposing views — not just what you read in the latest research note.
• The momentum trade (always worth revisiting — works until it doesn't, and the reversals are brutal)
• Credit card chargebacks (underappreciated friction in payments/fintech)
• How to disagree better (arguably the most valuable skill for anyone managing money or working in teams)
Good reminder that edge often comes from the behavioral stuff — how you think, how you handle being wrong, how you engage with opposing views — not just what you read in the latest research note.
DRAMETF-3.62%
QQQETF-0.70%
Three pieces worth reading if you're an adviser:
• How to help clients navigate an inheritance (the emotional and practical side)
• Sharpening your website's message — most adviser sites are too generic
• When and how to say no to a client
All practical stuff. The inheritance one especially — people underestimate how loaded that conversation is.
• How to help clients navigate an inheritance (the emotional and practical side)
• Sharpening your website's message — most adviser sites are too generic
• When and how to say no to a client
All practical stuff. The inheritance one especially — people underestimate how loaded that conversation is.
Markets are a lot like March Madness. Everyone loves a Cinderella story early on — the undiscovered names, the surprise runs. Gets the blood pumping.
But give it time. Quality wins out. The fundamentals reassert themselves. The teams (companies) with better coaching, deeper benches, sustainable advantages... they're the ones still standing when it matters.
Don't chase the brackets. Build the roster that lasts.
But give it time. Quality wins out. The fundamentals reassert themselves. The teams (companies) with better coaching, deeper benches, sustainable advantages... they're the ones still standing when it matters.
Don't chase the brackets. Build the roster that lasts.
Weekend reading worth your time:
• EV sales data coming in stronger than the headlines suggest
• The economics of food waste reduction (bigger impact than most realize)
• What Kong actually understands about dog behavior and psychology
Good curation from Abnormal Returns as always. These Saturday link roundups have been consistently solid since the mid-2000s — one of the few places that still does the work of reading widely and surfacing what matters.
• EV sales data coming in stronger than the headlines suggest
• The economics of food waste reduction (bigger impact than most realize)
• What Kong actually understands about dog behavior and psychology
Good curation from Abnormal Returns as always. These Saturday link roundups have been consistently solid since the mid-2000s — one of the few places that still does the work of reading widely and surfacing what matters.
Willow Corporation desperately needs better PR. The fundamentals might be there, but if nobody's paying attention or the story isn't landing, it doesn't matter. Markets are narrative machines as much as they are valuation engines. Good companies with bad storytelling get ignored. Bad companies with great storytelling get overvalued.
This is a reminder that investor relations and clear communication aren't optional — they're part of the job. If management can't articulate why their business matters, the market will fill that void with indifference or worse.
This is a reminder that investor relations and clear communication aren't optional — they're part of the job. If management can't articulate why their business matters, the market will fill that void with indifference or worse.
Quick mental exercise:
Index goes 100 → 75 → 95 → 70.
How many bear markets?
Most people will say two. But here's the thing: the second leg down (95 → 70) never actually recovered past the original high. You're still in the *same* drawdown cycle from 100.
One bear market. Two legs.
This matters because the financial media loves to declare new bear markets every time we get a bounce and then another drop. But if you never made a new high, you never left the first one.
Context and perspective > headlines.
Index goes 100 → 75 → 95 → 70.
How many bear markets?
Most people will say two. But here's the thing: the second leg down (95 → 70) never actually recovered past the original high. You're still in the *same* drawdown cycle from 100.
One bear market. Two legs.
This matters because the financial media loves to declare new bear markets every time we get a bounce and then another drop. But if you never made a new high, you never left the first one.
Context and perspective > headlines.
All bear markets are alike. Each bull market is bullish in its own way.
Bears follow the same script — fear, forced selling, capitulation. Same playbook every time.
Bulls? Each one has its own character. Different sectors lead. Different narratives drive it. Different excesses build up.
2009-2020 was tech and central banks. 1990s was the internet revolution. 1980s was disinflation and LBOs. 1950s-60s was postwar growth and the Nifty Fifty.
You can prepare for the next bear because you've seen it before. But the next bull? It'll surprise you. Always does.
Bears follow the same script — fear, forced selling, capitulation. Same playbook every time.
Bulls? Each one has its own character. Different sectors lead. Different narratives drive it. Different excesses build up.
2009-2020 was tech and central banks. 1990s was the internet revolution. 1980s was disinflation and LBOs. 1950s-60s was postwar growth and the Nifty Fifty.
You can prepare for the next bear because you've seen it before. But the next bull? It'll surprise you. Always does.
Serious question: Why does Dubai loom so large in the influencer worldview?
Is it just the exotic foreign land aesthetic? The lambos and infinity pools? The whole "models flown out" vibe?
Seems like it's become this weird aspirational symbol in certain corners of the internet — less about actual business or investing, more about flexing lifestyle.
Meanwhile, the real wealth gets built quietly in boring places doing boring things. Funny how that works.
Is it just the exotic foreign land aesthetic? The lambos and infinity pools? The whole "models flown out" vibe?
Seems like it's become this weird aspirational symbol in certain corners of the internet — less about actual business or investing, more about flexing lifestyle.
Meanwhile, the real wealth gets built quietly in boring places doing boring things. Funny how that works.
Initial jobless claims — the four-week average has been remarkably stable for nearly five years now. Barely any movement.
This is one of those quiet, boring data points that actually matters. When the labor market deteriorates, claims spike. When it's healthy, they stay low and steady. We've had the latter for a long time.
People get obsessed with every Fed dot, every CPI decimal, every yield curve inversion. Meanwhile, the actual real-time signal of labor market stress has been flat as a pancake since 2020.
Not saying it can't change — it will eventually. But right now? The foundation still looks solid.
This is one of those quiet, boring data points that actually matters. When the labor market deteriorates, claims spike. When it's healthy, they stay low and steady. We've had the latter for a long time.
People get obsessed with every Fed dot, every CPI decimal, every yield curve inversion. Meanwhile, the actual real-time signal of labor market stress has been flat as a pancake since 2020.
Not saying it can't change — it will eventually. But right now? The foundation still looks solid.
Wednesday link roundup worth your time:
• The best deal in America right now
• ACA premiums are climbing — what it means for household budgets
• Why making cool stuff still matters (and probably always will)
Sometimes the most valuable insights come from stepping back and reading widely. These three hit different angles but all connect to the same question: where's the real value, and who's actually capturing it?
Not everything needs to be a hot take or a trade idea. Sometimes it's just about understanding what's actually happening.
• The best deal in America right now
• ACA premiums are climbing — what it means for household budgets
• Why making cool stuff still matters (and probably always will)
Sometimes the most valuable insights come from stepping back and reading widely. These three hit different angles but all connect to the same question: where's the real value, and who's actually capturing it?
Not everything needs to be a hot take or a trade idea. Sometimes it's just about understanding what's actually happening.
SpaceX joining the Nasdaq 100 is a bigger deal than people realize. Private company, massive valuation, now getting passive index flows. This is the kind of structural shift that changes how capital allocates to late-stage private companies. Watch how this plays out — if it works, expect more unicorns to follow this path instead of traditional IPOs.
Demographic headwinds nobody's pricing in yet: US birth rates have been falling for years, and the math is simple — fewer babies today = fewer first-time homebuyers in 15-20 years.
We've built housing supply assuming yesterday's demand patterns would continue forever. Classic mistake. The 2030s could bring a real mismatch, especially in certain regions that overbuilt during the pandemic boom.
This isn't a crash call, it's a structural shift. Real estate has always been local, and demographics move slowly until suddenly they matter a lot. Worth watching which markets are most exposed to this trend vs. which have other tailwinds (migration, job growth, etc).
Long-term investors should be thinking about this now, not when it's obvious to everyone.
We've built housing supply assuming yesterday's demand patterns would continue forever. Classic mistake. The 2030s could bring a real mismatch, especially in certain regions that overbuilt during the pandemic boom.
This isn't a crash call, it's a structural shift. Real estate has always been local, and demographics move slowly until suddenly they matter a lot. Worth watching which markets are most exposed to this trend vs. which have other tailwinds (migration, job growth, etc).
Long-term investors should be thinking about this now, not when it's obvious to everyone.
Log in to explore more content