Whoa, I just saw this chart in the square, and I'm completely stunned. This isn't trading; it's practically a real-life 'suicidal attack'.
Brothers, did you see clearly? This dude went short on $LAB at 0.68, and now the price has skyrocketed to 4.7. He's sitting on a paper loss of $487,000, with a return rate of negative 85.95%. What's heartbreaking is his message: he's mortgaged his house and car, and has been margin-calling ever since; he really can't borrow any more money now. The liquidation price is at 5.29, just a step away from the current price.
Honestly, looking at this chart really reminds me of my past self. That desperate feeling of watching the price jump toward the liquidation line while being completely powerless is enough to drive anyone insane. This isn't shorting; it's like playing a 'life swap' game with the market makers. You thought 0.68 was a high point, but the market makers are telling you there's always a higher high.
What I admire (and feel sorry for) is his obsession. Going all-in short with 1x leverage, enduring nearly a 7x increase. That takes some serious 'courage' and a thick wallet, huh? But the trading market doesn’t care about tears, and definitely doesn’t believe in 'holding on for dear life'. You try to reason with the market makers, but they just want to drain your last drop of blood. $BTC #LAB
Wow, this guy made 140,000 times his investment in 14 years. Who else can be as awesome as him? In 2011, he spent less than $8,000 to buy 10,000 $BTC , when one Bitcoin was only $0.78.
So what happened? He just held on for 14 years! By October 2025, when Bitcoin broke through $109,000, he sold everything and cashed out over $1 billion. A 140,000 times return, this is not just investment, this is simply like cultivating immortality.
To be honest, what I admire most is not that he bought early, but that he was able to hold on. Over these 14 years, he experienced hundreds of crashes and endured four long bear markets lasting several years. How many times did the market halve, how many times did the media shout 'Bitcoin will go to zero', and he never wavered once. This kind of determination is really not something ordinary people can possess.
I used to have quite a few good stocks, but I sold when they rose two or three times, and cut losses when they fell by 20%. Seeing others get a 140,000 times increase, I can only mock myself: people like us who can't hold on deserve to miss out on big money.
Risk Warning: This kind of 'get rich quick myth' is an extreme case of survivor bias. Just because he made a fortune after 14 years, don’t think you can do the same. Investment requires caution; first, ask yourself if you can withstand a 90% drawdown.
What do you think? If you bought 10,000 Bitcoins in 2011, could you still hold on until now? Be honest in the comments, at which point would you get off the ride? $BTC
Weekend Market Analysis: US Retail Sales Plunge 0.6%—Can BTC Still Hold at 60,000? Early Data: US July retail sales unexpectedly fell by 0.6%, the probability of a September rate hike dropped to about 31%, and the US dollar index fell to 99.67—yet risk assets didn’t rise as a result. The S&P 500 fell 0.17% and the Nasdaq dropped 0.28%, suggesting the market is starting to worry not about interest rates, but about consumption and economic growth. Oil prices further complicated the picture. Brent crude rebounded to $88.52, up 6% so far this week. The yield on the 10-year US Treasury is around 4.66%, while the borrowing cost on the 30-year remains at a 25-year high. With a weakening economy, rising energy prices, and long-end yields not falling, you get the combination the market likes the least. $BTC dropped to around 62,950, down 0.7% over 24 hours, and has already touched $62,525; $ETH is around $1,881, with trading volume down 19% from the previous day. US stocks continued to climb: $SNDK rose about 7%. Meanwhile, BTC started moving downward, reflecting ETF outflows, miners selling, and weekend liquidity shortages still weighing on buying pressure. Today, we’ll first see whether $62,500 can hold. If it breaks, the $60,000–$61,000 range will come back into focus. Reclaiming $63,500–$64,000 would indicate that short-term selling pressure is easing. Since US stock markets are closed on the weekend, are you bearish on a BTC drop or staying put with your positions? #油价小幅走高 #全球股市逼近历史高位
Is BTC really over? S&P hits a historical high, yet BTC is stuck at $63.0k. Yesterday, the S&P 500 rose 0.65% to close at 7,798.99 points; the Nasdaq gained 0.81%. The main storyline I see is very clear: the U.S. July PPI came in flat month-over-month, oil prices fell, and the market dialed back near-term rate-hike expectations—so funds rotated back into tech stocks. SanDisk jumped 13.7%, Micron rose 4.2%; AI trading is still there, but the money is more focused on companies that can turn expectations into realized profits. Crypto is lifeless—on the gainers board you can barely even see the presence of crypto anymore. $BTC about $63,376, up just 0.1% over 24 hours, with trading volume around $18.8 billion; $ETH about $1,887, up 0.4%. Total market cap is about $2.26 trillion, and trading volume has dropped to $45.8 billion, indicating this is mainly rotation of existing capital, not broad-based new inflows. The reason for the divergence is on the bond side: short-term rate pressure is easing, but the auction yield on the U.S. 30-year Treasury hit 5.22%, the highest level since 2001. U.S. stocks can absorb high rates through earnings, but BTC is still affected by USD liquidity, miners cashing out, and failed breakouts. On the short term, I see BTC’s $62,800–$63,000 as the support zone; only regaining $64,000 would count as a repair. ETH needs to reclaim $1,900–$1,920. If U.S. stocks keep making new highs while Crypto doesn’t follow, the weakness will be even more pronounced. How much of your portfolio is in U.S. stocks right now, and how much is in Crypto? #美国7月PPI持平
So bizarre! Customer buys 4 pieces of beef jerky at Zhao Yiming’s store for 64 yuan, then reweighs and it’s only 17 yuan! On August 10, in Cangzhou, Hebei. A customer complained after shopping at a Zhao Yiming Snacks store: at checkout, 4 pieces of beef jerky weighing 0.299 kg reportedly cost 64.58 yuan. After reweighing, it was 0.08 kg and 17.29 yuan. Reweighing showed that the items on the receipt were all charged for extra weight. In response, the store owner said they checked the surveillance and the staff’s handling was fine, the scale was fine too, but they didn’t know how the system was identifying it. The owner also said, “If it’s wrong, then it’s wrong. The store manager apologized. We’ve agreed to triple the compensation for the whole order, but the customer still won’t give up and wants to file a complaint.” Do you think such a scammer should be shut down? $BNB no more to say—I got liquidated on my BNB, so I’m rushing to deliver food.
Did you get on the bus? $CASHCAT has surged more than 40% in seven days—Robinhood itself has opened the traffic entry!
Looking at this rally, the most direct catalyst is that $CASHCAT has officially entered trading on the Robinhood App. A meme coin that was originally community-issued and borrowed Robinhood’s early “Cash Cat” name suddenly gained a native purchase entry on the platform. Naturally, the market has repriced it as a top cultural asset on the Robinhood Chain.
Money is backing the narrative too. $CASHCAT is currently around $0.163, up about 10% in 24 hours, and up more than 40% over seven days. Spot trading is about $19.8 million, up 27% from the previous day. Even more aggressive is the derivatives side: open interest is roughly $34.18 million—about 21% of a $162 million market cap. Derivatives trading volume is clearly higher than spot, suggesting the rise is driven by real buying as well as amplification from newly added leverage and short covering.
Its advantage is that the supply is close to fully circulating, with no major unlock pressure. The problem is that it has no product revenue or cash flow—its price relies entirely on the heat around the Robinhood Chain. Currently, it’s still about 29% below its all-time high of $0.2288. The $0.168–$0.186 range is the near-term overhead supply zone. If spot volume keeps growing, the uptrend will be healthier. But if price continues to surge while OI rapidly inflates, the pullback could be brutal.
The Korean stocks are back! SK’s dual contracts rose more than 11%, SPCX rose 10%, and funds are once again betting on AI hardware Yesterday, $SKHX rose 11.22%, and $SKHYNIX rose 11.08%. I think this came from the combined effect of three forces. First, news spread that Temasek is considering investing in Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. Coupled with expectations that the company may strengthen shareholder returns, Korean stocks in the original market rose about 7%, while the KOSPI rose 3.7%. The earlier sell-off triggered by results falling short of lofty expectations was too concentrated; once the positive catalyst appeared, it naturally led to short covering. Second, CoreWeave raised its capital expenditure, again proving that AI data centers are still expanding. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 2.5%, Micron rose nearly 5%, and money rotated back from the “AI spending peak” narrative to HBM and memory demand. On Hyperliquid, SKHX and SKHYNIX are also perpetual contracts—not the underlying shares. With relatively thin liquidity and leveraged liquidations, the 7% spot gain was amplified to 11%. $SPCX has a more straightforward rationale for its 10.23% rise: the release of Grok 4.6, an internal meeting at which Musk announced a 10GW AI computing target, plus updates on Starlink users and satellite launch progress—prompting the market to re-rate AI business valuations. And because the expected pre-earnings de-listing selling pressure didn’t materialize as anticipated, it also forced short covering. $SPCX will have to face the next wave of unlocking on August 20. Do you think this round will have more staying power in memory chips, or in SpaceX’s AI story? #韩股KOSPI涨近5%启动买方侧车
Morning Market Recap: I’m fed up! CPI drops to 3.4%—AI stocks rebound, but BTC is still stuck around $63.5k, trading in a tight range. This shakeout is taking a bit too long! Today’s U.S. July CPI rose 0.1% month-over-month, and year-over-year fell to 3.4%, with core CPI down to 2.5% year-over-year. Rate-hike pressure eases accordingly: the S&P 500 rose 0.26%, the Nasdaq gained 0.54%, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumped 2.5%. CoreWeave and Super Micro Computer both surged 19%, Nvidia rose 3%, and money has returned to AI compute power and chips. Asian tech stocks also saw a recovery: South Korea’s KOSPI rose 3.68% on the previous trading day, Samsung Electronics jumped 6.7%, and SK Hynix rose 11.2% ($SKHY ). SPCX Shanghai rose 11%. Traditional AI stocks are all up, but Brent crude is still near $88.98. The Iran–U.S. standoff hasn’t been resolved, and energy prices continue to limit the market’s hopes for rate cuts. $BTC is currently about $63,550, with a 24-hour range of $63,267–$64,329; $ETH is about $1,879. After the CPI-positive news, gains still haven’t come with strong volume, suggesting that part of the macro upside has already been priced in, and Crypto lacks independent incremental capital. Next, I’ll watch whether BTC can reclaim and hold above $64,300 and whether ETH can regain $1,920. If tech stocks keep rising while crypto remains rangebound, the divergence in capital preferences will become even more obvious. Where is your portfolio mainly allocated—BTC and other crypto assets, or should you keep chasing AI chip and tech stocks? #韩股KOSPI涨近5%启动买方侧车 #美国7月CPI与PPI数据本周出炉
Oh my God! This is even more profitable than buying MEME coins! Liu Yiqian collected a Qi Baishi painting. He originally bought it for more than 5 million yuan. Then he spent another 10 million yuan to purchase matching couplets for the painting. These works were auctioned with a reserve price of 80 million yuan, but they ended up selling for a whopping 370 million yuan. After 6 years of collecting, he earned 350 million yuan in profit. Finally, what do you think of the return on investment over 6 years? Is it satisfactory? #MEME
New listings “big money play”: a 15x price spread for $YARD that looks like arbitrage, but is actually a two-layer liquidity battle #Robinhood Chain: the NFT’s conversion value for $YARD—“listing equals profit by 15x.” Based on an initial FDV of $200,000 and a total supply of about 2 billion tokens, the starting price of YARD is roughly $0.0001. If one Yardkeeper needs 331,533 YARD to redeem, and the NFT is valued at $545, that corresponds to about $0.00164 per YARD, implying an FDV of roughly $3.29 million and a book price difference of about 16x. In addition, public information shows two different redemption quantities—300,030 and 331,533—so calculations must follow the official contract. Even with 100% unlock (no later unlock sell-pressure), it means all tokens are tradable from day one, allowing early concentrated buyers to exit at any time. I’d rather view it as price discovery driven by early traffic on the Robinhood Chain, not a risk-free opportunity. Would you participate at a $200,000 FDV at launch, or wait to confirm the redemption contract and secondary-market depth before deciding?$RED
$XAU gold returns to $4,408—only two of the four demand engines were ignited! Gold fell below $4,000 in July, then rebounded more than 8% in August and reclaimed $4,408. I believe this rally was mainly driven by “investment safe-haven demand + central bank reserves,” not all four categories of demand surging at once. The situation between Iran and the U.S. has been volatile, oil prices are nearing $90, and the market is waiting for the U.S. CPI—so funds have flowed back into gold ETFs. Central banks remain long-term buyers; in Q1 2026, net gold purchases were about 244 tonnes, providing structural support to prices. The other two engines are relatively weaker: high gold prices are squeezing jewelry demand, with Q2 demand only around 278 tonnes. And the scale of tech gold is smaller—while AI hardware may bring incremental demand, it’s not enough to take the lead in determining gold prices. So the key near-term conflict for gold is clear: geopolitical and monetary-credit support underpin safe-haven demand, while the high price level and real interest rates limit valuation upside. First, look for $4,450–$4,500 above. If CPI comes in hot and lifts the dollar and U.S. Treasury yields, $4,300 may face renewed tests. On-chain gold enables 24/7 trading and entry into DeFi, but the token represents a custodial claim rather than naturally equivalent ownership of physical metal—you still need to examine the issuer, reserve audits, and redemption capability. Do you think gold’s next breakout above $4,500 will be driven by central banks continuing to buy, or will ETF inflows accelerate again? #金价升破4400美元创两月高位
This morning’s market update: Brent crude oil is edging toward $89, while BTC holds around $63,000, waiting for CPI pricing! This morning’s market direction is: Brent crude rose 1.4% to $88.91, S&P 500 fell 0.32% and the Nasdaq fell 0.60%; Alphabet dropped 3.8% and Amazon fell 2.1%, while the energy sector climbed 1.1% against the trend. Money hasn’t fully pulled out; instead, ahead of the U.S. CPI release, it rotated from overvalued tech stocks into energy and defensive assets. The Asian session continued this divergence: the Nikkei is near flat, with energy and financials rising and electronics under pressure. Falling U.S. Treasury yields also failed to meaningfully lift tech stocks, suggesting the market is more worried that oil prices may feed back into inflation. $BTC is currently about $63,780, down 0.4% over 24 hours; $ETH is about $1,884, up slightly 0.4%. ETH has been relatively resilient, but both trade volumes are moving down in tandem—more like waiting for data rather than new inflows. If tonight’s CPI cools and oil prices pull back, risk assets may have room to recover; if inflation stays high, BTC’s $63,200 low may face renewed pressure. Do you think BTC will break below $63,000 this time, or continue to trade sideways between $63,000 and $65,000?#美国7月CPI与PPI数据本周出炉
I’d always heard: “Diamonds are forever, one diamond lasts forever.” Until I saw that this diamond has already been conquered by technology—the massive diamond growth farms, and artificially cultivated diamond quality is even better than natural diamonds. Just 1 carat for 1,000 yuan Mao Coins—literally wiping out the multi-billion-dollar diamond market that De Beers had monopolized. Sometimes, you suddenly realize that everything seems like a game... it’s all fake! Would you buy a diamond like this? $BNB
700,000 yuan in stock trading savings wiped out—what’s most dangerous isn’t the first drop! Actor Zhu Rui recently shared that she initially put more than 400,000 yuan into the stock market. After her account kept losing, because she wouldn’t accept it, she added another more than 300,000 yuan. In the end, about 700,000 yuan in savings was completely lost, and during her unemployment period she still needed support from her mother. Zhu Rui was born in 1987 and graduated from the Beijing Film Academy’s Acting Department. Her debut work was <em>Yong Chun</em>. After that, she also worked with actors such as Nicholas Tse and Sammo Hung. <em>The Glorious Era of the Wife</em>, which aired in 2009, made her better known to more viewers. At the time, when she was in her early twenties, Zhu Rui played a rural woman, Pan Fenghuang. She portrayed the character’s shrewdness, fierceness, and lived-in “street savvy” so naturally that many viewers at the time even thought she was an ordinary non-professional actress. She used nearly 20 years to accumulate her principal, but she may lose most of her options in just one stretch of a market downturn. The truly cruel part of the market is that it won’t hold back on anyone just because the principal was hard-earned. If your account keeps losing, at what stage would you stop adding to your position and re-check the logic behind your original investment? $GOOGL.US $AAPL.US $NVDAB #股票
$DOS Seven-day surge of 388% — the valuation is already ahead of the product! I looked into DappOS’s latest market cycle. The price is about $0.489, up 33.7% in 24 hours, with a circulating market cap of about $97.95 million. But only 20% of the tokens are circulating; assuming a total supply of 1 billion coins, the FDV is already close to $489 million. This valuation is about 63% higher than DappOS’s $300 million valuation when it completed financing in 2024. The project isn’t vaporware: it’s building an intent execution network, letting users use assets across chains through a unified account. Behind it are institutions such as Polychain, Binance Labs, Sequoia China, and IDG. The conflicts on the order book are even more obvious: contract trades are about $62.39 million, while spot is only $7.43 million — 8.4 times higher for the former. The increase is mainly driven by derivatives trading; spot buy-side demand hasn’t expanded in sync yet. Current open positions are only $2.44 million, suggesting funds are rotating quickly. Whether this can sustain still needs observation. In the short term, $0.50 is the sentiment level. Only if volume expands and it holds above it — with spot trading also increasing — can it be considered that buyers are willing to support the current valuation. If it falls back below $0.45, it may retest the $0.425–$0.39 range. The longer-term question is how the remaining 80% of supply will be unlocked, and whether DOS can evolve from governance and staking tooling into an asset that truly captures protocol revenue. Have you sold all the DOS from your airdrop? #空投大毛