密智君 Crypto Plus AI

Explosive: Stephen Chow transforms into a “Soccer Kid” to promote “Kung Fu Women’s Football” with a big splash. Zhang Baizhi generously supports—bookings for 18 screenings to stand firmly behind it!
Stephen Chow’s directed new film “Kung Fu Women’s Football” has announced that it will be released in mainland China on the 11th, and it also revealed the complete cast lineup. The starring cast includes Golden Rooster Best Actress winner Zhang Xiafei, Dilraba, and Zhang Yixing. The special appearances feature a star-studded lineup such as Zhao Liying, Sun Zi Qi, Japan’s heartthrob Sato Takeru, Cecilia Cheung, Tsai Si-Bei, Cheung Kai-chung, Wu Yang, Jimmy O. Yang (Yang Wancheng), and more. In addition, former Chinese women’s national team players Zhao Lina and Sun Zi Qi, as well as Japan’s well-known dance troupe Avantgarde, have joined—an extravagantly impressive lineup that has left many viewers pleasantly surprised.
With less than a week to go before release, promotion has naturally entered a sprint phase. As both director and screenwriter, Stephen Chow also personally took the stage this time. On his official account, he shared a promotional video in which he appears as “Soccer Kid.” In the video, he stands in front of a green screen preparing to shoot and can’t help but show off his skills. After skillfully controlling the ball, he fires a powerful shot— the football first hits the underside of the crossbar and then bounces into the goal. Even the staff member acting as the goalkeeper was startled by the speed and force of the ball, completely unable to react in time.
After the video was released, it quickly garnered a large number of likes from netizens. Many commented: “Old Stephen Chow’s blade is still sharp!” and “His ball skills are still so impressive!”
In the film’s poster, a female lead shows her prowess. A massive soccer ball is surrounded by raging flames. The poster also features a striking slogan:
“Let the fire in my heart never go out.”
Full of blood-pumping energy and passion overall, it makes people even more eager for the official release of “Kung Fu Women’s Football.” $AAPL.US #世界杯

Whoa: How to easily make $1,000,000? You just need to
• Borrow $1,000,000 at an interest rate of 3%
• Buy at a price of $60,000
$BTC
• Wait 2 years
• Sell at a price higher than $120,000
• Repay the loan, keeping $1,000,000

Why doesn’t anyone do this?$BTC

Incredible—Cook already held Bitcoin in 2021, and Apple’s CEO has quietly been part of the crypto crowd
He said at the time, “I’m very interested in Bitcoin,” and that he held it in his personal capacity—not as an Apple-company allocation. He even added this: he believes that holding cryptocurrencies is a reasonable choice to diversify one’s personal investment portfolio, but he doesn’t think Apple should put Bitcoin on its balance sheet.
Given the context of 2021, this stance was very restrained—and very smart.
Buy personally, not for the company. One sentence cleanly separates his own risk from the company’s: he doesn’t miss out on the asset, yet he doesn’t have to take on the pressure from Apple shareholders.
Looking back now, holding it from 2021 until today—no matter where he bought in—most likely is still a net gain. But what’s even more worth thinking about is this: the CEO of the world’s highest market-cap company, at a time when Bitcoin was still widely questioned by mainstream media, had already quietly allocated it at the personal level.
The actions of people like this always come earlier than what they say.
Back then, when Cook allocated, so did Trump; BlackRock entered, and Charles Schwab enabled spot trading. Tie this timeline together—the sequence isn’t a coincidence. It’s a complete path for a new asset class to be gradually accepted by top-tier capital.
In 2021, did you allocate to Bitcoin, or were you still waiting for “a more certain signal”? $AAPL.US #SEC将提议加密新规

Oh wow, this person mined 900,000 Bitcoins in 2009, and then they disappeared from the internet!
No interviews, no podcasts, no “gm,” no selling courses, no community, no storytelling. They just vanished, leaving behind a string of legendary addresses and an identity whose real name nobody can trace.
900,000 coins—at today’s prices, that’s around $54 billion.
So, do you think this person is Satoshi Nakamoto? (No one can confirm that Satoshi is definitely a man)$BTC

Too ruthless. JPMorgan goes bearish on chips, Burry calls for a 30% pullback, BlackRock bets on blue-collar workers, Cramer flips and tells people to buy Micron, ANSEM surged to 390 million in three days, and Tom Lee remains firmly convinced of the value of $ETH up to $100,000!
JPMorgan has released an official bearish report. The reason is that AWS, Google, Meta, and Microsoft are all developing their own AI chips, so long-term reliance on Nvidia will decline. It takes 3 to 5 years from in-house development to mass production, and the short-term moat still exists.
At the same time, Burry is calling for a 30% pullback. The CAPE ratio is 67.6x, which is 4.6 standard deviations above the trend line. The last time it reached here was in 1999. Burry was right about 2008, but he acted nearly two years earlier than the actual crash.
BlackRock’s move is the one worth noting separately: they invested $100 million to partner with Walmart, Home Depot, Google, and Meta to train 50,000 electricians, welders, and plumbers—intended for future AI data centers and power infrastructure building worth $1 trillion over the next decade. In the AI era, the most scarce jobs may not be engineers—it might be the people who can connect circuits.
Cramer calls Micron: gross margin is 85%, and the P/E is under 8x, making it a good value play. MU’s data is real—the complication is that Cramer’s historical track record of recommendations makes the message harder to use directly. How to judge this information yourself is the question.
Finally, ANSEM spiked to a new high market cap of 391 million, with 100,000+ holders and 6 addresses sitting on gains of over one million. After a 600x surge in three days, it continues to hit new highs. In a bear market with such poor liquidity, reaching this size—what structure is behind it, nobody has clarified.
At the peak of Trump coin, the number of holders exceeded a million and they were down $3.8 billion, while Trump made $600 million.
Which direction are you most focused on this week—chips, the US stock market, or on-chain? $MU.US

Someone has provided a complete BTC roadmap for 2026: top out in July around 68K, break below 50K in August, form a bottom around late September at 45K, and target 90K in December
The logic is: capitulate first, then reverse. In July, resistance near 68K kicks off the sell-off. In August, 58K is lost and it falls below 50K. In late September, a bottom forms near 45K and accumulation begins. Then October rebounds. In November, it steps up in a staircase-like way from the 50K range to 77K. And in December, the target is 90K with a consolidation that effectively closes out the year.
The core assumption of the whole path is: before the market finds the real bottom, it has to go through one final capitulation. Without capitulation, there is no solid foundation for a healthy reversal.
This framework has internal logic—every bear-market bottom is indeed accompanied by extreme panic and shrinking trading volume. It’s not a slow grind lower; it’s a collapse in emotions after a sharp drop. The problem is that nobody can accurately predict the timing and depth of the “capitulation.” 45K is an inference, not a guarantee.
From the current price to 45K means another decline of roughly 25%. From 45K to 90K in December means doubling. This kind of move is not unusual in BTC history, but over the 3–4 months of holding, most people near the lowest point tend to choose to exit rather than add positions.
Knowing the script and executing the script are two different things.
In the next 3–4 months, if it really plays out along this line, at what price would you start building a position? $BTC

Unbelievable—In 2015, someone offered to buy a house with 50,000 BTC. The seller refused. Today, those BTC are worth $3 billion.
Back then, buying a house for $13 million, the seller thought Bitcoin wasn’t “real money,” wouldn’t accept it, and the deal fell through.
If those 50,000 BTC were held all the way until today, they’d be worth $3 billion. A house exchanged for $3 billion—this contrast is so extreme it’s hard to even laugh about.
But there’s one more layer that many people skip over: the seller who refused the deal in 2015 made a completely rational decision. In 2015, Bitcoin’s average price was $260, with massive volatility. It had just gone through the 2013-to-2014 collapse, falling from $1,000 back to $200. Mainstream media was saying “it’s going to zero” every few months. Trading a real-world property for a bunch of “network tokens”—would you dare take that?
The one who refused wasn’t stupid; they just didn’t know the future.
“Invest with a long-term perspective” is correct—but the premise for holding long-term is that you don’t sell when it’s the most uncomfortable. The 50,000 BTC fell from $13 million to less than $2 million at one point. Whether anyone managed to hold through that—that’s the real test.
If you trace the outcome backward, every decision looks either foolish or brilliant. When looking forward, no one knows the answer.
Do you have a trade in your hands right now that was a “rational refusal” back then—but you regret it now? $BTC #比特币较10月高点跌超50%

Unbelievable—Taylor Swift’s once-in-a-century wedding booked out Madison Square Garden for the ceremony. The venue rental fee was $3 million, and on top of that, she donated $26 million to multiple New York organizations for charity. Just these two items alone put the wedding at over $30 million.
Streets were closed for three days, and New York’s mayor personally confirmed it. A guest list of 1,000 people was fully signed with NDAs.
On July 3, at MSG, 500 to 1,000 guests attended a black-tie evening. The streets were closed from July 2 until July 4 at noon. Page Six reported that the two had already privately completed the formal ceremony; they got married in Nashville, while MSG was reserved for the public celebration.
Taylor personally called each friend with a verbal invitation and then mailed out save-the-dates. All vendors, guests, and security personnel signed NDAs—phones and cameras were banned from entry. Even New York Mayor Mamdani accidentally let slip in a press conference: "The World Cup, America’s 250th anniversary celebration, and Taylor Swift’s wedding all happening at the same time—we’re excited."
Confirmed attendees include Ed Sheeran, Selena Gomez, the Haim sisters, Emma Stone, Gigi Hadid, Zoe Kravitz, and the couple Patrick Mahomes and his wife. Tim McGraw might perform on-site—he’s the star of that eponymous song that first put 16-year-old Taylor on the map.
Do you think, after 18 years, finally singing that ‘Love Story’—is this the best time in her life to do it? $AAPL.US #TaylorSwift

Grass, turning from $12 million to $100 million: someone precisely bought put options before the regulatory announcement was released, and the SEC has already launched an investigation!
On May 22, 2026, China announced a crackdown on cross-border broker regulation, and the share prices of Futu Holdings and Tiger Brokers plunged. Before the announcement was published, someone bought about 200,000 short-term put options for the two companies, paying $12 million in option premiums; after the announcement came out, they cashed out for more than $100 million.
Market maker Susquehanna was the counterparty in the trade and lost over $70 million, after which it filed a lawsuit. The SEC received the complaint and has started an investigation.
The options trade itself is not illegal, but the timing was far too precise. Short-term put options mean the position holder needs the price to drop within an extremely short window to profit—this is not hedging, but betting on a specific drop event. They built the position days before the regulatory announcement, then cashed out as soon as the announcement came out. That is the core question of where the information for this operation came from.
$12 million becoming $100 million—more than 8x—from a single trade. As a market maker, Susquehanna was passively on the hook as the counterparty, losing $70 million. That’s why they’re suing—when the loss is big enough, it’s worth going to court to identify who did it.
The core of the SEC’s investigation into insider trading is tracing the flow of funds and communications. Options accounts are实名-registered, transaction timestamps are recorded; if information was leaked, digital evidence is far harder to destroy than evidence from stock trades. $GOOGL.US

Unbelievable—when BTC breaks below the 200-week moving average, there have been two prior instances at this level. In both cases, were they the last bottom-buying windows?
In March 2020, during the COVID crash, the price broke below the 200-week moving average—around $3,000. In the bottom of the 2022 bear market, it broke again—around $15,000. Now it’s the third time: the price is $59,052, with the red line pressing down.
The 200-week moving average is the thickest support line in BTC history. It represents the average cost range of holders over nearly four years. When the price falls to this level, it means that most holders who have held for more than two years begin to be in losses. That’s when the pressure from panic selling is at its highest—and it’s also when the chips are the cheapest.
When the market broke below this line the first two times, the sentiment was exactly the same as it is now: confidence is low, most people are afraid to buy, and the media is discussing the possibility of it going to zero. Then both times, this level marked the start of the biggest sustained rally.
There are only two historical samples, so the statistical significance is limited. The third time may not necessarily repeat the pattern; the 200-week moving average could also be broken through and then continue to fall. After the 2022 breakdown, it still took nearly half a year to stabilize for real.
The buyers now and the sellers now have reached completely opposite conclusions.
Do you think this 200-week moving average will hold, or will it fall to 38,000 as some people predict?$BTC #比特币6月下跌20.5%至58526美元