TVBee
EXCEL/Python数据分析|区块链项目/Defi模型研究|16年硕士财经论文|伪程序员|无收费群|比特币死忠粉|币圈趋势交易|推特：@blockTVBee
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
6.7 Years
183 Following
8.1K+ Followers
6.5K+ Liked
718 Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
PINNED
Interpreting Binance's 2025 Annual Report: A Hidden Evolution of Symbiosis
Binance has just released its 2025 annual summary, from which we can see that Binance is transitioning from the symbiotic relationship between "platform & users" to a broader, more comprehensive symbiosis.
┈┈➤"Platform & Users" Symbiosis
╰┈✦ Value Symbiosis and Flywheel
First of all, as a trading platform, the most essential aspect is trading volume. Users' total trading volume on Binance in 2025 reached 34 trillion US dollars.
The massive trading volume and growth in trading activity are not only a source of Binance's revenue and a foundation for stable operations, but also ensure deep market liquidity for users. This guarantees a high-quality trading experience for users and serves as proof of that experience. It is precisely because of the excellent trading experience that a large number of users are attracted.
┈┈➤"Platform & Users" Symbiosis
╰┈✦ Value Symbiosis and Flywheel
First of all, as a trading platform, the most essential aspect is trading volume. Users' total trading volume on Binance in 2025 reached 34 trillion US dollars.
The massive trading volume and growth in trading activity are not only a source of Binance's revenue and a foundation for stable operations, but also ensure deep market liquidity for users. This guarantees a high-quality trading experience for users and serves as proof of that experience. It is precisely because of the excellent trading experience that a large number of users are attracted.
The title isn't good; what I mean is not a short-term pullback, but that gold may be close to reaching its peak in the medium term. (Because gold is ultimately upward in the long term, it is referred to as a pullback)
Note that it may be close to the peak, and there might be a bit of upward strength in the short term. Short selling is not recommended.
Note that it may be close to the peak, and there might be a bit of upward strength in the short term. Short selling is not recommended.
TVBee
·
--
Pay attention to the risk of gold pullbacks!
┈┈➤Technical indicators show that gold is overbought
Although it is said that the technical aspect of gold as an asset may very well fail.
However, the monthly RSI is 95.6, weekly RSI is 82.8, and daily RSI is 88.5, all indicating overbought conditions, with the monthly level of overbought possibly being the highest in 55 years.
┈┈➤Remarkable historical similarities
First, comparing historical data on a logarithmic scale, the current situation bears some resemblance to 1979, before Reagan took office.
Second, during that time, the U.S. economy faced stagflation, and currently, CPI is relatively high.
Third, there was the Iran hostage crisis (after the Islamic Revolution broke out, the pro-American Shah Pahlavi was overthrown and went into exile, Iranian students stormed the U.S. embassy and took diplomatic personnel hostage, demanding the U.S. hand over Pahlavi).
Now, there is internal turmoil in Iran, with the U.S. applying military pressure on Iran, and the possibility of firing cannot be ruled out.
Fourth, many of Trump's actions, including the MAGA slogan, bear some similarities to Reagan's when he took office in 1980.
┈┈➤Final thoughts
By comparing technical indicators with historical events, it is possible that as the U.S.-Iran situation escalates, gold will continue to rise.
However, most of Trump's actions this year have been quick decisions, and there is a fear that the U.S.-Iran situation could suddenly reverse (for example, if Iran suddenly gives up resistance). After the conflict subsides, be cautious of a gold pullback.
From January to September 1980, gold rebounded after a decline, and then from September 1980 to June 1982, it fell continuously for nearly two years. It wasn't until 2007-2008 that it returned to the previous high.
In the short term, going short is not recommended, as the U.S. government may enter a short-term shutdown on January 31, and the U.S.-Iran situation has not yet calmed down.
But be cautious about chasing the rise! It's not that buying is off the table, but it is advised to be highly sensitive and closely monitor the U.S.-Iran events.
(Note that Chart 1 is on a logarithmic scale, and Chart 2 on a linear scale, where the monthly upward trend of gold somewhat resembles the peak of the bull market.)
┈┈➤Technical indicators show that gold is overbought
Although it is said that the technical aspect of gold as an asset may very well fail.
However, the monthly RSI is 95.6, weekly RSI is 82.8, and daily RSI is 88.5, all indicating overbought conditions, with the monthly level of overbought possibly being the highest in 55 years.
┈┈➤Remarkable historical similarities
First, comparing historical data on a logarithmic scale, the current situation bears some resemblance to 1979, before Reagan took office.
Second, during that time, the U.S. economy faced stagflation, and currently, CPI is relatively high.
Third, there was the Iran hostage crisis (after the Islamic Revolution broke out, the pro-American Shah Pahlavi was overthrown and went into exile, Iranian students stormed the U.S. embassy and took diplomatic personnel hostage, demanding the U.S. hand over Pahlavi).
Now, there is internal turmoil in Iran, with the U.S. applying military pressure on Iran, and the possibility of firing cannot be ruled out.
Fourth, many of Trump's actions, including the MAGA slogan, bear some similarities to Reagan's when he took office in 1980.
┈┈➤Final thoughts
By comparing technical indicators with historical events, it is possible that as the U.S.-Iran situation escalates, gold will continue to rise.
However, most of Trump's actions this year have been quick decisions, and there is a fear that the U.S.-Iran situation could suddenly reverse (for example, if Iran suddenly gives up resistance). After the conflict subsides, be cautious of a gold pullback.
From January to September 1980, gold rebounded after a decline, and then from September 1980 to June 1982, it fell continuously for nearly two years. It wasn't until 2007-2008 that it returned to the previous high.
In the short term, going short is not recommended, as the U.S. government may enter a short-term shutdown on January 31, and the U.S.-Iran situation has not yet calmed down.
But be cautious about chasing the rise! It's not that buying is off the table, but it is advised to be highly sensitive and closely monitor the U.S.-Iran events.
(Note that Chart 1 is on a logarithmic scale, and Chart 2 on a linear scale, where the monthly upward trend of gold somewhat resembles the peak of the bull market.)
Pay attention to the risk of gold pullbacks!
┈┈➤Technical indicators show that gold is overbought
Although it is said that the technical aspect of gold as an asset may very well fail.
However, the monthly RSI is 95.6, weekly RSI is 82.8, and daily RSI is 88.5, all indicating overbought conditions, with the monthly level of overbought possibly being the highest in 55 years.
┈┈➤Remarkable historical similarities
First, comparing historical data on a logarithmic scale, the current situation bears some resemblance to 1979, before Reagan took office.
Second, during that time, the U.S. economy faced stagflation, and currently, CPI is relatively high.
Third, there was the Iran hostage crisis (after the Islamic Revolution broke out, the pro-American Shah Pahlavi was overthrown and went into exile, Iranian students stormed the U.S. embassy and took diplomatic personnel hostage, demanding the U.S. hand over Pahlavi).
Now, there is internal turmoil in Iran, with the U.S. applying military pressure on Iran, and the possibility of firing cannot be ruled out.
Fourth, many of Trump's actions, including the MAGA slogan, bear some similarities to Reagan's when he took office in 1980.
┈┈➤Final thoughts
By comparing technical indicators with historical events, it is possible that as the U.S.-Iran situation escalates, gold will continue to rise.
However, most of Trump's actions this year have been quick decisions, and there is a fear that the U.S.-Iran situation could suddenly reverse (for example, if Iran suddenly gives up resistance). After the conflict subsides, be cautious of a gold pullback.
From January to September 1980, gold rebounded after a decline, and then from September 1980 to June 1982, it fell continuously for nearly two years. It wasn't until 2007-2008 that it returned to the previous high.
In the short term, going short is not recommended, as the U.S. government may enter a short-term shutdown on January 31, and the U.S.-Iran situation has not yet calmed down.
But be cautious about chasing the rise! It's not that buying is off the table, but it is advised to be highly sensitive and closely monitor the U.S.-Iran events.
(Note that Chart 1 is on a logarithmic scale, and Chart 2 on a linear scale, where the monthly upward trend of gold somewhat resembles the peak of the bull market.)
┈┈➤Technical indicators show that gold is overbought
Although it is said that the technical aspect of gold as an asset may very well fail.
However, the monthly RSI is 95.6, weekly RSI is 82.8, and daily RSI is 88.5, all indicating overbought conditions, with the monthly level of overbought possibly being the highest in 55 years.
┈┈➤Remarkable historical similarities
First, comparing historical data on a logarithmic scale, the current situation bears some resemblance to 1979, before Reagan took office.
Second, during that time, the U.S. economy faced stagflation, and currently, CPI is relatively high.
Third, there was the Iran hostage crisis (after the Islamic Revolution broke out, the pro-American Shah Pahlavi was overthrown and went into exile, Iranian students stormed the U.S. embassy and took diplomatic personnel hostage, demanding the U.S. hand over Pahlavi).
Now, there is internal turmoil in Iran, with the U.S. applying military pressure on Iran, and the possibility of firing cannot be ruled out.
Fourth, many of Trump's actions, including the MAGA slogan, bear some similarities to Reagan's when he took office in 1980.
┈┈➤Final thoughts
By comparing technical indicators with historical events, it is possible that as the U.S.-Iran situation escalates, gold will continue to rise.
However, most of Trump's actions this year have been quick decisions, and there is a fear that the U.S.-Iran situation could suddenly reverse (for example, if Iran suddenly gives up resistance). After the conflict subsides, be cautious of a gold pullback.
From January to September 1980, gold rebounded after a decline, and then from September 1980 to June 1982, it fell continuously for nearly two years. It wasn't until 2007-2008 that it returned to the previous high.
In the short term, going short is not recommended, as the U.S. government may enter a short-term shutdown on January 31, and the U.S.-Iran situation has not yet calmed down.
But be cautious about chasing the rise! It's not that buying is off the table, but it is advised to be highly sensitive and closely monitor the U.S.-Iran events.
(Note that Chart 1 is on a logarithmic scale, and Chart 2 on a linear scale, where the monthly upward trend of gold somewhat resembles the peak of the bull market.)
Why is such a noble thing as playing MEME called "Hitting the Dog"?
Meat bun hitting the dog - there is no return.
So unlucky.
😂
Meat bun hitting the dog - there is no return.
So unlucky.
😂
This should be good news!
Consumer confidence in the United States fell again in January!
After three consecutive interest rate cuts in Q4 of last year, consumer confidence in January has significantly declined and is clearly below expectations.
It appears that the CPI for January is unlikely to rise, and may even fall. The CPI for January will be released on February 11, and it may be favorable at that time.
Unemployment + the CPI not rebounding after interest rate cuts, and potentially falling, reduces the resistance for the Federal Reserve to cut rates further.
Of course, it is impossible to cut rates in January, and the probability of a rate cut in March or April is low, but there is still some hope.
Consumer confidence in the United States fell again in January!
After three consecutive interest rate cuts in Q4 of last year, consumer confidence in January has significantly declined and is clearly below expectations.
It appears that the CPI for January is unlikely to rise, and may even fall. The CPI for January will be released on February 11, and it may be favorable at that time.
Unemployment + the CPI not rebounding after interest rate cuts, and potentially falling, reduces the resistance for the Federal Reserve to cut rates further.
Of course, it is impossible to cut rates in January, and the probability of a rate cut in March or April is low, but there is still some hope.
The naming expert is back—let's give WLFI a Chinese name
After naming DBR "Northeast Person" and ZAMA "Zama", Brother Bee is now extending his "claws" to Trump!
The name $WLFI is hard to remember in the Chinese-speaking region.
Brother Bee splits these four letters into two parts, taking the first two letters WL from the pinyin of the word "future". WeiLai.
FI remains, just like the "FI" in deFI, gameFi, and rawFI.
Therefore, we can refer to WLFI as "Future FI" or "Future Finance". Very straightforward:
Web3 finance, @worldlibertyfi is a form of finance belonging to the future!
@realDonaldTrump, do you like this Chinese name for WLFI?
Unfortunately, Trump does not have Binance Square!
After naming DBR "Northeast Person" and ZAMA "Zama", Brother Bee is now extending his "claws" to Trump!
The name $WLFI is hard to remember in the Chinese-speaking region.
Brother Bee splits these four letters into two parts, taking the first two letters WL from the pinyin of the word "future". WeiLai.
FI remains, just like the "FI" in deFI, gameFi, and rawFI.
Therefore, we can refer to WLFI as "Future FI" or "Future Finance". Very straightforward:
Web3 finance, @worldlibertyfi is a form of finance belonging to the future!
@realDonaldTrump, do you like this Chinese name for WLFI?
Unfortunately, Trump does not have Binance Square!
Brothers, don't be too greedy!
You can't hope for BTC to be a safe haven like gold on one hand,
and on the other hand hope for a BTC bull market!
As long as the so-called four-year cycle hasn't completely disappeared, the speculative nature of BTC will persist, meaning BTC is a risk asset. What are you even talking about regarding safe havens?
When have you ever heard of terms like bull market or bear market for gold?!
Only when the so-called BTC bull and bear cycles are no longer mentioned can BTC return to its function as digital gold and a safe haven!
You can't hope for BTC to be a safe haven like gold on one hand,
and on the other hand hope for a BTC bull market!
As long as the so-called four-year cycle hasn't completely disappeared, the speculative nature of BTC will persist, meaning BTC is a risk asset. What are you even talking about regarding safe havens?
When have you ever heard of terms like bull market or bear market for gold?!
Only when the so-called BTC bull and bear cycles are no longer mentioned can BTC return to its function as digital gold and a safe haven!
Gambling that the U.S. government will not shut down again on January 31.
$60 small gamble for pleasure.
$60 small gamble for pleasure.
【Must Watch】Regarding Binance's "Hold USD1 to Earn WLFI" event, several in-depth logics that cannot be ignored.
┈┈➤ The trend of WLFI
The reward is in USD terms, worth 40 million dollars of #WLFI.
This means that the higher the price of WLFI, the fewer WLFI tokens will be distributed, and the subsequent selling pressure on WLFI will also be less.
Therefore, if we follow normal logic, the next increase in WLFI, especially before the distribution of rewards, is more beneficial for the WLFI project team and market makers.
┈┈➤ The increase in USD1
Regarding the recent increase in USD1, it is actually to meet the needs of this event.
According to Binance's storage proof, on January 1st, Binance had a total of 2.506B #USD1.
According to the on-chain data read by defillama, Binance had a total of 3.571B USD1.
The reward is in USD terms, worth 40 million dollars of #WLFI.
This means that the higher the price of WLFI, the fewer WLFI tokens will be distributed, and the subsequent selling pressure on WLFI will also be less.
Therefore, if we follow normal logic, the next increase in WLFI, especially before the distribution of rewards, is more beneficial for the WLFI project team and market makers.
┈┈➤ The increase in USD1
Regarding the recent increase in USD1, it is actually to meet the needs of this event.
According to Binance's storage proof, on January 1st, Binance had a total of 2.506B #USD1.
According to the on-chain data read by defillama, Binance had a total of 3.571B USD1.
CZ's Davos Moment: The Global Mainstreaming of the Crypto Industry
┈┈➤What is the significance of CZ attending Davos?
In January 2026, CZ officially attended the Davos WEF (World Economic Forum) and gave a wonderful speech.
The name of the Davos Forum is well-known, but its status may not be familiar to every friend.
The Davos Forum is recognized as the highest-level unofficial economic coordination platform in the world, bringing together political leaders, central bank governors, and business leaders every year to jointly assess and set the global economic agenda.
On January 22, 2026, @cz_binance officially attended the New Era for Finance sub-forum in the official agenda of the World Economic Forum (WEF). The New Era for Finance is one of the official agendas in the main venue of Davos.
In January 2026, CZ officially attended the Davos WEF (World Economic Forum) and gave a wonderful speech.
The name of the Davos Forum is well-known, but its status may not be familiar to every friend.
The Davos Forum is recognized as the highest-level unofficial economic coordination platform in the world, bringing together political leaders, central bank governors, and business leaders every year to jointly assess and set the global economic agenda.
On January 22, 2026, @cz_binance officially attended the New Era for Finance sub-forum in the official agenda of the World Economic Forum (WEF). The New Era for Finance is one of the official agendas in the main venue of Davos.
Does interest-bearing stablecoins threaten commercial bank deposit operations?
The stablecoin-related content of the CLARITY draft has faced strong opposition from commercial banks. They believe that interest-bearing stablecoin products will impact the deposit business of commercial banks.
By comparing the interest rates of interest-bearing stablecoins based on U.S. Treasury bonds with the deposit rates of commercial banks, we can indeed find that the threat of stablecoins to the deposit business of commercial banks exists.
The interest-bearing stablecoins based on U.S. Treasury bonds mainly include Ondo's USDY, Usual's USD0, OpenEden's USDO, and Mountain's USDM (there is another project that issues a stablecoin also called USDM, but that USDM is not primarily backed by U.S. Treasury bonds).
Annualized yields range from 3.45% to 4%.
However, according to a survey by Bankrate, as of January 17, 2026, the national average annual interest rate for savings accounts is 0.62%. The best high-yield savings accounts have an annual interest rate of about 4%.
3.45%~4% vs 0.62%~4%
It can be seen that the concern about the threat of interest-bearing stablecoins to the deposit business of commercial banks is not groundless.
The stablecoin-related content of the CLARITY draft has faced strong opposition from commercial banks. They believe that interest-bearing stablecoin products will impact the deposit business of commercial banks.
By comparing the interest rates of interest-bearing stablecoins based on U.S. Treasury bonds with the deposit rates of commercial banks, we can indeed find that the threat of stablecoins to the deposit business of commercial banks exists.
The interest-bearing stablecoins based on U.S. Treasury bonds mainly include Ondo's USDY, Usual's USD0, OpenEden's USDO, and Mountain's USDM (there is another project that issues a stablecoin also called USDM, but that USDM is not primarily backed by U.S. Treasury bonds).
Annualized yields range from 3.45% to 4%.
However, according to a survey by Bankrate, as of January 17, 2026, the national average annual interest rate for savings accounts is 0.62%. The best high-yield savings accounts have an annual interest rate of about 4%.
3.45%~4% vs 0.62%~4%
It can be seen that the concern about the threat of interest-bearing stablecoins to the deposit business of commercial banks is not groundless.
This round is incredibly difficult!
2022, worrying about the bear market.
2023, worrying about missing out on inscriptions.
2024, worrying about missing out on MEME.
In the first half of 2025, worrying about Trump's tariffs.
In the second half of 2025, worrying about the lack of a knockoff season.
By the end of 2025, worrying that the dollar exchange rate has fallen and assets have shrunk.
By early 2026, worrying again about CSR and capital outflow.
What a word of worry it is!
2022, worrying about the bear market.
2023, worrying about missing out on inscriptions.
2024, worrying about missing out on MEME.
In the first half of 2025, worrying about Trump's tariffs.
In the second half of 2025, worrying about the lack of a knockoff season.
By the end of 2025, worrying that the dollar exchange rate has fallen and assets have shrunk.
By early 2026, worrying again about CSR and capital outflow.
What a word of worry it is!
The impact of the US and Europe is starting to ease! But don't celebrate too early yet.
As Brother Bee analyzed before, both sides have started negotiating.
In fact, Trump never really thought about buying Greenland; Denmark would never agree, and Europe is not to be trifled with; he has known this all along.
Trump tends to hide his true motives behind an exaggerated statement, just like the claim of a 100% tariff on China.
This thunder can probably be temporarily ruled out. It is likely that the talks won't fall apart because what Trump wants is the rare earth mining in Greenland, not a war with the other side.
Additionally, there's one point that might need some attention, which is the military significance of Greenland.
The shortest path for Russia to launch missiles to the US (great circle route) just happens to pass through Greenland.
So if Russia launches missiles to attack the US, they can intercept the missiles in Greenland. Therefore, the US might want more permissions in Greenland, which could possibly lead to some controversy.
The value distribution of purely rare earths is estimated not to have too much disagreement.
As Brother Bee analyzed before, both sides have started negotiating.
In fact, Trump never really thought about buying Greenland; Denmark would never agree, and Europe is not to be trifled with; he has known this all along.
Trump tends to hide his true motives behind an exaggerated statement, just like the claim of a 100% tariff on China.
This thunder can probably be temporarily ruled out. It is likely that the talks won't fall apart because what Trump wants is the rare earth mining in Greenland, not a war with the other side.
Additionally, there's one point that might need some attention, which is the military significance of Greenland.
The shortest path for Russia to launch missiles to the US (great circle route) just happens to pass through Greenland.
So if Russia launches missiles to attack the US, they can intercept the missiles in Greenland. Therefore, the US might want more permissions in Greenland, which could possibly lead to some controversy.
The value distribution of purely rare earths is estimated not to have too much disagreement.
TVBee
·
--
It seems that there are still people who do not see the essence of the current US-EU conflict.
┈┈➤ On the surface, it is a trade war, but essentially both sides are playing their cards.
For 25 years, Trump imposed tariffs on China, while tariffs on Mexico were quickly suspended. This indicates that China is Trump's primary target.
The goal of the US imposing tariffs on China is to suppress China and prevent its development; perhaps they feel threatened by China?
However, when the US imposes tariffs on Europe, the goal is not targeting Denmark or Europe. It is just that Trump wants to mine rare earths in Greenland. In fact, the goal of mining rare earths is still to break free from China's constraints on rare earths.
So, the trade war between the US and China is real. But the situation between the US and Europe is not a real trade war; whether it is about tariffs or Denmark selling US bonds, essentially both sides are just playing their cards.
┈┈➤ In the end, there is a high probability that negotiations for rare earth cooperation in Greenland will take place.
Whether it is Denmark or Europe, neither is easy to deal with. We all know this, and Trump cannot be unaware of it. Trump's motive is to have long-term stable mining of rare earths in Greenland, the stronger the control the better.
Denmark's motive is to protect the sovereignty of Greenland.
After both sides have presented their cards, they should ultimately enter into negotiations.
If the US and China can negotiate a real trade war, why not the US and Europe?!
┈┈➤ The risk lies in the duration.
However, it is hard to say how long it will take; prolonged dragging and frequent negative impacts could affect not only cryptocurrencies but also US stocks.
One can only say that Trump hopes for a short duration. From directly taking Maduro to dealing with Iran, combined with the midterm elections he faces in the second half of the year, all of Trump's strategies in 2026 aim for a quick resolution.
However, some things are beyond Trump's control, including the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts and Greenland.
The best case scenario is that Denmark directly offers a way out, and then both sides negotiate and reach a rare earth cooperation. This situation would take a relatively short time.
On the other hand, a worse scenario would be that the US gradually undermines the eight European countries, ultimately forcing Denmark to negotiate and reach a rare earth cooperation. This situation would take a longer time.
┈┈➤ On the surface, it is a trade war, but essentially both sides are playing their cards.
For 25 years, Trump imposed tariffs on China, while tariffs on Mexico were quickly suspended. This indicates that China is Trump's primary target.
The goal of the US imposing tariffs on China is to suppress China and prevent its development; perhaps they feel threatened by China?
However, when the US imposes tariffs on Europe, the goal is not targeting Denmark or Europe. It is just that Trump wants to mine rare earths in Greenland. In fact, the goal of mining rare earths is still to break free from China's constraints on rare earths.
So, the trade war between the US and China is real. But the situation between the US and Europe is not a real trade war; whether it is about tariffs or Denmark selling US bonds, essentially both sides are just playing their cards.
┈┈➤ In the end, there is a high probability that negotiations for rare earth cooperation in Greenland will take place.
Whether it is Denmark or Europe, neither is easy to deal with. We all know this, and Trump cannot be unaware of it. Trump's motive is to have long-term stable mining of rare earths in Greenland, the stronger the control the better.
Denmark's motive is to protect the sovereignty of Greenland.
After both sides have presented their cards, they should ultimately enter into negotiations.
If the US and China can negotiate a real trade war, why not the US and Europe?!
┈┈➤ The risk lies in the duration.
However, it is hard to say how long it will take; prolonged dragging and frequent negative impacts could affect not only cryptocurrencies but also US stocks.
One can only say that Trump hopes for a short duration. From directly taking Maduro to dealing with Iran, combined with the midterm elections he faces in the second half of the year, all of Trump's strategies in 2026 aim for a quick resolution.
However, some things are beyond Trump's control, including the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts and Greenland.
The best case scenario is that Denmark directly offers a way out, and then both sides negotiate and reach a rare earth cooperation. This situation would take a relatively short time.
On the other hand, a worse scenario would be that the US gradually undermines the eight European countries, ultimately forcing Denmark to negotiate and reach a rare earth cooperation. This situation would take a longer time.
It seems that there are still people who do not see the essence of the current US-EU conflict.
┈┈➤ On the surface, it is a trade war, but essentially both sides are playing their cards.
For 25 years, Trump imposed tariffs on China, while tariffs on Mexico were quickly suspended. This indicates that China is Trump's primary target.
The goal of the US imposing tariffs on China is to suppress China and prevent its development; perhaps they feel threatened by China?
However, when the US imposes tariffs on Europe, the goal is not targeting Denmark or Europe. It is just that Trump wants to mine rare earths in Greenland. In fact, the goal of mining rare earths is still to break free from China's constraints on rare earths.
So, the trade war between the US and China is real. But the situation between the US and Europe is not a real trade war; whether it is about tariffs or Denmark selling US bonds, essentially both sides are just playing their cards.
┈┈➤ In the end, there is a high probability that negotiations for rare earth cooperation in Greenland will take place.
Whether it is Denmark or Europe, neither is easy to deal with. We all know this, and Trump cannot be unaware of it. Trump's motive is to have long-term stable mining of rare earths in Greenland, the stronger the control the better.
Denmark's motive is to protect the sovereignty of Greenland.
After both sides have presented their cards, they should ultimately enter into negotiations.
If the US and China can negotiate a real trade war, why not the US and Europe?!
┈┈➤ The risk lies in the duration.
However, it is hard to say how long it will take; prolonged dragging and frequent negative impacts could affect not only cryptocurrencies but also US stocks.
One can only say that Trump hopes for a short duration. From directly taking Maduro to dealing with Iran, combined with the midterm elections he faces in the second half of the year, all of Trump's strategies in 2026 aim for a quick resolution.
However, some things are beyond Trump's control, including the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts and Greenland.
The best case scenario is that Denmark directly offers a way out, and then both sides negotiate and reach a rare earth cooperation. This situation would take a relatively short time.
On the other hand, a worse scenario would be that the US gradually undermines the eight European countries, ultimately forcing Denmark to negotiate and reach a rare earth cooperation. This situation would take a longer time.
┈┈➤ On the surface, it is a trade war, but essentially both sides are playing their cards.
For 25 years, Trump imposed tariffs on China, while tariffs on Mexico were quickly suspended. This indicates that China is Trump's primary target.
The goal of the US imposing tariffs on China is to suppress China and prevent its development; perhaps they feel threatened by China?
However, when the US imposes tariffs on Europe, the goal is not targeting Denmark or Europe. It is just that Trump wants to mine rare earths in Greenland. In fact, the goal of mining rare earths is still to break free from China's constraints on rare earths.
So, the trade war between the US and China is real. But the situation between the US and Europe is not a real trade war; whether it is about tariffs or Denmark selling US bonds, essentially both sides are just playing their cards.
┈┈➤ In the end, there is a high probability that negotiations for rare earth cooperation in Greenland will take place.
Whether it is Denmark or Europe, neither is easy to deal with. We all know this, and Trump cannot be unaware of it. Trump's motive is to have long-term stable mining of rare earths in Greenland, the stronger the control the better.
Denmark's motive is to protect the sovereignty of Greenland.
After both sides have presented their cards, they should ultimately enter into negotiations.
If the US and China can negotiate a real trade war, why not the US and Europe?!
┈┈➤ The risk lies in the duration.
However, it is hard to say how long it will take; prolonged dragging and frequent negative impacts could affect not only cryptocurrencies but also US stocks.
One can only say that Trump hopes for a short duration. From directly taking Maduro to dealing with Iran, combined with the midterm elections he faces in the second half of the year, all of Trump's strategies in 2026 aim for a quick resolution.
However, some things are beyond Trump's control, including the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts and Greenland.
The best case scenario is that Denmark directly offers a way out, and then both sides negotiate and reach a rare earth cooperation. This situation would take a relatively short time.
On the other hand, a worse scenario would be that the US gradually undermines the eight European countries, ultimately forcing Denmark to negotiate and reach a rare earth cooperation. This situation would take a longer time.
TVBee
·
--
Trump announced on Saturday via social media (Truth Social) that tariffs will be imposed on 8 European countries.
It can be said that he cleverly bypassed the opening time of the US stock market; Monday, January 19, is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, and the US stock market will be closed all day.
Therefore, the dialogue between the US and Europe, as well as market sentiment, have a 3-day buffer.
Thus, only cryptocurrency is left to bear the burden alone...
It can be said that he cleverly bypassed the opening time of the US stock market; Monday, January 19, is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, and the US stock market will be closed all day.
Therefore, the dialogue between the US and Europe, as well as market sentiment, have a 3-day buffer.
Thus, only cryptocurrency is left to bear the burden alone...
Vitalik Buterin proposed native DVT (Distributed Validator Technology) at the Ethereum Research Forum, suggesting that DVT be directly incorporated into the Ethereum staking protocol layer.
$SSV increased by 14% in the last 24 hours.
$SSV itself has some early signs of a rounded bottom. After January 20, it clearly saw increased trading volume.
$SSV increased by 14% in the last 24 hours.
$SSV itself has some early signs of a rounded bottom. After January 20, it clearly saw increased trading volume.
What I learned most deeply this round is——do not go against the market.
If the market believes the bull is over, then the bull is over; sell first and talk later, otherwise you will become a victim of the market.
Although AI Agents have technology, the market treats them as MEMEs, so we can only treat them as MEMEs. If we treat them as valuable coins, the outcome will be very tragic.
$NVDA has a large market value but a low price-to-earnings ratio, but the market thinks it is too expensive, so it is too expensive; if you don't believe in the market, being trapped is fate.
……
Truth is held in the hands of a few, but most trajectories in this world do not progress along the path of truth. They may fluctuate around the truth with great amplitude or be far away from the path of truth for a long time.
High emotional intelligence: Never underestimate the power of the mob.
Low emotional intelligence: The consensus of fools is also a consensus——Li Xiaolai.
If the market believes the bull is over, then the bull is over; sell first and talk later, otherwise you will become a victim of the market.
Although AI Agents have technology, the market treats them as MEMEs, so we can only treat them as MEMEs. If we treat them as valuable coins, the outcome will be very tragic.
$NVDA has a large market value but a low price-to-earnings ratio, but the market thinks it is too expensive, so it is too expensive; if you don't believe in the market, being trapped is fate.
……
Truth is held in the hands of a few, but most trajectories in this world do not progress along the path of truth. They may fluctuate around the truth with great amplitude or be far away from the path of truth for a long time.
High emotional intelligence: Never underestimate the power of the mob.
Low emotional intelligence: The consensus of fools is also a consensus——Li Xiaolai.
【End of Text 100U Lottery】 This wave of BSC chain MEME has stood up, and Brother Bee has already started to shift to the BSC chain!
This time I noticed $BIGDON, "Big Don" refers to "Big Donald," which is a nickname for Donald Trump.
"Big Don" has become popular among the young crowd on TikTok and Twitter since the end of last year.
$BIGDON is the first MEME on the BSC chain with MAGA and Trump concepts, don't forget the impact of USD1 on the BSC chain. Currently, the market cap is relatively high, DYOR.
Lottery
① Trade $BIGDON with Binance's non-custodial wallet
CA: 0x71429f2e1e243b451b939a2af2b69fa646064444
② Follow @blockTVBee
③ Reply in the comments with the Binance non-custodial wallet you traded $BIGDON
Draw 10 spots, 10U for each person
24-hour lottery
This time I noticed $BIGDON, "Big Don" refers to "Big Donald," which is a nickname for Donald Trump.
"Big Don" has become popular among the young crowd on TikTok and Twitter since the end of last year.
$BIGDON is the first MEME on the BSC chain with MAGA and Trump concepts, don't forget the impact of USD1 on the BSC chain. Currently, the market cap is relatively high, DYOR.
Lottery
① Trade $BIGDON with Binance's non-custodial wallet
CA: 0x71429f2e1e243b451b939a2af2b69fa646064444
② Follow @blockTVBee
③ Reply in the comments with the Binance non-custodial wallet you traded $BIGDON
Draw 10 spots, 10U for each person
24-hour lottery
Trump announced on Saturday via social media (Truth Social) that tariffs will be imposed on 8 European countries.
It can be said that he cleverly bypassed the opening time of the US stock market; Monday, January 19, is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, and the US stock market will be closed all day.
Therefore, the dialogue between the US and Europe, as well as market sentiment, have a 3-day buffer.
Thus, only cryptocurrency is left to bear the burden alone...
It can be said that he cleverly bypassed the opening time of the US stock market; Monday, January 19, is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, and the US stock market will be closed all day.
Therefore, the dialogue between the US and Europe, as well as market sentiment, have a 3-day buffer.
Thus, only cryptocurrency is left to bear the burden alone...
The encryption has another issue, which is the CLARITY Act
┈┈➤ CLARITY Act
The CLARITY Act is legislation regarding the structure of the cryptocurrency asset market, primarily used to stipulate how cryptocurrency assets should be regulated in the United States.
Currently, the draft of the CLARITY Act has entered the committee markup (review/amendment/vote) stage. The process originally scheduled for January 15 has now been postponed.
┈┈➤ Opposition from the Banking Sector
The banking sector opposes exchanges creating interest-bearing products based on stablecoins, fearing it will impact banks' deposit businesses.
┈┈➤ Opposition from Coinbase
Coinbase CEO Armstrong has more objections:
• Opposes restrictions on tokenized stocks and tokenized securities;
• Opposes restrictions on DeFi, fearing the government may obtain users' financial records;
• Opposes SEC predominance, weakening CFTC's regulation over cryptocurrency;
• Opposes restrictions related to stablecoin yield mechanisms.
In his words: "I would rather have no bill than a bad bill."
┈┈➤ Opposition from Democrats and Regulators
Additionally, some people in the traditionally restrained Democratic Party and some from the regulatory side have expressed that the CLARITY draft offers inadequate protection for investors.
The biggest contradiction seems to be the provisions related to stablecoins. The stablecoin terms in this draft face opposition from both sides. Regarding the regulation of products related to stablecoins, the banking sector thinks it is too lenient, while exchanges believe it is too strict.
The CLARITY Act is currently in a state of suspension, and it is unclear when the process can resume.
┈┈➤ CLARITY Act
The CLARITY Act is legislation regarding the structure of the cryptocurrency asset market, primarily used to stipulate how cryptocurrency assets should be regulated in the United States.
Currently, the draft of the CLARITY Act has entered the committee markup (review/amendment/vote) stage. The process originally scheduled for January 15 has now been postponed.
┈┈➤ Opposition from the Banking Sector
The banking sector opposes exchanges creating interest-bearing products based on stablecoins, fearing it will impact banks' deposit businesses.
┈┈➤ Opposition from Coinbase
Coinbase CEO Armstrong has more objections:
• Opposes restrictions on tokenized stocks and tokenized securities;
• Opposes restrictions on DeFi, fearing the government may obtain users' financial records;
• Opposes SEC predominance, weakening CFTC's regulation over cryptocurrency;
• Opposes restrictions related to stablecoin yield mechanisms.
In his words: "I would rather have no bill than a bad bill."
┈┈➤ Opposition from Democrats and Regulators
Additionally, some people in the traditionally restrained Democratic Party and some from the regulatory side have expressed that the CLARITY draft offers inadequate protection for investors.
The biggest contradiction seems to be the provisions related to stablecoins. The stablecoin terms in this draft face opposition from both sides. Regarding the regulation of products related to stablecoins, the banking sector thinks it is too lenient, while exchanges believe it is too strict.
The CLARITY Act is currently in a state of suspension, and it is unclear when the process can resume.
TVBee
·
--
BTC and US stocks may enter a 'mine-clearing' phase
Every time an analysis post is saved, Brother Bee trembles.
Such posts are only saved because they're preparing to settle accounts later.
Previously, BTC reached 92,500, and I advised not to be overly optimistic—just 7 saves on the post. Fortunately, it dropped back the same day. BTC冲上92500，但先别太乐观
Last night, I wrote about CPI being bullish, and the post got 3 saves. At that time, BTC was still falling, but it surged to 96,000 the next day.
Still, I'll boldly predict BTC's next move.
┈┈➤ Three short-term risk points
First, tonight the US Supreme Court may rule on whether Trump's tariff policies are constitutional. The issue isn't whether Trump is guilty, but whether the court will require tariffs to revert to last year's levels. If Trump loses, what actions might he take? He previously hinted that if defeated, he might push for legal changes. The market reaction is uncertain. I suspect the Supreme Court won't allow Trump to restore tariffs to their original state, as that would cause greater political and economic disruption.
Second, will the US attack Iran? If so, how long would the conflict last? Regardless of the strategic impact, the market will likely react bearishly at the start of war. If the conflict drags on, sentiment might shift back to bullish. But this remains a current risk point.
Third, the bipartisan disagreement over healthcare budget legislation that led to the government shutdown in October—both parties still haven't reached consensus. With the short-term budget expiring on January 30th, if no agreement is reached, a government shutdown could happen again. However, the more likely scenario is that both sides fail to agree, pass another short-term budget, keep the government running, and continue negotiations. Still, this is another current risk point.
┈┈➤ US stocks attempting breakout, BTC temporarily broken through
The Nasdaq 100's MACD trend still appears to be building momentum, and RSI hasn't hit 70 yet—US stocks may be trying to break through resistance levels.
BTC's weekly MACD downtrend is also weakening. Let's see if it can hold above 95 going forward.
As always, unless a major negative surprise emerges, each mine cleared may come with an upward trend.
Of course, be cautious of pullbacks on the day a risk materializes.
Lastly, don't dream of a rapid bull market return—current liquidity doesn't support a major bull run.
Every time an analysis post is saved, Brother Bee trembles.
Such posts are only saved because they're preparing to settle accounts later.
Previously, BTC reached 92,500, and I advised not to be overly optimistic—just 7 saves on the post. Fortunately, it dropped back the same day. BTC冲上92500，但先别太乐观
Last night, I wrote about CPI being bullish, and the post got 3 saves. At that time, BTC was still falling, but it surged to 96,000 the next day.
Still, I'll boldly predict BTC's next move.
┈┈➤ Three short-term risk points
First, tonight the US Supreme Court may rule on whether Trump's tariff policies are constitutional. The issue isn't whether Trump is guilty, but whether the court will require tariffs to revert to last year's levels. If Trump loses, what actions might he take? He previously hinted that if defeated, he might push for legal changes. The market reaction is uncertain. I suspect the Supreme Court won't allow Trump to restore tariffs to their original state, as that would cause greater political and economic disruption.
Second, will the US attack Iran? If so, how long would the conflict last? Regardless of the strategic impact, the market will likely react bearishly at the start of war. If the conflict drags on, sentiment might shift back to bullish. But this remains a current risk point.
Third, the bipartisan disagreement over healthcare budget legislation that led to the government shutdown in October—both parties still haven't reached consensus. With the short-term budget expiring on January 30th, if no agreement is reached, a government shutdown could happen again. However, the more likely scenario is that both sides fail to agree, pass another short-term budget, keep the government running, and continue negotiations. Still, this is another current risk point.
┈┈➤ US stocks attempting breakout, BTC temporarily broken through
The Nasdaq 100's MACD trend still appears to be building momentum, and RSI hasn't hit 70 yet—US stocks may be trying to break through resistance levels.
BTC's weekly MACD downtrend is also weakening. Let's see if it can hold above 95 going forward.
As always, unless a major negative surprise emerges, each mine cleared may come with an upward trend.
Of course, be cautious of pullbacks on the day a risk materializes.
Lastly, don't dream of a rapid bull market return—current liquidity doesn't support a major bull run.
Login to explore more contents