Elon Musk's StarShip rocket aims for complete reusability. Compared to the first stage reusability of the Falcon 9, this reusability is on the next level. If it is finally put into operation, it can greatly reduce launch costs to $10/kg, which is on par with current cargo planes. Sounds a bit unbelievable.
Let Elys's digital avatar run on its own for a day, It browsed 53239 posts, Liked only once, Commented twice. It quite matches my situation, I also consume a lot of ineffective junk information every day, With some interaction, Proactively outputting less.
Having a digital avatar to observe oneself, To iterate on daily life and work Is also a very beneficial living experiment.
As the capabilities of large AI models continue to grow, the overall productivity of society has significantly increased, and the prices of most consumer goods are decreasing. However, some industries and services will not follow this pattern. For example: Business K Psychological Counseling Specialty Drugs BTC Top Athletes' Market Value High-End Chefs Reservation-Based Clubs, etc.
The philosopher Max Weber once proposed a concept called disenchantment, originally referring to how modern science liberated the world from mysticism. But today, the context of disenchantment is different. The subject has shifted to the emotions between men and women. We are living in an era that calculates all costs and benefits: the costs, returns, risks, and cost-effectiveness of marriage. The commercial theory of K in WeChat chat screenshots essentially represents an extreme practice of instrumental rationality. However, when everyone measures marriage with rational standards, the parts of marriage that cannot be quantified—unconditional trust, determination to share hardships, and the fit of souls—collapse.
When society generally views marriage through the lens of return on investment, both men and women feel that they are at a loss. Men feel they have paid a high material price, while women feel they have paid the price of youth in childbirth.
Some time ago, Alibaba joined the food delivery war, burning hundreds of billions. At that time, I didn't quite understand it. Recently, after researching the scenarios of Qianwen, I realized that in the future, whether online or offline, Qianwen is an excellent entry point. Alibaba cannot afford to lose in this scenario; they must take it down. If they win, Alibaba will return to the top; if they lose, Alibaba is done.
To this day, there are still many people who say that Manus is not successful enough. These people may understand technology but do not necessarily understand products, and even less do they understand the true users.
They cannot see what constitutes a successful product through the eyes of users, always judging with a narrow and stubborn perspective, easily making conclusions like a frog at the bottom of a well. These types likely also think that moltbot is just a shell of cc, having never used it themselves, or they give up at the first sign of lag and easily call it garbage.
Is this rush to conclusions due to laziness in thinking, or is it a flaw in their reasoning?
Currently, the leading large model companies, under the premise of free access to large model calls, will face bankruptcy or acquisition by giants if they fail to achieve a commercial closed loop within two years and still rely on selling tokens for survival. Tokens will eventually be free, just like basic internet services. These fundamental intelligent units will inevitably transition from luxury goods to consumables, and finally to being completely free. What will the business model of large model companies be in the future? Currently, Google, Alibaba, Claude, and Xai have actually made preliminary explorations.
Select your main sources of income in the recent period: □ National Investment Silver □ Non-ferrous Metals □ Aerospace Commerce □ Gold ETF □ Cryptocurrency ✅ Yuanbao Red Packet
1 is what 1 1 is dan koe's reading of over 100 million popular articles 1 is the one-year anniversary of Trump issuing currency 1 is you sitting idly for years like it's just one day 1 is in 2026 you will definitely soar to great heights in one go
A beautiful woman with a graceful temperament on Xiaohongshu often shares some reading notes. Once she posted a photo in her study: a warm light table lamp, an open book, and a cup of black tea by her hand, with the caption: "In the quiet of the night, conversing with words, my soul is gently comforted."
In the comments section, someone asked: "What book are you reading? I'm in a reading slump, please recommend something."
The blogger replied instantly: "Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji), I just reached the chapter on the Song Dynasty, it's really well written."
Many people watch the live stream of the little general sitting still, and immediately ordered a 600HZ display. Do you lack a professional display?
Imagine a person who buys a size manual and thinks he has learned to sew. He watches the live stream, sees the K-line jumping, and says: Look, making money is actually like this.
But he forgets that scanning the chain is not an isolated action, but a complex language game. This game includes: a keen sense of memes, almost pathological energy, and rapid reactions on the edge of the abyss. These are not plugins you can buy, but meme agents with a high degree of unity between mind and hand.
When retail investors recharge, they are imitating an action rather than executing a logic. Their curses a week later are merely the anger of realizing they cannot automatically become chess players just by purchasing the chessboard.
The real core competitiveness is that kind of special quality bestowed by heaven, which cannot be exhausted by the action of stuffing eggs.
Sun Yuchen no longer only talks about "on-chain stories," but has started buying electricity and reactors. Not long ago, he acquired two small hydropower stations (approximately 86MW) in Norway, which can also issue invoices; over the past year, he invested $100 million in AI + blockchain, and last month he took a stake in a nuclear startup.
His investment logic is very straightforward: energy → computing power → AI/blockchain applications, first securing the cost and supply rights of the foundation, then discussing the scale and profits of the upper layer. Many people say he has become "inflated," but let’s not forget his early heavy investment in a package of U.S. stocks and his judgment on computing power economics.
The risks lie in regulation, execution, and energy cycles, but it points to a more realistic issue: the future moat is not in slogans, but in electricity and data centers. First, secure the foundation, and the narrative will naturally follow.
The US stock market's AI is no longer just a technological revolution; it's a funding sleight of hand. Look at Nvidia investing in CoreWeave → CoreWeave buys Nvidia cards → then rents them to OpenAI/Microsoft → Microsoft uses Azure Credit to funnel the money back. In the end, sales, profits, and narratives all take off together.
Meta extends GPU depreciation to 10 years, knowing they will be obsolete in 2-3 years; Amazon records income from self-investment and purchases; Broadcom's pre-sale orders; AMD's advanced confirmations. This is not a secret; it's a consensus: no one wants to be the child who reveals the emperor has no clothes, because the bubble cannot burst. AI is not a scam, but it has become the most sophisticated capital illusion of our time. When no one picks up a certain link, stepping on the left foot and right foot won't work anymore, and it will fall to the ground.