花太香
web3的世界很精彩,web3也有很多的坑和祸害,切记天上不会掉馅饼,小心被割.
Open Trade
USD1 Holder
High-Frequency Trader
5.2 Years
590 Following
11.9K+ Followers
8.5K+ Liked
1.2K+ Shared
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
E卫兵兄弟们，有没有一种感觉：ETH 拿在手里，涨跌都经历过，但横盘的时候，才是真正的折磨？
币没卖，心也没死，但账户就是不怎么动，这种状态，其实是在悄悄付出机会成本。
我之前也是典型的 ETH 长期持有者。
不想卖，怕踏空；
不加仓，又怕行情不确定。
结果就是：资产在，但资金效率几乎为零。
直到有天刷群，看到有人提到用 ETH 在 ListaDAO 借 USD1，我才第一次认真算了一下账。
不是算收益，而是算成本。
在 ListaDAO，用 ETH 抵押借 USD1，借款年化非常低。
这意味着，我可以在不卖 ETH 的情况下，把一部分仓位转化成稳定币弹药。
我的实际操作是：
ETH 抵押 → 借 USD1 → 转入 Binance Earn → 吃稳定币高收益
这样一来，我的 ETH 头寸还在，
但我不再只是被动等行情，而是在横盘期间，也持续有现金流进来。
更重要的是，这套结构让我心理压力明显小了。
因为我不是把未来压在一次上涨上，
而是把持仓，变成一台能持续产出收益的机器。
当你把这条逻辑跑顺，会发现 ListaDAO 给你的不是杠杆，
而是选择权。
你可以等行情，
也可以在等的过程中，让时间替你赚钱。
如果你现在手里 ETH 占比不小，其实真的值得重新算一遍这笔账。
你是更想靠一次行情，还是更想让仓位自己跑出现金流？
@ListaDAO
#USD1理财最佳策略ListaDAO $LISTA
币没卖，心也没死，但账户就是不怎么动，这种状态，其实是在悄悄付出机会成本。
我之前也是典型的 ETH 长期持有者。
不想卖，怕踏空；
不加仓，又怕行情不确定。
结果就是：资产在，但资金效率几乎为零。
直到有天刷群，看到有人提到用 ETH 在 ListaDAO 借 USD1，我才第一次认真算了一下账。
不是算收益，而是算成本。
在 ListaDAO，用 ETH 抵押借 USD1，借款年化非常低。
这意味着，我可以在不卖 ETH 的情况下，把一部分仓位转化成稳定币弹药。
我的实际操作是：
ETH 抵押 → 借 USD1 → 转入 Binance Earn → 吃稳定币高收益
这样一来，我的 ETH 头寸还在，
但我不再只是被动等行情，而是在横盘期间，也持续有现金流进来。
更重要的是，这套结构让我心理压力明显小了。
因为我不是把未来压在一次上涨上，
而是把持仓，变成一台能持续产出收益的机器。
当你把这条逻辑跑顺，会发现 ListaDAO 给你的不是杠杆，
而是选择权。
你可以等行情，
也可以在等的过程中，让时间替你赚钱。
如果你现在手里 ETH 占比不小，其实真的值得重新算一遍这笔账。
你是更想靠一次行情，还是更想让仓位自己跑出现金流？
@ListaDAO
#USD1理财最佳策略ListaDAO $LISTA
Brothers in the square, have many people recently discovered: when the market is stagnant, it's even more painful than when the market is falling?
I haven't sold my coins, my position is still there, but my account just isn't moving much. This kind of 'lying flat holding' is actually the most wasteful of capital efficiency.
I'm like this too, holding BTCB, just waiting for the market. Until one day a friend asked me in the group:
Why don't you take BTCB and borrow some USD1 from ListaDAO for arbitrage?
At that moment, my first reaction was:
Borrowing money = greater risk.
But when I calculated it myself, I realized this is a typical misconception.
In ListaDAO, using BTCB as collateral to borrow USD1 has an annualized cost of about 1%.
What does this mean?
It means I'm essentially using extremely low cost to turn BTCB into a stablecoin cash flow machine.
My structure is very simple:
BTCB collateral → borrow USD1 → transfer to Binance Earn → earn 18%-20% stablecoin returns
With this setup, my BTCB position is still there,
but I'm no longer just waiting for it to rise; I'm continuously generating income even during sideways markets.
Later, I tried income-generating assets like PT-USDe and asUSDF, and found something even more outrageous:
The collateral itself generates income,
the borrowed USD1 also generates income,
the same amount of capital is running two lines of returns.
At this point, I finally understood the value of ListaDAO:
it doesn't make you gamble on the market,
but allows you to upgrade your 'position' into a 'structure that makes money on its own.'
What do you have the most of now, BTCB, ETH, or BNB?
Actually, the difference in using which asset to run this structure is greater than you think.
@ListaDAO
#USD1理财最佳策略ListaDAO $LISTA
I haven't sold my coins, my position is still there, but my account just isn't moving much. This kind of 'lying flat holding' is actually the most wasteful of capital efficiency.
I'm like this too, holding BTCB, just waiting for the market. Until one day a friend asked me in the group:
Why don't you take BTCB and borrow some USD1 from ListaDAO for arbitrage?
At that moment, my first reaction was:
Borrowing money = greater risk.
But when I calculated it myself, I realized this is a typical misconception.
In ListaDAO, using BTCB as collateral to borrow USD1 has an annualized cost of about 1%.
What does this mean?
It means I'm essentially using extremely low cost to turn BTCB into a stablecoin cash flow machine.
My structure is very simple:
BTCB collateral → borrow USD1 → transfer to Binance Earn → earn 18%-20% stablecoin returns
With this setup, my BTCB position is still there,
but I'm no longer just waiting for it to rise; I'm continuously generating income even during sideways markets.
Later, I tried income-generating assets like PT-USDe and asUSDF, and found something even more outrageous:
The collateral itself generates income,
the borrowed USD1 also generates income,
the same amount of capital is running two lines of returns.
At this point, I finally understood the value of ListaDAO:
it doesn't make you gamble on the market,
but allows you to upgrade your 'position' into a 'structure that makes money on its own.'
What do you have the most of now, BTCB, ETH, or BNB?
Actually, the difference in using which asset to run this structure is greater than you think.
@ListaDAO
#USD1理财最佳策略ListaDAO $LISTA
Stake BTCB/ETH to borrow USD1, 1% low interest makes profits triple, holding and earning interest simultaneously
Brothers in the crypto community, do you often find yourselves in a dilemma between 'holding vs investing'? Holding BTCB and ETH while fearing missing out on market opportunities, selling your investments yet regretting the rising coin prices; wanting to earn investment returns without incurring the opportunity cost of selling coins? I've hoarded 2 BTCB (valued at about 200,000 U) for two years, watching the coin prices rise without cash flow, until I used ListaDAO to 'stake blue-chip coins to borrow USD1', which allowed me to achieve 'holding while earning interest'—1% low-interest borrowing, with annualized investment returns of 20%, yielding three times the profit compared to simply holding; plus, I can earn extra from the rising coin prices!
The curtain rises on the elimination tournament for traditional Chinese medicine! A large number of traditional Chinese medicines will exit the market. (It should have been this way long ago)
Only six months remain until July 1, 2026, and the implementation of Article 75 of the State Drug Administration's "Special Regulations on the Registration Management of Traditional Chinese Medicine" has entered its final window period.
This regulation, referred to in the industry as the "life and death clause" for traditional Chinese medicine, clearly states that starting from July 1, 2023, after three years of implementation, if any item in the instructions [Contraindications] [Adverse Reactions] [Precautions] still indicates "not yet clear" for traditional Chinese medicine, re-registration applications will not be approved by law. This means that among the approximately 57,000 valid approval numbers for traditional Chinese medicine currently existing in the country, over 70% of the approvals with safety information labeling issues will face elimination, and a regulatory-driven deep clearing of the traditional Chinese medicine industry has officially entered a critical stage.
The core of this new regulatory policy is to completely end the long-standing era of "not yet clear" instructions for traditional Chinese medicine, forcing drug holders to make up for the shortcomings of post-market safety data.
Research from the China Food and Drug Administration magazine previously showed that in the 2018 version of the "National Essential Medicines List," the labeling rates for adverse reactions, contraindications, and drug interactions in 465 instructions for 268 varieties of traditional Chinese medicine were only 20.64%, 30.1%, and 1.07%, respectively. A large number of varieties relied on vague statements to complete market circulation after listing. As the re-registration exam approaches, this model of "vague exemption" has completely lost its space for survival. #ClawdBot创始人声明不会发币 #美国伊朗对峙
Only six months remain until July 1, 2026, and the implementation of Article 75 of the State Drug Administration's "Special Regulations on the Registration Management of Traditional Chinese Medicine" has entered its final window period.
This regulation, referred to in the industry as the "life and death clause" for traditional Chinese medicine, clearly states that starting from July 1, 2023, after three years of implementation, if any item in the instructions [Contraindications] [Adverse Reactions] [Precautions] still indicates "not yet clear" for traditional Chinese medicine, re-registration applications will not be approved by law. This means that among the approximately 57,000 valid approval numbers for traditional Chinese medicine currently existing in the country, over 70% of the approvals with safety information labeling issues will face elimination, and a regulatory-driven deep clearing of the traditional Chinese medicine industry has officially entered a critical stage.
The core of this new regulatory policy is to completely end the long-standing era of "not yet clear" instructions for traditional Chinese medicine, forcing drug holders to make up for the shortcomings of post-market safety data.
Research from the China Food and Drug Administration magazine previously showed that in the 2018 version of the "National Essential Medicines List," the labeling rates for adverse reactions, contraindications, and drug interactions in 465 instructions for 268 varieties of traditional Chinese medicine were only 20.64%, 30.1%, and 1.07%, respectively. A large number of varieties relied on vague statements to complete market circulation after listing. As the re-registration exam approaches, this model of "vague exemption" has completely lost its space for survival. #ClawdBot创始人声明不会发币 #美国伊朗对峙
Stake interest-bearing coins to borrow USD1, use in multiple ways to earn double, ListaDAO annualized return directly surges to 23%
Brothers who like financial management, do you often feel that "one asset can only earn one income"? With stablecoins like PT-USDe and asUSDF in hand, you either hold them to earn an annualized return of 3%-5%, or you stake them and lose the interest income. No matter how you calculate it, it feels like a loss? I used to be so conflicted — holding 100,000 U of interest-bearing coins, wanting to earn more but afraid of wasting the native earnings, until I unlocked the way to "stake interest-bearing coins to borrow USD1" on ListaDAO, I realized that assets can actually be "used in multiple ways", with interest income + 19% interest margin income stacked together, leading to an annualized return directly soaring to 23%!
Shanxi Heshun Supervision Institute: Is rape for the purpose of forming a family not a crime?🙄
1% Low Interest Borrowing USD1, Binance Earn Easy Earnings 20%, ListaDAO Risk-Free Arbitrage Practice
Cryptocurrency arbitrage enthusiasts, are you always looking for 'almost risk-free arbitrage opportunities'? Either the borrowing interest rates are too high, consuming the arbitrage space; or cross-platform transfers are cumbersome, with fees offsetting profits; or the asset threshold is high, making it impossible for small funds to participate? I have fallen into countless arbitrage traps before — being trapped by high-interest borrowing, losing everything when platforms exit, missing price differences due to transfer delays, until I discovered the '1% low-interest borrowing + USD1 arbitrage' combination from ListaDAO, which truly unlocked 'easy earning arbitrage'. I'll teach you step-by-step how to operate it, making it easy even for those with zero experience!
Don't let the "alternating bull and bear losses" control you anymore. ListaDAO navigates through bull and bear markets, making returns as stable as Mount Tai.
Friends, have you gone through several cycles of bull and bear markets, only to be trapped by the curse of "the money earned in the bull market is all lost in the bear market"? During the bull market, I made a fortune by chasing high contracts, but when the bear market came, I either faced liquidation or my investment's annualized return was halved. In the end, it felt like drawing water with a basket—after all that effort, it would have been better to do nothing? I endured 6 cycles of bull and bear markets, turning from a contract big shot into a stable investment party, and it was because I encountered ListaDAO that I completely broke free from the curse of alternating profits in bull and bear markets. Regardless of market fluctuations, the returns have always been as stable as Mount Tai, and I even earned more solidly in the bear market than in the bull market!
I have been struggling in the cryptocurrency circle for 6 years. I made over a million during the bull market through contracts, and I also faced a liquidation in the bear market, losing everything. The worst was in the bear market of 2024, when my investment funds halved due to the platform's annualized return, coupled with being trapped in altcoins, leading to a direct loss of over 400,000 U. At that time, I completely realized: the money in the cryptocurrency world is earned quickly but it's harder to keep it safe. However, keeping money is also difficult, as there are very few reliable investment platforms in the bear market; either the annualized return is pitifully low or there are hidden risks of running away. Until I was recommended ListaDAO by several senior players in an old school group: "Real veterans know to rely on ListaDAO to navigate through bull and bear markets. Its gameplay is not about betting on the market but about earning guaranteed money through rules."
I have been struggling in the cryptocurrency circle for 6 years. I made over a million during the bull market through contracts, and I also faced a liquidation in the bear market, losing everything. The worst was in the bear market of 2024, when my investment funds halved due to the platform's annualized return, coupled with being trapped in altcoins, leading to a direct loss of over 400,000 U. At that time, I completely realized: the money in the cryptocurrency world is earned quickly but it's harder to keep it safe. However, keeping money is also difficult, as there are very few reliable investment platforms in the bear market; either the annualized return is pitifully low or there are hidden risks of running away. Until I was recommended ListaDAO by several senior players in an old school group: "Real veterans know to rely on ListaDAO to navigate through bull and bear markets. Its gameplay is not about betting on the market but about earning guaranteed money through rules."
Tether Issues Stablecoin USA₮ (USA Tether), What Is the Difference from USDT?
January 27, 2026 — The digital asset industry giant Tether today announced the official launch of USA₮, a stablecoin regulated by the United States federal government and backed by the US dollar, specifically developed to operate within the new federal stablecoin framework established under the (GENIUS Act) in the United States. The issuer of USA₮ is Anchorage Digital Bank, NA, which is the first federally regulated stablecoin issuer in the United States.
Friends, you might be wondering, why issue another stablecoin? What is the essential difference between this thing and the USDT that we use every day? Don't worry, let's clarify this one by one — this is not just 'a re-skinned USDT,' but Tether's dual-track strategy aimed at completely different battlegrounds.
Friends, you might be wondering, why issue another stablecoin? What is the essential difference between this thing and the USDT that we use every day? Don't worry, let's clarify this one by one — this is not just 'a re-skinned USDT,' but Tether's dual-track strategy aimed at completely different battlegrounds.
Why has River surged so dramatically recently, and what else can it do?
River ($RIVER) has indeed surged recently, jumping from a few dollars at the end of last year to nearly 80-90 dollars recently, with an increase of over 1000%-1900% within just one month (different time point statistics show slight variations), completely independent of the market and creating an extraordinary trend.
The core reasons can be summarized as the following points that have combined to ignite the situation:
Top tycoons/institutions continuously pouring money for endorsement
The Maelstrom fund, strategically invested by BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes (one of the rounds of 12 million dollars), directly ignited market sentiment.
Justin Sun + TRON DAO invested 8 million dollars, clearly aiming to deeply integrate the TRON ecosystem and push satUSD (the core stablecoin of River) towards multi-chain.
The core reasons can be summarized as the following points that have combined to ignite the situation:
Top tycoons/institutions continuously pouring money for endorsement
The Maelstrom fund, strategically invested by BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes (one of the rounds of 12 million dollars), directly ignited market sentiment.
Justin Sun + TRON DAO invested 8 million dollars, clearly aiming to deeply integrate the TRON ecosystem and push satUSD (the core stablecoin of River) towards multi-chain.
Don't be discouraged by "complex finance"; with ListaDAO's three-step process, even novices can earn 500U a month.
Brothers in the square, do you feel overwhelmed when you hear "staking, lending, LP mining"? It always seems that crypto finance is filled with obscure terminology, and the steps are so complicated that they deter people? I used to feel this way — every time I saw experts sharing financial strategies, the screen full of professional terms left me dazzled. I tried to operate it twice, and each time I either authorized the wrong wallet or mixed up the financial pool, ultimately giving up, thinking that "novices can't play crypto finance at all." It wasn't until a friend introduced me to ListaDAO that I realized finance could be this simple; with three steps, even a complete novice like me can earn 500U a month.
Heartbreaking, bro 🥶
Stop treating crypto finance as a gamble; ListaDAO has allowed me to earn over a thousand a month reliably.
Crypto friends, do you feel like I used to, thinking that crypto finance is just a 'gamble'? Either it's a contract liquidation that leads to losses or high-interest mining pools that run away, leaving you with nothing. Over time, this has created the stereotype that 'crypto finance = high risk'. I was once a victim of this misunderstanding — three years ago, I followed the trend into contracts and lost my 50,000 U principal in half a month. Since then, I've avoided crypto finance, preferring to let my money sit in my wallet and devalue rather than dare to touch any financial projects.
It wasn't until the end of last year that my childhood friend A-Zhe introduced me to ListaDAO, saying, 'This is not a gamble; it's a stable earning channel for ordinary people.' I immediately shot back, 'Don't fool me, where in the crypto world is there a guaranteed profit?' But A-Zhe didn't say a word and sent me a screenshot of his account — 100,000 U principal, earning 6,800 U in six months, with a profit curve as steady as a straight line, with no major ups and downs. Seeing my skepticism, he took me through the operation in person, and I realized that crypto finance can actually be so 'reliable'.
It wasn't until the end of last year that my childhood friend A-Zhe introduced me to ListaDAO, saying, 'This is not a gamble; it's a stable earning channel for ordinary people.' I immediately shot back, 'Don't fool me, where in the crypto world is there a guaranteed profit?' But A-Zhe didn't say a word and sent me a screenshot of his account — 100,000 U principal, earning 6,800 U in six months, with a profit curve as steady as a straight line, with no major ups and downs. Seeing my skepticism, he took me through the operation in person, and I realized that crypto finance can actually be so 'reliable'.
Crypto friends, after discussing RWA for so long, why hasn't the trillion-dollar asset moved? Because the logic of public chains is too rigid: either be fully transparent and let institutions 'run naked', making their holding strategies exposed; or play anonymous, leading to compliance (AML) issues. This contradiction between privacy and compliance is the rusty lock that prevents RWA from exploding.
So, where is the key to unlock this lock? DUSK, that's right, it is! I studied the technical white paper of DUSK for several days and found that this guy didn't even intend to roll out TPS; instead, he performed a 'craniotomy' at the protocol layer.
Many people do not understand why it insists on building a Layer 1 from scratch rather than adding a privacy patch on L2, but when you delve into its Piecrust virtual machine, you will realize that this is not just about optimizing efficiency, but also about reconstructing the logic of 'identity'. It achieves true self-sovereign identity through a set of Citadel SDK, allowing users to generate compliance certificates off-chain, while on-chain only verifies whether this Proof is valid. This means that both parties in the transaction and regulatory agencies can be 100% confident that the money is compliant, yet no one can peek into your specific account data. This approach of directly embedding the compliance layer into the protocol base is significantly more robust than adding contracts at the application layer.
Even more remarkable is its accompanying SBA (Isolated Byzantine Agreement) consensus mechanism, which is entirely aimed at the 'essential needs' of financial settlement. In traditional finance, you cannot tell clients that a transaction of several hundred million dollars is 'highly likely to succeed'; you must have immediate finality. The design of Dusk ensures that once a transaction is made, it's set in stone and cannot be rolled back. Additionally, it is inherently physically isolated from MEV—because transactions are encrypted, sorting nodes cannot perform 'sandwich attacks' to exploit large accounts. This hardcore logic of protecting market fairness from the ground up is precisely the prerequisite for institutions to confidently move real money in.
The current market is still speculating on concepts, but what I see is the inevitable evolution of the technology stack. Once this bridge is built, the liquidity on both sides will not be of the same magnitude.
Friends, can this 'mathematically defined compliance' make Wall Street willingly hand over their private keys? Let's discuss in the comments and see who can catch this wave of infrastructure dividends!
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
So, where is the key to unlock this lock? DUSK, that's right, it is! I studied the technical white paper of DUSK for several days and found that this guy didn't even intend to roll out TPS; instead, he performed a 'craniotomy' at the protocol layer.
Many people do not understand why it insists on building a Layer 1 from scratch rather than adding a privacy patch on L2, but when you delve into its Piecrust virtual machine, you will realize that this is not just about optimizing efficiency, but also about reconstructing the logic of 'identity'. It achieves true self-sovereign identity through a set of Citadel SDK, allowing users to generate compliance certificates off-chain, while on-chain only verifies whether this Proof is valid. This means that both parties in the transaction and regulatory agencies can be 100% confident that the money is compliant, yet no one can peek into your specific account data. This approach of directly embedding the compliance layer into the protocol base is significantly more robust than adding contracts at the application layer.
Even more remarkable is its accompanying SBA (Isolated Byzantine Agreement) consensus mechanism, which is entirely aimed at the 'essential needs' of financial settlement. In traditional finance, you cannot tell clients that a transaction of several hundred million dollars is 'highly likely to succeed'; you must have immediate finality. The design of Dusk ensures that once a transaction is made, it's set in stone and cannot be rolled back. Additionally, it is inherently physically isolated from MEV—because transactions are encrypted, sorting nodes cannot perform 'sandwich attacks' to exploit large accounts. This hardcore logic of protecting market fairness from the ground up is precisely the prerequisite for institutions to confidently move real money in.
The current market is still speculating on concepts, but what I see is the inevitable evolution of the technology stack. Once this bridge is built, the liquidity on both sides will not be of the same magnitude.
Friends, can this 'mathematically defined compliance' make Wall Street willingly hand over their private keys? Let's discuss in the comments and see who can catch this wave of infrastructure dividends!
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
The Ultimate Foundation of Privacy Finance: Why Real-World Assets (RWA) Can Only Grow on Dusk
Brothers, we have been in Web3 for a long time, easily falling into a binary mindset: either a completely transparent, privacy-naked 'dark forest', or a controlled, centralized 'walled garden'. Everyone seems to assume that 'permissionless' and 'compliance' are dead enemies.
But I have recently been deeply engaged with Dusk (@Dusk)'s white paper and underlying architecture, and I found that our previous intuition may have missed a dimension—once zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) are introduced, this contradiction in a flat plane will be resolved in three-dimensional space.
But I have recently been deeply engaged with Dusk (@Dusk)'s white paper and underlying architecture, and I found that our previous intuition may have missed a dimension—once zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) are introduced, this contradiction in a flat plane will be resolved in three-dimensional space.
From Filecoin's slowness to S3's speed: Why does Walrus dare to claim it is the terminator of Web3 storage?
Web3 players, we need to talk about that 'elephant in the room' that has been locked in the cupboard and everyone pretends not to see.
We talk about decentralization every day, but when it comes to storing a high-definition NFT original image or deploying a DApp frontend, in the end, we still have to obediently open the AWS S3 console, right? This sense of disconnection, where 'logic is on the chain and data is in the cloud,' is like wearing a suit with baggy shorts; all the decency is just for show.
It wasn't until the last couple of days that I deeply explored the logic of Walrus that I felt Web3's infrastructure finally picked up the 'pants that had fallen on the ground.'
We talk about decentralization every day, but when it comes to storing a high-definition NFT original image or deploying a DApp frontend, in the end, we still have to obediently open the AWS S3 console, right? This sense of disconnection, where 'logic is on the chain and data is in the cloud,' is like wearing a suit with baggy shorts; all the decency is just for show.
It wasn't until the last couple of days that I deeply explored the logic of Walrus that I felt Web3's infrastructure finally picked up the 'pants that had fallen on the ground.'
Web3 technology players, are you questioning life due to storage issues? Either the costs are too high for small teams to bear, or the mechanisms for data permanence are complicated enough to cause headaches. In high-throughput dApps like full-chain games and decentralized social networks, we can only helplessly revert to AWS S3. Is it really impossible to achieve both decentralization and user experience?
Recently, I've been iterating on product development, and the unstructured data like images and short videos uploaded by users are driving me crazy: on-chain storage is out of the question, a few megabytes of files can exhaust the budget; I’ve tried several mainstream solutions, but either there’s severe redundancy waste, or the mechanisms are too complex to implement. Just when I was struggling with whether to compromise, I delved into the architecture documentation of Walrus and was suddenly enlightened by its core design points.
What’s remarkable about Walrus is the two-dimensional erasure code implemented by the 'Red Stuff Algorithm', which completely reconstructs the storage 'redundancy' logic — instead of naively storing multiple complete copies, data is fragmented into shards, and even if 30% of the nodes go offline, the remaining shards can quickly rebuild the complete data. The high fault tolerance in Byzantine environments directly breaks the curse of 'security = high cost'. Even better, it relies on Sui’s efficient consensus to manage metadata, decoupling storage and execution layers, which not only addresses the pain point of public chain state explosion but also offers a calling experience as simple as Web2 services. The cost of storing 1GB of data is 40% lower than Filecoin, perfectly adapting to the massive data needs of high-throughput dApps.
The essence of technology is to solve pain points. Walrus doesn’t engage in flashy concepts; it focuses on solid underlying optimizations. When storage is no longer a cost bottleneck, Web3 applications can move beyond simple DeFi interactions and advance into complex scenarios like full-chain games and distributed AI.
I have now fully migrated the product storage module to the Walrus testnet, and will continue to test its high concurrency performance. Developers in front of the screen, what pitfalls have you encountered in storage? Do you think Walrus’s design can solve your core pain points? Feel free to share in the comments!
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus
Recently, I've been iterating on product development, and the unstructured data like images and short videos uploaded by users are driving me crazy: on-chain storage is out of the question, a few megabytes of files can exhaust the budget; I’ve tried several mainstream solutions, but either there’s severe redundancy waste, or the mechanisms are too complex to implement. Just when I was struggling with whether to compromise, I delved into the architecture documentation of Walrus and was suddenly enlightened by its core design points.
What’s remarkable about Walrus is the two-dimensional erasure code implemented by the 'Red Stuff Algorithm', which completely reconstructs the storage 'redundancy' logic — instead of naively storing multiple complete copies, data is fragmented into shards, and even if 30% of the nodes go offline, the remaining shards can quickly rebuild the complete data. The high fault tolerance in Byzantine environments directly breaks the curse of 'security = high cost'. Even better, it relies on Sui’s efficient consensus to manage metadata, decoupling storage and execution layers, which not only addresses the pain point of public chain state explosion but also offers a calling experience as simple as Web2 services. The cost of storing 1GB of data is 40% lower than Filecoin, perfectly adapting to the massive data needs of high-throughput dApps.
The essence of technology is to solve pain points. Walrus doesn’t engage in flashy concepts; it focuses on solid underlying optimizations. When storage is no longer a cost bottleneck, Web3 applications can move beyond simple DeFi interactions and advance into complex scenarios like full-chain games and distributed AI.
I have now fully migrated the product storage module to the Walrus testnet, and will continue to test its high concurrency performance. Developers in front of the screen, what pitfalls have you encountered in storage? Do you think Walrus’s design can solve your core pain points? Feel free to share in the comments!
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus
Why do I still firmly believe that Plasma is the wronged payment revolution after a 90% crash?
Brothers of the square, the recent market sentiment is indeed a bit hard to understand. I was lost in thought while staring at the K-line chart of Plasma — XPL has dropped 90% from its high. According to the norms of the crypto circle, this is already the standard script of 'project going to zero, team running away', but as an investor who has been immersed in the industry for 6 years and is used to seeking truth from code and on-chain data, this extreme plummet instead made me sniff the scent of 'value mismatch': with such crazy selling pressure, why is its TVL still as stable as a mountain? Why are developers still continuously submitting code? Why haven't institutional funds retreated?
$SOL likes and shares, 66
@Binance BiBi Summary of this content
Breaking Free from Computing Power Speculation: Vanar's Hybrid Architecture Captures the Future of Large-Scale AI on the Blockchain
Reflecting on the competition of AI track L1 public chains, I am increasingly convinced: purely "tokenizing computing power" is just a temporary bubble in the AI+Web3 phase, the real long-term value lies in the "enterprise-level adaptability" of the infrastructure. As generative AI (GenAI) goes large-scale on the blockchain, and as AI DApps evolve into complex systems involving asset rights confirmation, privacy computing, and on-chain reasoning, only public chains that address compliance, performance, and energy efficiency pain points can support the next wave of traffic explosion — Vanarchain's layout precisely hits this core demand.
When examining Vanar's tech stack, I often wonder: can the traditional EVM architecture truly support the high frequency and concurrency of AI on the blockchain? The answer is no. The "decentralization-first" logic of traditional public chains brings delays and Gas friction that deter Web2 enterprises. In contrast, Vanar's "hybrid architecture" is a pragmatic solution: through deep integration with Google Cloud, it seamlessly migrates the high-performance computing experience of Web2 to the Web3 value network, accurately solving the compliance and performance bottlenecks faced by Web2 giants.
Many people view Vanar's "carbon neutrality" as a marketing gimmick, but for large enterprises bound by ESG constraints, this is an irreplaceable compliance moat — high-energy-consuming chains carry compliance risks, while Vanar's low-energy design fills the ecological gap. Analyzing its Vanguard testnet logic further reveals its potential: after the AI seamlessly integrates modular architecture, it will form a "trusted computing environment" where brand owners do not need to worry about private key management, and AI Agents can automatically execute complex operations, significantly lowering the entry barrier for enterprises.
I am optimistic about Vanar, not due to market sentiment, but based on judgments at the infrastructure level: the critical point for large-scale AI on the blockchain will eventually arrive. Whoever can balance the high performance of Web2 and the value network of Web3 will be able to seize the wave. Vanar's architectural flexibility is fully prepared for this moment, and in the bubble of computing power speculation, this pragmatic layout focused on enterprise-level adaptability is precisely the most scarce competitive edge of AI public chains.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
Reflecting on the competition of AI track L1 public chains, I am increasingly convinced: purely "tokenizing computing power" is just a temporary bubble in the AI+Web3 phase, the real long-term value lies in the "enterprise-level adaptability" of the infrastructure. As generative AI (GenAI) goes large-scale on the blockchain, and as AI DApps evolve into complex systems involving asset rights confirmation, privacy computing, and on-chain reasoning, only public chains that address compliance, performance, and energy efficiency pain points can support the next wave of traffic explosion — Vanarchain's layout precisely hits this core demand.
When examining Vanar's tech stack, I often wonder: can the traditional EVM architecture truly support the high frequency and concurrency of AI on the blockchain? The answer is no. The "decentralization-first" logic of traditional public chains brings delays and Gas friction that deter Web2 enterprises. In contrast, Vanar's "hybrid architecture" is a pragmatic solution: through deep integration with Google Cloud, it seamlessly migrates the high-performance computing experience of Web2 to the Web3 value network, accurately solving the compliance and performance bottlenecks faced by Web2 giants.
Many people view Vanar's "carbon neutrality" as a marketing gimmick, but for large enterprises bound by ESG constraints, this is an irreplaceable compliance moat — high-energy-consuming chains carry compliance risks, while Vanar's low-energy design fills the ecological gap. Analyzing its Vanguard testnet logic further reveals its potential: after the AI seamlessly integrates modular architecture, it will form a "trusted computing environment" where brand owners do not need to worry about private key management, and AI Agents can automatically execute complex operations, significantly lowering the entry barrier for enterprises.
I am optimistic about Vanar, not due to market sentiment, but based on judgments at the infrastructure level: the critical point for large-scale AI on the blockchain will eventually arrive. Whoever can balance the high performance of Web2 and the value network of Web3 will be able to seize the wave. Vanar's architectural flexibility is fully prepared for this moment, and in the bubble of computing power speculation, this pragmatic layout focused on enterprise-level adaptability is precisely the most scarce competitive edge of AI public chains.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar
Login to explore more contents