Bitcoinworld

BitcoinWorldSouth Korea’s Digital Asset Bill Stalls Again as Key Disagreements Remain Unresolved
A legislative effort to establish a comprehensive legal framework for South Korea’s digital asset industry has remained stalled in the National Assembly for more than a year, and persistent disagreements over two critical issues are likely to delay progress further, according to a report by Yonhap News Agency.
Political Calendar Adds Pressure
The ruling Democratic Party is expected to conclude its national convention on August 17. Once its policy committee is formed, the party plans to restart its digital asset task force, which has been inactive for months. Both the party and the government see the regular National Assembly session in September as a potential turning point for moving the bill forward.
However, the timeline is tight. With the session set to begin in early September, lawmakers have only a few weeks to bridge differences on the bill’s most contentious provisions.
Two Core Disputes Blocking Progress
The report identifies two main issues that have prevented the bill from advancing:
Stablecoin issuance structure: Lawmakers disagree on how to regulate won-based stablecoins, particularly whether to require full reserve backing and how to define permissible reserve assets. Some legislators argue for strict oversight to prevent systemic risk, while others warn that overly rigid rules could stifle innovation.
Limits on major shareholders’ equity stakes: The bill includes provisions that would cap the equity stakes major shareholders can hold in digital asset exchanges. Critics say the proposed limits are too restrictive and could discourage investment, while supporters argue they are necessary to prevent market manipulation and conflicts of interest.
Broader Implications for the Industry
South Korea has one of the world’s most active cryptocurrency trading markets, but its regulatory environment remains fragmented. The absence of a unified legal framework has created uncertainty for exchanges, investors, and businesses operating in the space. A clear law would provide much-needed clarity on licensing, consumer protection, and anti-money laundering requirements.
The prolonged delay also raises questions about the country’s competitiveness as a hub for blockchain and digital asset innovation. Other jurisdictions, including Japan, Singapore, and the European Union, have already moved forward with comprehensive regulatory frameworks.
What Happens Next
The Democratic Party’s digital asset task force will need to draft compromise language that can win support from both sides of the aisle. If an agreement is not reached before the September plenary session, the bill could be pushed to the next regular session in 2026, further delaying implementation.
Industry observers say the stakes are high. A well-designed law could boost investor confidence and attract institutional participation, while a poorly designed one could drive businesses offshore.
Conclusion
South Korea’s digital asset bill remains a work in progress, with fundamental disagreements over stablecoin regulation and shareholder equity limits unresolved. The upcoming September session offers a narrow window for progress, but political dynamics and the complexity of the issues suggest that further delays are likely. For now, the industry waits — and watches.
FAQs
Q1: Why has South Korea’s digital asset bill been stalled for over a year? A1: The bill has stalled due to disagreements between lawmakers over two key issues: how to regulate won-based stablecoins and whether to impose limits on major shareholders’ equity stakes in digital asset exchanges.
Q2: When is the next opportunity for the bill to pass? A2: The regular National Assembly session in September 2025 is seen as the next potential turning point. If no agreement is reached, the bill may be delayed until the 2026 session.
Q3: Why does this matter for the broader cryptocurrency market? A3: South Korea is a major cryptocurrency trading hub, and a clear legal framework would provide regulatory certainty, boost investor confidence, and help prevent market manipulation. Delays could hurt the country’s competitiveness in the digital asset space.
This post South Korea’s Digital Asset Bill Stalls Again as Key Disagreements Remain Unresolved first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldSaylor Rejects BIP-110, Calls for Bitcoin to Remain Neutral on Data Transactions
Strategy founder Michael Saylor has publicly opposed Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110), arguing that the proposal threatens Bitcoin’s core principle of neutrality. In a detailed 110-point post, Saylor stated that valid, fee-paying transactions should not be judged based on their purpose, warning that the network must have ‘guardians of neutrality, not guardians of purity.’
What BIP-110 Proposes
BIP-110 aims to restrict the recording of images, text, and other non-financial data within Bitcoin transactions. Proponents argue that large data transactions bloat the blockchain and increase costs for all users. However, critics, including Saylor, contend that such restrictions set a dangerous precedent by introducing subjective judgment into transaction validation.
Current Miner Support and Timeline
According to The Block, miner signaling on whether to activate BIP-110 is scheduled to begin in August. Currently, miner support stands at approximately 0.86%, indicating significant opposition from the mining community. This low level of support suggests the proposal faces an uphill battle before reaching the activation threshold.
Why This Matters
The debate over BIP-110 highlights a fundamental tension within the Bitcoin ecosystem: the balance between network efficiency and preserving permissionless, censorship-resistant transactions. Saylor’s stance reinforces the view that Bitcoin’s value proposition relies on its ability to process any valid transaction without gatekeeping. If BIP-110 were to gain traction, it could set a precedent for future restrictions, potentially undermining Bitcoin’s neutrality.
Conclusion
As the August signaling period approaches, the Bitcoin community remains divided on how to handle non-financial data on the blockchain. Saylor’s vocal opposition adds weight to the argument for preserving Bitcoin’s open and neutral nature, but the debate is far from settled. The outcome will likely influence how Bitcoin evolves as both a payment network and a data layer.
FAQs
Q1: What is BIP-110? BIP-110 is a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal that seeks to restrict the recording of images, text, and other large data within Bitcoin transactions to reduce blockchain bloat.
Q2: Why does Michael Saylor oppose BIP-110? Saylor argues that restricting transactions based on their content violates Bitcoin’s principle of neutrality, and that valid, fee-paying transactions should not be judged by subjective consensus rules.
Q3: What is the current level of miner support for BIP-110? As of now, miner support stands at about 0.86%, far below the threshold needed for activation. Miner signaling is set to begin in August.
This post Saylor Rejects BIP-110, Calls for Bitcoin to Remain Neutral on Data Transactions first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldBank of Korea Could Launch Live Deposit Token Trials as Early as September
The Bank of Korea is moving closer to live transaction testing of deposit tokens under the second phase of Project Hangang, its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot program. According to a report from Yonhap News, the central bank and participating commercial banks are finalizing system preparations and participant recruitment. If development proceeds on schedule, live trading could begin as early as September and continue on an open-ended basis.
What Is Project Hangang?
Project Hangang is the Bank of Korea’s multi-phase initiative to explore the feasibility and practical applications of a wholesale CBDC. The first phase focused on technical infrastructure and simulated transactions. The second phase now aims to test deposit tokens—digital representations of commercial bank deposits that can be transferred using distributed ledger technology. Unlike a retail CBDC available to the general public, these tokens are designed for interbank and institutional use.
The open-ended nature of the live trials suggests the central bank is prioritizing long-term data collection over a fixed deadline, a signal that it views the technology as a serious infrastructure upgrade rather than a short-term experiment.
Tokenized Government Bonds on the Horizon
In a separate development, South Korea’s Ministry of Economy and Finance announced on July 15 that it plans to launch a pilot project for tokenized government bonds in 2025. These bonds would be linked to the Bank of Korea’s wholesale CBDC infrastructure, creating a direct digital pipeline between sovereign debt issuance and central bank digital money.
This move aligns with a broader global trend among central banks exploring programmable securities and instant settlement. Tokenized government bonds could reduce settlement times, lower operational costs, and enable more granular trading of sovereign debt.
Why This Matters for the Crypto and Financial Ecosystem
South Korea has long been a bellwether for digital asset adoption, with one of the most active retail crypto markets in the world. The Bank of Korea’s cautious but deliberate approach to CBDC development reflects a balancing act between innovation and financial stability. For market participants, the live deposit token trials offer a glimpse into how traditional banking infrastructure may evolve to incorporate blockchain-based settlement layers.
If successful, the Project Hangang model could influence other central banks in Asia and beyond that are evaluating similar hybrid systems combining wholesale CBDCs with tokenized commercial bank deposits.
Conclusion
The Bank of Korea’s push toward live deposit token trials and tokenized government bonds marks a significant step in the practical application of central bank digital currencies. While the timeline remains conditional on technical readiness, the open-ended trial structure and parallel bond pilot suggest a strategic commitment to modernizing South Korea’s financial market infrastructure. Market observers and institutional participants will be watching closely for results that could shape the future of digital money in one of the world’s most technologically advanced economies.
FAQs
Q1: What is a deposit token in the context of Project Hangang? A deposit token is a digital representation of a commercial bank deposit that can be transferred on a distributed ledger. Unlike a retail CBDC, it is issued by commercial banks and settled using the central bank’s wholesale CBDC infrastructure.
Q2: When will the live trials begin? The Bank of Korea aims to start live transactions as early as September 2024, pending the completion of system development and participant recruitment. The trials will have no fixed end date.
Q3: How do tokenized government bonds relate to the CBDC project? Tokenized government bonds will be linked to the Bank of Korea’s wholesale CBDC, enabling instant settlement and programmable features. The pilot is planned for 2025 and represents a step toward integrating digital assets with sovereign debt markets.
This post Bank of Korea Could Launch Live Deposit Token Trials as Early as September first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldFormer Goldman Sachs Executive Says Strategy’s STRC Preferred Stock Is Undervalued by 13%
A former Goldman Sachs credit investment specialist has publicly stated that Strategy’s preferred stock, ticker STRC, is trading at a significant discount to its intrinsic value. Khing Oei, who previously focused on credit investments at the investment bank, argues that the market is mispricing the security by roughly 13%.
Valuation Analysis and Fair Value Estimate
According to a report from BeInCrypto, Oei estimates STRC’s fair value to be approximately $96 per share. This stands in contrast to its current market price, which hovers around the $85 mark. The analyst’s methodology is notable because he evaluates STRC through the lens of a bond, analyzing its future cash flows, rather than treating it as a perpetual dividend product.
Sustainability of Dividends
A central pillar of Oei’s analysis is the long-term sustainability of STRC’s dividend. He posits that even in a scenario where Bitcoin’s price remains stagnant for an extended period, the dividend could continue to be paid out for roughly 29 years. This assessment provides a significant buffer for investors concerned about the security’s yield in a volatile market.
Why This Matters for Investors
This perspective is particularly relevant for income-focused investors who may be wary of preferred stocks tied to Bitcoin-centric companies. Oei’s background at Goldman Sachs lends a degree of authority to the analysis, offering a more traditional financial framework for evaluating a digital asset-linked security. The key takeaway is that the market may be over-penalizing STRC for its association with Bitcoin, potentially creating a buying opportunity for those who accept Oei’s bond-like valuation model.
Conclusion
The argument from the former Goldman Sachs executive suggests that Strategy’s STRC preferred stock may offer a compelling risk/reward profile. While the stock is currently trading at a discount, the analysis hinges on a specific valuation method that treats the security more like a fixed-income instrument. Investors should weigh this professional opinion against their own due diligence, particularly regarding Bitcoin price assumptions and the financial health of the issuer.
FAQs
Q1: What is STRC? STRC is the ticker symbol for a specific series of preferred stock issued by Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy). It pays a fixed dividend and is senior to common stock in the company’s capital structure.
Q2: Why does Khing Oei believe STRC is undervalued? Oei believes the market is incorrectly pricing STRC by treating it as a perpetual risk. He analyzes it as a bond with a defined cash flow stream, concluding its fair value is around $96, versus its current ~$85 price.
Q3: Is the STRC dividend safe? According to Oei’s analysis, the dividend could be sustainable for up to 29 years even without Bitcoin price appreciation. However, this is a forward-looking estimate and not a guarantee. Investors should review the company’s financial statements for a complete picture.
This post Former Goldman Sachs Executive Says Strategy’s STRC Preferred Stock Is Undervalued by 13% first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldAnalyst Warns Bitcoin May Not Bottom Until October, Citing ‘Fake Stability’
A cryptocurrency analyst known as Noname has cautioned that Bitcoin may not have reached its cyclical bottom, arguing that the current sideways price action is deceptive. In a detailed market outlook, Noname described the recent period of relative stability as a “fake stability” phase that historically precedes further declines, not a genuine recovery.
Analyst’s Timeline Points to Deeper Drop
Noname’s forecast outlines a specific timeline for Bitcoin’s price trajectory through the end of the year. The analyst predicts a short-squeeze rebound in July, followed by a deeper correction in August that could test the $50,000 support level. September is expected to form a W-shaped bottom, with the actual bottom and accumulation zone arriving in October. A recovery phase would begin in November, potentially pushing Bitcoin back toward $100,000 by December.
The analyst emphasized that the decline since Bitcoin’s June peak is part of a broader unwinding of gains accumulated over the past three years. Noname noted that historical bear markets have often seen corrections exceeding 80%, while the current price is roughly 50% below the all-time high, leaving room for additional downside.
Context and Market Implications
The warning comes amid a period of low volatility and declining trading volumes in the cryptocurrency market. Many investors have been waiting for a clear signal that the bottom is in, but Noname’s analysis suggests that patience may be required. The analyst’s reference to “fake stability” echoes patterns seen in previous bear markets, where periods of calm were followed by sharp sell-offs.
What This Means for Investors
For long-term holders, Noname’s forecast suggests that the current price levels may not represent the best entry point. The analyst advises caution, warning that a drop to $50,000 could trigger further panic selling. However, the predicted recovery to $100,000 by December implies a potential upside of nearly 100% from the projected October bottom, which could present a significant opportunity for those who wait.
Conclusion
While Noname’s predictions are speculative and should be treated with caution, the underlying argument—that Bitcoin’s current stability may be misleading—aligns with historical patterns in cryptocurrency bear markets. Investors should remain vigilant, avoid making decisions based solely on short-term price movements, and consider the possibility of further downside before a sustainable recovery begins.
FAQs
Q1: What does “fake stability” mean in Bitcoin trading? It refers to a period of low volatility and sideways price movement that appears calm but historically precedes a significant decline, as indecision among traders masks underlying selling pressure.
Q2: Is it certain that Bitcoin will drop to $50,000? No. This is a single analyst’s forecast based on historical patterns and technical analysis. Price predictions are inherently uncertain, and actual market movements may differ significantly.
Q3: Should I sell my Bitcoin based on this analysis? This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investors should conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any trading decisions.
This post Analyst Warns Bitcoin May Not Bottom Until October, Citing ‘Fake Stability’ first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldGENIUS Act at One Year: U.S. Stablecoin Rules Still Under Construction
One year after the U.S. GENIUS Act took effect, the detailed regulatory framework that stablecoin issuers must follow remains a work in progress. The law, which established a broad legal foundation for dollar-pegged digital assets, has yet to see its key implementing rules finalized, leaving the industry in a state of regulatory limbo.
Regulatory Rulemaking Still Underway
According to a report from CoinDesk, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) are actively proposing rules and gathering public feedback on critical standards. These include requirements for reserve composition, capital and liquidity buffers, custody practices, anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, and know-your-customer (KYC) procedures.
The rulemaking process is expected to unfold in stages over the coming months, with different components of the regulatory framework being finalized at different times. This phased approach aims to allow for thorough industry input and to address complex technical and legal questions.
Two-Year Grace Period and Compliance Deadline
The GENIUS Act provides stablecoin issuers with a two-year grace period to come into full compliance with the forthcoming rules. This means that stablecoins that fail to meet the finalized regulatory standards will no longer be available to U.S. users starting in July 2028.
This timeline gives issuers a clear, if distant, deadline to adapt their operations. However, the uncertainty surrounding the exact nature of the final rules complicates long-term planning for companies operating in the space.
What This Means for the Market
The slow pace of rule finalization creates a challenging environment for stablecoin issuers. While the GENIUS Act provides legal clarity at a high level, the absence of detailed operational rules makes it difficult for firms to confidently invest in compliance infrastructure or launch new products. For users and investors, the key takeaway is that the current stablecoin market is operating under a transitional framework, and significant changes are likely once the detailed rules are published.
The outcome of this regulatory process will have broad implications for the U.S. digital asset market, potentially setting a global standard for stablecoin oversight. It will also determine which stablecoins remain accessible to American consumers and businesses in the years ahead.
Conclusion
The GENIUS Act has been in effect for one year, but the detailed rules that will govern stablecoin issuers are still being drafted. With a two-year compliance grace period running until July 2028, the industry faces a period of adjustment as the OCC and FDIC finalize requirements for reserves, capital, and anti-money laundering controls. The coming months will be critical in shaping the future of stablecoin regulation in the United States.
FAQs
Q1: What is the GENIUS Act? The GENIUS Act is a U.S. law that provides a legal framework for stablecoins. It has been in force for one year, but detailed implementing rules are still being developed by financial regulators.
Q2: When will stablecoin issuers need to be fully compliant? Issuers have a two-year grace period from the law’s enactment. Non-compliant stablecoins will be unavailable to U.S. users starting in July 2028.
Q3: Which agencies are writing the detailed rules? The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) are leading the rulemaking process, covering areas like reserves, capital, custody, and anti-money laundering.
This post GENIUS Act at One Year: U.S. Stablecoin Rules Still Under Construction first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorld63% of Investors in Robinhood’s Top Meme Coins Are Losing Money, Data Shows
More than half of investors in the most popular meme coins traded on Robinhood are currently losing money, according to new data from on-chain analytics platform Bubblemaps. The analysis found that 63% of the 164,538 tracked wallets holding the top 50 meme coins on the platform were in the red, underscoring the high-risk nature of speculative cryptocurrency trading.
Bubblemaps Data Reveals Widespread Losses
Bubblemaps, a platform that visualizes blockchain token holdings, examined the profitability of investors in the 50 meme coins most actively traded on Robinhood. The dataset, which spans a broad range of tokens from Dogecoin to lesser-known community coins, showed that the majority of holders had purchased at prices above current market value. The analysis highlights a stark reality for retail investors drawn to the volatility and social media hype surrounding meme coins.
Why This Matters for Retail Investors
Meme coins, often characterized by their origins in internet jokes or community-driven momentum, have become a significant part of the retail trading landscape on platforms like Robinhood. Unlike established cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, these tokens frequently experience extreme price swings driven by social media trends rather than fundamental value. The Bubblemaps data suggests that timing the market on these assets is exceptionally difficult, with the majority of participants ending up at a loss.
Implications for Trading Behavior
The findings serve as a cautionary note for investors who may be influenced by viral posts or celebrity endorsements. While some traders have realized substantial gains during rallies, the data indicates that sustained profitability is rare. Financial advisors often warn that speculative assets with low liquidity and high volatility pose disproportionate risks to inexperienced investors.
Conclusion
The Bubblemaps analysis provides a data-driven snapshot of the risks inherent in meme coin trading on Robinhood. With nearly two-thirds of investors currently underwater, the numbers reinforce the importance of due diligence and risk management for anyone participating in these markets. As regulatory scrutiny of crypto trading platforms intensifies, such data may inform broader discussions about investor protection.
FAQs
Q1: What are meme coins? Meme coins are cryptocurrencies inspired by internet memes or jokes, often created without a serious development roadmap. They typically rely on community hype and social media for value.
Q2: How did Bubblemaps collect this data? Bubblemaps analyzed on-chain wallet data linked to the top 50 meme coins traded on Robinhood, calculating the cost basis of each wallet compared to current prices.
Q3: Is it common for most meme coin investors to lose money? Yes, due to extreme volatility and the difficulty of timing the market, a majority of retail investors in highly speculative assets like meme coins often end up at a loss.
This post 63% of Investors in Robinhood’s Top Meme Coins Are Losing Money, Data Shows first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldLummis pushes CLARITY Act, argues decentralized crypto projects should avoid bank-style rules
U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis, a long-standing advocate for cryptocurrency innovation, has renewed her call for the passage of the CLARITY Act. In a recent post on X, Lummis argued that genuinely decentralized blockchain projects should not be subjected to the same regulatory framework as traditional banks.
What is the CLARITY Act?
The CLARITY Act, short for “Clarity for Digital Tokens Act,” aims to establish a clear legal distinction between decentralized digital asset networks and centralized financial institutions. Lummis emphasized that it took years of legal and policy debate to reach a consensus on this distinction. She stated that now is the opportune moment to codify it into federal law, providing certainty for developers and investors alike.
Why this matters for the crypto industry
The legislation addresses a long-standing concern within the cryptocurrency sector: the risk of overregulation. Many blockchain projects operate without a central authority, making traditional bank-style compliance measures both impractical and stifling to innovation. Lummis’s push for the CLARITY Act signals a potential shift toward more nuanced regulatory treatment, which could encourage development and investment in the United States.
Implications for decentralized finance
If passed, the CLARITY Act could reduce legal uncertainty for decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and other non-custodial applications. Industry observers note that clear rules would help distinguish between projects that require oversight, such as centralized exchanges, and those that operate autonomously through smart contracts. This clarity is seen as essential for maintaining U.S. competitiveness in the global digital asset market.
Conclusion
Senator Lummis’s latest statement reinforces her commitment to establishing a legal framework that recognizes the unique nature of decentralized technology. While the bill faces the usual legislative hurdles, its passage would represent a significant milestone in the ongoing effort to integrate digital assets into the U.S. financial system without imposing one-size-fits-all banking regulations.
FAQs
Q1: What does the CLARITY Act aim to do? The CLARITY Act seeks to legally define decentralized digital token projects and exempt them from regulations designed for traditional banks and financial intermediaries.
Q2: Why does Senator Lummis believe decentralized projects should be treated differently? Lummis argues that decentralized projects, which lack a central controlling entity, cannot comply with bank-style rules in a meaningful way, and that applying such rules would stifle innovation without improving consumer protection.
Q3: What would be the impact of the CLARITY Act on crypto developers? Developers would gain clearer legal guidance on how to structure projects to qualify as decentralized, reducing the risk of enforcement actions and encouraging more blockchain development within the United States.
This post Lummis pushes CLARITY Act, argues decentralized crypto projects should avoid bank-style rules first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldAfter Jensen Huang’s Tokyo Visit, Japan’s Physical AI Strategy Takes Shape
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang concluded a two-day visit to Tokyo on July 16, securing a series of agreements that position Japan as a central hub for the company’s push into physical AI. The deals, announced alongside Japanese government and industry leaders, span a national AI factory, a robotics coalition, and deepened ties with Toyota. The visit underscores a mutual strategic shift: Nvidia is betting on factory-floor and machine-based AI as its next growth frontier, while Japan, facing a shrinking workforce, is accelerating a $65 billion plan to deploy 10 million AI-equipped robots across 18 sectors by 2040.
Noetra: Japan’s Sovereign AI Factory
The centerpiece of the visit was the formalization of Noetra, a consortium of roughly 44 Japanese firms, including SoftBank, Sony, NEC, and Honda, backed by government funding of up to 1 trillion yen ($6.2 billion) over five years. Noetra’s mission is to develop homegrown “physical AI” foundation models — software brains designed to run robots, vehicles, and factory machinery. Japan’s government has made clear it does not want its critical industrial infrastructure dependent on American or Chinese AI models.
To train these models, Nvidia is building a massive data center, dubbed the “Vera Rubin AI factory,” expected to launch in 2028. The facility will house 13,750 Vera CPUs and 27,500 Rubin GPUs, delivering 140 megawatts of computing power. Noetra’s development roadmap is structured in three phases: a reasoning model strong in Japanese-language processing by fiscal 2026; an omni-modal version handling text, images, video, and audio by 2028; and a “Real-world Native AI” system for direct robot control by 2030.
Robotics Coalition Lines Up Behind Cosmos
Nvidia also secured commitments from a broad swath of Japan’s industrial base to adopt its Cosmos AI models. Fanuc, Yaskawa, Kawasaki Heavy, Fujitsu, Hitachi, NEC, Sony, SoftBank, Kubota, and the AIRoA robotics group have all signed on to build on Cosmos, an open-model initiative Nvidia launched in May. During the Tokyo visit, Nvidia unveiled Cosmos 3 Edge, a version of the model optimized to run on its Jetson Thor chips inside machines themselves. Several companies, including Honda R&D and Omron, are already testing a shared control system built on the tools.
“The next frontier of AI is in the physical world, and this is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for Japan,” Huang said in a company statement. “Japan invented modern manufacturing. Now, it has the opportunity to reinvent it for the age of intelligent industries.”
Toyota Deepens Its Nvidia Integration
Toyota, already a major Nvidia customer, expanded its commitment during the visit. The automaker has committed its next-generation vehicles to Nvidia’s Drive platform, a decision announced at CES in January 2025. The newer agreements extend Nvidia’s role into Toyota’s manufacturing operations, where simulations are used to design production lines, into the software that runs its vehicles, and into systems that read road traffic. Toyota’s approach to advanced driver assistance remains more conservative than that of Waymo or Tesla, focusing on systems that assist the driver rather than replace them.
Why It Matters: Sovereignty and Demographics
Huang’s visit placed physical AI at the center of Japan’s industrial strategy, and Tokyo is backing that strategy with significant funding. The government’s AI Robotics Strategy, released in March, aims to capture more than 30% of the global AI robotics market by 2040, a market Tokyo values at roughly ¥20 trillion, or about $133 billion. The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) is funding the domestic foundation model, and Noetra’s Nvidia-powered factory is where models of that scale would be trained.
Underneath the industrial case is a sovereign one. As the United States and China pull ahead in large-scale AI, Tokyo wants its own data, its own compute, and less dependence on infrastructure it does not control. Huang appeared on July 16 alongside trade minister Ryosei Akazawa at the government’s physical-AI launch, with Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi joining by video. The Takaichi administration has made AI and semiconductors the centerpiece of a growth plan chasing ¥370 trillion ($2.3 trillion) in public and private investment by 2040. Noetra’s factory — which Nvidia bills as “the world’s first national AI infrastructure” — is the clearest bet yet. Japan’s push for independence, at least for now, rests on American chips.
Conclusion
Jensen Huang’s two days in Tokyo produced a clear blueprint for Nvidia’s next chapter in Asia. By tying its hardware and software roadmaps to Japan’s sovereign AI ambitions, the company has secured a beachhead in a market that is both a major manufacturing hub and a committed investor in physical AI. For Japan, the deals offer a path to building its own AI infrastructure and addressing a demographic crisis through automation. The partnership is a strategic alignment of mutual need, built on a foundation of government backing, industrial scale, and a shared vision of a machine-driven AI future.
FAQs
Q1: What is Noetra? Noetra is a Japanese consortium of roughly 44 domestic firms, including SoftBank, Sony, NEC, and Honda, formed to develop homegrown physical AI foundation models. It is backed by up to 1 trillion yen ($6.2 billion) in government funding over five years.
Q2: What is Nvidia building in Japan? Nvidia is building a “Vera Rubin AI factory,” a massive data center packed with its next-generation chips, expected to launch in 2028. It will house 13,750 Vera CPUs and 27,500 Rubin GPUs, delivering 140 megawatts of computing power.
Q3: Why is Japan investing so heavily in physical AI? Japan faces a shrinking workforce and wants to deploy 10 million AI-equipped robots across 18 sectors by 2040. The government is targeting more than 30% of the global AI robotics market by 2040, valued at roughly ¥20 trillion ($133 billion). The investment is also driven by a desire for technological sovereignty, reducing dependence on U.S. and Chinese AI infrastructure.
This post After Jensen Huang’s Tokyo Visit, Japan’s Physical AI Strategy Takes Shape first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldCan Apple’s Trade Secrets Lawsuit Derail OpenAI’s Hardware Ambitions?
Apple recently filed a trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI, accusing the AI company of orchestrating a campaign to solicit confidential information from current and former Apple employees. The legal action, which names OpenAI’s chief hardware officer Tang Tan, directly threatens OpenAI’s reported plans to enter the hardware market with a mobile smart speaker and to proceed with a confidential initial public offering (IPO).
What Are the Allegations?
The complaint, filed in a California court, alleges a pattern of misconduct at the highest levels of OpenAI. Apple claims that OpenAI systematically targeted its employees to gain access to proprietary trade secrets, potentially for use in developing competing hardware products. According to the lawsuit, more than 400 former Apple employees now work at OpenAI. OpenAI has responded by stating it is “not aware of any evidence that this complaint has merit.”
Implications for OpenAI’s Hardware and IPO Plans
On a recent episode of Bitcoin World’s Equity podcast, editors Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and Anthony Ha debated the lawsuit’s potential fallout. Sean O’Kane argued that even without an injunction, the lawsuit could cause significant delays. “Even setting aside whether or not the court grants any kind of injunctive relief or any kind of restraining order over what OpenAI is doing, it just naturally can lead to that sort of situation where it’s going to cause some delays in what OpenAI is working on,” O’Kane said. “Which I’m sure was probably part of the reasoning behind Apple doing this. They don’t do this stuff willy nilly.”
The IPO Calculus
OpenAI is reportedly preparing for an IPO, potentially as early as late 2025 or early 2026. The company’s valuation is heavily tied to its software business, but hardware plans could represent a significant future addressable market. O’Kane noted that this lawsuit introduces substantial risk to that narrative. “If they have a big amount of that pegged to a potential hardware division and hardware products, this could be a huge risk to that and changes a lot of the calculus of sort of how the IPO gets priced,” he said.
Will OpenAI Settle or Fight?
The podcast panel also explored OpenAI’s likely legal strategy. The company recently emerged from a high-profile lawsuit filed by Elon Musk, a case that, while ultimately won by OpenAI, exposed internal communications and caused reputational discomfort. Anthony Ha questioned whether OpenAI would seek to avoid a similar ordeal. Kirsten Korosec predicted the opposite: “I fully predict the latter,” she said, suggesting OpenAI believes it can withstand the cost and embarrassment of another trial.
What Does This Mean for Consumers?
OpenAI’s first hardware product is rumored to be a screenless, mobile smart speaker developed in collaboration with designer Jony Ive. The device is said to be always listening, raising significant privacy and social norm questions. As Anthony Ha pointed out, “depending on how mobile it is, it’s not just listening to you, it’s listening to the people around you.” The lawsuit adds another layer of uncertainty to whether and when such a product might reach the market.
Conclusion
Apple’s trade secrets lawsuit presents a material challenge to OpenAI’s hardware ambitions and its IPO timeline. While the legal merits remain untested, the potential for delays, reputational damage, and investor uncertainty is significant. The outcome will likely shape not only OpenAI’s product roadmap but also the broader competitive dynamics between AI and hardware giants in Silicon Valley.
FAQs
Q1: What is Apple accusing OpenAI of? Apple alleges that OpenAI engaged in a coordinated effort to recruit Apple employees and obtain confidential trade secrets, potentially for use in developing competing hardware products.
Q2: How could this lawsuit affect OpenAI’s IPO? The lawsuit introduces risk to OpenAI’s valuation, particularly if a significant portion of its projected growth is tied to hardware products. This could complicate pricing and investor confidence during the IPO process.
Q3: What is OpenAI’s first hardware product? Reports indicate OpenAI is developing a screenless, mobile smart speaker designed in collaboration with former Apple designer Jony Ive. The device is expected to rely heavily on voice interaction.
This post Can Apple’s Trade Secrets Lawsuit Derail OpenAI’s Hardware Ambitions? first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldChristopher Nolan Calls AI a ‘Transparent Trojan Horse’ — and Says Public Skepticism Is Healthy
Oscar-winning director Christopher Nolan, whose epic adaptation of The Odyssey is currently dominating the global box office, has described artificial intelligence as a “Trojan horse” — one that everyone already knows is carrying a hidden threat. In a new interview published this week, Nolan said he finds it “pretty encouraging” that young people in particular have met the rapid rise of AI with deep suspicion, coining terms like “AI slop” to dismiss low-quality generated content.
Nolan’s Trojan Horse Analogy for AI
During a conversation with French interviewer Hugo Travers, who publishes under the handle HugoDécrypte, the director was asked whether AI might be like the legendary Trojan horse — a gift that conceals something far more dangerous. Nolan laughed and responded: “I think AI is a Trojan horse that everybody knows the Greeks are inside.” He went further, calling the technology “a transparent horse, it’s made of glass.”
Nolan emphasized that he has never seen a technology advance so quickly while being so widely rejected by the public. “Everybody’s suspicion of it is so extreme, particularly young people,” he said. “The reaction to AI videos online and people my children’s age immediately calling it ‘AI slop’ and coining that term and just putting it in a box.”
In his view, this widespread skepticism is a healthy corrective to the tech industry’s typical hype cycle. “Technology is always going to give us great gifts, but it has to be viewed with skepticism,” Nolan said. “The motives of the people giving it to us also have to be viewed with skepticism. That’s when we’ll get the best out of a new technology, rather than just blind faith that everything’s going to be great.”
Hollywood’s Ongoing Struggle With AI
Nolan did not detail specific threats he sees from AI, but the technology has become a flashpoint across the entertainment industry. It was a central issue during the 2023 Writers Guild of America and SAG-AFTRA strikes, with creators demanding protections against the use of generative AI to replace human labor. The Directors Guild of America, where Nolan serves as president, also secured some generative AI protections in its most recent collective bargaining agreement.
The director’s comments arrive as major studios and tech companies race to integrate AI into production workflows, sparking debates over copyright, creative credit, and job displacement. Nolan’s position as a high-profile filmmaker and union leader gives his words weight in an industry still navigating the technology’s implications.
Nolan’s Broader Techno-Skepticism
The director’s caution around AI fits a longer pattern of measured resistance to new technology. Nolan has famously avoided smartphones and remains a vocal advocate for shooting on film. The Odyssey became the first feature film shot entirely on IMAX film and IMAX cameras, a technical achievement that underscores his preference for analog methods.
When The New York Times recently asked if he considers himself a technophobe, Nolan replied: “I think of myself as a techno-skeptic.” He explained that his love of film comes from the fact that it is “better in terms of representing the way the eye sees the world than any digital imaging system I’ve seen.” He added: “I embrace new technology all the time, but it tends to be sold to people at the expense of systems that might still be valid and viable. That’s what I saw in my industry — throwing the baby out with the bath water. We almost lost film!”
Why This Matters for Readers
Nolan’s comments resonate beyond Hollywood. As generative AI tools become embedded in everyday products — from search engines to creative software — public trust remains low. Surveys consistently show that a majority of consumers are wary of AI-generated content, and terms like “AI slop” reflect a growing cultural rejection of low-quality automated output. For readers, Nolan’s perspective offers a reminder that skepticism toward powerful new technologies is not Luddism, but a rational response to an opaque and rapidly evolving landscape.
Conclusion
Christopher Nolan’s characterization of AI as a transparent Trojan horse captures a moment of unusual public consensus: the technology is advancing faster than society’s ability to understand or regulate it. His praise for young people’s instinctive distrust, combined with his own track record of techno-skepticism, positions him as a prominent voice urging caution without rejecting innovation outright. As the debate over AI’s role in media, labor, and daily life intensifies, Nolan’s framing is likely to resonate with audiences already primed to question the motives of those delivering the gift.
FAQs
Q1: What exactly did Christopher Nolan say about AI being a Trojan horse? Nolan said AI is “a Trojan horse that everybody knows the Greeks are inside,” and called it “a transparent horse, it’s made of glass,” meaning the danger is obvious to most people.
Q2: Why does Nolan think public skepticism of AI is healthy? He believes skepticism forces a more honest evaluation of new technology, ensuring society gets the best out of it rather than accepting it with blind faith. He noted that young people’s immediate dismissal of AI-generated content as “slop” is a positive sign.
Q3: How does Nolan’s view on AI fit with his broader relationship with technology? Nolan describes himself as a “techno-skeptic” rather than a technophobe. He embraces new tools selectively but resists the wholesale abandonment of older, proven systems — such as shooting on film instead of digital.
This post Christopher Nolan Calls AI a ‘Transparent Trojan Horse’ — and Says Public Skepticism Is Healthy first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldCurrent AI builds a public alternative to Big Tech’s AI, starting with 22 Indian languages
A nonprofit called Current AI is racing to build an open, public AI infrastructure modeled on the early World Wide Web — free for all, starting with communities whose languages and cultures have been left out of today’s dominant AI systems. Founded in February 2025 by Martin Tisne, the organization has already secured $400 million in commitments from the French government, Ford Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, DeepMind, and Salesforce.
A device for farmers who don’t speak English
In February at the India AI Summit, Current AI partnered with Bhashini, the Indian government’s AI language division, to create Suno Sutra (Hindi for “listening chronicles”). The result is a pocket-sized, offline device that runs AI in 22 Indian languages — no internet required. The device is fully open-sourced, meaning developer communities anywhere can build on it.
“In India, there are hundreds of different languages and dialects, and right now AI is not representing them,” Current AI CEO Ayah Bdeir told Bitcoin World. Bdeir, who joined Current AI in January after leading Mozilla’s AI strategy and founding littleBits, says the problem is straightforward: every major AI system today belongs to a private company. “If AI is truly a transformative technology, there has to be a public alternative,” she said.
$3.2 million in grants to four continents
Last month, Current AI allocated $3.2 million in grants to four organizations across Kenya, Lebanon, and the Brazilian Amazon. The projects include building AI datasets across more than 50 African languages for health, farming, and education (Masakhane, Kenya); digitizing Arab cultural history into community-controlled databases (Institute for Worldmaking, Lebanon); building offline AI tools with Indigenous Amazon communities (Portal sem Porteiras, Brazil); and developing audit tools to hold AI systems accountable across Africa (African Internet Rights Alliance, Kenya).
None of the grantees have fully solved the data ownership question yet, but Bdeir sees that as the point. “Every one of them has built the question into their work, rather than accepting the usual default, where complexity becomes the excuse to let a government or a tech company decide for everyone,” she said.
Why language and data ownership matter
Bdeir draws a sharp distinction between Current AI’s approach and Big Tech’s multilingual push. “Big tech builds multilingual models to expand their market, regardless of consent or context,” she said. She points to a concrete example: “For Indigenous languages, missionary Bible translations become training data before communities have set any rules.”
The stakes go beyond language itself. “Language is how knowledge, tradition, memory and identity get carried from one generation to the next,” Bdeir said. “So when a technology can’t speak your language, it can’t hold your culture either.” Current AI’s model stores models and data locally, brings in community experts before anything is built, and writes consent protocols into the pipeline so communities can halt the process at any point.
An open-source AI stack for the Global South
Earlier this month in Geneva, Current AI launched Alpha Chat, an open-source chatbot assembled in seven weeks by a coalition of ten organizations including Hugging Face, Mozilla, and MIT Media Lab. Each contributor brought a piece of the stack: a language model, safety tooling, and computing power. The nonprofit also struck a deal with Sakana AI, a Tokyo-based startup focused on “Sovereign AI,” to build a shared open-source AI stack designed to support Japanese language and culture — and communities across the Global South that dominant AI systems have largely ignored.
Conclusion
Current AI’s approach is still early — its first grant round was $3.2 million split across four organizations — but its vision is ambitious. “Scale is not always the measure. That is the Big Tech paradigm,” Bdeir said. “This could look like an Indigenous elder in the Brazilian Amazon using a tool built in Kenya to be able to pass down ecological knowledge in their own language.” With $400 million in committed funding and growing partnerships across governments, nonprofits, and tech companies, Current AI is positioning itself as a credible public alternative to the private AI giants.
FAQs
Q1: What is Current AI? A: Current AI is a nonprofit founded in February 2025 that builds open, public AI infrastructure for underserved languages and communities. It operates as a public-private partnership with $400 million in commitments from governments, foundations, and tech companies.
Q2: How is Current AI different from Big Tech’s AI efforts? A: Current AI focuses on community control, consent, and open-source development. Unlike Big Tech, which Bdeir says builds multilingual models to expand market reach, Current AI works with communities to set rules for data use and keeps models and data stored locally.
Q3: What has Current AI built so far? A: The nonprofit has launched Suno Sutra, an offline AI device supporting 22 Indian languages; Alpha Chat, an open-source chatbot built with Hugging Face, Mozilla, and MIT Media Lab; and awarded $3.2 million in grants to four organizations working on AI datasets, cultural digitization, offline tools, and audit systems across Africa, Lebanon, and Brazil.
This post Current AI builds a public alternative to Big Tech’s AI, starting with 22 Indian languages first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldBitcoin World Live Feed: Operating Hours and Weekend Coverage Explained
Bitcoin World, a leading source for real-time cryptocurrency investment updates, has clarified its live feed operating hours to help readers plan their market monitoring. The service provides continuous coverage from 10:00 p.m. UTC on Sunday through 3:00 p.m. UTC on Saturday, with limited updates during the weekend gap.
Understanding the Live Feed Schedule
The Bitcoin World Live Feed is designed to offer near-24/7 coverage of the volatile cryptocurrency market, which operates around the clock. The primary operating window covers six and a half days, from Sunday evening to Saturday afternoon UTC. During this period, the team provides real-time updates on price movements, regulatory news, and market analysis.
Between 3:00 p.m. UTC on Saturday and 10:00 p.m. UTC on Sunday, the feed shifts to an on-call mode. Investment updates are published only when major issues arise, such as significant price swings, security breaches, or breaking regulatory announcements. This approach ensures that readers are not flooded with low-importance content during traditionally quieter market hours.
Breaking News Accessibility
For urgent developments, Bitcoin World maintains a separate channel for breaking overseas economic news. This service remains available at all times through the Bitcoin World Live app and the Bitcoin World web service. Readers can access critical updates regardless of the live feed’s operating status, ensuring they never miss impactful events that could affect their portfolios.
Why This Matters for Traders
The cryptocurrency market never sleeps, but newsrooms must balance coverage with editorial resources. By clearly defining its operating hours, Bitcoin World sets realistic expectations for its audience. Traders and investors can rely on the live feed for continuous updates during the primary window and know that major breaking news will still be covered during the weekend gap. This transparency builds trust and helps users plan their information consumption.
Conclusion
Bitcoin World’s live feed schedule reflects a practical approach to covering a 24/7 market. With full coverage from Sunday evening to Saturday afternoon and on-call weekend updates, the service balances depth with responsiveness. The separate availability of breaking economic news through the app and web service further ensures that readers stay informed during all hours.
FAQs
Q1: What are the exact operating hours of the Bitcoin World Live Feed? The live feed runs from 10:00 p.m. UTC on Sunday through 3:00 p.m. UTC on Saturday, providing continuous real-time cryptocurrency investment updates.
Q2: What happens during the weekend gap? Between 3:00 p.m. UTC on Saturday and 10:00 p.m. UTC on Sunday, updates are published only when major issues arise. However, breaking overseas economic news remains available at all times via the Bitcoin World Live app and web service.
Q3: How can I access breaking news outside live feed hours? You can use the Bitcoin World Live app or the Bitcoin World web service, which provide continuous access to breaking overseas economic news regardless of the live feed’s operating status.
This post Bitcoin World Live Feed: Operating Hours and Weekend Coverage Explained first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldBithumb to Temporarily Halt USDT Withdrawals on Tron Network
South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb has announced a temporary suspension of Tether (USDT) withdrawals on the Tron network. The halt is scheduled to begin at 2:00 p.m. UTC on July 18, according to an official notice from the exchange.
Why Bithumb Is Suspending USDT Withdrawals
Bithumb did not provide a detailed explanation for the suspension in its initial announcement. However, such pauses are often related to network upgrades, wallet maintenance, or security checks. The exchange has stated that the suspension is temporary, but has not yet specified when normal service will resume. Users are advised to complete any pending USDT withdrawals on the Tron network before the cutoff time to avoid delays.
Impact on Users and the Market
The suspension affects only USDT withdrawals on the Tron network. Other tokens and networks remain operational. Tether (USDT) is the largest stablecoin by market capitalization and is widely used for trading, remittances, and as a store of value. The Tron network is one of the most popular blockchains for USDT transfers due to its low fees and fast transaction times.
What This Means for Traders
Traders who rely on USDT on the Tron network for arbitrage, liquidity, or cross-exchange transfers may need to use alternative networks such as Ethereum, Solana, or Binance Smart Chain during the suspension period. Bithumb has not indicated whether the suspension is related to any security incident, but the move is precautionary in nature.
Conclusion
Bithumb’s temporary suspension of USDT withdrawals on the Tron network is a routine operational measure that may cause short-term inconvenience for users. The exchange has not provided a specific timeline for resumption, but such pauses typically last from a few hours to a couple of days. Users should monitor Bithumb’s official channels for updates and plan their transactions accordingly.
FAQs
Q1: When will Bithumb suspend USDT withdrawals on Tron? The suspension starts at 2:00 p.m. UTC on July 18. Users should complete withdrawals before this time.
Q2: Which networks are affected? Only USDT withdrawals on the Tron network are affected. Other networks and tokens remain operational.
Q3: Is this suspension related to a security issue? Bithumb has not specified a reason. Such pauses are often for maintenance or upgrades and are not necessarily linked to security incidents.
This post Bithumb to Temporarily Halt USDT Withdrawals on Tron Network first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldEthereum Whale Moves $35.4 Million to Binance, Eyes Potential Profit
A significant Ethereum whale, identified by the address beginning with 0x49C and the ENS name geministar.eth, deposited 19,235 ETH—valued at approximately $35.34 million—into the Binance exchange just 15 minutes ago, according to blockchain analytics firm EmberCN. The transaction marks a notable movement of capital that could signal an intent to sell.
Background of the Trade
The deposited tokens were originally withdrawn from Binance roughly one month ago, when Ethereum was trading at approximately $1,766 per coin. At current prices, the whale is sitting on an unrealized gain of about $1.4 million if the position is liquidated at market rates. According to CoinMarketCap, ETH was trading at $1,840.58 at the time of reporting, showing little change from the previous day’s close.
Market Implications
Large deposits to centralized exchanges are often interpreted by traders as a precursor to selling activity, as moving assets from cold storage or self-custody wallets to an exchange reduces the friction of executing a trade. While a single transaction does not necessarily predict a market move, the size of this deposit—over $35 million—is substantial enough to warrant attention from institutional and retail observers alike.
Context for Ethereum Investors
The whale’s cost basis of roughly $1,766 places the trade in a profitable position, with an estimated gain of around 4.2% over the holding period. However, the broader Ethereum market has faced headwinds in recent weeks, with prices consolidating in a narrow range between $1,800 and $1,860. This lack of directional momentum may be influencing large holders to take profits or reduce exposure.
Conclusion
The movement of 19,235 ETH to Binance by the geministar.eth address represents a notable large-capacity transaction that market participants will be watching closely. Whether the whale executes a sale or moves the funds again remains to be seen, but the deposit itself adds a layer of potential selling pressure to an already range-bound Ethereum market.
FAQs
Q1: What is a whale in cryptocurrency? A whale is an individual or entity that holds a large amount of a particular cryptocurrency, often enough to influence market prices through their trading activity.
Q2: Why does a whale depositing to an exchange matter? Depositing funds to an exchange typically makes them easier to sell quickly. Large deposits can signal an impending sale, which may put downward pressure on the asset’s price.
Q3: How was this transaction detected? Blockchain analytics firms like EmberCN monitor public ledger data for large or unusual transactions, flagging addresses and amounts for market observers.
This post Ethereum Whale Moves $35.4 Million to Binance, Eyes Potential Profit first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldCardano’s Van Rossem Upgrade Set for Activation Early July 19
The Cardano network is preparing to activate the Van Rossem upgrade, scheduled for approximately 1:44 a.m. UTC on July 19. The upgrade, first reported by U.Today, marks a significant technical milestone for the blockchain platform, focusing on performance enhancements for its smart contract capabilities.
Key Technical Improvements
The Van Rossem upgrade introduces several core changes to the Cardano protocol. Most notably, it includes optimizations to the Plutus smart contract platform, which is the backbone for decentralized applications (dApps) on the network. The upgrade also implements modifications to the cost model, which governs transaction fees and computational costs, aiming to make operations more efficient and predictable for developers. Additionally, the update strengthens node security, a critical factor for maintaining network integrity and user trust.
Market Reaction and ADA Price
In the lead-up to the upgrade, ADA, Cardano’s native token, has seen a modest price increase. According to data from CoinMarketCap, ADA was trading at $0.1658, reflecting a 3.10% gain over the past 24 hours. While this uptick aligns with the positive sentiment surrounding the network’s development, it is consistent with broader market movements and not necessarily a direct result of the upgrade alone. Investors and analysts will be watching for sustained momentum as the upgrade goes live.
Why This Upgrade Matters
For the Cardano ecosystem, the Van Rossem upgrade represents a step forward in the platform’s roadmap toward greater scalability and developer accessibility. By improving Plutus performance and adjusting the cost model, the upgrade could lower barriers for developers building on Cardano, potentially attracting more projects to the network. Stronger node security also reinforces the network’s resilience against attacks, which is essential for long-term adoption.
Conclusion
The Van Rossem upgrade is a scheduled technical event for Cardano, bringing targeted improvements to smart contract execution, cost efficiency, and security. While the market has shown a mild positive reaction, the true impact will be measured over the coming weeks as developers and users interact with the updated network.
FAQs
Q1: What is the Van Rossem upgrade? The Van Rossem upgrade is a planned update to the Cardano blockchain that enhances the Plutus smart contract platform, adjusts the cost model, and improves node security.
Q2: When will the Van Rossem upgrade be activated? The upgrade is scheduled for activation at approximately 1:44 a.m. UTC on July 19.
Q3: How has the ADA price reacted to the upgrade news? ADA was trading at $0.1658, up 3.10% over the past 24 hours, though this movement is part of broader market trends.
This post Cardano’s Van Rossem Upgrade Set for Activation Early July 19 first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldHyperliquid’s Share of Perpetual Futures Open Interest Hits Record 9.4%
Hyperliquid, the decentralized perpetual futures exchange, has reached a new milestone. According to data from on-chain analytics platform Hypeflows, the platform’s share of open interest in perpetual futures relative to major centralized exchanges has climbed to 9.4%. This figure represents an all-time high since Hyperliquid’s inception, signaling growing trader preference for decentralized derivatives markets.
What the Data Shows
The 9.4% share means that for every $100 of open interest held across both centralized and decentralized perpetual futures markets, $9.40 is now held on Hyperliquid. This metric tracks the total value of outstanding futures contracts — positions that have not yet been settled. A rising share suggests that traders are increasingly allocating capital to Hyperliquid’s platform, potentially drawn by its low fees, self-custody model, or unique market mechanics.
Hypeflows, the data provider behind the report, aggregates open interest figures from Hyperliquid and compares them against major centralized exchanges (CEXs) such as Binance, Bybit, and OKX. The record comes amid a broader trend of capital rotation toward decentralized finance (DeFi) derivatives platforms.
HYPE Price Reaction
Despite the record open interest share, the native token of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, HYPE, traded at $58.58 at the time of writing. This marks a 2.84% decline over the past 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap. The divergence between the platform’s growing market share and the token’s price action is not unusual in crypto markets, where token prices are influenced by a wide range of factors including broader market sentiment, tokenomics, and speculative flows.
Some analysts suggest that the price dip may reflect profit-taking after a recent rally, or a temporary disconnect between on-chain usage metrics and market pricing. Others note that HYPE’s price action remains closely tied to overall crypto market conditions.
Why This Matters for Traders
The growth of Hyperliquid’s open interest share is a clear indicator of shifting trader behavior. Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) for perpetual futures have historically struggled to capture significant market share from CEXs due to liquidity and user experience challenges. Hyperliquid’s sustained growth suggests that these barriers are eroding, at least for a subset of active traders.
For readers, this trend signals that the DeFi derivatives sector is maturing. Increased competition between CEXs and DEXs often leads to better fee structures, more innovative products, and improved user experience across the board. However, traders should also be aware that DEXs carry unique risks, including smart contract vulnerabilities and lower liquidity during volatile periods.
Conclusion
Hyperliquid’s record 9.4% share of perpetual futures open interest versus centralized exchanges marks a notable moment for decentralized finance. While the HYPE token experienced a modest price decline, the underlying usage data points to growing adoption of decentralized derivatives platforms. The development reinforces the narrative that DeFi is gradually capturing a larger slice of the crypto derivatives market, a trend worth monitoring for anyone involved in digital asset trading.
FAQs
Q1: What is open interest in perpetual futures? Open interest represents the total value of all outstanding perpetual futures contracts that have not been settled. It is a key metric for gauging market activity and capital flow in derivatives markets.
Q2: Why is Hyperliquid’s open interest share significant? A rising share indicates that traders are moving capital from centralized exchanges to Hyperliquid, reflecting growing trust and preference for decentralized trading platforms. The 9.4% figure is a record high for the platform.
Q3: Does the HYPE price drop contradict the positive open interest data? Not necessarily. Token prices are influenced by multiple factors including market sentiment, token supply dynamics, and broader macroeconomic conditions. Short-term price movements do not always correlate directly with on-chain usage metrics.
This post Hyperliquid’s Share of Perpetual Futures Open Interest Hits Record 9.4% first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldIran Suspends Implementation of Memorandum of Understanding with United States, Deputy Minister Says
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs, Kazem Gharibabadi, announced that Tehran has suspended implementation of its memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the United States, citing violations of commitments by Washington. The statement was reported by China’s Xinhua news agency, citing Iranian media sources.
Background of the MOU and the Suspension
The MOU in question is understood to relate to a broader framework of mutual commitments, though specific terms have not been publicly detailed by either government. Gharibabadi’s remarks, made during a parliamentary session, did not specify which U.S. actions constituted the alleged violations. The suspension marks a notable setback in already strained diplomatic channels between the two nations, which have lacked formal diplomatic relations since 1980.
Implications for Regional Diplomacy
This development comes amid ongoing tensions over Iran’s nuclear program, regional military activities, and economic sanctions. The suspension could complicate broader diplomatic efforts, including indirect negotiations over a potential return to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal. The United States has not yet officially responded to the Iranian announcement.
Why This Matters
For readers, this story signals a hardening of Iran’s stance toward the United States, which may affect global oil markets, regional stability in the Middle East, and the trajectory of nuclear negotiations. Any disruption in diplomatic channels raises the risk of miscalculation or escalation, particularly in the Persian Gulf and in relation to Iran’s nuclear enrichment activities.
Conclusion
The suspension of the MOU by Iran represents a tangible deterioration in U.S.-Iran relations, driven by mutual allegations of non-compliance. As of this report, no timeline for resumption has been announced, and the path forward remains uncertain. Both nations continue to operate under a framework of indirect communication, primarily through European and Gulf intermediaries.
FAQs
Q1: What is the MOU between Iran and the United States? A1: The memorandum of understanding is a bilateral agreement outlining mutual commitments, though its specific provisions have not been publicly disclosed in full. It was intended to facilitate cooperation on certain issues, including potentially nuclear safeguards and regional security.
Q2: Why did Iran suspend the MOU? A2: According to Deputy Foreign Minister Gharibabadi, Iran suspended implementation because the United States violated its commitments under the agreement. No specific violations were detailed in the announcement.
Q3: How might this affect the Iran nuclear deal? A3: The suspension adds another layer of mistrust between the parties, potentially complicating efforts to revive the JCPOA. Indirect talks have been stalled for months, and this move may further delay any diplomatic progress.
This post Iran Suspends Implementation of Memorandum of Understanding with United States, Deputy Minister Says first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldBONK DAO Attacker Moves Another $1.19M to Coinbase as Price Slides 7%
The wallet address responsible for the $21.2 million BONK DAO governance attack has deposited an additional 400 billion BONK tokens, valued at approximately $1.19 million, into the Coinbase exchange, according to blockchain monitoring service EmberCN. The deposit triggered a further 7% decline in BONK’s price, compounding losses for token holders already reeling from the breach.
Ongoing Fallout from the BONK DAO Attack
The attack, which occurred in late July 2024, exploited a vulnerability in the BONK DAO’s governance mechanism, allowing the attacker to drain 5.4 trillion BONK tokens—worth $21.2 million at the time—from the DAO treasury. Since then, the attacker has been methodically moving small tranches of the stolen tokens to centralized exchanges, likely in an attempt to liquidate them without causing excessive slippage. This latest deposit brings the total moved to Coinbase to over 1.2 trillion BONK.
According to CoinMarketCap data, BONK is currently trading at $0.00000293, down 8.74% over the past 24 hours. The token has lost more than 30% of its value since the attack was first disclosed, as investor confidence in the project’s security has eroded.
South Korean Exchanges Suspend BONK Services
Adding to the pressure, major South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Upbit and Bithumb have temporarily suspended BONK deposits and withdrawals since July 7. The suspension has created a price divergence, with BONK trading at a discount on these platforms compared to global markets. South Korean regulators have not publicly commented on the suspension, but local exchange policies often require additional security reviews following major incidents.
What This Means for BONK Holders
The ongoing sell pressure from the attacker’s deposits, combined with reduced liquidity from the South Korean exchange suspensions, creates a challenging environment for BONK holders. The price divergence between Korean and global exchanges suggests that arbitrage opportunities exist, but the risk of further deposits by the attacker may deter buyers. The BONK DAO has not announced any compensation plan for affected token holders, and the attacker’s identity remains unknown.
Conclusion
The BONK DAO attack continues to reverberate through the market as the attacker systematically moves stolen funds to exchanges. The combination of active liquidation and regional exchange suspensions has driven BONK to multi-month lows. Investors should monitor on-chain activity for further deposits and watch for any updates from the BONK DAO regarding security enhancements or recovery efforts.
FAQs
Q1: How much BONK has the attacker moved to exchanges so far? The attacker has moved over 1.2 trillion BONK tokens to Coinbase in multiple transactions since the attack. The total value of the stolen tokens was $21.2 million at the time of the breach.
Q2: Why did Upbit and Bithumb suspend BONK deposits and withdrawals? South Korean exchanges Upbit and Bithumb temporarily suspended BONK services on July 7, likely as a precautionary measure following the DAO attack. The suspension is intended to protect users and allow for additional security review.
Q3: Is there any way for BONK holders to recover their losses? As of now, the BONK DAO has not announced a compensation or recovery plan. The attacker’s identity is unknown, and the stolen funds are being actively moved to exchanges. Token holders should exercise caution and monitor official DAO communications for any updates.
This post BONK DAO Attacker Moves Another $1.19M to Coinbase as Price Slides 7% first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

BitcoinWorldMorgan Stanley Submits Additional Amendments for Spot Ethereum and Solana ETFs
Morgan Stanley has submitted additional amendments for its proposed spot Ethereum and Solana exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on July 14, according to a post from Cointelegraph on its official X account. The filings mark the latest step in the financial giant’s push to offer direct exposure to two of the largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization.
Background of the Filings
Morgan Stanley initially filed applications for spot ETH and SOL ETFs with the SEC in January of this year. The move signaled a significant shift in institutional appetite for cryptocurrency-based investment products, particularly from a traditional Wall Street powerhouse. In June, the firm submitted earlier amendments that outlined plans for staking the underlying assets within the ETFs and set a management fee of 0.14%, which it described as among the lowest in the industry.
The latest amendments, filed on July 14, build on those earlier proposals, though the specific details of the new changes have not been publicly disclosed. The ticker for Morgan Stanley’s spot ETH ETF is expected to be MSSE, while the spot SOL ETF is anticipated to trade under MSOL.
Institutional Momentum and Market Implications
The filings come amid a broader trend of traditional financial institutions seeking to offer regulated crypto investment products. If approved, Morgan Stanley’s ETFs would provide investors with a more accessible and regulated way to gain exposure to Ethereum and Solana without directly holding the assets. The inclusion of staking in the June amendments is particularly noteworthy, as it would allow the ETFs to generate yield from the underlying tokens, potentially offering a competitive advantage over similar products.
The SEC has historically been cautious in approving spot crypto ETFs, particularly for assets beyond Bitcoin. However, the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs earlier this year has opened the door for other cryptocurrencies. Morgan Stanley’s persistent engagement with the regulator suggests a belief that the market is maturing and that regulatory clarity is improving.
What This Means for Investors
For retail and institutional investors, the potential approval of Morgan Stanley’s ETFs could broaden the range of crypto investment options available through traditional brokerage accounts. The low management fee of 0.14% is also notable, as it undercuts many existing crypto-focused funds, potentially increasing their attractiveness. However, investors should be aware that the SEC’s review process can be lengthy and that approval is not guaranteed.
Conclusion
Morgan Stanley’s latest amendments for spot ETH and SOL ETFs represent a continued push by traditional finance to integrate digital assets into regulated investment vehicles. While the outcome remains uncertain, the filings underscore the growing institutional interest in cryptocurrencies and the evolving regulatory landscape. The SEC’s decision on these proposals will be closely watched by market participants as a bellwether for future crypto ETF approvals.
FAQs
Q1: What are the ticker symbols for Morgan Stanley’s proposed ETFs? The ticker for the spot ETH ETF is expected to be MSSE, and the spot SOL ETF is expected to trade under MSOL.
Q2: What is the management fee for these ETFs? Morgan Stanley has set a management fee of 0.14%, which it describes as among the lowest in the industry.
Q3: When did Morgan Stanley first file for these ETFs? The initial applications for the spot ETH and SOL ETFs were filed with the SEC in January.
This post Morgan Stanley Submits Additional Amendments for Spot Ethereum and Solana ETFs first appeared on BitcoinWorld.