TradeWithChantel 1
110 Posts
TradeWithChantel 1
Report
Block User
HERE TO SHARE MY CRYPTO EXPERIENCE 📈 🌸
0 Following
8 Followers
19 Liked
Posts
$US One of the most volatile AI coins in crypto over the past few weeks. If this volume keeps holding and we start getting daily closes above $0.04, the setup could be primed for another leg higher. Trend lines remain useful with trades like this, especially when momentum gets crowded. I’d rather keep leverage low and let the move develop naturally than overexpose the position chasing every candle. The key now is whether buyers can keep absorbing the selling pressure while volume stays elevated. If that continues, the structure becomes interesting to watch, with $0.04 acting as the level that could confirm the move.
$US One of the most volatile AI coins in crypto over the past few weeks. If this volume keeps holding and we start getting daily closes above $0.04, the setup could be primed for another leg higher. Trend lines remain useful with trades like this, especially when momentum gets crowded. I’d rather keep leverage low and let the move develop naturally than overexpose the position chasing every candle. The key now is whether buyers can keep absorbing the selling pressure while volume stays elevated. If that continues, the structure becomes interesting to watch, with $0.04 acting as the level that could confirm the move.
$BTC at $82K could tell us more than whether support holds. A 3% pullback from the $84.8K breakout puts Bitcoin right into a zone where fresh longs, stops and leveraged positions can get pressured. If $82K breaks, derivatives could accelerate the move as liquidations hit and open interest gets flushed. But that alone doesn’t necessarily invalidate the breakout. The real signal comes afterward. If spot and ETF demand absorb the forced selling, Bitcoin could emerge with less leverage and cleaner positioning. But if $82K fails and spot buyers don’t step in, the weakness becomes harder to dismiss as simple deleveraging. For me, the key isn’t just whether $82K breaks. It’s what Bitcoin does once the forced sellers are gone.
$BTC at $82K could tell us more than whether support holds. A 3% pullback from the $84.8K breakout puts Bitcoin right into a zone where fresh longs, stops and leveraged positions can get pressured. If $82K breaks, derivatives could accelerate the move as liquidations hit and open interest gets flushed. But that alone doesn’t necessarily invalidate the breakout. The real signal comes afterward. If spot and ETF demand absorb the forced selling, Bitcoin could emerge with less leverage and cleaner positioning. But if $82K fails and spot buyers don’t step in, the weakness becomes harder to dismiss as simple deleveraging. For me, the key isn’t just whether $82K breaks. It’s what Bitcoin does once the forced sellers are gone.
69
$MON BREAKS ABOVE $0.03! 🚀 MONAD has officially pushed past the $0.03 level, marking another important step as momentum builds and market attention returns to the project. With $0.03 now behind it, the next major level on the radar is $0.05. The move shows that buyers are still willing to step in, but the key question now is whether $MON can hold this momentum and turn the $0.03 area into support. If buying pressure continues, $0.05 could become the next major target. A clean move toward that level would put even more attention on $MON and its ability to sustain the current strength. Watching this one closely. 👀
$MON BREAKS ABOVE $0.03! 🚀 MONAD has officially pushed past the $0.03 level, marking another important step as momentum builds and market attention returns to the project. With $0.03 now behind it, the next major level on the radar is $0.05. The move shows that buyers are still willing to step in, but the key question now is whether $MON can hold this momentum and turn the $0.03 area into support. If buying pressure continues, $0.05 could become the next major target. A clean move toward that level would put even more attention on $MON and its ability to sustain the current strength. Watching this one closely. 👀
72
Maybe the real “Uptober” trade starts before October. If traders already expect $BTC to perform well this month, they don’t need to wait for October to arrive. Some will position early, which can pull part of the expected move forward. That makes this October different. Instead of asking whether Bitcoin will repeat its historical October performance, I’m watching whether the market can keep buying after the obvious seasonal trade has already been crowded. does $BTC continue finding buyers once the “Uptober” narrative stops being new? If it does, the strength may have less to do with the calendar and more to do with genuine demand.
Maybe the real “Uptober” trade starts before October. If traders already expect $BTC to perform well this month, they don’t need to wait for October to arrive. Some will position early, which can pull part of the expected move forward. That makes this October different. Instead of asking whether Bitcoin will repeat its historical October performance, I’m watching whether the market can keep buying after the obvious seasonal trade has already been crowded. does $BTC continue finding buyers once the “Uptober” narrative stops being new? If it does, the strength may have less to do with the calendar and more to do with genuine demand.
1
463
$AGT is pressing into a key resistance around $0.02328 after a strong expansion. 👀 This is the level I’m watching closely because it could determine the next move. A clean 1H/4H close above $0.02328 could open the door for more upside momentum and confirm that buyers are still in control. If price gets rejected and fails to hold above it, a pullback becomes more likely. Downside levels: $0.02170 → $0.02023 → $0.01902 → $0.01803 For now, I’m waiting for confirmation. No reason to chase the current candle or force a trade before the setup is clear. Patience matters here, especially around a level this important.
$AGT is pressing into a key resistance around $0.02328 after a strong expansion. 👀 This is the level I’m watching closely because it could determine the next move. A clean 1H/4H close above $0.02328 could open the door for more upside momentum and confirm that buyers are still in control. If price gets rejected and fails to hold above it, a pullback becomes more likely. Downside levels: $0.02170 → $0.02023 → $0.01902 → $0.01803 For now, I’m waiting for confirmation. No reason to chase the current candle or force a trade before the setup is clear. Patience matters here, especially around a level this important.
112
Thousands of memes appear every day, but only a small number manage to capture attention and stay relevant for weeks or even months. Those are the memes that build real mindshare, create stronger communities, and keep people talking long after the initial hype fades. Most disappear quickly, but the ones that survive usually have something deeper behind them: culture, recognition, and an audience willing to keep the narrative alive. That’s exactly why I’m watching $NEET The idea is simple: identify the memes with lasting attention and position early before the market fully catches on.
Thousands of memes appear every day, but only a small number manage to capture attention and stay relevant for weeks or even months. Those are the memes that build real mindshare, create stronger communities, and keep people talking long after the initial hype fades. Most disappear quickly, but the ones that survive usually have something deeper behind them: culture, recognition, and an audience willing to keep the narrative alive. That’s exactly why I’m watching $NEET The idea is simple: identify the memes with lasting attention and position early before the market fully catches on.
57
Why the fuck is no one talking about $TEL? Telcoin is trying to connect mobile networks with onchain financial services. The goal is to make remittances, digital cash, payments, and access to DeFi feel more natural for people using mobile phones around the world. That is a much bigger market than crypto traders alone. $TEL is the native token of the Telcoin platform and the gas token of the Telcoin Network. The risk is that payments and remittances are heavily regulated, while the market is already full of fintech and stablecoin competitors. But mobile-first financial infrastructure could be one of crypto’s clearest paths to reaching everyday users. Do you think $TEL still has a real opportunity in global payments, or is the competition too far ahead?
Why the fuck is no one talking about $TEL? Telcoin is trying to connect mobile networks with onchain financial services. The goal is to make remittances, digital cash, payments, and access to DeFi feel more natural for people using mobile phones around the world. That is a much bigger market than crypto traders alone. $TEL is the native token of the Telcoin platform and the gas token of the Telcoin Network. The risk is that payments and remittances are heavily regulated, while the market is already full of fintech and stablecoin competitors. But mobile-first financial infrastructure could be one of crypto’s clearest paths to reaching everyday users. Do you think $TEL still has a real opportunity in global payments, or is the competition too far ahead?
78
The THORChain debate is bigger than defending hackers. $RUNE is up strongly since the Bitget breach, while roughly $387M in stolen funds moved through cross-chain infrastructure. THORChain says it cannot selectively freeze an address without stopping the network itself and that permissionless design is the whole point. That creates a real trade-off: Permissionless: no single party decides who can transact. No selective freeze: stolen funds can potentially move through the same rails. What interests me as a trader is the market reaction. If volume and fees spike while RUNEkeeps holding higher, the market may be pricing more usage, not necessarily approval of the hack. For #RUNE ,I’d watch whether this volume spike turns into sustained activity after the headlines fade. The bigger question isn’t Should THORChain defend hackers? It’s whether permissionless liquidity remains valuable when that liquidity is being used against an exchang
The THORChain debate is bigger than defending hackers. $RUNE is up strongly since the Bitget breach, while roughly $387M in stolen funds moved through cross-chain infrastructure. THORChain says it cannot selectively freeze an address without stopping the network itself and that permissionless design is the whole point. That creates a real trade-off: Permissionless: no single party decides who can transact. No selective freeze: stolen funds can potentially move through the same rails. What interests me as a trader is the market reaction. If volume and fees spike while RUNEkeeps holding higher, the market may be pricing more usage, not necessarily approval of the hack. For #RUNE ,I’d watch whether this volume spike turns into sustained activity after the headlines fade. The bigger question isn’t Should THORChain defend hackers? It’s whether permissionless liquidity remains valuable when that liquidity is being used against an exchang
18
The THORChain debate is bigger than defending hackers.$RUNE is up strongly since the Bitget breach, while roughly $387M in stolen funds moved through cross-chain infrastructure. THORChain says it cannot selectively freeze an address without stopping the network itself and that permissionless design is the whole point.That creates a real trade-off:Permissionless: no single party decides who can transact.No selective freeze: stolen funds can potentially move through the same rails.What interests me as a trader is the market reaction. If volume and fees spike while RUNEkeeps holding higher, the market may be pricing more usage, not necessarily approval of the hack.For #RUNE ,I’d watch whether this volume spike turns into sustained activity after the headlines fade.The bigger question isn’t Should THORChain defend hackers?It’s whether permissionless liquidity remains valuable when that liquidity is being used against an exchange.
The THORChain debate is bigger than defending hackers.$RUNE is up strongly since the Bitget breach, while roughly $387M in stolen funds moved through cross-chain infrastructure. THORChain says it cannot selectively freeze an address without stopping the network itself and that permissionless design is the whole point.That creates a real trade-off:Permissionless: no single party decides who can transact.No selective freeze: stolen funds can potentially move through the same rails.What interests me as a trader is the market reaction. If volume and fees spike while RUNEkeeps holding higher, the market may be pricing more usage, not necessarily approval of the hack.For #RUNE ,I’d watch whether this volume spike turns into sustained activity after the headlines fade.The bigger question isn’t Should THORChain defend hackers?It’s whether permissionless liquidity remains valuable when that liquidity is being used against an exchange.
31
Will $HYPE correct first to $85.26 and liquidate the $72.6M positions before making another push toward $100? Imo, yes. I think we need a correction first, although I honestly don’t know where the bottom will be. A healthy pullback could also be good for the market. So, if $HYPE starts going down, I’ll simply DCA again and keep it simple. Or maybe this is just the Binance effect after they finally listed $HYPE on their spot market? 🤣
Will $HYPE correct first to $85.26 and liquidate the $72.6M positions before making another push toward $100? Imo, yes. I think we need a correction first, although I honestly don’t know where the bottom will be. A healthy pullback could also be good for the market. So, if $HYPE starts going down, I’ll simply DCA again and keep it simple. Or maybe this is just the Binance effect after they finally listed $HYPE on their spot market? 🤣
69
$SUI has swept the high at 1.15 and is now looking increasingly likely to take out the 1.40 high. However, if you’re looking for entries, I wouldn’t be chasing the move here. I’d rather wait for a clear correction and an HTF support test before considering a position. In this case, if $SUI pulls back toward 1.05, that would be the ideal zone I’d be watching for a potential entry. Patience matters here.
$SUI has swept the high at 1.15 and is now looking increasingly likely to take out the 1.40 high. However, if you’re looking for entries, I wouldn’t be chasing the move here. I’d rather wait for a clear correction and an HTF support test before considering a position. In this case, if $SUI pulls back toward 1.05, that would be the ideal zone I’d be watching for a potential entry. Patience matters here.
54
$LITKEY per (request) Interesting project! Definitely one worth keeping on the radar. Bottom should be in (marked with crazy wick + massive buying), showing where strong demand could step in. Will likely take a few months before actual sending, so patience is key here. Retrace target: $0.026 🎯 Expansion is still too early to call… Not Fa!
$LITKEY per (request) Interesting project! Definitely one worth keeping on the radar. Bottom should be in (marked with crazy wick + massive buying), showing where strong demand could step in. Will likely take a few months before actual sending, so patience is key here. Retrace target: $0.026 🎯 Expansion is still too early to call… Not Fa!
51
New ATH 🚨 $ZAMA just printed a fresh all-time high at $0.090, marking another strong move for the token Presale users are now sitting on a massive 31x 📈 Public auction users are also up around 1.5x. Momentum is clearly building, and if this strength continues, I’m watching for even higher levels from here. We’re cooking higher 🔥
New ATH 🚨 $ZAMA just printed a fresh all-time high at $0.090, marking another strong move for the token Presale users are now sitting on a massive 31x 📈 Public auction users are also up around 1.5x. Momentum is clearly building, and if this strength continues, I’m watching for even higher levels from here. We’re cooking higher 🔥
65
The interesting part about $UNI right now isn’t just the price move. The bigger question is whether the tokenized-stock narrative can bring real activity to on-chain markets. The SEC’s “Innovation Exemption” could open a clearer route for tokenized equities to use licensed AMMs and liquidity pools. That creates a potential tailwind for Uniswap, while Robinhood Chain activity adds another layer to its role in tokenized assets. If more assets and traders move on-chain, Uniswap could see higher trading volume and fees. Its fee, buyback and burn mechanics could also make increased activity more important for the protocol. $UNI is already up 28% in 24H and 47% this week, so I’m not interested in blindly chasing the move. I’m watching volume, pullbacks and whether the momentum can actually hold. I’m trading the UNI Trading Club Championship on Bitget while I track the setup. If you’re following $UNI, this is one worth watching closely.
The interesting part about $UNI right now isn’t just the price move. The bigger question is whether the tokenized-stock narrative can bring real activity to on-chain markets. The SEC’s “Innovation Exemption” could open a clearer route for tokenized equities to use licensed AMMs and liquidity pools. That creates a potential tailwind for Uniswap, while Robinhood Chain activity adds another layer to its role in tokenized assets. If more assets and traders move on-chain, Uniswap could see higher trading volume and fees. Its fee, buyback and burn mechanics could also make increased activity more important for the protocol. $UNI is already up 28% in 24H and 47% this week, so I’m not interested in blindly chasing the move. I’m watching volume, pullbacks and whether the momentum can actually hold. I’m trading the UNI Trading Club Championship on Bitget while I track the setup. If you’re following $UNI, this is one worth watching closely.
$G is fucking interesting. Gravity is the L1 built by the team behind Galxe. Most chains have technology. Very few have a meaningful distribution layer already connected to millions of Web3 users. That is Gravity’s edge. The network is designed for fast, scalable applications, while Galxe brings user acquisition, credentials, and engagement tools into the same ecosystem. $G powers activity through fees, staking, and incentives. Execution remains the risk, but distribution is one of the hardest things to build in crypto. Anyone else watching $G? 👀
$G is fucking interesting. Gravity is the L1 built by the team behind Galxe. Most chains have technology. Very few have a meaningful distribution layer already connected to millions of Web3 users. That is Gravity’s edge. The network is designed for fast, scalable applications, while Galxe brings user acquisition, credentials, and engagement tools into the same ecosystem. $G powers activity through fees, staking, and incentives. Execution remains the risk, but distribution is one of the hardest things to build in crypto. Anyone else watching $G? 👀
55
People are so bearish on the market rn, but at the same time, some alts are actually looking pretty strong! 👀 Like $ARC here! 💪 It just broke out of that “crypto president” downtrend after grinding through the resistance for weeks. A +90% candle is obviously a big move, so I wouldn’t be surprised to see some profit-taking or a pullback before the next leg. No need to FOMO in blindly. I’d rather watch the structure, volume and how it holds the breakout. Keeping $ARC on my Bitget watchlist!
People are so bearish on the market rn, but at the same time, some alts are actually looking pretty strong! 👀 Like $ARC here! 💪 It just broke out of that “crypto president” downtrend after grinding through the resistance for weeks. A +90% candle is obviously a big move, so I wouldn’t be surprised to see some profit-taking or a pullback before the next leg. No need to FOMO in blindly. I’d rather watch the structure, volume and how it holds the breakout. Keeping $ARC on my Bitget watchlist!
67
Massive exchange liquidity is shifting on $AIN after a 100%+ vertical pump. 1 hour ago, Gate executed a massive 12.45M $AIN ($1.53M) Hot-to-Cold sweep, showing extreme volume and inventory rebalancing across major CEXs. The chart shows a violent squeeze from the $0.075 baseline up to $0.160, but it's currently stalling and chopping heavily around $0.140. exchange pulls 7-figures worth of a token from cold storage to a hot wallet right at a local top, it means they are preparing to facilitate heavy trading volume usually massive incoming sell orders. Proceed with caution if you are longing here. The top might already be in.
Massive exchange liquidity is shifting on $AIN after a 100%+ vertical pump. 1 hour ago, Gate executed a massive 12.45M $AIN ($1.53M) Hot-to-Cold sweep, showing extreme volume and inventory rebalancing across major CEXs. The chart shows a violent squeeze from the $0.075 baseline up to $0.160, but it's currently stalling and chopping heavily around $0.140. exchange pulls 7-figures worth of a token from cold storage to a hot wallet right at a local top, it means they are preparing to facilitate heavy trading volume usually massive incoming sell orders. Proceed with caution if you are longing here. The top might already be in.
66
The interesting part isn’t simply whether the Fed hikes. Markets have been preparing for that possibility already. The bigger question is whether progress on the CLARITY Act can change how investors view crypto beyond the immediate rate decision. Better regulation could reduce uncertainty, make institutions more comfortable with the space, and strengthen Bitcoin’s longer-term appeal. So if $BTC stays resilient through a hawkish Fed, that could tell us something important: The market may be starting to value Bitcoin’s improving fundamentals more than short-term liquidity fears.
The interesting part isn’t simply whether the Fed hikes. Markets have been preparing for that possibility already. The bigger question is whether progress on the CLARITY Act can change how investors view crypto beyond the immediate rate decision. Better regulation could reduce uncertainty, make institutions more comfortable with the space, and strengthen Bitcoin’s longer-term appeal. So if $BTC stays resilient through a hawkish Fed, that could tell us something important: The market may be starting to value Bitcoin’s improving fundamentals more than short-term liquidity fears.
78
🚨 What are we seeing on $LSK? $LSK is moving up strongly, yet there are no major buys showing up. At the same time, huge sell orders are sitting above the current price. Some are especially large around $0.30, $0.40 and $0.50. This could be an attempt to scare traders into thinking price will fall. If traders start shorting because of these sell walls, but the orders suddenly disappear as price gets closer, that could be a sign they were fake sell orders.
🚨 What are we seeing on $LSK? $LSK is moving up strongly, yet there are no major buys showing up. At the same time, huge sell orders are sitting above the current price. Some are especially large around $0.30, $0.40 and $0.50. This could be an attempt to scare traders into thinking price will fall. If traders start shorting because of these sell walls, but the orders suddenly disappear as price gets closer, that could be a sign they were fake sell orders.
66
The last 2 times $XCN bounced off this trendline, it went on to pump 6X and 47X respectively. That kind of reaction makes this level worth paying close attention to again. If history repeats itself, the next move could be significant. But the real question is whether $XCN can produce another explosive move from this same trendline. How high can it pump this time around?
The last 2 times $XCN bounced off this trendline, it went on to pump 6X and 47X respectively. That kind of reaction makes this level worth paying close attention to again. If history repeats itself, the next move could be significant. But the real question is whether $XCN can produce another explosive move from this same trendline. How high can it pump this time around?
2
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
NEARFallsToAround$4.70Down14%
12,696 views
25 Discussing
🚨 $NEAR — FROM ETF HYPE TO A 14% SLAP IN THE FACE.
NEAR has dropped toward $4.70, giving back a big chunk of its recent run after briefly trading above $5.50. The selloff also came as NEAR Intents disclosed a security incident tied to its cross-chain infrastructure, with reported losses around $3.8M. The underlying NEAR blockchain itself was not reported as compromised.
Here’s the part traders should care about:
$4.69–$4.74 is now the key support zone.
Hold it, and this could simply be a violent retest after the September breakout.
Lose it?
The next downside references sit closer to $4.58, then ~$4.30.
And the irony?
The new Bitwise NEAR ETF was still seeing positive inflows around launch week.
So this isn’t a simple “nobody wants NEAR” story.
It’s a battle between:
fresh institutional access
vs.
post-rally profit-taking + security fear.
$NEAR doesn’t need hype right now. It needs $4.70 to hold. 👀
#NEARFallsToAround$4.70Down14% #EvernorthPlansNasdaqListingOct8 #SECProposesCryptoCustodyFramework #IMFApproves$139MDisbursementToElSalvador #AnthropicTargetsIPOAsSoonAsMidNovember
KimHotbae
·0 Likes
·264 views
EthereumFoundationLaunchesZkAPIOnMainnet
4,572 views
137 Discussing
EvernorthPlansNasdaqListingOct8
14,494 views
150 Discussing