A brief “grudge” against $TON and the development team (for Binance Square):
TON positioned itself as an “open network” with huge potential through Telegram, but in reality it turned out otherwise. Developers are often banned in official chats without explanations and without any chance to appeal; documentation is rough, and ecosystem support depends on “closeness” to the right people. In the end, building on TON is difficult and unpleasant.
At the same time, the ecosystem has been flooded with scam token projects, memecoins, and ponzi schemes—where teams quickly pull out liquidity while holders are left with empty hands.
Meanwhile, the Foundation and related structures either stay silent or engage in questionable marketing.
In the end: there’s hype, there are lots of Telegram users, but proper care for developers and investors—almost none. Coin listings, too, that people were collecting.
zkSync quietly does its job. While the market gets distracted by hype, they keep improving the ecosystem: • fast and cheap transactions • a normal UX • more and more projects that actually build, not just announce
I like that zkSync doesn’t try to shout louder than everyone else.$ZK Step by step, it’s taking its place among L2. For now, I’m holding a small amount and watching how things develop. And what do you think about zkSync? Do you still believe in it, or have you already written it off?