I think there are enough long positions gathered during this time to go down well. I am opening a short from the current position at 0.5% and will accumulate to 2% on a breakout above the highs (if such occurs) There are no levels, the coin is at historical highs. I accept the risks 👌
Wishing everyone profit. This is not financial advice!!!
📉 What is the "Saw" movement in the market. How to trade it correctly.
On Thursday, the coin #ON made traders experience such swings 😂 I wanted to explain what was actually happening. I know there are many beginners among my subscribers, and they might be interested in reading 🤔 "Saw" is a sharp, jagged price movement back and forth in a narrow range that literally "cuts" both sides of the market: both longs and shorts.
#BTC decided to share thoughts on the movement today
So, what do we see. The price went down a bit to shave off the shorts in the area of 72K. I was really waiting to see 73K, BUT! Liquidity at this level has been intentionally left - which means we will fly higher! Exactly higher! Why? Because at 73K there is a very good pool in the form of short stops, and their forced closure (which means market purchases) will drive the price even higher - into the zone of 80K +
#power Notifications have come that we have reached the price 0.08, which I previously marked as "the bottom" I don't even know, guys, whether I need it or not 🤷♀️ So far, this asset is risky for me. Long holders are sitting like flies...
Why RSI deceives beginners (and how to use it correctly)
RSI — one of the most popular indicators. Almost every beginner starts with it because it seems simple: ▶️ above 70 — overbought, ▶️ below 30 — oversold. Sounds logical. But this is exactly where the biggest mistake begins. ❌️ 1. Overbought ≠ signal to short
#SKYAIUSDT Liquidity withdrawals 0.06160 (+-) and shaving long positions down by 0.050 I will make an average in the resistance area. A couple of limit orders, one of which is at the local high.
A couple of days ago, one person wrote to me that I run a blog for the sake of earning from subscribers.
Honestly — it's even a little funny 🤡 But, I still haven't published my trades for two days, just in case 👌 Sharing screenshots "as a fact" is also some kind of madness, in my opinion 😁
I'm attaching a screenshot 😂
If you really think that I'm wasting my time on analytics, breakdowns, forecasts, and trades for such amounts — I have nothing to add. With my trading statistics, it just doesn't make sense.
I share my market vision, scenarios, news, educational content, logic of movements — and, as many see, this often confirms the market!
But if it all comes down to this being "for the sake of 30 cents", then perhaps it's easier to stop writing anything at all 🤔
"Spot is safe." The truth that is comfortable to believe
Today one comment made me sit down to write this article👇 One of the most common myths among beginners is the belief that spot trading is safer than futures trading. The argument is usually simple: "I won't be liquidated, so I'm safe." Sounds logical. But only at first glance.
Miners are working "for free": minus $14,000 for each BTC 📉
Mining bitcoin now is a dubious pleasure. According to Checkonchain, the production cost of one BTC has jumped to $82,600, while the market offers just over $68,000 for it.
Outcome: a loss of $14,600 on each coin. Even a 7.7% reduction in network difficulty doesn't save the situation as energy prices continue to press from above.
If this continues, miners will start actively selling off reserves just to survive.
Now they are stirring up the story about a "major insider" before Trump's statement: supposedly someone opened huge positions in advance and perfectly timed the market movement.
I got curious, and I checked this news👌
In short: there is no confirmation for this.
— there is no data on specific trades of this volume — there are no confirmations from major media or analysts — there are no facts that can be verified
This is a typical example of when the market is explained in hindsight: first, a movement occurs, then a “logical” story is invented for it.
Why is this false? Because real insiders of this scale: — leave a clear trace — end up in reports — quickly become the subject of investigations
There is none of this here.
Why is it so easy to believe in this?
Because: — people want to explain the market as “someone's control” — it's easier to think that “someone knows” than to admit uncertainty — the brain loves beautiful coincidences
💬 The reality is simpler: the market moves not because “someone knew everything,” but because someone bet on probabilities — and got it right.
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.