Htp96
Verified Creator
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.8 Years
105 Following
23.4K+ Followers
12.9K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
Vanar Chain and the future of intelligent dApps
I look at the story of 'intelligent dApps' as
a continuation of the trend of turning blockchain into the backend for consumer applications.
But instead of just stopping at storing and transferring value, they are trying to push an additional layer of smart logic, where applications can automatically respond, personalize experiences, or integrate AI into on-chain interaction flows, and this sounds very timely as everyone is talking about AI x Web3 as a narrative for the next cycle.
a continuation of the trend of turning blockchain into the backend for consumer applications.
But instead of just stopping at storing and transferring value, they are trying to push an additional layer of smart logic, where applications can automatically respond, personalize experiences, or integrate AI into on-chain interaction flows, and this sounds very timely as everyone is talking about AI x Web3 as a narrative for the next cycle.
How Fogo attracts natural order flow instead of incentives
Once I placed a few small orders on a dApp order book running on @Fogo Official , just to see how the system reacted in a rather calm market.
Fast matching orders, low latency, but then I didn't come back that day. Not because of a poor experience, but because I had no natural reason to continue trading there.
That moment made me realize: order flow does not come from a fast system, but from users having a need to repeat.
Fast matching orders, low latency, but then I didn't come back that day. Not because of a poor experience, but because I had no natural reason to continue trading there.
That moment made me realize: order flow does not come from a fast system, but from users having a need to repeat.
Weekly RSI Approaches Zone 30: A Deep Correction Phase Similar to Previous Cycles
The average RSI index on the weekly timeframe of many coins in the top 10-20 group often hovers around the 30 zone, and this is almost a 'characteristic' zone whenever the market falls into a deep correction phase or enters a strong downtrend.
When the weekly RSI approaches or hits this zone, it reflects an oversold state on a larger timeframe, where pessimistic sentiment prevails and short-term capital almost withdraws from the market.
When the weekly RSI approaches or hits this zone, it reflects an oversold state on a larger timeframe, where pessimistic sentiment prevails and short-term capital almost withdraws from the market.
Can Vanar serve as a backend for existing Web2 apps?
I think of @Vanarchain as a potential backend for Web2 apps at the experience level, where users do not need to know they are interacting with blockchain, as wallet layers, logins, and fees can be abstracted to resemble a cloud service more than a chain.
This makes sense for apps wanting to add elements of digital ownership, payments, or rewards without disrupting the existing UX.
However, when turning blockchain into an invisible backend, the question shifts to the trust model: who operates that orchestration layer, who has the authority to upgrade or intervene, and in case of issues, can user data and assets be accessed directly on-chain?
With Web2 apps, they are used to relying on a backend provider, but when moving user assets to the chain, expectations shift regarding withdrawal rights and control over changes.
So if Vanar plays the role of backend, are you having a “decentralized cloud” or an infrastructure layer that you still have to trust in some specific entities, and when problems arise, can your app still operate independently?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
I think of @Vanarchain as a potential backend for Web2 apps at the experience level, where users do not need to know they are interacting with blockchain, as wallet layers, logins, and fees can be abstracted to resemble a cloud service more than a chain.
This makes sense for apps wanting to add elements of digital ownership, payments, or rewards without disrupting the existing UX.
However, when turning blockchain into an invisible backend, the question shifts to the trust model: who operates that orchestration layer, who has the authority to upgrade or intervene, and in case of issues, can user data and assets be accessed directly on-chain?
With Web2 apps, they are used to relying on a backend provider, but when moving user assets to the chain, expectations shift regarding withdrawal rights and control over changes.
So if Vanar plays the role of backend, are you having a “decentralized cloud” or an infrastructure layer that you still have to trust in some specific entities, and when problems arise, can your app still operate independently?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Fogo is solving what problem in a market without altseason
There was a time I opened @Fogo Official during a week when the market was quite calm, with almost no new narrative. The network was still running smoothly, orders were executed quickly, but the actual number of transactions from end users noticeably decreased.
During the period without altseason, most new chains face the question: if there is no speculative capital, who will use us.
$FOGO is trying to solve this problem by focusing on execution and latency, that is, serving needs that are more “infrastructure” than narrative. Use cases like trading require low latency, fast settlement, or systems that need continuous order processing still exist even when the market is sluggish.
However, the quiet market also reveals a limitation: if use cases are too narrow, activity will sharply decrease when overall volume drops. At that point, high performance alone does not create usage.
I think Fogo is trying to prove that there is a layer of real demand that requires speed and predictability, but the question is whether that layer of demand is large enough to sustain an ecosystem or not.
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
There was a time I opened @Fogo Official during a week when the market was quite calm, with almost no new narrative. The network was still running smoothly, orders were executed quickly, but the actual number of transactions from end users noticeably decreased.
During the period without altseason, most new chains face the question: if there is no speculative capital, who will use us.
$FOGO is trying to solve this problem by focusing on execution and latency, that is, serving needs that are more “infrastructure” than narrative. Use cases like trading require low latency, fast settlement, or systems that need continuous order processing still exist even when the market is sluggish.
However, the quiet market also reveals a limitation: if use cases are too narrow, activity will sharply decrease when overall volume drops. At that point, high performance alone does not create usage.
I think Fogo is trying to prove that there is a layer of real demand that requires speed and predictability, but the question is whether that layer of demand is large enough to sustain an ecosystem or not.
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
Bitcoin is tightly compressed in the price range: waiting for a decisive breakout to determine the short-term trend
Bitcoin is tightly compressed in the price range: waiting for a decisive breakout to determine the short-term trend
$BTC is in a phase of narrow but tense volatility like a guitar string. On the short-term frame, the lower highs and higher lows are gradually converging into a distinct compression zone, reflecting the market's indecisiveness as both buyers and sellers have yet to gain clear control.
Such compression phases usually do not last forever; statistically, the longer the accumulation, the stronger the subsequent breakout amplitude because market energy is 'stored' during the sideways phase.
$BTC is in a phase of narrow but tense volatility like a guitar string. On the short-term frame, the lower highs and higher lows are gradually converging into a distinct compression zone, reflecting the market's indecisiveness as both buyers and sellers have yet to gain clear control.
Such compression phases usually do not last forever; statistically, the longer the accumulation, the stronger the subsequent breakout amplitude because market energy is 'stored' during the sideways phase.
The law of diminishing returns signals: Bitcoin may bottom out in August
Based on the theoretical framework of diminishing returns combined with how the market often adjusts according to fractals, I don't think the current cycle will bottom out in the areas where the majority is expecting.
Looking back at previous cycles, each time the market matures more, the growth amplitude decreases, but at the same time, the adjustment structure becomes more complex and prolonged. This creates a repeating 'expectation trap': the majority waits for a quick capitulation, while the market chooses to gradually erode trust.
Looking back at previous cycles, each time the market matures more, the growth amplitude decreases, but at the same time, the adjustment structure becomes more complex and prolonged. This creates a repeating 'expectation trap': the majority waits for a quick capitulation, while the market chooses to gradually erode trust.
What problem is Vanar solving that other L1s have not solved well?
I think if we look at @Vanarchain like a normal L1 to compare TPS, block time, or what the “ecosystem has”, it will be very easy to get lost in the exact loop that crypto often gets caught in: evaluating a system by its brochure.
The problem that Vanar is trying to solve, from my perspective, is no longer about being “faster”, because speed is no longer a sustainable advantage, but rather the challenge of how to bring mainstream users into an on-chain experience without them needing to become crypto users first.
The problem that Vanar is trying to solve, from my perspective, is no longer about being “faster”, because speed is no longer a sustainable advantage, but rather the challenge of how to bring mainstream users into an on-chain experience without them needing to become crypto users first.
The Fogo ecosystem is developing: Which DeFi, NFT, GameFi projects are building?
One thing I see quite clearly when looking at @Fogo Official is that its ecosystem is in the "deliberate formation" stage, meaning it hasn't exploded in the number of projects like mature chains but has started to show pieces that align with the initial thesis of the chain, which is financial execution and trading infrastructure. The important question is not how many projects there are, but which projects have the potential to create real order flow and liquidity.
Why Vanar is the hidden gem L1 for PayFi 2026
I find the story of "hidden gem L1 for PayFi 2026" very concise, but when broken down, I return to the old question about the trust model and the ability to withstand pressure.
@Vanarchain is clearly trying to optimize the payment experience: low fees, smooth UX, wallets and flows close to Web2, and if everything runs smoothly, it fits the PayFi use case, where users need to transact quickly, cheaply, and without technical friction.
But PayFi is not just about speed or fees, but about reliable settlement capabilities and withdrawing money when needed.
The orchestration layer between the user and the chain is operated by whom, who has the authority to upgrade or pause, and when there are liquidity issues or network congestion, does the user have a direct escape route or must wait for a gateway to process.
If PayFi truly is the target use case, then the question is not whether Vanar is smooth or not, but in the worst day, can cash still flow and can users still save their assets, and where are you willing to place that trust?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
I find the story of "hidden gem L1 for PayFi 2026" very concise, but when broken down, I return to the old question about the trust model and the ability to withstand pressure.
@Vanarchain is clearly trying to optimize the payment experience: low fees, smooth UX, wallets and flows close to Web2, and if everything runs smoothly, it fits the PayFi use case, where users need to transact quickly, cheaply, and without technical friction.
But PayFi is not just about speed or fees, but about reliable settlement capabilities and withdrawing money when needed.
The orchestration layer between the user and the chain is operated by whom, who has the authority to upgrade or pause, and when there are liquidity issues or network congestion, does the user have a direct escape route or must wait for a gateway to process.
If PayFi truly is the target use case, then the question is not whether Vanar is smooth or not, but in the worst day, can cash still flow and can users still save their assets, and where are you willing to place that trust?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
After @Fogo Official listing on Binance, what I clearly see is that the price action and its volume reflect an infrastructure asset being valued more according to the narrative.
It's not about how much it pumps or dumps, but whether the capital flow behind it is sustainable.
In the early sessions, the price surged quickly due to the listing effect and the trading-optimized L1 narrative at the moment the market was interested in derivatives, creating a short-term repricing.
However, after that, the price adjusted and moved sideways within a narrower range, indicating that speculative capital was gradually withdrawing and the market began to seek a balanced area based on real liquidity.
Volume also followed this logic, initially very high due to traders and leverage, then gradually decreasing as activity shifted from event-driven to usage-driven.
From a builder's perspective, what matters is whether $FOGO can translate attention into development activity and liquidity on the chain, because if adoption does not keep pace with the narrative, price and volume will continue to be driven by short-term capital flows.
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
It's not about how much it pumps or dumps, but whether the capital flow behind it is sustainable.
In the early sessions, the price surged quickly due to the listing effect and the trading-optimized L1 narrative at the moment the market was interested in derivatives, creating a short-term repricing.
However, after that, the price adjusted and moved sideways within a narrower range, indicating that speculative capital was gradually withdrawing and the market began to seek a balanced area based on real liquidity.
Volume also followed this logic, initially very high due to traders and leverage, then gradually decreasing as activity shifted from event-driven to usage-driven.
From a builder's perspective, what matters is whether $FOGO can translate attention into development activity and liquidity on the chain, because if adoption does not keep pace with the narrative, price and volume will continue to be driven by short-term capital flows.
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
Is Vanar a long-term bet or a short-term narrative trade?
I look at @Vanarchain and see a very familiar tension in crypto: between the long-term narrative about infrastructure and the short-term pull of narrative, and in fact these two do not exclude each other, but the way I participate will completely depend on which part I believe in more.
On the surface, Vanar is packaging a straightforward promise: to bring mainstream users into Web3 with a smooth experience like Web2, low fees, simple wallets, games, and easily accessible entertainment content.
On the surface, Vanar is packaging a straightforward promise: to bring mainstream users into Web3 with a smooth experience like Web2, low fees, simple wallets, games, and easily accessible entertainment content.
If altseason does not come, what direction will the Fogo ecosystem take?
A paradox that I see when talking about @Fogo Official is that most growth plans of L1 ecosystems often assume an altseason cycle to attract liquidity and dev, but the more practical question is if speculative cash flow does not return strongly, what will a new chain like Fogo survive on?
From a builder's perspective, when there is no altseason, all growth narratives based on airdrop, farming, and liquidity mining will weaken very quickly, and what remains is only real usage and real fees.
From a builder's perspective, when there is no altseason, all growth narratives based on airdrop, farming, and liquidity mining will weaken very quickly, and what remains is only real usage and real fees.
What is Vanar's architectural difference compared to Ethereum L2
I see @Vanarchain as an independent L1 optimized for UX right from the base layer, while Ethereum L2 is an extended layer inheriting security from Ethereum, and the architectural difference lies in the fact that Vanar can design the entire execution, consensus, and account management to reduce friction for users, whereas L2 must adhere to the rollup model, sequencer, and data availability of Ethereum.
With $VANRY they can integrate wallets, gas abstraction, and orchestration layers so that users do not see the blockchain behind the scenes, but this also means that the upgrade rights and operations are more centralized towards the team or a specific multisig.
Meanwhile, L2 on Ethereum, although currently having a centralized sequencer, ultimately still has to settle on Ethereum L1, and users have an on-chain escape route if the sequencer encounters issues.
So when comparing these two architectures, the question is not just which is faster or cheaper, but whether you want to place your trust in the security layer of
your Ethereum or in an independent system optimized for experience like Vanar, and in the event of an issue, can you withdraw your assets?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
I see @Vanarchain as an independent L1 optimized for UX right from the base layer, while Ethereum L2 is an extended layer inheriting security from Ethereum, and the architectural difference lies in the fact that Vanar can design the entire execution, consensus, and account management to reduce friction for users, whereas L2 must adhere to the rollup model, sequencer, and data availability of Ethereum.
With $VANRY they can integrate wallets, gas abstraction, and orchestration layers so that users do not see the blockchain behind the scenes, but this also means that the upgrade rights and operations are more centralized towards the team or a specific multisig.
Meanwhile, L2 on Ethereum, although currently having a centralized sequencer, ultimately still has to settle on Ethereum L1, and users have an on-chain escape route if the sequencer encounters issues.
So when comparing these two architectures, the question is not just which is faster or cheaper, but whether you want to place your trust in the security layer of
your Ethereum or in an independent system optimized for experience like Vanar, and in the event of an issue, can you withdraw your assets?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Can Fogo become the default chain for perpetual DEX?
Can Fogo become the default chain for perpetual DEX? This question sounds like a marketing claim, but from a builder's perspective, we must return to execution, liquidity, and market structure.
Technically, @Fogo Official has advantages in low latency, short block time, and SVM compatibility, which suits the workload of perp such as order matching, funding rate updates, and liquidations that require quick responses.
I have seen some teams testing the deployment of perp engines on the SVM environment, and porting logic from Solana has almost no significant friction.
But in reality, perp DEX is not just an execution engine; it's a game of liquidity and market makers. A chain can be fast, but if there is no depth, the spread will be wide, and large traders will not stay.
Currently, Fogo is still in the liquidity bootstrap phase, so becoming the default chain depends on their ability to attract large market makers and maintain natural order flow.
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
Can Fogo become the default chain for perpetual DEX? This question sounds like a marketing claim, but from a builder's perspective, we must return to execution, liquidity, and market structure.
Technically, @Fogo Official has advantages in low latency, short block time, and SVM compatibility, which suits the workload of perp such as order matching, funding rate updates, and liquidations that require quick responses.
I have seen some teams testing the deployment of perp engines on the SVM environment, and porting logic from Solana has almost no significant friction.
But in reality, perp DEX is not just an execution engine; it's a game of liquidity and market makers. A chain can be fast, but if there is no depth, the spread will be wide, and large traders will not stay.
Currently, Fogo is still in the liquidity bootstrap phase, so becoming the default chain depends on their ability to attract large market makers and maintain natural order flow.
@Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO
Bitcoin stuck below 72,000 USD: The market is at a crossroads of 80K or 60K
Bitcoin stuck below 72,000 USD: The market is at a crossroads of 80K or 60K
Bitcoin is currently trading around 69,397 USD, with a market capitalization of 1.40 trillion USD and a 24-hour volume of about 42.58 billion USD.
The daily trading range is quite narrow, from 69,286 to 70,897 USD, indicating that the market is in a good liquidity state but cautious, as the cash flow has not yet clearly chosen a direction.
On the daily timeframe, the overall structure still shows a recovering trend within a larger downtrend. After reaching a peak near 97,900 USD and falling to 59,930 USD, the price bounced back to the 70,000–71,000 USD range but has not yet broken the series of lower highs.
Bitcoin is currently trading around 69,397 USD, with a market capitalization of 1.40 trillion USD and a 24-hour volume of about 42.58 billion USD.
The daily trading range is quite narrow, from 69,286 to 70,897 USD, indicating that the market is in a good liquidity state but cautious, as the cash flow has not yet clearly chosen a direction.
On the daily timeframe, the overall structure still shows a recovering trend within a larger downtrend. After reaching a peak near 97,900 USD and falling to 59,930 USD, the price bounced back to the 70,000–71,000 USD range but has not yet broken the series of lower highs.
Bitcoin is consolidating below 70,000 USD: The market enters a decisive zone
Bitcoin is consolidating below 70,000 USD: The market enters a decisive zone
Bitcoin $BTC is under significant pressure and in my opinion, this is a quite sensitive phase as the price continuously tests the 70,000 USD range but has not been able to maintain the breakout momentum. Each time it approaches this area, strong selling pressure appears, indicating that the supply above is still substantial.
I see that the upward momentum has not disappeared, but the ability to extend to 72,000 USD is currently quite limited as buyers have not fully controlled the short-term structure.
Bitcoin $BTC is under significant pressure and in my opinion, this is a quite sensitive phase as the price continuously tests the 70,000 USD range but has not been able to maintain the breakout momentum. Each time it approaches this area, strong selling pressure appears, indicating that the supply above is still substantial.
I see that the upward momentum has not disappeared, but the ability to extend to 72,000 USD is currently quite limited as buyers have not fully controlled the short-term structure.
Bitcoin approaches 70,000 USD: The market awaits confirmation signals for the trend
$BTC is approaching the 70,000 USD area and for me, this is not just a psychological round number but also a very clear supply zone on the weekly structure.
I see 70k as an area where strong distribution once occurred, where large volumes were exchanged and many long positions are trapped above.
When the price returns to this zone, latent selling pressure often emerges because those who are stuck tend to wait to break even to exit.
I see 70k as an area where strong distribution once occurred, where large volumes were exchanged and many long positions are trapped above.
When the price returns to this zone, latent selling pressure often emerges because those who are stuck tend to wait to break even to exit.
Is Vanar suitable for crypto beginners?
I usually see
mentioned as a friendly entry point for newcomers, where you don't have to struggle with seed phrases, gas fees, or the wallet setup steps that make many people give up right from the start.
And indeed, if you look at it on the surface, this experience is much more pleasant compared to starting on traditional L1s. But every time I see a system that is 'easy to use' like that, I can't help but wonder: where does that ease come from, and what am I sacrificing to get it?
mentioned as a friendly entry point for newcomers, where you don't have to struggle with seed phrases, gas fees, or the wallet setup steps that make many people give up right from the start.
And indeed, if you look at it on the surface, this experience is much more pleasant compared to starting on traditional L1s. But every time I see a system that is 'easy to use' like that, I can't help but wonder: where does that ease come from, and what am I sacrificing to get it?
Login to explore more contents