密智君 Crypto Plus AI

From the youngest county mayor to being investigated, his clash with Wang Jianlin has again become a hot topic
Six days ago he was removed from office, and six days later the authorities officially announced that he is under investigation. Xu Liuwei, a former county mayor who was once the youngest in Guizhou, has once again returned to the public spotlight.
Xu Liuwei was born in June 1982. He joined the workforce in August 2005 and holds a graduate degree from the National People’s Congress program. He worked for many years in the Guizhou provincial government. In April 2012, he became a Standing Committee member of the Party Committee of Danzhai County and deputy county magistrate. In 2014, he officially became county mayor. At that time he was only 32 years old, making him the youngest county mayor in Guizhou at the time.
On July 10, the Guizhou provincial government website suddenly published a batch of personnel appointments and removals. Among them, Xu Liuwei was no longer listed as serving as deputy secretary-general of the Guizhou Provincial People’s Government.
When Xu Liuwei served as county mayor of Danzhai County, he had once “gone head-to-head” with Wanda’s Wang Jianlin, which made him famous nationwide in one battle. The key points of the dispute were: how Wanda’s investment profits in Danzhai would be transferred for government payments; and how to ensure that impoverished areas could truly shake off poverty for good.
The incident began in 2014, when senior executives of Wanda suddenly came up with the idea of contracting poverty alleviation efforts county-wide. At first, they had not considered including Danzhai. After Danzhai County learned of the plan, it immediately reported to the leaders of the provincial poverty alleviation office and requested that Danzhai be included among the candidate inspection and evaluation points—only then was it “added to the list.” It is said that after the investigation, they had to call Wanda every two or three days to check on progress.
Through this series of efforts, they persuaded Wanda Group. In the end, it was determined that Wanda would invest 1.4 billion yuan: 300 million yuan to build a Danzhai Vocational and Technical College, 600 million yuan to build a tourism town, and another 500 million yuan to set up a Danzhai poverty alleviation special fund, so that within two years, the entire county’s population would be lifted out of poverty.
Now Wanda is mired in a “debt crisis,” and the former most outstanding county mayor has also fallen from power. What do you think about Wanda’s choice back then? $BTC

Sega once missed out on $1 trillion, but made an even more important decision!
30 years ago, Huang Renxun flew to Tokyo with a request that was almost certain to fail: Nvidia’s chip built for Sega had failed. He admitted that the architecture choice was wrong, and asked to convert the remaining $5 million under the contract into an equity investment in Nvidia.
He even told Kazuo Irijo, in advance, that this money would very likely be entirely lost.
Sega considered it for two days and then agreed. The $5 million gave Nvidia about six more months to survive. The company laid off most of its employees, abandoned the wrong path, and concentrated its resources on RIVA 128. After the 1997 product launched, it sold about one million units in four months—only then did Nvidia truly cross the point of no return.
On July 15, 2026, Huang Renxun returned to Tokyo’s Akihabara to reunite with Sega’s former president, Kazuo Irijo. He said that without Sega and Irijo’s support back then, Nvidia would not exist today.
My take is: the real investment happens when a project has already failed, and the other side admits it may all be a complete loss—yet you can still distinguish the “wrong architecture” from the team that’s worth continuing to bet on.
If you were you, would you have invested in Nvidia 30 years ago?$NVDAB #英伟达

CZ comments that Binance’s 1 billion users proactively sought talks with Musk about an X Money partnership, but the response they got was: “X will process fiat currency; it doesn’t touch Crypto.” Musk is basically playing both sides again—he personally holds most of Dogecoin, has long been bullish on BTC, yet X is now actively “cracking down” on cryptocurrencies across the board!
As for X Money, its currently public roadmap is Visa top-ups, bank transfers, peer-to-peer payments, and debit cards. X Payments has already obtained remittance licenses in more than 40 U.S. states. If native Bitcoin payments are added as well, X would need to handle custody, on-chain risk control, taxation, and price volatility.
Back when Meta launched Libra, it had billions of users and a top-tier engineering team, but in the end, under regulatory pressure it still changed its name to Diem and sold its assets. What payment networks touch is never just technology—it’s also monetary sovereignty.
CZ wants to turn X into a global Crypto payments layer, while Musk chose to lay out the fiat rails first. Their goals differ, and so does their scale and vision completely!
If you were Musk, and X Money enabled crypto payments, would you choose <c-1/>$BTC </c-1/>, or Dogecoin <c-1/>$DOGE </c-1/>?

$BTC It’s too real! There are many single men because men don’t have money.
There are many single women because men don’t have money.
The marriage rate is very low because men don’t have money.
The divorce rate is very high because men don’t have money.
The birth rate is very low because men don’t have money.
So the root of all evil is—men don’t have money.
Since nobody has money, why not trade crypto? At least there’s a chance to make money?

“After the ‘Trump account’ goes live, the most eye-catching line is: the U.S. government will give $1,000 the moment a child is born.
The actual scope is not that large. Only U.S. citizens who are born between 2025 and 2028 and have a Social Security number can receive this one-time startup funding. Parents also need to proactively submit Form 4547 to open the account; not all newborns receive the deposit automatically.
The money will be invested in low-cost funds that track U.S. stock indexes such as the S&P 500, and in principle it cannot be withdrawn before the child turns 18. Parents, relatives, employers, and charitable organizations can continue adding money to the account, with an annual cap of $5,000.
The controversy lies here as well.
The White House Council of Economic Advisers calculated that if no additional funding is added afterward, the $1,000 could grow to about $5,800 by age 18; if the annual contributions continue at the maximum level, the account could reach about $303,800. With the same policy starting point, the outcomes could still differ by more than 50 times.
The United States is running an 18-year experiment: making children stock-market investors from birth. Whether it ultimately narrows or expands the wealth gap will not depend on the initial $1,000, but on who has the ability to keep contributing $5,000 each year afterward. If it were you, would you keep investing this ‘funding’ in your child?” $GOOGL.US #特朗普召开会议筹划扩大对伊攻势

Damn it—$2.1 billion bet on AI drug discovery, and Hassabis faces the real test by year-end!
Hassabis is taking on two of the hardest challenges at once: leading DeepMind on the path to AGI, and trying to use AI to rewrite drug discovery rules that have lasted for decades.
Traditional new drug development averages about 10 years and often costs billions of dollars, and most candidate drugs ultimately never make it to market. Isomorphic Labs’ goal is to compress early-stage drug discovery from years to months, and improve the success rate of candidate drugs once they enter clinical trials.
Capital has already placed its bets. Isomorphic Labs raised $600 million in 2025, and completed a $2.1 billion Series B in 2026, with total external funding of about $2.7 billion. Its potential value from collaborations with Eli Lilly and Novartis is close to $3 billion, and it has also established a partnership with Johnson & Johnson.
Risk warning: funding scale and potential collaboration amounts cannot represent the success of drug development. Even after the first batch of candidate drugs enters clinical trials, there are still risks related to safety, efficacy, and regulatory approval.$GOOGL.US

$BNB hours old when I was just focused on seeing Gege look cool. Only after growing up did I understand: gambling is never about winning by probabilities. It’s like contracts—you guess which way prices will move and you’ll lose ten times out of ten. Real trading relies on insight into human nature!#散户购股规模降至2020年来最低