Binance Square
macbookpro
204 Posts

macbookpro

专注于每期币安 Alpha 新币分析 & 投研 & 交易!!
2 Following
103 Followers
126 Liked
Posts
·
--
In 2027, the privacy protocol worth waiting to buy early: PLabs @_PLabs $P20 : Privacy leader Zcash $ZEC hits consecutive all-time highs in price; FDV 16.57B; Privacy infrastructure Interfold $FOLD goes live on Upbit; FDV 200M; Meanwhile, the very early EVM privacy protocol pERC20 $P20 has just started—it’s an excellent timing to “lay in the weeds.” Ethereum co-founder Vitalik has repeatedly strongly recommended privacy protocols; pERC20 is a new EVM privacy protocol built on the Zcash Orchard privacy protocol, and $P20 is pERC20’s native token. See the quoted tweet for details; Main features of pERC20 (see image): 1⃣ Balances are not visible; 2⃣ Transfer details are not visible; 3⃣ It requires privacy-native applications to support it; Many people equate privacy with “mixing” or “money laundering,” but in reality, privacy has a wide range of application scenarios: institutional market-making strategies, actions by celebrities such as CZ’s private addresses, DEXs, and even lending protocols, etc.; pERC20 has a built-in cmxFrozenRoot freeze mechanism that supports compliant blacklists. For hackers, money laundering, criminal funds, and more, you can use $P20 governance to enable freezing—thus enabling auditable privacy. You don’t need to worry about compliance at all; compliance means it can accommodate institutional-level capital; The working principle of pERC20 is: download all (optional partial) blocks, decrypt your own privacy assets locally: Transfer request - Local proof - On-chain confirmation - Privacy asset sync - Local decryption It involves zero centralized nodes; Total supply of $P20 is 1 billion. The Genesis airdrop provides 8.3% of the total supply. A total of 1,470,463 addresses participated. So far, 86.19% has been claimed; the remaining 13.81% is waiting for the team to reallocate; pERC20 is the first to be deployed on Monad. The combination of high performance + privacy is definitely worth期待. Currently, pERC20 is already compatible with EVM assets, the transfer feature is enabled, and you can trade via OTC. The official will soon release the $P20 private clob DEX—at that time, you’ll be able to trade $P20 ; So if you buy into the privacy narrative, you can track pERC20’s progress early. There may be many opportunities to get early allocation. I’ll put links related to the project in the comments—if you’re interested, take a look. My goal is to get 0.1% of the allocation and wait for it to bloom; Of course, the project is still at a very early stage, so many things haven’t been fully developed yet, and you may run into all kinds of issues. But the community and the team are very enthusiastic. You can join the community Telegram channel—the link is in the comments; Later, I’ll release a dedicated episode on how to use a privacy wallet, sync assets, founders’ background, and more.
In 2027, the privacy protocol worth waiting to buy early: PLabs @_PLabs $P20 :

Privacy leader Zcash $ZEC hits consecutive all-time highs in price; FDV 16.57B;
Privacy infrastructure Interfold $FOLD goes live on Upbit; FDV 200M;

Meanwhile, the very early EVM privacy protocol pERC20 $P20 has just started—it’s an excellent timing to “lay in the weeds.” Ethereum co-founder Vitalik has repeatedly strongly recommended privacy protocols;

pERC20 is a new EVM privacy protocol built on the Zcash Orchard privacy protocol, and $P20 is pERC20’s native token. See the quoted tweet for details;

Main features of pERC20 (see image):

1⃣ Balances are not visible;
2⃣ Transfer details are not visible;
3⃣ It requires privacy-native applications to support it;

Many people equate privacy with “mixing” or “money laundering,” but in reality, privacy has a wide range of application scenarios: institutional market-making strategies, actions by celebrities such as CZ’s private addresses, DEXs, and even lending protocols, etc.;

pERC20 has a built-in cmxFrozenRoot freeze mechanism that supports compliant blacklists. For hackers, money laundering, criminal funds, and more, you can use $P20 governance to enable freezing—thus enabling auditable privacy. You don’t need to worry about compliance at all; compliance means it can accommodate institutional-level capital;

The working principle of pERC20 is: download all (optional partial) blocks, decrypt your own privacy assets locally:

Transfer request - Local proof - On-chain confirmation - Privacy asset sync - Local decryption

It involves zero centralized nodes;

Total supply of $P20 is 1 billion. The Genesis airdrop provides 8.3% of the total supply. A total of 1,470,463 addresses participated. So far, 86.19% has been claimed; the remaining 13.81% is waiting for the team to reallocate;

pERC20 is the first to be deployed on Monad. The combination of high performance + privacy is definitely worth期待. Currently, pERC20 is already compatible with EVM assets, the transfer feature is enabled, and you can trade via OTC. The official will soon release the $P20 private clob DEX—at that time, you’ll be able to trade $P20 ;

So if you buy into the privacy narrative, you can track pERC20’s progress early. There may be many opportunities to get early allocation. I’ll put links related to the project in the comments—if you’re interested, take a look. My goal is to get 0.1% of the allocation and wait for it to bloom;

Of course, the project is still at a very early stage, so many things haven’t been fully developed yet, and you may run into all kinds of issues. But the community and the team are very enthusiastic. You can join the community Telegram channel—the link is in the comments;

Later, I’ll release a dedicated episode on how to use a privacy wallet, sync assets, founders’ background, and more.
$SAND 🍌MMSnews The SAND vulnerability incident has already minted over 500 million tokens and is still ongoing; the official authorities have not responded to date ------------------------------ They’re talking about both deposits and withdrawals—it's basically a single-machine coin. Be careful of a pump-and-dump crew getting you dumped.
$SAND 🍌MMSnews
The SAND vulnerability incident has already minted over 500 million tokens and is still ongoing; the official authorities have not responded to date
------------------------------
They’re talking about both deposits and withdrawals—it's basically a single-machine coin. Be careful of a pump-and-dump crew getting you dumped.
Let me briefly explain Aligned $ALIGN. Although it didn’t list on Binance Alpha, I think many addresses will have an airdrop: 1⃣, Airdrop claim at 23:00. It may synchronize on-chain when trading opens, and it will be listed on CEX at 03:00 tomorrow, including Bitget, KuCoin, Gate, Coinbase, etc.; 2⃣, Total supply is 10 billion, circulating supply is 16.22%, including: ecosystem 0.58%, foundation 4.31%, future development 6.68%, community sales 0.67%, airdrop 3.88%, ZK Arcade 0.10%; 🔺 Airdrops < 10000 are fully unlocked; if the airdrop is > 10000, then 10000 will be unlocked; 3⃣, Airdrop lookup: https://community.alignedlayer.com ; 4⃣, Contract addresses: ETH: 0x50614CC8e44F7814549c223aA31db9296e58057c base: 0x53f39e5C53EE40bbc3Da97C3B47BD2968d110a8D 5⃣, Aspecta pre-market is 0.03. Polymarket FDV forecast is > 200M at 62%, and > 300M at 37%; 6⃣, The Aligned narrative is a ZK verification layer. It raised 36.27M, but it has dragged on for way too long. I checked and they started the airdrop check as early as December 2024. It’s been one year and eight more months; 7⃣, Hack VC led the round—I usually look down on it a bit. Plus while the project team put in quite a lot of advertising, they also closed the comment section. So if it opens at 0.04 or above, I’ll decisively sell the airdrop; if it’s too low, then it doesn’t matter.
Let me briefly explain Aligned $ALIGN. Although it didn’t list on Binance Alpha, I think many addresses will have an airdrop:

1⃣, Airdrop claim at 23:00. It may synchronize on-chain when trading opens, and it will be listed on CEX at 03:00 tomorrow, including Bitget, KuCoin, Gate, Coinbase, etc.;

2⃣, Total supply is 10 billion, circulating supply is 16.22%, including: ecosystem 0.58%, foundation 4.31%, future development 6.68%, community sales 0.67%, airdrop 3.88%, ZK Arcade 0.10%;

🔺 Airdrops < 10000 are fully unlocked; if the airdrop is > 10000, then 10000 will be unlocked;

3⃣, Airdrop lookup: https://community.alignedlayer.com ;

4⃣, Contract addresses:

ETH: 0x50614CC8e44F7814549c223aA31db9296e58057c
base: 0x53f39e5C53EE40bbc3Da97C3B47BD2968d110a8D

5⃣, Aspecta pre-market is 0.03. Polymarket FDV forecast is > 200M at 62%, and > 300M at 37%;

6⃣, The Aligned narrative is a ZK verification layer. It raised 36.27M, but it has dragged on for way too long. I checked and they started the airdrop check as early as December 2024. It’s been one year and eight more months;

7⃣, Hack VC led the round—I usually look down on it a bit. Plus while the project team put in quite a lot of advertising, they also closed the comment section. So if it opens at 0.04 or above, I’ll decisively sell the airdrop; if it’s too low, then it doesn’t matter.
Verified
TermMax $TMX goes live on Binance Alpha time confirmation ✅ 🔵 Listing time: 2026/8/25 18:00:00 UTC+8 🟢 Token name: $TMX Token contract: 0x3c2f61f2e27c865981d2e7aaf6b2cdf823030039 #TermMax #TMX
TermMax $TMX goes live on Binance Alpha time confirmation ✅

🔵 Listing time: 2026/8/25 18:00:00 UTC+8
🟢 Token name: $TMX
Token contract: 0x3c2f61f2e27c865981d2e7aaf6b2cdf823030039
#TermMax #TMX
Say whatever comes to mind! 1⃣, Binance Alpha should have new listings no earlier than next week, because: $DGAI has announced an airdrop, but it hasn’t launched yet; $FOLD is already live, but it’s not on Alpha; $SWARM is already live, but it’s not on Alpha; $TMX will definitely be listed on Binance Alpha; $PROPR likely won’t have much chance either; $ALIGN has made it onto Coinbase’s roadmap, but the question is when it can reach TGE before we consider whether it can get onto Alpha. I’ve checked the airdrops for over a year already ( $DGAI is basically like “no matter what, I’m going to look at you” ); $MULT has a public sale of 250 million—given the market conditions, I can only say it really doesn’t screw over poor people; $LNRA also joined the public sale. It issued a few hundred Galaxies and POAPs—now the POAPs have all gone under. Came for the public sale 😂; So although it looks like many projects are going to TGE, in reality the ones that can make it onto Binance Alpha are probably only $TMX; 2⃣, $MarsCoin has already been smashed. It’s currently down about -30%+ on floating loss. At this point there’s nothing else to do except hold. If by the end of the month CZ doesn’t call it out, it’s likely to be down -50%+… stuck in a trap, trapped, save me 😭; 3⃣, SK Hynix’s 40 trillion won (USD 28.4 billion) share repurchase—this is actually old news, but the market’s bullish sentiment is hard to ignore. I chose to short. Even though the price has already fallen back now, when the news is positive, you really can pretend to be a dumb guy and go all-in long; 4⃣, Aspecta’s pre-market roadmap added lots of projects: AlloX, Konnex, RealGo, Multipli, Linera, GenLayer, Apyx. It feels like the market suddenly has a sense of urgency 😂;
Say whatever comes to mind!

1⃣, Binance Alpha should have new listings no earlier than next week, because:

$DGAI has announced an airdrop, but it hasn’t launched yet;

$FOLD is already live, but it’s not on Alpha;

$SWARM is already live, but it’s not on Alpha;

$TMX will definitely be listed on Binance Alpha;

$PROPR likely won’t have much chance either;

$ALIGN has made it onto Coinbase’s roadmap, but the question is when it can reach TGE before we consider whether it can get onto Alpha. I’ve checked the airdrops for over a year already ( $DGAI is basically like “no matter what, I’m going to look at you” );

$MULT has a public sale of 250 million—given the market conditions, I can only say it really doesn’t screw over poor people;

$LNRA also joined the public sale. It issued a few hundred Galaxies and POAPs—now the POAPs have all gone under. Came for the public sale 😂;

So although it looks like many projects are going to TGE, in reality the ones that can make it onto Binance Alpha are probably only $TMX;

2⃣, $MarsCoin has already been smashed. It’s currently down about -30%+ on floating loss. At this point there’s nothing else to do except hold. If by the end of the month CZ doesn’t call it out, it’s likely to be down -50%+… stuck in a trap, trapped, save me
😭;

3⃣, SK Hynix’s 40 trillion won (USD 28.4 billion) share repurchase—this is actually old news, but the market’s bullish sentiment is hard to ignore. I chose to short. Even though the price has already fallen back now, when the news is positive, you really can pretend to be a dumb guy and go all-in long;

4⃣, Aspecta’s pre-market roadmap added lots of projects: AlloX, Konnex, RealGo, Multipli, Linera, GenLayer, Apyx. It feels like the market suddenly has a sense of urgency 😂;
One句话 becomes a prophecy; Last night I really had a strong premonition that $牛来 would list on Binance Alpha, but the group mates all said there’s no longer any need for Binance Alpha at this market cap; They’re right—except Binance Alpha still needs it, because $牛来 is truly a very solid narrative. It’s completely detached from the previous CZ HEYI two-person sketch, and the momentum is still stacking up. No matter whether it’s remixes or merchandise, there’s no shortage—if it doesn’t make it as a meme, then don’t say you support memes; At this point, the only thing we can hope for is the futures contract on $MarsCoin. Also, CZ will be posting the dividend at the end of the month (in the red right now.....);
One句话 becomes a prophecy;

Last night I really had a strong premonition that $牛来 would list on Binance Alpha, but the group mates all said there’s no longer any need for Binance Alpha at this market cap;

They’re right—except Binance Alpha still needs it, because $牛来 is truly a very solid narrative. It’s completely detached from the previous CZ HEYI two-person sketch, and the momentum is still stacking up. No matter whether it’s remixes or merchandise, there’s no shortage—if it doesn’t make it as a meme, then don’t say you support memes;

At this point, the only thing we can hope for is the futures contract on $MarsCoin. Also, CZ will be posting the dividend at the end of the month (in the red right now.....);
Why did it suddenly spike up so sharply to $RED ?
Why did it suddenly spike up so sharply to $RED ?
DeFiLlama got it wrong—big time! KiiChain $KII raised financing, and only DeFiLlama shows 26M😂. That immediately weakened DeFiLlama’s authority in my heart; The first one I found showed only 1M—personal financing; The second was DeFiLlama, which showed 26M; The third plainly indicated there was no data; The fourth couldn’t find the project at all; The fifth didn’t specify an amount, so it seemed questionable; Yesterday, $KII started trading on-chain early. After Binance Alpha opened, I didn’t expect it to open low—I'd said that below 0.1, there should be buyers. I hesitated for a few seconds and thought an early low open on Binance Alpha was rare, so I decided to give it a shot; So I entered around 0.1. Another reason was my trust in DeFiLlama—many data points come from DeFiLlama. I thought even if it wasn’t 26M, there should still be around 10M. Turns out it was totally fake. The maximum unrealized loss was 30%+; it rebounded to around 0.08 and I exited, losing 20%😂; From what I remember, on CEX sync it had pretty poor liquidity. As for actions like withdrawing liquidity and depositing to exchanges—after it got that bad, those things are already minor at this point!!
DeFiLlama got it wrong—big time!

KiiChain $KII raised financing, and only DeFiLlama shows 26M😂. That immediately weakened DeFiLlama’s authority in my heart;

The first one I found showed only 1M—personal financing;
The second was DeFiLlama, which showed 26M;
The third plainly indicated there was no data;
The fourth couldn’t find the project at all;
The fifth didn’t specify an amount, so it seemed questionable;

Yesterday, $KII started trading on-chain early. After Binance Alpha opened, I didn’t expect it to open low—I'd said that below 0.1, there should be buyers. I hesitated for a few seconds and thought an early low open on Binance Alpha was rare, so I decided to give it a shot;

So I entered around 0.1. Another reason was my trust in DeFiLlama—many data points come from DeFiLlama. I thought even if it wasn’t 26M, there should still be around 10M. Turns out it was totally fake. The maximum unrealized loss was 30%+; it rebounded to around 0.08 and I exited, losing 20%😂;

From what I remember, on CEX sync it had pretty poor liquidity. As for actions like withdrawing liquidity and depositing to exchanges—after it got that bad, those things are already minor at this point!!
$KII cs ah, down 20%, still investing in a 50u KOL ad. It probably won’t pump it— I cut my losses.
$KII cs ah, down 20%, still investing in a 50u KOL ad. It probably won’t pump it— I cut my losses.
🟢KiiChain $KII Open Strike Update 🟢 🔵 Strike Amount: 84,375 🟡 Bribe Amount: 25,777.07 🟣 Token Quantity: 1,145,999.30 🟠 Position Cost: 0.09611879307 It opened on-chain early, but it’s just too bad, seriously.
🟢KiiChain $KII Open Strike Update 🟢

🔵 Strike Amount: 84,375
🟡 Bribe Amount: 25,777.07
🟣 Token Quantity: 1,145,999.30
🟠 Position Cost: 0.09611879307

It opened on-chain early, but it’s just too bad, seriously.
Verified
August 14, 2026 21:00: Launch Binance Alpha’s $KII (KiiChain) 🟢Quick summary: The project has no highlights. Airdrop sell-pressure is heavy, and the marketing efforts are low—overall, there isn’t much hype! 🟠Token name: $KII 🔴Token contract: 0xeec6574eabba52bac3f0277f2cd5ac7e67197886 🔵Pool price: 0.0583 🟡Pool composition: 0.146-0.583: 3.42M $KII ---- top sell orders 0.0583-0.292: 2.57M $KII ---- top sell orders 0-∞: 150k usdt + 2.57M $KII ---- full-range liquidity 0.0292-0.0583: 200k usdt ---- bottom buy orders 0.0437-0.0583: 150k usdt ---- bottom buy orders 【Key info】: 1⃣. Total supply: 1.8B. Circulating: 17.455%, including: Airdrop 2.1%, Public sale 0.275%, Ecosystem 5%, Community incentives 10.08%; 🔺BSC currently has 8.1%, including: Binance 3% (Alpha included 1%), liquidity 2.14%, Bybit deposit 0.43%, okx 0.3%, $SLX market maker 0.066%, and another 1% is kucoin/mexc/kraken/bitget etc. Roughly 1% is unknown; 🔺Liquidity of 2.14% also added 0.476%, with the remainder at 1.3%. The number of cross-chain transfers to BSC is still increasing; 2⃣. Clear sell-pressure sources are: Binance Alpha 1% + Public sale 0.275% + Airdrop 2.1%, and the community airdrop timing is unknown; 🔺Airdrop at 2.1% doesn’t sound like much, but actually it’s 2.1% of the total 1.8B supply. Using $0.1 as a reference price, that’s about 3.78M in sell-pressure; the public sale contribution is comparatively negligible; 🔺Public sale is 0.74% of total supply: raising 1M, with TGE unlock at 0.275%. Breakdown: ➡️ FDV 105M, locked in December, cost 0.0583, representing 0.29%; ➡️ FDV 140M, unlocks 30%, cost 0.0778, representing 0.25%; ➡️ FDV 175M, unlocks 100%, cost 0.0972, representing 0.20%; 🔺That Public sale total address set is only 131 addresses. Of them, 108 addresses chose 175M FDV. Among these, 75 are below $500, and 14 subscription addresses (team or whales or market makers) make up 92.3%. The 9 addresses subscribing above $100k have the same source of funds; (I’ve put the Public sale data in the comments. If you’re interested, you can check the comments and the referenced posts.) 3⃣. Launch on Binance Alpha at 21:00. At the same time, CEXs also list it at 21:00, including: Bybit, Kucoin, Kraken, Bitget, Mexc, etc.; 4⃣. There is no pre-market price. Aspecta joined the roadmap, but for the future and pre-listing period, there is no Polymarket FDV forecast; 5⃣. About targeting/sniping: Someone should buy below 0.1. Around 0.2, you’d need to weigh it. So I estimate the sniping would be about $300k, with $200k in bribes. The average price would be 0.1655266778. Anyway, I won’t buy at that price 😂; 6⃣. KiiChain is a modular L1, based on a blockchain-based FX processing layer. It supports 24/7 forex trading, cross-border payments, and programmable settlement functions; 🔺Funding is 26M. This credibility is average at best—mostly from the project team’s blog and Defillama. There’s no authoritative data verification. Nimbus Capital has pledged to invest 20M, but the actual and formal details are unclear; 🟢Overall: The narrative is average, the background is average, marketing/community hype is low, funding credibility is low, real revenue is unknown, and the team’s control over supply seems generally strong. Plus, with activities on many CEXs, a decent amount of tokens should have been distributed. Potential sell-pressure from the airdrop is relatively high. Also, the KiiChain mainnet doesn’t have much trading—keep an eye on cross-chain activity. (Attached figure: Estimated price model for snipers opening positions to snipe $0.1M–$1M) 🔍 Data from on-chain monitoring and publicly available information | Analysis is for reference only | Not investment advice—DYOR
August 14, 2026 21:00: Launch Binance Alpha’s $KII (KiiChain)

🟢Quick summary: The project has no highlights. Airdrop sell-pressure is heavy, and the marketing efforts are low—overall, there isn’t much hype!

🟠Token name: $KII
🔴Token contract: 0xeec6574eabba52bac3f0277f2cd5ac7e67197886
🔵Pool price: 0.0583
🟡Pool composition:
0.146-0.583: 3.42M $KII ---- top sell orders
0.0583-0.292: 2.57M $KII ---- top sell orders
0-∞: 150k usdt + 2.57M $KII ---- full-range liquidity
0.0292-0.0583: 200k usdt ---- bottom buy orders
0.0437-0.0583: 150k usdt ---- bottom buy orders

【Key info】:
1⃣. Total supply: 1.8B. Circulating: 17.455%, including: Airdrop 2.1%, Public sale 0.275%, Ecosystem 5%, Community incentives 10.08%;

🔺BSC currently has 8.1%, including: Binance 3% (Alpha included 1%), liquidity 2.14%, Bybit deposit 0.43%, okx 0.3%, $SLX market maker 0.066%, and another 1% is kucoin/mexc/kraken/bitget etc. Roughly 1% is unknown;

🔺Liquidity of 2.14% also added 0.476%, with the remainder at 1.3%. The number of cross-chain transfers to BSC is still increasing;

2⃣. Clear sell-pressure sources are: Binance Alpha 1% + Public sale 0.275% + Airdrop 2.1%, and the community airdrop timing is unknown;

🔺Airdrop at 2.1% doesn’t sound like much, but actually it’s 2.1% of the total 1.8B supply. Using $0.1 as a reference price, that’s about 3.78M in sell-pressure; the public sale contribution is comparatively negligible;

🔺Public sale is 0.74% of total supply: raising 1M, with TGE unlock at 0.275%. Breakdown:

➡️ FDV 105M, locked in December, cost 0.0583, representing 0.29%;
➡️ FDV 140M, unlocks 30%, cost 0.0778, representing 0.25%;
➡️ FDV 175M, unlocks 100%, cost 0.0972, representing 0.20%;

🔺That Public sale total address set is only 131 addresses. Of them, 108 addresses chose 175M FDV. Among these, 75 are below $500, and 14 subscription addresses (team or whales or market makers) make up 92.3%. The 9 addresses subscribing above $100k have the same source of funds;

(I’ve put the Public sale data in the comments. If you’re interested, you can check the comments and the referenced posts.)

3⃣. Launch on Binance Alpha at 21:00. At the same time, CEXs also list it at 21:00, including: Bybit, Kucoin, Kraken, Bitget, Mexc, etc.;

4⃣. There is no pre-market price. Aspecta joined the roadmap, but for the future and pre-listing period, there is no Polymarket FDV forecast;

5⃣. About targeting/sniping: Someone should buy below 0.1. Around 0.2, you’d need to weigh it. So I estimate the sniping would be about $300k, with $200k in bribes. The average price would be 0.1655266778. Anyway, I won’t buy at that price 😂;

6⃣. KiiChain is a modular L1, based on a blockchain-based FX processing layer. It supports 24/7 forex trading, cross-border payments, and programmable settlement functions;

🔺Funding is 26M. This credibility is average at best—mostly from the project team’s blog and Defillama. There’s no authoritative data verification. Nimbus Capital has pledged to invest 20M, but the actual and formal details are unclear;

🟢Overall: The narrative is average, the background is average, marketing/community hype is low, funding credibility is low, real revenue is unknown, and the team’s control over supply seems generally strong. Plus, with activities on many CEXs, a decent amount of tokens should have been distributed. Potential sell-pressure from the airdrop is relatively high. Also, the KiiChain mainnet doesn’t have much trading—keep an eye on cross-chain activity.

(Attached figure: Estimated price model for snipers opening positions to snipe $0.1M–$1M)

🔍 Data from on-chain monitoring and publicly available information | Analysis is for reference only | Not investment advice—DYOR
Data for KiiChain $KII Public Sale on Binance Alpha that went live on August 14: The goal was to raise 1M; the sale was over-subscribed to 1.6X, for a total amount of 1.6M. Subscriptions were made via Echo. The period was 08.03 - 08.11. It has ended and refunds have been processed; A total of 131 addresses subscribed, including 14 addresses with over 50k, which subscribed 1.45M and accepted 923k; Of those, there are 9 addresses with over 100k. These successful subscriptions accounted for 69.1% of the public offering. All the funds came from just two addresses: 0xcF748f1bD1E2a1E2a1cef35A480acFD5220c9e7D 0xBefa750Ed568Cc84970eB4FD506aF4FF599c42D0 Portal: https://basescan.org/advanced-filter?fadd=0xFCDe5B2471a833fe600d469fF9e65fa46879Cc9B&tadd=0xFCDe5B2471a833fe600d469fF9e65fa46879Cc9B&amt=100000%7e999999999&mtd=0xd12cf2c5%7eReplace+Bid+With+Approval… Putting on armor: This is purely data—no conclusions are drawn. For reference only 😊
Data for KiiChain $KII Public Sale on Binance Alpha that went live on August 14:

The goal was to raise 1M; the sale was over-subscribed to 1.6X, for a total amount of 1.6M. Subscriptions were made via Echo. The period was 08.03 - 08.11. It has ended and refunds have been processed;

A total of 131 addresses subscribed, including 14 addresses with over 50k, which subscribed 1.45M and accepted 923k;

Of those, there are 9 addresses with over 100k. These successful subscriptions accounted for 69.1% of the public offering. All the funds came from just two addresses:

0xcF748f1bD1E2a1E2a1cef35A480acFD5220c9e7D
0xBefa750Ed568Cc84970eB4FD506aF4FF599c42D0

Portal: https://basescan.org/advanced-filter?fadd=0xFCDe5B2471a833fe600d469fF9e65fa46879Cc9B&tadd=0xFCDe5B2471a833fe600d469fF9e65fa46879Cc9B&amt=100000%7e999999999&mtd=0xd12cf2c5%7eReplace+Bid+With+Approval…

Putting on armor: This is purely data—no conclusions are drawn. For reference only 😊
KiiChain $KII goes live on Binance Alpha — time confirmed ✅ 🔵 Listing time: 2026/8/14 21:00:00 (UTC+8) 🟢 Token name: $KII 🔴 Token contract: 0xEEC6574eAbBa52bac3f0277F2cD5Ac7e67197886 Another project with lots of hype circles—do you have a trader/operator this time? Which of the Thirty-Six Stratagems will you use?!!!
KiiChain $KII goes live on Binance Alpha — time confirmed ✅

🔵 Listing time: 2026/8/14 21:00:00 (UTC+8)
🟢 Token name: $KII
🔴 Token contract: 0xEEC6574eAbBa52bac3f0277F2cD5Ac7e67197886

Another project with lots of hype circles—do you have a trader/operator this time? Which of the Thirty-Six Stratagems will you use?!!!
Let me do a complete post-mortem recap of the entire saga of the DappOS $DOS “accidentally added to the wrong pool” incident—one of the greatest pieces of trading manipulation I’ve ever seen in my career!!! 1⃣, Yesterday, after the project team added the pool, I knew they had added it to the wrong one. But changing the pool multiple times before the market opens is pretty common, so I didn’t bother tweeting. I figured the team would almost certainly/very likely/should eventually notice and fix the problem; 2⃣, So when I wrote my analysis of $DOS , I based everything on the pool they originally intended to add, because I believed the project team would find the issue sooner or later and revert it; 🔺I had even considered the scenario where the team didn’t notice it: then there likely wouldn’t be snipers targeting it. In that case, there would be a chance to catch Binance Alpha sell orders around 0.1. In my mind, 0.1–0.2 would both be workable, since the pre-market price was 0.3; 3⃣, Up until 16:59, I went back to double-check. Since there was no record of the pool being modified, I knew this time they were going to do something big. Then I looked at the sniper situation: only 23k. Sure enough, something was wrong. I immediately placed a 0.1 limit order on Binance Alpha to see if a unlucky trader would sell to me 😂; 🔺I didn’t use a market order because I was afraid I’d make a mistake in the rush and lose big; 4⃣, The order ended up hanging for half a day with no fills. It sat from 0.1 all the way to 0.2. I kept watching the project team’s pool and it still didn’t move, so later around 0.25 I sold, because there was no official pool. I wasn’t very confident holding. Not boarding afterward was also due to the same reason; 🔺Along the way, I even questioned whether the project team intentionally did it. Since Binance Alpha had issues at launch—Binance theoretically would investigate and handle the project team—but the team never showed up to adjust the pool; 5⃣, Then it kept getting pumped up to 0.45. Of course, mainly because the pool was thin at the time. The project team’s 500k USDT and the 5M $DOS pool were not activated. So it was only the users’ pools with several tens of thousands of USDT, which made it comparatively easier to pump; 🔺It looked like I also saw in the community claims that there were other pump methods related to $DOS ; 6⃣, Finally, at 21:03 (this timing is really suspicious—seriously, I suspect it was on purpose), the project team “arrived quite late” and re-adjusted the pool’s liquidity: 0.08–0.2: 150k USDT 0.1–0.387: 350k USDT 0.45–0.7: 450k $DOS 0.39–1.42: 375k $DOS When I saw this range, I was flabbergasted. Who would believe this wasn’t deliberate?! The two pools from 1.42–9.99 also weren’t removed. They cleverly connected everything together. Back then, they transferred 10M for liquidity, but only added 5M. The remaining 5M—wasn’t that basically the setup, i.e., premeditation? In the end, the project team pulled off a “cover-up” maneuver—sidestepping the issue with a well-planned trick. With great wisdom and cunning, like playing dumb but actually not, they succeeded with zero effort in stabilizing the $DOS price around 0.4. Then they moved the buy-side pool up to 0.387. After that, they connected two new pools to take over from the “wrongly added” pool. I can only say: this is the greatest trading manipulation I’ve ever witnessed!!! ⚠️⚠️⚠️Of course, I’m not saying you should buy blindly below 0.387. The pool can also be withdrawn—risk management always matters more than making money!!!
Let me do a complete post-mortem recap of the entire saga of the DappOS $DOS “accidentally added to the wrong pool” incident—one of the greatest pieces of trading manipulation I’ve ever seen in my career!!!

1⃣, Yesterday, after the project team added the pool, I knew they had added it to the wrong one. But changing the pool multiple times before the market opens is pretty common, so I didn’t bother tweeting. I figured the team would almost certainly/very likely/should eventually notice and fix the problem;

2⃣, So when I wrote my analysis of $DOS , I based everything on the pool they originally intended to add, because I believed the project team would find the issue sooner or later and revert it;

🔺I had even considered the scenario where the team didn’t notice it: then there likely wouldn’t be snipers targeting it. In that case, there would be a chance to catch Binance Alpha sell orders around 0.1. In my mind, 0.1–0.2 would both be workable, since the pre-market price was 0.3;

3⃣, Up until 16:59, I went back to double-check. Since there was no record of the pool being modified, I knew this time they were going to do something big. Then I looked at the sniper situation: only 23k. Sure enough, something was wrong. I immediately placed a 0.1 limit order on Binance Alpha to see if a unlucky trader would sell to me 😂;

🔺I didn’t use a market order because I was afraid I’d make a mistake in the rush and lose big;

4⃣, The order ended up hanging for half a day with no fills. It sat from 0.1 all the way to 0.2. I kept watching the project team’s pool and it still didn’t move, so later around 0.25 I sold, because there was no official pool. I wasn’t very confident holding. Not boarding afterward was also due to the same reason;

🔺Along the way, I even questioned whether the project team intentionally did it. Since Binance Alpha had issues at launch—Binance theoretically would investigate and handle the project team—but the team never showed up to adjust the pool;

5⃣, Then it kept getting pumped up to 0.45. Of course, mainly because the pool was thin at the time. The project team’s 500k USDT and the 5M $DOS pool were not activated. So it was only the users’ pools with several tens of thousands of USDT, which made it comparatively easier to pump;

🔺It looked like I also saw in the community claims that there were other pump methods related to $DOS ;

6⃣, Finally, at 21:03 (this timing is really suspicious—seriously, I suspect it was on purpose), the project team “arrived quite late” and re-adjusted the pool’s liquidity:
0.08–0.2: 150k USDT
0.1–0.387: 350k USDT
0.45–0.7: 450k $DOS
0.39–1.42: 375k $DOS

When I saw this range, I was flabbergasted. Who would believe this wasn’t deliberate?!

The two pools from 1.42–9.99 also weren’t removed. They cleverly connected everything together. Back then, they transferred 10M for liquidity, but only added 5M. The remaining 5M—wasn’t that basically the setup, i.e., premeditation?

In the end, the project team pulled off a “cover-up” maneuver—sidestepping the issue with a well-planned trick. With great wisdom and cunning, like playing dumb but actually not, they succeeded with zero effort in stabilizing the $DOS price around 0.4. Then they moved the buy-side pool up to 0.387. After that, they connected two new pools to take over from the “wrongly added” pool. I can only say: this is the greatest trading manipulation I’ve ever witnessed!!!

⚠️⚠️⚠️Of course, I’m not saying you should buy blindly below 0.387. The pool can also be withdrawn—risk management always matters more than making money!!!
DappOS $DOS can only stay here for now; The project team mixed up the pool range, which means the 0.1 to 1.42 segment has no liquidity, so trades can’t go through; Sniping should be a beginner, but they didn’t lose much. I entered around 0.2 and exited around 0.25—this is already a pleasant surprise. Originally, I definitely wouldn’t have taken any at 0.3+ 😂;
DappOS $DOS can only stay here for now;

The project team mixed up the pool range, which means the 0.1 to 1.42 segment has no liquidity, so trades can’t go through;

Sniping should be a beginner, but they didn’t lose much. I entered around 0.2 and exited around 0.25—this is already a pleasant surprise. Originally, I definitely wouldn’t have taken any at 0.3+ 😂;
🟢DappOS $DOS pre-market sniper update 🟢 🔵 Sniping amount: 23,923 🟡 Bribe amount: 241.65 🟣 Token quantity: 16,652.98 🟠 Position cost: 1.451085878 Lol, as expected the project team definitely didn’t notice they put it in the wrong pool hahahahahahaha
🟢DappOS $DOS pre-market sniper update 🟢

🔵 Sniping amount: 23,923
🟡 Bribe amount: 241.65
🟣 Token quantity: 16,652.98
🟠 Position cost: 1.451085878

Lol, as expected the project team definitely didn’t notice they put it in the wrong pool hahahahahahaha
DOS (DappOS) goes live on Binance Alpha on Aug 10, 2026 at 17:00DOS goes live on Binance Alpha on Aug 10, 2026 at 17:00 (DappOS): 🟢 Efficient version: VC + Chinese investors + pivot to AI Agent + real income questionable + ads everywhere—be careful of a VC marketing scheme!! 🟠 Token name: DOS 🔴 Token contract: 0xb0f09ea9ae0515c3551080d4a745c8115aa30e37 🔵 Pool price: 0.1 🟡 Pool composition: 0.05-0.1: 350k USDT ---- Buy support 0.03-0.099: 150k USDT ---- Buy support 0.1-0.4: 3.5M DOS ---- Sell pressure 0.1-0.7: 1.5M DOS ---- Sell pressure 🔺 The project team added the wrong pool price range—I corrected it for him 🐶

DOS (DappOS) goes live on Binance Alpha on Aug 10, 2026 at 17:00

DOS goes live on Binance Alpha on Aug 10, 2026 at 17:00
(DappOS):
🟢 Efficient version: VC + Chinese investors + pivot to AI Agent + real income questionable + ads everywhere—be careful of a VC marketing scheme!!
🟠 Token name: DOS
🔴 Token contract: 0xb0f09ea9ae0515c3551080d4a745c8115aa30e37
🔵 Pool price: 0.1
🟡 Pool composition:
0.05-0.1: 350k USDT ---- Buy support
0.03-0.099: 150k USDT ---- Buy support
0.1-0.4: 3.5M DOS ---- Sell pressure
0.1-0.7: 1.5M DOS ---- Sell pressure
🔺 The project team added the wrong pool price range—I corrected it for him 🐶
DAPPOS TGE ✅, $DOS will list on Binance Alpha!! 🔵 Listing time: 2026/8/10 17:00:00 UTC+8 🟢 Token name: $DOS 🔴 Token contract: 0xb0f09ea9ae0515c3551080d4a745c8115aa30e37 There’s a lot going on, but the most important thing is whether Upbit will follow—I'm a bit excited!!
DAPPOS TGE ✅, $DOS will list on Binance Alpha!!

🔵 Listing time: 2026/8/10 17:00:00 UTC+8
🟢 Token name: $DOS
🔴 Token contract: 0xb0f09ea9ae0515c3551080d4a745c8115aa30e37

There’s a lot going on, but the most important thing is whether Upbit will follow—I'm a bit excited!!
Upbit is going wild—14 new coins listed in 16 days: From July 25–31, it listed 1 coin every day for 7 straight days; From August 4–7, it listed 6 coins in 4 days, including listing 2 coins on both the 4th and 7th; The listing pace is extremely intense, and the market’s reaction has been rather muted. So many people might think Upbit no longer has a listing effect. But the truth is even more brutal: Judging from daily trading volume, Upbit hit its peak from December 2024, with an average monthly daily volume of 9.05b. Since 2025, it has gradually slid into the 2b–3b range—by then, Upbit is no longer the Upbit people remember! Starting in 2026, it drops another rung. The daily average is now below 1b. In recent months it has even hovered around 500M. Of course, it’s not only Upbit that’s seeing reduced volume—every other exchange is shrinking too. Crypto has entered yet another winter, one after another. And in the past half month, behind Upbit’s frantic listings, it may be related to de-leveraging in the Korean stock market—some funds have flowed back into crypto. Upbit even listed Binance Alpha’s $QUID (Squid) in sync on August 4. On the same day as Binance Alpha, it directly launched the KRW/BTC/USDT in three markets, and the results were very good. I wonder whether it will continue following Binance Alpha’s pace 😂 Whether this can become the opportunity for a shift from bear to bull remains to be seen. But these past two days, the secondary market has been lively again—everyone’s rising in their own way. The news is endless. All I want to say is: please last a bit longer!
Upbit is going wild—14 new coins listed in 16 days:

From July 25–31, it listed 1 coin every day for 7 straight days;
From August 4–7, it listed 6 coins in 4 days, including listing 2 coins on both the 4th and 7th;

The listing pace is extremely intense, and the market’s reaction has been rather muted. So many people might think Upbit no longer has a listing effect. But the truth is even more brutal:

Judging from daily trading volume, Upbit hit its peak from December 2024, with an average monthly daily volume of 9.05b. Since 2025, it has gradually slid into the 2b–3b range—by then, Upbit is no longer the Upbit people remember!

Starting in 2026, it drops another rung. The daily average is now below 1b. In recent months it has even hovered around 500M. Of course, it’s not only Upbit that’s seeing reduced volume—every other exchange is shrinking too. Crypto has entered yet another winter, one after another.

And in the past half month, behind Upbit’s frantic listings, it may be related to de-leveraging in the Korean stock market—some funds have flowed back into crypto.

Upbit even listed Binance Alpha’s $QUID (Squid) in sync on August 4. On the same day as Binance Alpha, it directly launched the KRW/BTC/USDT in three markets, and the results were very good. I wonder whether it will continue following Binance Alpha’s pace 😂

Whether this can become the opportunity for a shift from bear to bull remains to be seen. But these past two days, the secondary market has been lively again—everyone’s rising in their own way. The news is endless. All I want to say is: please last a bit longer!
Verified
Summarize squid $QUID : 1, First of all, I really have to thank Han Yi Er’s UPbit + Bithumb—trading volume exceeded 40%, even surpassing Binance Alpha + Pancake. They steadied and absorbed the 6% sell pressure firmly; that’s a huge credit to them—very strong. 2, They provided Bithumb with 100 million KRW in trading allocation for the campaign—around 1M, I guess. So naturally UPbit had even more. In that sense, it shows they have a broader perspective: during the public sale, everyone gave the project team an oversubscription of 11.9X. The project team also took everyone’s trust seriously—good. 3, The public sale achieved a profit of 200%+ purely due to luck. Originally, the expectation was only listing on Binance Alpha. We estimated 20%–100% profit, but it turned out to rapidly get listed on UPbit + Bithumb. With 200%+ profit, I think a lot of people should have been able to sell—congratulations. 4, Many instructors ask when they can buy and at what price. I can’t say that either, because I’m not a trading/lead-instructor and I don’t take any commissions or rebates from everyone. It’s simply that sharing publicly available information increases the cost for the project team to do shady things, and then everyone works together to push even higher. I hope everyone makes their own judgment and is responsible for their own funds. 5, Finally, if you missed this public sale, don’t be anxious. Keep analyzing anyway in the future, and avoid getting sliced by FOMO. At the end of the day, it’s more luck than logic. If there’s also some intention behind revitalizing the base chain, that would be even better.
Summarize squid $QUID :

1, First of all, I really have to thank Han Yi Er’s UPbit + Bithumb—trading volume exceeded 40%, even surpassing Binance Alpha + Pancake. They steadied and absorbed the 6% sell pressure firmly; that’s a huge credit to them—very strong.

2, They provided Bithumb with 100 million KRW in trading allocation for the campaign—around 1M, I guess. So naturally UPbit had even more. In that sense, it shows they have a broader perspective: during the public sale, everyone gave the project team an oversubscription of 11.9X. The project team also took everyone’s trust seriously—good.

3, The public sale achieved a profit of 200%+ purely due to luck. Originally, the expectation was only listing on Binance Alpha. We estimated 20%–100% profit, but it turned out to rapidly get listed on UPbit + Bithumb. With 200%+ profit, I think a lot of people should have been able to sell—congratulations.

4, Many instructors ask when they can buy and at what price. I can’t say that either, because I’m not a trading/lead-instructor and I don’t take any commissions or rebates from everyone. It’s simply that sharing publicly available information increases the cost for the project team to do shady things, and then everyone works together to push even higher. I hope everyone makes their own judgment and is responsible for their own funds.

5, Finally, if you missed this public sale, don’t be anxious. Keep analyzing anyway in the future, and avoid getting sliced by FOMO. At the end of the day, it’s more luck than logic. If there’s also some intention behind revitalizing the base chain, that would be even better.
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs