In a written judgment, drawn from a failed defense at trial earlier this year, the word "forgery" was mentioned 130 times, all in relation to Wright.

A British judge has formally found computer scientist Craig Wright guilty of mass forgery, following his decisive defeat in court in March.

In a written judgment released on Monday, High Court Judge James Mellor noted that Wright lied "pervasively and repeatedly" in court to support his "big lie" about being Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of bitcoin.

Wright's forgery is shocking

"Dr. Wright claims to be a very intelligent man," Mellor wrote. "However, in my opinion, he is not nearly as intelligent as he thinks he is."

This statement complements Judge Mellor’s assertion about Wright after a six-week trial, in which he declared that Wright was not the creator of Bitcoin. This conclusion was based on the “overwhelming” evidence presented against him in court.

The organization suing Craig Wright is the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a coalition of leading companies in the crypto industry. COPA's mission is to protect the interests of open source developers and promote the adoption of technology by removing patent barriers. One of the goals of the alliance is to end Wright's long-standing series of defamation lawsuits against his online critics.

During the trial, the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) made serious allegations against Craig Wright, claiming that he had engaged in forgery on an "industrial scale". COPA presented some documents that Wright had previously used as evidence to support his claim that he was the author of the Bitcoin white paper. However, these documents were revealed to be forgeries, thus dealing a blow to Wright's credibility and claims.

During the trial, Wright refuted the testimony of all the expert witnesses (including those hired by his own legal team) who provided evidence showing that the documents were forged. This rebuttal showed that Wright questioned the testimony of the experts and the evidence they provided, and tried to defend himself in court.

Full of lies, forgeries and technical jargon

During the cross-examination in court, Craig Wright failed to provide any information about the recipient of bitcoins sent as "Satoshi Nakamoto", which could have strengthened his claim to be the founder of Bitcoin. As one of his personal witnesses, Wright's sister provided testimony, saying that she believed Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto, based on Wright's childhood love of karate and his preference for Japanese names.

However, Judge Mellor noted that the evidence she presented did not provide any credible support for Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, nor did she establish that Wright had ever shared a pre-release version of the Bitcoin white paper with her.

In the judge’s detailed judgment, Craig Wright’s behavior was strongly criticized, with the word “forgery” being repeated 130 times, “lie” being mentioned 123 times, and the word “fraud” appearing 19 times. These frequently used words reflect the judge’s view of Wright’s behavior in court.

When confronted with lies, Judge Mellor observed that Wright tended to deflect blame or resort to incomprehensible “technical jargon” in his responses, suggesting that, in the judge’s opinion, Wright’s performance in court failed to provide a reasonable and convincing explanation to counter the evidence against him.

Judge Mellor expressed his opinion in his judgment that Craig Wright resorted to technical terms because he could not provide a logically coherent explanation for the forgeries that had been revealed. Mellor further pointed out that Wright also failed to admit that he was responsible for these forgeries. This reflects the judge's assessment of Wright's defense strategy in court and his doubts about Wright's personal integrity.

Craig Wright issued a statement on Twitter on Monday, saying that he plans to appeal the court's ruling on his status. At the same time, he also expressed his gratitude to all his supporters for their continued encouragement and support. This statement shows that despite the unfavorable court ruling, Wright still has the support of some people and intends to continue to fight for the legitimacy of his position.

Conclusion:

With the release of Judge James Mellor's verdict in the case against Craig Wright, the computer scientist who claims to be the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, is facing a major setback in his career. Judge Mellor's verdict is full of doubts about Wright's integrity, and the frequent use of words such as "forgery", "lies" and "fraud" highlights the court's distrust of the evidence provided by Wright.

Meanwhile, although Wright has expressed his intention to appeal through social media and thanked his supporters, his future path remains challenging.

Ultimately, this case not only has far-reaching consequences for Wright personally, but also raises important questions about trust, identity, and intellectual property for the entire cryptocurrency community. As legal proceedings continue, the world will be watching closely to see how this legal battle over the identity of Bitcoin's mysterious founder will develop. #比特币创始人 #身份造假 $BTC