To extend this content, what I posted yesterday seems a bit convoluted:

Many people like to compare the hedging effect of gold with its value-preserving properties, and thus have the following similar remarks: Physical gold is still a better safe-haven asset

📍I had similar thoughts before, but since the XX conflict, I think this kind of risk aversion needs to be determined according to the macro environment and the needs of the environment

For example, in extreme environments such as geopolitical conflicts, the "predatory nature" of gold is too strong, and it cannot guarantee the "safety" of assets. Instead, it is a big pie. It is not only easy to carry, but also not easily subject to JG-level restrictions.

📍In addition, there are actually virtual equivalents of gold such as futures, but even if these virtual golds do not need to be carried, there are still unavoidable risks in entry and exit, but #BTC obviously will not have this problem, travel around the world, remember Just mnemonic #合约锦标赛