Iโ€™d like to express a few thoughts regarding indicators, because 90% of people use them in the wrong way. (sacrificing a lot of money)

๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜, ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ฒ.

It's very common to see MACD, Stochastic, RSI, Gaussian Channel and plenty of other โ€œmagic wandsโ€ plotted together in one single chart.

โ€œ๐—ฅ๐—ฆ๐—œ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐˜‡๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ, ๐—œ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—นโ€

Wait, you inexperienced Padawan.

Youโ€™ve been misled by fake gurus that taught you the โ€œretail wayโ€, aka the easiest path to go broke.

What most individuals don't comprehend, along with the functioning of indicators, is that the majority of them are lagging ones.

This means that they trail price movements providing signals AFTER a trend has already begun.

They donโ€™t forecast the future, they โ€œhelpโ€ to sustain your main thesis, eventually.

And your thesis HAS to be originated by the study of the price action together with the fundamental connotation BEFORE using a single indicator.

Base your strategy on indicators ~> rekt, gulag and harakiri pooled together ๐Ÿ’€

In reality, you can completely live without them and be one step ahead of most โ€œtradersโ€. (most profitable people I know rely on naked charts only)

โ€œ๐˜ฝ๐™ช๐™ฉ โ€œ๐™“โ€ ๐™–๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™ž๐™จ ๐™จ๐™š๐™ก๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™™๐™ž๐™˜๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ฉ๐™๐™–๐™ฉ ๐™ž๐™จ ๐™ข๐™–๐™ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š ๐™ง๐™ž๐™˜๐™!โ€

Nah, the indicator is probably making HIM rich, because he's selling it to the masses.

Fix it in your head: ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ'๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ-๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜† ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜†.

It doesn't exist.

Sure, that might be โ€œuseful onesโ€ that provide you with good information, but the majority of them are just smokescreens.

What I learned after these 7 years in this jungle and after getting sucked into the death centrifuge multiple times, is that this is a game of liquidity.

Nothing else, nothing more.

Whales, institutions, and hedge funds (smart money) clearly know the behavior of retails.

How they operate from both โ€œtechnicalโ€ and psychological aspects.

And that's why they win.

โ€œ๐—ฆ๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„, ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ?โ€.

Well, premising that everyone has a different operativity and a different style, that's what I think should be truly studied to try to get closer to an institutional level:

โ€ข Market structure (classic HH/HL + LH/LL)

โ€ข Support and resistance levels, but most specifically supply and demand zones

โ€ข Fibonacci levels, which help to individuate premium and discount areas

โ€ข Volume profile (LVN, HVN, VAL, VAH, POC)

โ€ข Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) and Imbalances (Auction Market Theory to study first)

โ€ข Closures above/below key areas

All of these concepts applied to HTFs, because their validity has a bigger โ€œweightโ€ than LTF and it's also easier to stay in control.

From there, and exclusively after you have a CLEAR idea of the trend ongoing and the most important levels you can start applying indicators, if you feel the need.

My confluence ones are:

โ€ข OBV

โ€ข Volumes

โ€ข Ichimoku

โ€ข EMAs 9-21-50-200 (depending on the context)

โ€ข RSI

Apply this methodology of charting (๐ฒ๐ž๐ฌ, ๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ง ๐ข๐Ÿ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐š๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ) and I'll promise you that you will be not 1, but 10 steps ahead of the crowd.

Price action first, noise later.

#Write2Earn