Explanatory text:
The biggest reason why it is difficult to understand parts of my article is that I study history (area A in the attached picture), use history as a basis, and interpret other people’s comments as referring to the basis area in area A in the attached picture that has already happened.
For example, those who use technology will say that they can see waves A, B, and C from the K-line chart. However, my articles are never based on history.
And what my article talks about is area B in the attached picture: For example, in the attached picture, the multiple masters give information at 22 o'clock. It can be seen that the multiple masters enter the market and hit a new high, which is the end. As the attached picture explains, the multiple masters define the high point. Therefore, the multiple masters are at the high point. After finishing the operation, he announced that he would fall back to the low point of the upward consolidation range before continuing to speculate long, so he fell back from the multi-primary position.
The above is the point where most people read my article from a subjective perspective and misunderstand or feel that it is a counter-point. They are subjective and feel that the main force is counter-pointing. The problem is that the market is found by the main force. How can it be counter-pointed? There is no main force. Nor will everyone see the price.