Today I put the three rankings side by side, and their intersection is empty.
The top 20 on the popularity ranking generated a total of 16.97 million discussions, down 6.4% from yesterday. BTC alone accounted for 8.32 million, nearly half. Ten of the 20 spots were U.S. stock tickers. QQQ ranked third and SPY fifth. Together, those ten drew 3.71 million discussions, backed by just 131 accounts, while BTC alone had 301.
Across the 63 assets on the fund-flow ranking, inflows totaled $37,239 and outflows $35,974, leaving a net of just $1,265. The top-ranked LYX alone brought in $13,865, eleven times the net total. Of the 63 assets, 44 had only one trader active.
The 25 addresses on the profit ranking made a combined $594,000 over seven days, all in profit, with a median of $18,000. Broken down by day, November 8 alone brought in $209,000, a third of the total. On the 10th, that fell to $35,000. So far today, it’s just $3,394, with only 13 addresses showing activity.
What made me pause was that empty intersection. Not one of the 20 assets on the popularity ranking appeared among the 63 on the fund-flow ranking. Nor did any appear among the top-earning assets linked to the 25 addresses on the profit ranking. The three rankings are telling three different stories.
The popularity ranking measures discussion volume: whoever has the catchiest name rises to the top. The fund-flow and profit rankings measure money. Today, money is sitting in small-cap assets nobody is talking about, with 6,100 sell orders against 4,184 buy orders. Looking to the trending list for direction means starting from the wrong place.
I make a habit of treating the popularity ranking like a thermometer, just to gauge sentiment. I look to the other two rankings for money and profits, and first discount the portion driven by a single address. What these three rankings taught me today is that having no direction is itself information.
#中本聪国际社区Baoluo币商资本 #币安推出BinanceIntelligence $BTC
The top 20 on the popularity ranking generated a total of 16.97 million discussions, down 6.4% from yesterday. BTC alone accounted for 8.32 million, nearly half. Ten of the 20 spots were U.S. stock tickers. QQQ ranked third and SPY fifth. Together, those ten drew 3.71 million discussions, backed by just 131 accounts, while BTC alone had 301.
Across the 63 assets on the fund-flow ranking, inflows totaled $37,239 and outflows $35,974, leaving a net of just $1,265. The top-ranked LYX alone brought in $13,865, eleven times the net total. Of the 63 assets, 44 had only one trader active.
The 25 addresses on the profit ranking made a combined $594,000 over seven days, all in profit, with a median of $18,000. Broken down by day, November 8 alone brought in $209,000, a third of the total. On the 10th, that fell to $35,000. So far today, it’s just $3,394, with only 13 addresses showing activity.
What made me pause was that empty intersection. Not one of the 20 assets on the popularity ranking appeared among the 63 on the fund-flow ranking. Nor did any appear among the top-earning assets linked to the 25 addresses on the profit ranking. The three rankings are telling three different stories.
The popularity ranking measures discussion volume: whoever has the catchiest name rises to the top. The fund-flow and profit rankings measure money. Today, money is sitting in small-cap assets nobody is talking about, with 6,100 sell orders against 4,184 buy orders. Looking to the trending list for direction means starting from the wrong place.
I make a habit of treating the popularity ranking like a thermometer, just to gauge sentiment. I look to the other two rankings for money and profits, and first discount the portion driven by a single address. What these three rankings taught me today is that having no direction is itself information.
#中本聪国际社区Baoluo币商资本 #币安推出BinanceIntelligence $BTC