人人都在卖
211 Posts
人人都在卖
Report
Block User
推特X同名，X Search：@WeAllSells
34 Following
180 Followers
177 Liked
Posts
·
--
【What will China’s astronauts say first when they land on the Moon?】
Their first words after stepping onto the Moon will probably be something like, “I’m out of the capsule, and I feel good.”
The first report after stepping out of the lunar module and onto the lunar surface will most likely be along those lines: brief and reassuring, first letting Mission Control know they’re safe and confirming their status.
They’ll have decided on the wording in advance, so it probably won’t be too elaborate.
On July 20, 1969, American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the Moon, and humanity set foot on the lunar surface for the first time.
As Armstrong stepped onto the Moon, he said: “That’s one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind.”
When Yang Liwei went into space, he said, “Use space peacefully to benefit all humanity.”
There’s no need to try to outdo him.
I think simply saying anything in Chinese would be enough to rival the words Armstrong spoke as he stepped onto the Moon.
Just saying something in Chinese would show that a Chinese person had successfully landed on the Moon!
In 2003, when Yang Liwei ventured into space on behalf of the Chinese people, he said:
Use space peacefully to benefit all humanity.
Greetings to the people of our motherland, our compatriots in Hong Kong and Macao, our compatriots in Taiwan, and overseas Chinese!
He also wrote in his logbook: “For the peace and progress of humanity, the Chinese people have come to space!”
Speaking of this, there’s a little story I’d like to share with everyone.
After entering space, Yang Liwei wrote “For the peace and progress of humanity, the Chinese people have come to space” on the back of his work log and held it up to the camera to share with people across the country.
But when he got back and watched the footage, he discovered that it was completely illegible.
After the spacecraft returned, Yang Liwei wanted to go inside and retrieve the logbook, but the staff told him that it belonged to the state and couldn’t be taken away.
So he had the cameraman take a few photos as keepsakes.
The logbook is now on display at the National Museum of China.
【What will China’s astronauts say first when they land on the Moon?】
Their first words after stepping onto the Moon will probably be something like, “I’m out of the capsule, and I feel good.”
The first report after stepping out of the lunar module and onto the lunar surface will most likely be along those lines: brief and reassuring, first letting Mission Control know they’re safe and confirming their status.
They’ll have decided on the wording in advance, so it probably won’t be too elaborate.
On July 20, 1969, American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the Moon, and humanity set foot on the lunar surface for the first time.
As Armstrong stepped onto the Moon, he said: “That’s one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind.”
When Yang Liwei went into space, he said, “Use space peacefully to benefit all humanity.”
There’s no need to try to outdo him.
I think simply saying anything in Chinese would be enough to rival the words Armstrong spoke as he stepped onto the Moon.
Just saying something in Chinese would show that a Chinese person had successfully landed on the Moon!
In 2003, when Yang Liwei ventured into space on behalf of the Chinese people, he said:
Use space peacefully to benefit all humanity.
Greetings to the people of our motherland, our compatriots in Hong Kong and Macao, our compatriots in Taiwan, and overseas Chinese!
He also wrote in his logbook: “For the peace and progress of humanity, the Chinese people have come to space!”
Speaking of this, there’s a little story I’d like to share with everyone.
After entering space, Yang Liwei wrote “For the peace and progress of humanity, the Chinese people have come to space” on the back of his work log and held it up to the camera to share with people across the country.
But when he got back and watched the footage, he discovered that it was completely illegible.
After the spacecraft returned, Yang Liwei wanted to go inside and retrieve the logbook, but the staff told him that it belonged to the state and couldn’t be taken away.
So he had the cameraman take a few photos as keepsakes.
The logbook is now on display at the National Museum of China.
Their first words after stepping onto the Moon will probably be something like, “I’m out of the capsule, and I feel good.”
The first report after stepping out of the lunar module and onto the lunar surface will most likely be along those lines: brief and reassuring, first letting Mission Control know they’re safe and confirming their status.
They’ll have decided on the wording in advance, so it probably won’t be too elaborate.
On July 20, 1969, American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the Moon, and humanity set foot on the lunar surface for the first time.
As Armstrong stepped onto the Moon, he said: “That’s one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind.”
When Yang Liwei went into space, he said, “Use space peacefully to benefit all humanity.”
There’s no need to try to outdo him.
I think simply saying anything in Chinese would be enough to rival the words Armstrong spoke as he stepped onto the Moon.
Just saying something in Chinese would show that a Chinese person had successfully landed on the Moon!
In 2003, when Yang Liwei ventured into space on behalf of the Chinese people, he said:
Use space peacefully to benefit all humanity.
Greetings to the people of our motherland, our compatriots in Hong Kong and Macao, our compatriots in Taiwan, and overseas Chinese!
He also wrote in his logbook: “For the peace and progress of humanity, the Chinese people have come to space!”
Speaking of this, there’s a little story I’d like to share with everyone.
After entering space, Yang Liwei wrote “For the peace and progress of humanity, the Chinese people have come to space” on the back of his work log and held it up to the camera to share with people across the country.
But when he got back and watched the footage, he discovered that it was completely illegible.
After the spacecraft returned, Yang Liwei wanted to go inside and retrieve the logbook, but the staff told him that it belonged to the state and couldn’t be taken away.
So he had the cameraman take a few photos as keepsakes.
The logbook is now on display at the National Museum of China.
26
·
--
【Why was Sun Yingsha able to win four games in a row and defeat Kuai Man?】
Age and experience still have their edge. In the final of the Montpellier Champions, Sun Yingsha came back from losing the first game to win four straight, defeating Kuai Man and claiming the 20th WTT series title of her career.
The five game scores were: 8‑11, 11‑7, 11‑3, 11‑9, 11‑6.
Kuai Man had made her way through the draw by defeating Hessey and Diaz, beating Miwa Harimoto in the quarterfinals, and getting past Chen Yi in the semifinals before meeting Sasha in the final.
On her way to the final, Sun Yingsha competed through injury and illness. Despite being off form, she beat Lutz and Shin Yubin, edged Hina Hayata 4–3 in the quarterfinals, and defeated Wang Yidi 4–3 in the semifinals to reach the final showdown!
People had assumed that the young and fit Kuai Man would play with more power, and that Sasha, carrying an injury and not in top form, might not be able to match her.
But unexpectedly, those two earlier seven-game battles were exactly what helped Sasha regain her form. Although she dropped the first game, she adjusted on the spot and won four straight to defeat Kuai Man.
How did Sasha manage to come out on top despite being off form?
First, she made on-the-fly adjustments and relentlessly targeted Kuai Man’s forehand. They are teammates, so they know each other well and understand one another’s strengths and weaknesses.
Kuai Man is a left-hander. Her biggest advantage is her fast, powerful backhand counter to the forehand, with its high speed and wide angles. She aimed to exploit Sun Yingsha’s poor physical condition and the possibility that she might struggle to cover the forehand. Kuai Man’s forehand loop from around the backhand corner also directly pins Sun Yingsha’s backhand. Using the forehand to attack the backhand gives her a major advantage—but the question was whether Sun Yingsha could withstand it.
In the first game, Sun Yingsha really couldn’t hold up. Her backhand exchanges had already improved considerably, but she still couldn’t withstand Kuai Man’s backhand counterattacks and follow-up loops directed at her forehand.
From the second game, though, Sasha adjusted on the fly and began targeting Kuai Man’s forehand.
Kuai Man is balanced on both wings, but she is a little slow on the move, so she often struggles to cover her forehand. Sasha naturally latched onto that opening—and once she did, she never let go.
Watch her: after serving, she plays a short ball to set things up, then swings her arm and arches her body before unleashing a fierce counter straight to the wide forehand. Or, on the return, she goes straight to the backhand, then in a flash suddenly fires another backhand counter right into the forehand.
Even in backhand exchanges, she can suddenly pivot and unleash a powerful loop toward the forehand. These changes come as she shifts her position, in the blink of an eye; they happen so suddenly that they are almost impossible to defend against.
Even when Kuai Man anticipated that Sasha would attack her forehand, she couldn’t react in time or get into position quickly enough to keep up with those instantaneous changes.
Second, she gritted her teeth and raised the quality of her backhand, holding her own in the exchanges.
The reason Sasha was on the back foot against Hina Hayata was that her backhand rallies were far too weak. In the past, she could trade several, even a dozen, backhand counters without losing the exchange, but against Hayata she struggled to keep it going.
The backhand is a woman player’s signature weapon, and Sasha certainly understood that. So she kept bouncing around on court, repeatedly working to activate herself. Especially after the match against Hayata, she deliberately tried to recapture the feel of her usual backhand exchanges during practice backstage.
Sure enough, in the seven-game battle against Wang Yidi, Wang’s powerful attacks helped Sasha raise the strength and speed of her backhand, turning a weakness into a strength.
So in her battle with Kuai Man, she began to find her rhythm from the second game. Not only did she protect her forehand, she also gave Kuai Man no openings on the backhand. When Kuai Man repeatedly pivoted to attack Sasha’s backhand, Sasha was even able to withstand three powerful shots in a row!
Third, the veteran’s resilience and fighting spirit shone through. The more crucial the moment, the calmer she remained. There is an enduring saying in table tennis: winning takes aggression; surviving a dogfight takes experience.
Young players can attack their opponents fearlessly, without knowing what to fear. But when a match turns into a stalemate and both players are locked in a long battle, the one with more experience—who has weathered more trials—is the one more likely to come out on top.
Sasha has been through countless ups and downs on the battlefield. As world number one for more than four years, she has faced repeated challenges from the best in the game. Each challenge and test has made her more solid, added more weapons to her game, and made her calmer.
That deep foundation has sharpened her vision. Whatever her opponent throws at her, she can read it in an instant. Once she gets herself fired up, she strikes without warning, attacks ruthlessly, and makes every shot count!
This is a formidable wall that Kuai Man won’t be able to break through anytime soon, however hard she keeps trying to batter it down!
【Why was Sun Yingsha able to win four games in a row and defeat Kuai Man?】
Age and experience still have their edge. In the final of the Montpellier Champions, Sun Yingsha came back from losing the first game to win four straight, defeating Kuai Man and claiming the 20th WTT series title of her career.
The five game scores were: 8‑11, 11‑7, 11‑3, 11‑9, 11‑6.
Kuai Man had made her way through the draw by defeating Hessey and Diaz, beating Miwa Harimoto in the quarterfinals, and getting past Chen Yi in the semifinals before meeting Sasha in the final.
On her way to the final, Sun Yingsha competed through injury and illness. Despite being off form, she beat Lutz and Shin Yubin, edged Hina Hayata 4–3 in the quarterfinals, and defeated Wang Yidi 4–3 in the semifinals to reach the final showdown!
People had assumed that the young and fit Kuai Man would play with more power, and that Sasha, carrying an injury and not in top form, might not be able to match her.
But unexpectedly, those two earlier seven-game battles were exactly what helped Sasha regain her form. Although she dropped the first game, she adjusted on the spot and won four straight to defeat Kuai Man.
How did Sasha manage to come out on top despite being off form?
First, she made on-the-fly adjustments and relentlessly targeted Kuai Man’s forehand. They are teammates, so they know each other well and understand one another’s strengths and weaknesses.
Kuai Man is a left-hander. Her biggest advantage is her fast, powerful backhand counter to the forehand, with its high speed and wide angles. She aimed to exploit Sun Yingsha’s poor physical condition and the possibility that she might struggle to cover the forehand. Kuai Man’s forehand loop from around the backhand corner also directly pins Sun Yingsha’s backhand. Using the forehand to attack the backhand gives her a major advantage—but the question was whether Sun Yingsha could withstand it.
In the first game, Sun Yingsha really couldn’t hold up. Her backhand exchanges had already improved considerably, but she still couldn’t withstand Kuai Man’s backhand counterattacks and follow-up loops directed at her forehand.
From the second game, though, Sasha adjusted on the fly and began targeting Kuai Man’s forehand.
Kuai Man is balanced on both wings, but she is a little slow on the move, so she often struggles to cover her forehand. Sasha naturally latched onto that opening—and once she did, she never let go.
Watch her: after serving, she plays a short ball to set things up, then swings her arm and arches her body before unleashing a fierce counter straight to the wide forehand. Or, on the return, she goes straight to the backhand, then in a flash suddenly fires another backhand counter right into the forehand.
Even in backhand exchanges, she can suddenly pivot and unleash a powerful loop toward the forehand. These changes come as she shifts her position, in the blink of an eye; they happen so suddenly that they are almost impossible to defend against.
Even when Kuai Man anticipated that Sasha would attack her forehand, she couldn’t react in time or get into position quickly enough to keep up with those instantaneous changes.
Second, she gritted her teeth and raised the quality of her backhand, holding her own in the exchanges.
The reason Sasha was on the back foot against Hina Hayata was that her backhand rallies were far too weak. In the past, she could trade several, even a dozen, backhand counters without losing the exchange, but against Hayata she struggled to keep it going.
The backhand is a woman player’s signature weapon, and Sasha certainly understood that. So she kept bouncing around on court, repeatedly working to activate herself. Especially after the match against Hayata, she deliberately tried to recapture the feel of her usual backhand exchanges during practice backstage.
Sure enough, in the seven-game battle against Wang Yidi, Wang’s powerful attacks helped Sasha raise the strength and speed of her backhand, turning a weakness into a strength.
So in her battle with Kuai Man, she began to find her rhythm from the second game. Not only did she protect her forehand, she also gave Kuai Man no openings on the backhand. When Kuai Man repeatedly pivoted to attack Sasha’s backhand, Sasha was even able to withstand three powerful shots in a row!
Third, the veteran’s resilience and fighting spirit shone through. The more crucial the moment, the calmer she remained. There is an enduring saying in table tennis: winning takes aggression; surviving a dogfight takes experience.
Young players can attack their opponents fearlessly, without knowing what to fear. But when a match turns into a stalemate and both players are locked in a long battle, the one with more experience—who has weathered more trials—is the one more likely to come out on top.
Sasha has been through countless ups and downs on the battlefield. As world number one for more than four years, she has faced repeated challenges from the best in the game. Each challenge and test has made her more solid, added more weapons to her game, and made her calmer.
That deep foundation has sharpened her vision. Whatever her opponent throws at her, she can read it in an instant. Once she gets herself fired up, she strikes without warning, attacks ruthlessly, and makes every shot count!
This is a formidable wall that Kuai Man won’t be able to break through anytime soon, however hard she keeps trying to batter it down!
Age and experience still have their edge. In the final of the Montpellier Champions, Sun Yingsha came back from losing the first game to win four straight, defeating Kuai Man and claiming the 20th WTT series title of her career.
The five game scores were: 8‑11, 11‑7, 11‑3, 11‑9, 11‑6.
Kuai Man had made her way through the draw by defeating Hessey and Diaz, beating Miwa Harimoto in the quarterfinals, and getting past Chen Yi in the semifinals before meeting Sasha in the final.
On her way to the final, Sun Yingsha competed through injury and illness. Despite being off form, she beat Lutz and Shin Yubin, edged Hina Hayata 4–3 in the quarterfinals, and defeated Wang Yidi 4–3 in the semifinals to reach the final showdown!
People had assumed that the young and fit Kuai Man would play with more power, and that Sasha, carrying an injury and not in top form, might not be able to match her.
But unexpectedly, those two earlier seven-game battles were exactly what helped Sasha regain her form. Although she dropped the first game, she adjusted on the spot and won four straight to defeat Kuai Man.
How did Sasha manage to come out on top despite being off form?
First, she made on-the-fly adjustments and relentlessly targeted Kuai Man’s forehand. They are teammates, so they know each other well and understand one another’s strengths and weaknesses.
Kuai Man is a left-hander. Her biggest advantage is her fast, powerful backhand counter to the forehand, with its high speed and wide angles. She aimed to exploit Sun Yingsha’s poor physical condition and the possibility that she might struggle to cover the forehand. Kuai Man’s forehand loop from around the backhand corner also directly pins Sun Yingsha’s backhand. Using the forehand to attack the backhand gives her a major advantage—but the question was whether Sun Yingsha could withstand it.
In the first game, Sun Yingsha really couldn’t hold up. Her backhand exchanges had already improved considerably, but she still couldn’t withstand Kuai Man’s backhand counterattacks and follow-up loops directed at her forehand.
From the second game, though, Sasha adjusted on the fly and began targeting Kuai Man’s forehand.
Kuai Man is balanced on both wings, but she is a little slow on the move, so she often struggles to cover her forehand. Sasha naturally latched onto that opening—and once she did, she never let go.
Watch her: after serving, she plays a short ball to set things up, then swings her arm and arches her body before unleashing a fierce counter straight to the wide forehand. Or, on the return, she goes straight to the backhand, then in a flash suddenly fires another backhand counter right into the forehand.
Even in backhand exchanges, she can suddenly pivot and unleash a powerful loop toward the forehand. These changes come as she shifts her position, in the blink of an eye; they happen so suddenly that they are almost impossible to defend against.
Even when Kuai Man anticipated that Sasha would attack her forehand, she couldn’t react in time or get into position quickly enough to keep up with those instantaneous changes.
Second, she gritted her teeth and raised the quality of her backhand, holding her own in the exchanges.
The reason Sasha was on the back foot against Hina Hayata was that her backhand rallies were far too weak. In the past, she could trade several, even a dozen, backhand counters without losing the exchange, but against Hayata she struggled to keep it going.
The backhand is a woman player’s signature weapon, and Sasha certainly understood that. So she kept bouncing around on court, repeatedly working to activate herself. Especially after the match against Hayata, she deliberately tried to recapture the feel of her usual backhand exchanges during practice backstage.
Sure enough, in the seven-game battle against Wang Yidi, Wang’s powerful attacks helped Sasha raise the strength and speed of her backhand, turning a weakness into a strength.
So in her battle with Kuai Man, she began to find her rhythm from the second game. Not only did she protect her forehand, she also gave Kuai Man no openings on the backhand. When Kuai Man repeatedly pivoted to attack Sasha’s backhand, Sasha was even able to withstand three powerful shots in a row!
Third, the veteran’s resilience and fighting spirit shone through. The more crucial the moment, the calmer she remained. There is an enduring saying in table tennis: winning takes aggression; surviving a dogfight takes experience.
Young players can attack their opponents fearlessly, without knowing what to fear. But when a match turns into a stalemate and both players are locked in a long battle, the one with more experience—who has weathered more trials—is the one more likely to come out on top.
Sasha has been through countless ups and downs on the battlefield. As world number one for more than four years, she has faced repeated challenges from the best in the game. Each challenge and test has made her more solid, added more weapons to her game, and made her calmer.
That deep foundation has sharpened her vision. Whatever her opponent throws at her, she can read it in an instant. Once she gets herself fired up, she strikes without warning, attacks ruthlessly, and makes every shot count!
This is a formidable wall that Kuai Man won’t be able to break through anytime soon, however hard she keeps trying to batter it down!
30
·
--
【What should you do if your child doesn’t want to be number one and just wants to live comfortably?】
There’s a lot of happiness in being at peace with yourself.
When a person’s goals, actions, and feelings are aligned, they don’t get caught up in inner conflict.
It’s rare to be in such a state of inner harmony, where you don’t change your behavior based on other people’s opinions.
Some people at work are determined to get promoted, but aren’t willing to put in extra effort or win their boss’s favor. With no hope of promotion, they spend years feeling frustrated and unfulfilled.
Others have long grown tired of complicated social relationships and just want to tend to their own little corner of the world. Yet when they see others achieve impressive results, they can’t help making a few snide remarks.
To me, it’s wonderful when someone knows what they truly want and confidently moves forward in the direction they’ve chosen.
A child’s grades are consistently around the middle of the class. Studying isn’t too difficult for them, but they don’t slack off either.
When their parents talk with them about future goals, the child calmly says they don’t want to push for the top. They don’t want the stress of feeling anxious before exams and being watched by everyone. Staying somewhere in the middle and having time to enjoy the things they like is enough for them.
From this description, we can see that the child has a clear goal: to consistently stay around the middle of the class.
At this level, they don’t need to spend all their energy trying to get ahead.
They can use the time left over to do the things they enjoy. For now, this feels like a very comfortable place for them to be.
You could say this is the conclusion the child has reached after weighing the pros and cons. Perhaps we don’t need to rush to change their mind.
But what should parents do if their child is in the opposite situation?
These two seemingly opposite problems actually point to the same question: Can a person be at peace with themselves?
Children who always want to be first but can’t handle losing have tied their self-worth tightly to winning and losing. Once they fail, they reject themselves entirely.
Children who choose not to push themselves and just want to stay in the middle, on the other hand, won’t be easily shaken by other people’s opinions if they’re truly at peace with themselves and have found their own pace.
So what we parents need to pay attention to is whether our child’s apparent inner harmony is genuine or just a façade.
Sometimes a child may say they don’t want to be number one, but beneath the surface, there could be two very different mindsets.
One is the genuine inner harmony we mentioned earlier. The child is capable of pushing themselves to achieve more, but after carefully weighing things up, they decide that continuing to push would take too much of their time and energy.
In this case, the child actively chooses a more relaxed pace and uses the time they save to pursue things that interest them more.
And they feel no regret about the outcome or get caught up in inner conflict.
The other mindset is a false sense of inner harmony.
At its core, the child is afraid of trying hard and still failing, so they say they don’t want to be number one to cover up their feelings of helplessness.
This is really a form of self-comfort that serves as a defense mechanism.
That’s why, as we communicate with our children day to day, we need to keep an eye on how they’re doing:
Are they willing to put effort into the things they want to do?
How do they feel when they see classmates get good grades?
When their grades fluctuate or drop, do they have any specific strategies for dealing with it?
If a child’s apparent inner harmony is just a façade, they’re often unwilling to put in steady, practical effort.
They may also go out of their way to dismiss other people’s good results.
And when their own grades fluctuate or drop, they may simply say they don’t care, without taking any concrete steps to improve.
As parents, we shouldn’t always try to change our children. Instead, we should guide them to grow in directions that suit them better.
Some children like giving it their all and find a sense of accomplishment in competition.
Others prefer a steadier pace and want to save time and energy to enjoy life at their own speed.
The most important part of raising children isn’t forcing them to change their nature. It’s being there as they find a pace that suits them and helping them develop a sense of inner harmony.
As the psychologist Carl Rogers said:
The good life is a process, not a state of being. It is a direction, not a destination.
So if a child can enjoy life at a pace they like, isn’t that a wonderful thing too?
【What should you do if your child doesn’t want to be number one and just wants to live comfortably?】
There’s a lot of happiness in being at peace with yourself.
When a person’s goals, actions, and feelings are aligned, they don’t get caught up in inner conflict.
It’s rare to be in such a state of inner harmony, where you don’t change your behavior based on other people’s opinions.
Some people at work are determined to get promoted, but aren’t willing to put in extra effort or win their boss’s favor. With no hope of promotion, they spend years feeling frustrated and unfulfilled.
Others have long grown tired of complicated social relationships and just want to tend to their own little corner of the world. Yet when they see others achieve impressive results, they can’t help making a few snide remarks.
To me, it’s wonderful when someone knows what they truly want and confidently moves forward in the direction they’ve chosen.
A child’s grades are consistently around the middle of the class. Studying isn’t too difficult for them, but they don’t slack off either.
When their parents talk with them about future goals, the child calmly says they don’t want to push for the top. They don’t want the stress of feeling anxious before exams and being watched by everyone. Staying somewhere in the middle and having time to enjoy the things they like is enough for them.
From this description, we can see that the child has a clear goal: to consistently stay around the middle of the class.
At this level, they don’t need to spend all their energy trying to get ahead.
They can use the time left over to do the things they enjoy. For now, this feels like a very comfortable place for them to be.
You could say this is the conclusion the child has reached after weighing the pros and cons. Perhaps we don’t need to rush to change their mind.
But what should parents do if their child is in the opposite situation?
These two seemingly opposite problems actually point to the same question: Can a person be at peace with themselves?
Children who always want to be first but can’t handle losing have tied their self-worth tightly to winning and losing. Once they fail, they reject themselves entirely.
Children who choose not to push themselves and just want to stay in the middle, on the other hand, won’t be easily shaken by other people’s opinions if they’re truly at peace with themselves and have found their own pace.
So what we parents need to pay attention to is whether our child’s apparent inner harmony is genuine or just a façade.
Sometimes a child may say they don’t want to be number one, but beneath the surface, there could be two very different mindsets.
One is the genuine inner harmony we mentioned earlier. The child is capable of pushing themselves to achieve more, but after carefully weighing things up, they decide that continuing to push would take too much of their time and energy.
In this case, the child actively chooses a more relaxed pace and uses the time they save to pursue things that interest them more.
And they feel no regret about the outcome or get caught up in inner conflict.
The other mindset is a false sense of inner harmony.
At its core, the child is afraid of trying hard and still failing, so they say they don’t want to be number one to cover up their feelings of helplessness.
This is really a form of self-comfort that serves as a defense mechanism.
That’s why, as we communicate with our children day to day, we need to keep an eye on how they’re doing:
Are they willing to put effort into the things they want to do?
How do they feel when they see classmates get good grades?
When their grades fluctuate or drop, do they have any specific strategies for dealing with it?
If a child’s apparent inner harmony is just a façade, they’re often unwilling to put in steady, practical effort.
They may also go out of their way to dismiss other people’s good results.
And when their own grades fluctuate or drop, they may simply say they don’t care, without taking any concrete steps to improve.
As parents, we shouldn’t always try to change our children. Instead, we should guide them to grow in directions that suit them better.
Some children like giving it their all and find a sense of accomplishment in competition.
Others prefer a steadier pace and want to save time and energy to enjoy life at their own speed.
The most important part of raising children isn’t forcing them to change their nature. It’s being there as they find a pace that suits them and helping them develop a sense of inner harmony.
As the psychologist Carl Rogers said:
The good life is a process, not a state of being. It is a direction, not a destination.
So if a child can enjoy life at a pace they like, isn’t that a wonderful thing too?
There’s a lot of happiness in being at peace with yourself.
When a person’s goals, actions, and feelings are aligned, they don’t get caught up in inner conflict.
It’s rare to be in such a state of inner harmony, where you don’t change your behavior based on other people’s opinions.
Some people at work are determined to get promoted, but aren’t willing to put in extra effort or win their boss’s favor. With no hope of promotion, they spend years feeling frustrated and unfulfilled.
Others have long grown tired of complicated social relationships and just want to tend to their own little corner of the world. Yet when they see others achieve impressive results, they can’t help making a few snide remarks.
To me, it’s wonderful when someone knows what they truly want and confidently moves forward in the direction they’ve chosen.
A child’s grades are consistently around the middle of the class. Studying isn’t too difficult for them, but they don’t slack off either.
When their parents talk with them about future goals, the child calmly says they don’t want to push for the top. They don’t want the stress of feeling anxious before exams and being watched by everyone. Staying somewhere in the middle and having time to enjoy the things they like is enough for them.
From this description, we can see that the child has a clear goal: to consistently stay around the middle of the class.
At this level, they don’t need to spend all their energy trying to get ahead.
They can use the time left over to do the things they enjoy. For now, this feels like a very comfortable place for them to be.
You could say this is the conclusion the child has reached after weighing the pros and cons. Perhaps we don’t need to rush to change their mind.
But what should parents do if their child is in the opposite situation?
These two seemingly opposite problems actually point to the same question: Can a person be at peace with themselves?
Children who always want to be first but can’t handle losing have tied their self-worth tightly to winning and losing. Once they fail, they reject themselves entirely.
Children who choose not to push themselves and just want to stay in the middle, on the other hand, won’t be easily shaken by other people’s opinions if they’re truly at peace with themselves and have found their own pace.
So what we parents need to pay attention to is whether our child’s apparent inner harmony is genuine or just a façade.
Sometimes a child may say they don’t want to be number one, but beneath the surface, there could be two very different mindsets.
One is the genuine inner harmony we mentioned earlier. The child is capable of pushing themselves to achieve more, but after carefully weighing things up, they decide that continuing to push would take too much of their time and energy.
In this case, the child actively chooses a more relaxed pace and uses the time they save to pursue things that interest them more.
And they feel no regret about the outcome or get caught up in inner conflict.
The other mindset is a false sense of inner harmony.
At its core, the child is afraid of trying hard and still failing, so they say they don’t want to be number one to cover up their feelings of helplessness.
This is really a form of self-comfort that serves as a defense mechanism.
That’s why, as we communicate with our children day to day, we need to keep an eye on how they’re doing:
Are they willing to put effort into the things they want to do?
How do they feel when they see classmates get good grades?
When their grades fluctuate or drop, do they have any specific strategies for dealing with it?
If a child’s apparent inner harmony is just a façade, they’re often unwilling to put in steady, practical effort.
They may also go out of their way to dismiss other people’s good results.
And when their own grades fluctuate or drop, they may simply say they don’t care, without taking any concrete steps to improve.
As parents, we shouldn’t always try to change our children. Instead, we should guide them to grow in directions that suit them better.
Some children like giving it their all and find a sense of accomplishment in competition.
Others prefer a steadier pace and want to save time and energy to enjoy life at their own speed.
The most important part of raising children isn’t forcing them to change their nature. It’s being there as they find a pace that suits them and helping them develop a sense of inner harmony.
As the psychologist Carl Rogers said:
The good life is a process, not a state of being. It is a direction, not a destination.
So if a child can enjoy life at a pace they like, isn’t that a wonderful thing too?
·
--
【How can you politely turn down an offer with a salary that’s too low?】
Turn it down.
You can phrase it tactfully. It’s always best to leave the door open, since there’s nothing to gain from falling out with HR.
Here’s a suggested response: “Thank you for giving me the opportunity to interview with your company, and special thanks to you, xx, for such a sincere and patient conversation. After learning more about your company and assessing my own abilities, I feel that the salary you’re offering may be quite far below my expectations. Salary reflects a person’s value, so if your company isn’t able to reconsider the compensation for this position, I’m afraid I’ll have to decline your offer. Thank you again for inviting me to interview and for taking the time to speak with me. I wish you all the best at work.”
From a recruitment perspective, pressuring a candidate to give an answer quickly is a rather passive approach. HR wouldn’t do this unless they were in a difficult or pressured situation.
That pressure may come from recruitment KPIs, demands from the hiring department, criticism from management, and so on. The key point is that even under this pressure, they still can’t offer a salary the candidate is happy with. This suggests they don’t place much importance on the role itself. Most likely, it’s a catch-all, donkey-work kind of position: very busy, and things would fall into disarray if no one did it, but it isn’t a core role in the business.
On top of that, the salary already falls short of your expectations. If you took the job, you’d likely feel dissatisfied all the time. Even a minor setback at work could easily make you irritable and deepen that frustration. That’s bad for both you and the company—a lose-lose situation.
As a working professional, the only time you can confidently negotiate salary with HR is when you receive an offer after an interview. If you can’t get what you want at this point, chances are you’ll be stuck just coasting in the job afterward.
So, turning it down decisively is the best move.
【How can you politely turn down an offer with a salary that’s too low?】
Turn it down.
You can phrase it tactfully. It’s always best to leave the door open, since there’s nothing to gain from falling out with HR.
Here’s a suggested response: “Thank you for giving me the opportunity to interview with your company, and special thanks to you, xx, for such a sincere and patient conversation. After learning more about your company and assessing my own abilities, I feel that the salary you’re offering may be quite far below my expectations. Salary reflects a person’s value, so if your company isn’t able to reconsider the compensation for this position, I’m afraid I’ll have to decline your offer. Thank you again for inviting me to interview and for taking the time to speak with me. I wish you all the best at work.”
From a recruitment perspective, pressuring a candidate to give an answer quickly is a rather passive approach. HR wouldn’t do this unless they were in a difficult or pressured situation.
That pressure may come from recruitment KPIs, demands from the hiring department, criticism from management, and so on. The key point is that even under this pressure, they still can’t offer a salary the candidate is happy with. This suggests they don’t place much importance on the role itself. Most likely, it’s a catch-all, donkey-work kind of position: very busy, and things would fall into disarray if no one did it, but it isn’t a core role in the business.
On top of that, the salary already falls short of your expectations. If you took the job, you’d likely feel dissatisfied all the time. Even a minor setback at work could easily make you irritable and deepen that frustration. That’s bad for both you and the company—a lose-lose situation.
As a working professional, the only time you can confidently negotiate salary with HR is when you receive an offer after an interview. If you can’t get what you want at this point, chances are you’ll be stuck just coasting in the job afterward.
So, turning it down decisively is the best move.
Turn it down.
You can phrase it tactfully. It’s always best to leave the door open, since there’s nothing to gain from falling out with HR.
Here’s a suggested response: “Thank you for giving me the opportunity to interview with your company, and special thanks to you, xx, for such a sincere and patient conversation. After learning more about your company and assessing my own abilities, I feel that the salary you’re offering may be quite far below my expectations. Salary reflects a person’s value, so if your company isn’t able to reconsider the compensation for this position, I’m afraid I’ll have to decline your offer. Thank you again for inviting me to interview and for taking the time to speak with me. I wish you all the best at work.”
From a recruitment perspective, pressuring a candidate to give an answer quickly is a rather passive approach. HR wouldn’t do this unless they were in a difficult or pressured situation.
That pressure may come from recruitment KPIs, demands from the hiring department, criticism from management, and so on. The key point is that even under this pressure, they still can’t offer a salary the candidate is happy with. This suggests they don’t place much importance on the role itself. Most likely, it’s a catch-all, donkey-work kind of position: very busy, and things would fall into disarray if no one did it, but it isn’t a core role in the business.
On top of that, the salary already falls short of your expectations. If you took the job, you’d likely feel dissatisfied all the time. Even a minor setback at work could easily make you irritable and deepen that frustration. That’s bad for both you and the company—a lose-lose situation.
As a working professional, the only time you can confidently negotiate salary with HR is when you receive an offer after an interview. If you can’t get what you want at this point, chances are you’ll be stuck just coasting in the job afterward.
So, turning it down decisively is the best move.
2
·
--
【Is the internal combustion engine really a wrong turn in the history of automobile manufacturing?】
Honestly, I’ve seen plenty of debates about gas versus electric, and I usually don’t have much to say. But this question really is a bit anti-intellectual.
The internal combustion engine is, by any measure, one of the greatest heat engines ever invented by humanity—there’s hardly any competition.
By comparison, solar cells use solar radiation from a source at a temperature of up to 6,000 degrees as their hot reservoir, yet their power output is frankly pathetic.
There are all sorts of strange definitions of energy efficiency used nowadays to disparage the thermal efficiency of internal combustion engines. As I see it, these are just marketing spin and have no scientific value.
Scientifically speaking, until quantum heat engines become truly practical, the only limit on heat-to-work conversion efficiency is the Carnot limit. There is no other, higher limit.
There are many misconceptions about how these things are defined.
For example, something I often mention myself: the quantum efficiency of natural photosynthesis is close to 100%, but that doesn’t mean natural photosynthesis exceeds the Carnot limit.
In fact, as a heat engine, photosynthesis has a miserable actual efficiency of only a few percent.
Photovoltaics aren’t any better, of course.
Even if we set aside heat-to-work conversion and look only at external quantum efficiency, photovoltaics still don’t measure up to natural photosynthesis.
The principle is simple: every additional entropy-generating process reduces efficiency. That’s a constraint imposed by the laws of nature.
A Carnot engine confines every process to a reversible one, which is what makes it an ideal heat engine in the truest sense.
In photovoltaics, from the moment light is absorbed to the capture of charge, entropy is generated at every step, so their efficiency simply cannot get very high.
Although modern internal combustion engines don’t use the operating mechanism of a Carnot engine (and, of course, never could), their work-producing processes are already very close to reversible. Only the heat-absorption stroke still cannot fully overcome entropy generation, so they are already very close to the Carnot limit.
Some definitions claim that batteries have higher thermal efficiency than internal combustion engines. That, in itself, is a bogus definition.
Unless we’re talking about quantum batteries, no battery based on classical electrochemical reactions can defy the principle of increasing entropy. The entire discharge process is driven by entropy generation, so in theory its efficiency simply can’t be all that high.
There are several reasons why they can seem to perform about as well as modern gasoline cars.
The most fundamental one is that they are inherently nonequilibrium thermodynamic systems.
Put simply, when you put a reducing agent and an oxidizing agent together, you’re cheating.
That’s because it means you’re dealing with a negative-temperature system, so naturally the calculated thermal efficiency looks off the charts.
Imagine strapping a rocket engine—with its own oxidizer and fuel—to the back of a car. What kind of power would that give you?
And it doesn’t even have to be a rocket engine. Just switch to a fuel with a higher oxygen content, such as methanol, and the thermal efficiency can improve considerably.
I’ve always found it especially irritating when people compare gasoline cars to horse-drawn carriages just to make electric cars seem more technologically advanced.
Honestly, you really could sleep in a horse-drawn carriage and experience L5-level autonomous driving right away—it would be far more reliable and safer than your Level 2 driver-assistance system.
In the early days of the automobile, many mechanical transmission systems had already been tested on horse-drawn carriages for years. Even the most advanced electric cars still use all sorts of mechanical components invented for carriages, such as the differential.
Building up a tech tree is always a gradual process. You don’t eat the first four buns for nothing. A lot of people really are taking things too far these days.
【Is the internal combustion engine really a wrong turn in the history of automobile manufacturing?】
Honestly, I’ve seen plenty of debates about gas versus electric, and I usually don’t have much to say. But this question really is a bit anti-intellectual.
The internal combustion engine is, by any measure, one of the greatest heat engines ever invented by humanity—there’s hardly any competition.
By comparison, solar cells use solar radiation from a source at a temperature of up to 6,000 degrees as their hot reservoir, yet their power output is frankly pathetic.
There are all sorts of strange definitions of energy efficiency used nowadays to disparage the thermal efficiency of internal combustion engines. As I see it, these are just marketing spin and have no scientific value.
Scientifically speaking, until quantum heat engines become truly practical, the only limit on heat-to-work conversion efficiency is the Carnot limit. There is no other, higher limit.
There are many misconceptions about how these things are defined.
For example, something I often mention myself: the quantum efficiency of natural photosynthesis is close to 100%, but that doesn’t mean natural photosynthesis exceeds the Carnot limit.
In fact, as a heat engine, photosynthesis has a miserable actual efficiency of only a few percent.
Photovoltaics aren’t any better, of course.
Even if we set aside heat-to-work conversion and look only at external quantum efficiency, photovoltaics still don’t measure up to natural photosynthesis.
The principle is simple: every additional entropy-generating process reduces efficiency. That’s a constraint imposed by the laws of nature.
A Carnot engine confines every process to a reversible one, which is what makes it an ideal heat engine in the truest sense.
In photovoltaics, from the moment light is absorbed to the capture of charge, entropy is generated at every step, so their efficiency simply cannot get very high.
Although modern internal combustion engines don’t use the operating mechanism of a Carnot engine (and, of course, never could), their work-producing processes are already very close to reversible. Only the heat-absorption stroke still cannot fully overcome entropy generation, so they are already very close to the Carnot limit.
Some definitions claim that batteries have higher thermal efficiency than internal combustion engines. That, in itself, is a bogus definition.
Unless we’re talking about quantum batteries, no battery based on classical electrochemical reactions can defy the principle of increasing entropy. The entire discharge process is driven by entropy generation, so in theory its efficiency simply can’t be all that high.
There are several reasons why they can seem to perform about as well as modern gasoline cars.
The most fundamental one is that they are inherently nonequilibrium thermodynamic systems.
Put simply, when you put a reducing agent and an oxidizing agent together, you’re cheating.
That’s because it means you’re dealing with a negative-temperature system, so naturally the calculated thermal efficiency looks off the charts.
Imagine strapping a rocket engine—with its own oxidizer and fuel—to the back of a car. What kind of power would that give you?
And it doesn’t even have to be a rocket engine. Just switch to a fuel with a higher oxygen content, such as methanol, and the thermal efficiency can improve considerably.
I’ve always found it especially irritating when people compare gasoline cars to horse-drawn carriages just to make electric cars seem more technologically advanced.
Honestly, you really could sleep in a horse-drawn carriage and experience L5-level autonomous driving right away—it would be far more reliable and safer than your Level 2 driver-assistance system.
In the early days of the automobile, many mechanical transmission systems had already been tested on horse-drawn carriages for years. Even the most advanced electric cars still use all sorts of mechanical components invented for carriages, such as the differential.
Building up a tech tree is always a gradual process. You don’t eat the first four buns for nothing. A lot of people really are taking things too far these days.
Honestly, I’ve seen plenty of debates about gas versus electric, and I usually don’t have much to say. But this question really is a bit anti-intellectual.
The internal combustion engine is, by any measure, one of the greatest heat engines ever invented by humanity—there’s hardly any competition.
By comparison, solar cells use solar radiation from a source at a temperature of up to 6,000 degrees as their hot reservoir, yet their power output is frankly pathetic.
There are all sorts of strange definitions of energy efficiency used nowadays to disparage the thermal efficiency of internal combustion engines. As I see it, these are just marketing spin and have no scientific value.
Scientifically speaking, until quantum heat engines become truly practical, the only limit on heat-to-work conversion efficiency is the Carnot limit. There is no other, higher limit.
There are many misconceptions about how these things are defined.
For example, something I often mention myself: the quantum efficiency of natural photosynthesis is close to 100%, but that doesn’t mean natural photosynthesis exceeds the Carnot limit.
In fact, as a heat engine, photosynthesis has a miserable actual efficiency of only a few percent.
Photovoltaics aren’t any better, of course.
Even if we set aside heat-to-work conversion and look only at external quantum efficiency, photovoltaics still don’t measure up to natural photosynthesis.
The principle is simple: every additional entropy-generating process reduces efficiency. That’s a constraint imposed by the laws of nature.
A Carnot engine confines every process to a reversible one, which is what makes it an ideal heat engine in the truest sense.
In photovoltaics, from the moment light is absorbed to the capture of charge, entropy is generated at every step, so their efficiency simply cannot get very high.
Although modern internal combustion engines don’t use the operating mechanism of a Carnot engine (and, of course, never could), their work-producing processes are already very close to reversible. Only the heat-absorption stroke still cannot fully overcome entropy generation, so they are already very close to the Carnot limit.
Some definitions claim that batteries have higher thermal efficiency than internal combustion engines. That, in itself, is a bogus definition.
Unless we’re talking about quantum batteries, no battery based on classical electrochemical reactions can defy the principle of increasing entropy. The entire discharge process is driven by entropy generation, so in theory its efficiency simply can’t be all that high.
There are several reasons why they can seem to perform about as well as modern gasoline cars.
The most fundamental one is that they are inherently nonequilibrium thermodynamic systems.
Put simply, when you put a reducing agent and an oxidizing agent together, you’re cheating.
That’s because it means you’re dealing with a negative-temperature system, so naturally the calculated thermal efficiency looks off the charts.
Imagine strapping a rocket engine—with its own oxidizer and fuel—to the back of a car. What kind of power would that give you?
And it doesn’t even have to be a rocket engine. Just switch to a fuel with a higher oxygen content, such as methanol, and the thermal efficiency can improve considerably.
I’ve always found it especially irritating when people compare gasoline cars to horse-drawn carriages just to make electric cars seem more technologically advanced.
Honestly, you really could sleep in a horse-drawn carriage and experience L5-level autonomous driving right away—it would be far more reliable and safer than your Level 2 driver-assistance system.
In the early days of the automobile, many mechanical transmission systems had already been tested on horse-drawn carriages for years. Even the most advanced electric cars still use all sorts of mechanical components invented for carriages, such as the differential.
Building up a tech tree is always a gradual process. You don’t eat the first four buns for nothing. A lot of people really are taking things too far these days.
100
·
--
【Why does first place enjoy historical privilege?】
What kind of question is this, inviting humiliation? Are we supposed to bang our heads against objective reality?
History textbooks in China and other countries will record Armstrong’s words.
But history textbooks in the United States and other countries are extremely unlikely to record what Chinese astronauts say after landing on the Moon.
That is the “historical privilege” of being first.
【Why does first place enjoy historical privilege?】
What kind of question is this, inviting humiliation? Are we supposed to bang our heads against objective reality?
History textbooks in China and other countries will record Armstrong’s words.
But history textbooks in the United States and other countries are extremely unlikely to record what Chinese astronauts say after landing on the Moon.
That is the “historical privilege” of being first.
What kind of question is this, inviting humiliation? Are we supposed to bang our heads against objective reality?
History textbooks in China and other countries will record Armstrong’s words.
But history textbooks in the United States and other countries are extremely unlikely to record what Chinese astronauts say after landing on the Moon.
That is the “historical privilege” of being first.
48
·
--
【Why can’t the difficulty in *Phantom Blade Zero* be more player-friendly?】
People keep saying, “Ugh, another Soulslike,” while every game they play ends up looking like one.
In a game where ordinary players can beat a boss in single-digit attempts—which naturally means skilled players can probably take it down on their first try—a game with a bit of a challenge is the most comfortable difficulty for ordinary players. It’s the most human-friendly.
When did dying fifty times become the standard for a game being “well designed”?
It’s just that it makes for good livestreams. After all, everyone loves watching streamers die. The result is that loads of people buy the game and can’t get through it. The completion rates for *Elden Ring* and *Sekiro* are both in the 30-something-percent range—and that includes plenty of people who used mods because they wanted to experience the game without putting themselves through too much misery.
*Black Myth: Wukong* cut the number of deaths from around fifty to around twenty, and its completion rate rose significantly, to 46%.
I hope the people who say games should be easy will hold *GTA 6* to the same standard: “Three seconds after you enter the corner, someone with a machine gun will appear in the top-right. You need to move three steps left, three steps right, then crouch, or you’ll get killed instantly.”
Memorizing a boss’s moves should be a technique for skilled players taking on a challenge—not something most players have to do just to beat the game, only to then need a run with zero mistakes to win.
Games are meant to be played, not watched. There’s nothing wrong with lowering the difficulty a little and making them more accessible.
【Why can’t the difficulty in *Phantom Blade Zero* be more player-friendly?】
People keep saying, “Ugh, another Soulslike,” while every game they play ends up looking like one.
In a game where ordinary players can beat a boss in single-digit attempts—which naturally means skilled players can probably take it down on their first try—a game with a bit of a challenge is the most comfortable difficulty for ordinary players. It’s the most human-friendly.
When did dying fifty times become the standard for a game being “well designed”?
It’s just that it makes for good livestreams. After all, everyone loves watching streamers die. The result is that loads of people buy the game and can’t get through it. The completion rates for *Elden Ring* and *Sekiro* are both in the 30-something-percent range—and that includes plenty of people who used mods because they wanted to experience the game without putting themselves through too much misery.
*Black Myth: Wukong* cut the number of deaths from around fifty to around twenty, and its completion rate rose significantly, to 46%.
I hope the people who say games should be easy will hold *GTA 6* to the same standard: “Three seconds after you enter the corner, someone with a machine gun will appear in the top-right. You need to move three steps left, three steps right, then crouch, or you’ll get killed instantly.”
Memorizing a boss’s moves should be a technique for skilled players taking on a challenge—not something most players have to do just to beat the game, only to then need a run with zero mistakes to win.
Games are meant to be played, not watched. There’s nothing wrong with lowering the difficulty a little and making them more accessible.
People keep saying, “Ugh, another Soulslike,” while every game they play ends up looking like one.
In a game where ordinary players can beat a boss in single-digit attempts—which naturally means skilled players can probably take it down on their first try—a game with a bit of a challenge is the most comfortable difficulty for ordinary players. It’s the most human-friendly.
When did dying fifty times become the standard for a game being “well designed”?
It’s just that it makes for good livestreams. After all, everyone loves watching streamers die. The result is that loads of people buy the game and can’t get through it. The completion rates for *Elden Ring* and *Sekiro* are both in the 30-something-percent range—and that includes plenty of people who used mods because they wanted to experience the game without putting themselves through too much misery.
*Black Myth: Wukong* cut the number of deaths from around fifty to around twenty, and its completion rate rose significantly, to 46%.
I hope the people who say games should be easy will hold *GTA 6* to the same standard: “Three seconds after you enter the corner, someone with a machine gun will appear in the top-right. You need to move three steps left, three steps right, then crouch, or you’ll get killed instantly.”
Memorizing a boss’s moves should be a technique for skilled players taking on a challenge—not something most players have to do just to beat the game, only to then need a run with zero mistakes to win.
Games are meant to be played, not watched. There’s nothing wrong with lowering the difficulty a little and making them more accessible.
113
·
--
【How can a new sportswear brand stand out?】
At 20, Chery is working with manufacturers on running shoes and performance apparel after registering the business and securing the brand name and logo.
The idea has been growing for more than a year, driven by a genuine passion for running and sports. After struggling with direction since high school, Chery returned to university to study business management and says the brand has given that uncertainty a sense of purpose.
One commenter who said they had spent 15 years in consumer goods offered a blunt warning: this is a crowded market, and competitors will usually have more money for marketing. The brand needs a clear niche, lifestyle, or product that feels meaningfully different—not just another sportswear label.
Their practical suggestion was to get creative with outreach and, once the product is ready, give some pieces to micro-influencers to build from there. It will be a grind, but passion can help carry the work when the market is already full of bigger budgets.
#Entrepreneurship
【How can a new sportswear brand stand out?】
At 20, Chery is working with manufacturers on running shoes and performance apparel after registering the business and securing the brand name and logo.
The idea has been growing for more than a year, driven by a genuine passion for running and sports. After struggling with direction since high school, Chery returned to university to study business management and says the brand has given that uncertainty a sense of purpose.
One commenter who said they had spent 15 years in consumer goods offered a blunt warning: this is a crowded market, and competitors will usually have more money for marketing. The brand needs a clear niche, lifestyle, or product that feels meaningfully different—not just another sportswear label.
Their practical suggestion was to get creative with outreach and, once the product is ready, give some pieces to micro-influencers to build from there. It will be a grind, but passion can help carry the work when the market is already full of bigger budgets.
#Entrepreneurship
At 20, Chery is working with manufacturers on running shoes and performance apparel after registering the business and securing the brand name and logo.
The idea has been growing for more than a year, driven by a genuine passion for running and sports. After struggling with direction since high school, Chery returned to university to study business management and says the brand has given that uncertainty a sense of purpose.
One commenter who said they had spent 15 years in consumer goods offered a blunt warning: this is a crowded market, and competitors will usually have more money for marketing. The brand needs a clear niche, lifestyle, or product that feels meaningfully different—not just another sportswear label.
Their practical suggestion was to get creative with outreach and, once the product is ready, give some pieces to micro-influencers to build from there. It will be a grind, but passion can help carry the work when the market is already full of bigger budgets.
#Entrepreneurship
·
--
【Can you build a business without giving up a normal life?】
A Reddit poster is juggling several jobs to cover bills, then trying to find enough energy to build a business after work. By the time the day ends, the business is often the thing getting sacrificed.
The usual advice is to wake up earlier or be more disciplined. But when the schedule is already full, even the gym, friends and a little normal life start competing with the hours needed to make progress.
One commenter gave a much harsher answer: you do not build a business and keep a normal life at the same time. In their view, the gym and family time come back once the business is stable and management is in place.
They put the tradeoff even more bluntly: if you want a normal, stable income without sacrifice, you work for someone else. That does not create a neat time-management system, but it does force the real choice into the open: something may have to wait while the business is still being built.
#SmallBusiness
【Can you build a business without giving up a normal life?】
A Reddit poster is juggling several jobs to cover bills, then trying to find enough energy to build a business after work. By the time the day ends, the business is often the thing getting sacrificed.
The usual advice is to wake up earlier or be more disciplined. But when the schedule is already full, even the gym, friends and a little normal life start competing with the hours needed to make progress.
One commenter gave a much harsher answer: you do not build a business and keep a normal life at the same time. In their view, the gym and family time come back once the business is stable and management is in place.
They put the tradeoff even more bluntly: if you want a normal, stable income without sacrifice, you work for someone else. That does not create a neat time-management system, but it does force the real choice into the open: something may have to wait while the business is still being built.
#SmallBusiness
A Reddit poster is juggling several jobs to cover bills, then trying to find enough energy to build a business after work. By the time the day ends, the business is often the thing getting sacrificed.
The usual advice is to wake up earlier or be more disciplined. But when the schedule is already full, even the gym, friends and a little normal life start competing with the hours needed to make progress.
One commenter gave a much harsher answer: you do not build a business and keep a normal life at the same time. In their view, the gym and family time come back once the business is stable and management is in place.
They put the tradeoff even more bluntly: if you want a normal, stable income without sacrifice, you work for someone else. That does not create a neat time-management system, but it does force the real choice into the open: something may have to wait while the business is still being built.
#SmallBusiness
11
·
--
【What does building something from scratch actually cost?】
A Reddit poster expected product, fundraising, or finding users to be the hardest part after dropping out at 17. Instead, the real challenge was waking up every day and convincing themselves they weren’t crazy for believing it would work.
The nights were especially rough. Some days felt unstoppable; others made them question everything they had built. They lost touch with friends, worked while everyone else slept, and found that most people didn’t really understand what they were trying to do.
One commenter described that feeling as being “you vs. you in the dark.” No spotlights, no attention, and almost no credit—and often, nobody knows what you did or what it took to get there. That’s the part people rarely prepare you for when the path has no clear validation yet.
Then comes one good day: a user email, a small win, or someone saying they believe in you. Suddenly, the loneliness feels worth it again. Building from scratch may be a long game, but the commenter’s point is simple: the quiet, unseen stretch is part of the work, so save enough stamina to keep going.
#Entrepreneurship
【What does building something from scratch actually cost?】
A Reddit poster expected product, fundraising, or finding users to be the hardest part after dropping out at 17. Instead, the real challenge was waking up every day and convincing themselves they weren’t crazy for believing it would work.
The nights were especially rough. Some days felt unstoppable; others made them question everything they had built. They lost touch with friends, worked while everyone else slept, and found that most people didn’t really understand what they were trying to do.
One commenter described that feeling as being “you vs. you in the dark.” No spotlights, no attention, and almost no credit—and often, nobody knows what you did or what it took to get there. That’s the part people rarely prepare you for when the path has no clear validation yet.
Then comes one good day: a user email, a small win, or someone saying they believe in you. Suddenly, the loneliness feels worth it again. Building from scratch may be a long game, but the commenter’s point is simple: the quiet, unseen stretch is part of the work, so save enough stamina to keep going.
#Entrepreneurship
A Reddit poster expected product, fundraising, or finding users to be the hardest part after dropping out at 17. Instead, the real challenge was waking up every day and convincing themselves they weren’t crazy for believing it would work.
The nights were especially rough. Some days felt unstoppable; others made them question everything they had built. They lost touch with friends, worked while everyone else slept, and found that most people didn’t really understand what they were trying to do.
One commenter described that feeling as being “you vs. you in the dark.” No spotlights, no attention, and almost no credit—and often, nobody knows what you did or what it took to get there. That’s the part people rarely prepare you for when the path has no clear validation yet.
Then comes one good day: a user email, a small win, or someone saying they believe in you. Suddenly, the loneliness feels worth it again. Building from scratch may be a long game, but the commenter’s point is simple: the quiet, unseen stretch is part of the work, so save enough stamina to keep going.
#Entrepreneurship
11
·
--
【Is there really such a thing as quick money online?】
A poster from Serbia came asking how to make some extra money online—not large money, just $10/€ a day or more.
One commenter said the first mistake is trying to make “quick” money. There’s nothing like that, and nowadays, even $10 is not easy to come by. If you want money that sets you up for the long term, focus on building a side hustle or business with the right structure and solution. It will take a while to figure out, but it sets you up for success faster than jumping on anything random for some quick bucks.
#SideHustle
【Is there really such a thing as quick money online?】
A poster from Serbia came asking how to make some extra money online—not large money, just $10/€ a day or more.
One commenter said the first mistake is trying to make “quick” money. There’s nothing like that, and nowadays, even $10 is not easy to come by. If you want money that sets you up for the long term, focus on building a side hustle or business with the right structure and solution. It will take a while to figure out, but it sets you up for success faster than jumping on anything random for some quick bucks.
#SideHustle
A poster from Serbia came asking how to make some extra money online—not large money, just $10/€ a day or more.
One commenter said the first mistake is trying to make “quick” money. There’s nothing like that, and nowadays, even $10 is not easy to come by. If you want money that sets you up for the long term, focus on building a side hustle or business with the right structure and solution. It will take a while to figure out, but it sets you up for success faster than jumping on anything random for some quick bucks.
#SideHustle
11
·
--
【Is this a family restaurant or just a very demanding job?】
At 6 a.m., a father already in his 60s starts work at the family restaurant. He may not get home until 10 p.m., six or seven days a week, while doing the work of three or four employees.
The restaurant has been open for more than 17 years and reportedly nets €100k a year. But the operation now depends on just two chefs and the 26-year-old poster in the kitchen, with no head chef or floor manager. The family also owns the property and rents a nearby house to staff for €50 a week.
A Reddit poster says the business has slowed, advertising has been poor, and taking it over feels incredibly hard. They had wanted to pursue graphic design, but worry that a career paying at most €45k gross could still be less secure.
One commenter’s response was blunt: based on those numbers, the father may not have a business so much as a very demanding job. That conclusion partly depends on an important assumption—that he does not pay himself a salary and that the €100k is his entire earnings.
The commenter suggested a more useful test for owner “profits”: calculate what it would cost to hire someone, or several people, to handle everything the father currently does. If that cost is more than €100k a year, then the restaurant is not really netting €100k; it is losing money once the owner’s labor is valued.
The discounted staff rent matters too, because renting the house below market value is also forgone income. As the commenter put it, many small-business “owners” do not actually own a business—they own a terrible job. That is the question the family needs to answer before anyone agrees to take over.
#SmallBusiness
【Is this a family restaurant or just a very demanding job?】
At 6 a.m., a father already in his 60s starts work at the family restaurant. He may not get home until 10 p.m., six or seven days a week, while doing the work of three or four employees.
The restaurant has been open for more than 17 years and reportedly nets €100k a year. But the operation now depends on just two chefs and the 26-year-old poster in the kitchen, with no head chef or floor manager. The family also owns the property and rents a nearby house to staff for €50 a week.
A Reddit poster says the business has slowed, advertising has been poor, and taking it over feels incredibly hard. They had wanted to pursue graphic design, but worry that a career paying at most €45k gross could still be less secure.
One commenter’s response was blunt: based on those numbers, the father may not have a business so much as a very demanding job. That conclusion partly depends on an important assumption—that he does not pay himself a salary and that the €100k is his entire earnings.
The commenter suggested a more useful test for owner “profits”: calculate what it would cost to hire someone, or several people, to handle everything the father currently does. If that cost is more than €100k a year, then the restaurant is not really netting €100k; it is losing money once the owner’s labor is valued.
The discounted staff rent matters too, because renting the house below market value is also forgone income. As the commenter put it, many small-business “owners” do not actually own a business—they own a terrible job. That is the question the family needs to answer before anyone agrees to take over.
#SmallBusiness
At 6 a.m., a father already in his 60s starts work at the family restaurant. He may not get home until 10 p.m., six or seven days a week, while doing the work of three or four employees.
The restaurant has been open for more than 17 years and reportedly nets €100k a year. But the operation now depends on just two chefs and the 26-year-old poster in the kitchen, with no head chef or floor manager. The family also owns the property and rents a nearby house to staff for €50 a week.
A Reddit poster says the business has slowed, advertising has been poor, and taking it over feels incredibly hard. They had wanted to pursue graphic design, but worry that a career paying at most €45k gross could still be less secure.
One commenter’s response was blunt: based on those numbers, the father may not have a business so much as a very demanding job. That conclusion partly depends on an important assumption—that he does not pay himself a salary and that the €100k is his entire earnings.
The commenter suggested a more useful test for owner “profits”: calculate what it would cost to hire someone, or several people, to handle everything the father currently does. If that cost is more than €100k a year, then the restaurant is not really netting €100k; it is losing money once the owner’s labor is valued.
The discounted staff rent matters too, because renting the house below market value is also forgone income. As the commenter put it, many small-business “owners” do not actually own a business—they own a terrible job. That is the question the family needs to answer before anyone agrees to take over.
#SmallBusiness
35
·
--
【What changed when cool AI projects stopped being enough?】
Two years ago, a college student was studying AI with no marketing experience, no startup background, and a laptop full of failed projects. The first tools launched to a few pity likes, then silence.
The turning point came while putting together a landing page. Stock illustrations felt generic, hiring a designer was too expensive, and drawing them personally was not happening. So the poster built a simple tool that generated unique, vector-style illustrations from a prompt, then launched Illustration.app.
The difference was not another pile of features. It was starting with a problem people already had. The product eventually reached 7,900+ users and $1.7K+ in revenue—not massive numbers, but a clear step up from launching into crickets.
A commenter who has juggled side hustles for years put the shift plainly: too many projects are passion-first and market-last. Solving a real problem matters more than building something that merely looks impressive.
The other lesson is about momentum. Launching before everything was perfect brought in real users, and their requests shaped the best features. Marketing mattered too: even a strong product is useless if nobody knows it exists.
The journey started with failed AI demos and ended with a small product that stuck—not because the technology became cooler, but because the problem became clearer.
#SideHustle
【What changed when cool AI projects stopped being enough?】
Two years ago, a college student was studying AI with no marketing experience, no startup background, and a laptop full of failed projects. The first tools launched to a few pity likes, then silence.
The turning point came while putting together a landing page. Stock illustrations felt generic, hiring a designer was too expensive, and drawing them personally was not happening. So the poster built a simple tool that generated unique, vector-style illustrations from a prompt, then launched Illustration.app.
The difference was not another pile of features. It was starting with a problem people already had. The product eventually reached 7,900+ users and $1.7K+ in revenue—not massive numbers, but a clear step up from launching into crickets.
A commenter who has juggled side hustles for years put the shift plainly: too many projects are passion-first and market-last. Solving a real problem matters more than building something that merely looks impressive.
The other lesson is about momentum. Launching before everything was perfect brought in real users, and their requests shaped the best features. Marketing mattered too: even a strong product is useless if nobody knows it exists.
The journey started with failed AI demos and ended with a small product that stuck—not because the technology became cooler, but because the problem became clearer.
#SideHustle
Two years ago, a college student was studying AI with no marketing experience, no startup background, and a laptop full of failed projects. The first tools launched to a few pity likes, then silence.
The turning point came while putting together a landing page. Stock illustrations felt generic, hiring a designer was too expensive, and drawing them personally was not happening. So the poster built a simple tool that generated unique, vector-style illustrations from a prompt, then launched Illustration.app.
The difference was not another pile of features. It was starting with a problem people already had. The product eventually reached 7,900+ users and $1.7K+ in revenue—not massive numbers, but a clear step up from launching into crickets.
A commenter who has juggled side hustles for years put the shift plainly: too many projects are passion-first and market-last. Solving a real problem matters more than building something that merely looks impressive.
The other lesson is about momentum. Launching before everything was perfect brought in real users, and their requests shaped the best features. Marketing mattered too: even a strong product is useless if nobody knows it exists.
The journey started with failed AI demos and ended with a small product that stuck—not because the technology became cooler, but because the problem became clearer.
#SideHustle
·
--
【Is it really hard to make a successful business?】
A Reddit poster says learning everything—from marketing, sales, and finance to doing the thing—is a lot. But after a year of doing it, it really isn’t that hard, they say. Am I crazy and really about to drown?
One commenter answered: it depends on what business you're running and whether you actually have a business or just created a job for yourself. There's a difference, and most people who say they have a business actually just created themselves a job. The question was simple: What do you do?
#SmallBusiness
【Is it really hard to make a successful business?】
A Reddit poster says learning everything—from marketing, sales, and finance to doing the thing—is a lot. But after a year of doing it, it really isn’t that hard, they say. Am I crazy and really about to drown?
One commenter answered: it depends on what business you're running and whether you actually have a business or just created a job for yourself. There's a difference, and most people who say they have a business actually just created themselves a job. The question was simple: What do you do?
#SmallBusiness
A Reddit poster says learning everything—from marketing, sales, and finance to doing the thing—is a lot. But after a year of doing it, it really isn’t that hard, they say. Am I crazy and really about to drown?
One commenter answered: it depends on what business you're running and whether you actually have a business or just created a job for yourself. There's a difference, and most people who say they have a business actually just created themselves a job. The question was simple: What do you do?
#SmallBusiness
5
·
--
【What do gas-station sales reps actually do?】
At a gas station, a Celsius polo can mean more than a quick restock: one territory manager was setting up product and promotional cutouts.
A commenter pointed out that Pepsi and Frito-Lay have similar roles, as do many alcohol companies. Mars and other candy companies likely have territory reps doing comparable work too.
The job is mostly driving and stocking: making sure products are on the correct shelf, changing promotional material, and covering an assigned territory. The commenter said they had never worked it, but knew plenty of salespeople who came from that world—and it seemed like a reasonable way to get started.
#Sales
【What do gas-station sales reps actually do?】
At a gas station, a Celsius polo can mean more than a quick restock: one territory manager was setting up product and promotional cutouts.
A commenter pointed out that Pepsi and Frito-Lay have similar roles, as do many alcohol companies. Mars and other candy companies likely have territory reps doing comparable work too.
The job is mostly driving and stocking: making sure products are on the correct shelf, changing promotional material, and covering an assigned territory. The commenter said they had never worked it, but knew plenty of salespeople who came from that world—and it seemed like a reasonable way to get started.
#Sales
At a gas station, a Celsius polo can mean more than a quick restock: one territory manager was setting up product and promotional cutouts.
A commenter pointed out that Pepsi and Frito-Lay have similar roles, as do many alcohol companies. Mars and other candy companies likely have territory reps doing comparable work too.
The job is mostly driving and stocking: making sure products are on the correct shelf, changing promotional material, and covering an assigned territory. The commenter said they had never worked it, but knew plenty of salespeople who came from that world—and it seemed like a reasonable way to get started.
#Sales
·
--
【Should founders find customers before building the product?】
A fintech founder was still pre-launch—no revenue, just an app under construction with a technical co-founder—when the first wall turned out not to be coding.
The real headache was finding B2B providers for virtual and gift cards. Some weren't instant, some had downtime, and bad reviews raised questions about reliability and scams. Even the setup requirements—registered company, a business bank account, transaction history or minimum volumes—made it feel like every step depended on another.
A commenter offered a blunt reset: before spending too long pushing the product forward, talk to potential customers. For most founders, the harder hurdle is getting customers, retaining them and growing. Building gets easier when people are already waiting to pay. That doesn't erase the provider problems, but it changes what to prove first.
#Entrepreneurship
【Should founders find customers before building the product?】
A fintech founder was still pre-launch—no revenue, just an app under construction with a technical co-founder—when the first wall turned out not to be coding.
The real headache was finding B2B providers for virtual and gift cards. Some weren't instant, some had downtime, and bad reviews raised questions about reliability and scams. Even the setup requirements—registered company, a business bank account, transaction history or minimum volumes—made it feel like every step depended on another.
A commenter offered a blunt reset: before spending too long pushing the product forward, talk to potential customers. For most founders, the harder hurdle is getting customers, retaining them and growing. Building gets easier when people are already waiting to pay. That doesn't erase the provider problems, but it changes what to prove first.
#Entrepreneurship
A fintech founder was still pre-launch—no revenue, just an app under construction with a technical co-founder—when the first wall turned out not to be coding.
The real headache was finding B2B providers for virtual and gift cards. Some weren't instant, some had downtime, and bad reviews raised questions about reliability and scams. Even the setup requirements—registered company, a business bank account, transaction history or minimum volumes—made it feel like every step depended on another.
A commenter offered a blunt reset: before spending too long pushing the product forward, talk to potential customers. For most founders, the harder hurdle is getting customers, retaining them and growing. Building gets easier when people are already waiting to pay. That doesn't erase the provider problems, but it changes what to prove first.
#Entrepreneurship
2
·
--
【Is three months enough time to prove a world-first product?】
Three months from launch, a Reddit poster says every dollar goes straight into the product or food and rent. Credit cards and loans are maxed, the credit score is wrecked, and there is no backup plan.
They know how bad that looks on paper. If the product flops, this is not just a failed startup; it is debt, financial damage, and years of digging out. Still, they say they would rather risk burning their life down than spend years wondering what might have happened if they had played it safe.
One commenter did not argue about courage. They asked what the product does, what problem it solves, how much pain that problem creates, and who the TAM, TSM, and ICP are. Those questions force the vision into something buyers can actually recognize.
The three-month deadline got the same treatment. If that is when the money runs out, the commenter said selling—or at least advertising and creating interest—should have started yesterday. Why wait for the platform to reach MVP then? Why not a month earlier or later?
The point was not that every question needs a perfect answer. It was that the product needs evidence of demand before the runway disappears. The commenter’s example was the person who created the pet rock and became a millionaire: a simple product can work when the market understands the offer. A world’s first still has to solve a problem people feel strongly enough to pay for.
#Entrepreneurship
【Is three months enough time to prove a world-first product?】
Three months from launch, a Reddit poster says every dollar goes straight into the product or food and rent. Credit cards and loans are maxed, the credit score is wrecked, and there is no backup plan.
They know how bad that looks on paper. If the product flops, this is not just a failed startup; it is debt, financial damage, and years of digging out. Still, they say they would rather risk burning their life down than spend years wondering what might have happened if they had played it safe.
One commenter did not argue about courage. They asked what the product does, what problem it solves, how much pain that problem creates, and who the TAM, TSM, and ICP are. Those questions force the vision into something buyers can actually recognize.
The three-month deadline got the same treatment. If that is when the money runs out, the commenter said selling—or at least advertising and creating interest—should have started yesterday. Why wait for the platform to reach MVP then? Why not a month earlier or later?
The point was not that every question needs a perfect answer. It was that the product needs evidence of demand before the runway disappears. The commenter’s example was the person who created the pet rock and became a millionaire: a simple product can work when the market understands the offer. A world’s first still has to solve a problem people feel strongly enough to pay for.
#Entrepreneurship
Three months from launch, a Reddit poster says every dollar goes straight into the product or food and rent. Credit cards and loans are maxed, the credit score is wrecked, and there is no backup plan.
They know how bad that looks on paper. If the product flops, this is not just a failed startup; it is debt, financial damage, and years of digging out. Still, they say they would rather risk burning their life down than spend years wondering what might have happened if they had played it safe.
One commenter did not argue about courage. They asked what the product does, what problem it solves, how much pain that problem creates, and who the TAM, TSM, and ICP are. Those questions force the vision into something buyers can actually recognize.
The three-month deadline got the same treatment. If that is when the money runs out, the commenter said selling—or at least advertising and creating interest—should have started yesterday. Why wait for the platform to reach MVP then? Why not a month earlier or later?
The point was not that every question needs a perfect answer. It was that the product needs evidence of demand before the runway disappears. The commenter’s example was the person who created the pet rock and became a millionaire: a simple product can work when the market understands the offer. A world’s first still has to solve a problem people feel strongly enough to pay for.
#Entrepreneurship
34
·
--
【Can an AI flyer make a business look careless?】
A local cafe in a community art gallery used AI to promote a family painting day. One commenter’s reaction was blunt: “talk about tone deaf.”
A Reddit poster argued that AI flyers and social posts are not just unpopular when people notice them. They are often hard to read, cluttered, and bad at explaining who the business is or what it offers. That means possible conversions leak before anyone reaches the call to action.
One commenter said they find themselves shying away from businesses using AI flyers for ads—or really anything else. The cafe example shows why: the problem is not only visual quality. It is whether the message fits the moment and feels like someone actually thought about the audience.
The cleaner standard is simple: Hook → Your Offer → CTA. A recruiting ad used the contrast “A VP of Marketing Costs $250k a Year” against “Ours Costs Less and Starts This Week,” then ended with “Hire Fractional Senior Marketers.” No visual maze, no clever detour—just a clear reason to care and a clear next step.
Simplicity and clarity beat clutter because people should understand the offer before they have to work to decode it. When an ad is messy, people bounce.
#Entrepreneurship
【Can an AI flyer make a business look careless?】
A local cafe in a community art gallery used AI to promote a family painting day. One commenter’s reaction was blunt: “talk about tone deaf.”
A Reddit poster argued that AI flyers and social posts are not just unpopular when people notice them. They are often hard to read, cluttered, and bad at explaining who the business is or what it offers. That means possible conversions leak before anyone reaches the call to action.
One commenter said they find themselves shying away from businesses using AI flyers for ads—or really anything else. The cafe example shows why: the problem is not only visual quality. It is whether the message fits the moment and feels like someone actually thought about the audience.
The cleaner standard is simple: Hook → Your Offer → CTA. A recruiting ad used the contrast “A VP of Marketing Costs $250k a Year” against “Ours Costs Less and Starts This Week,” then ended with “Hire Fractional Senior Marketers.” No visual maze, no clever detour—just a clear reason to care and a clear next step.
Simplicity and clarity beat clutter because people should understand the offer before they have to work to decode it. When an ad is messy, people bounce.
#Entrepreneurship
A local cafe in a community art gallery used AI to promote a family painting day. One commenter’s reaction was blunt: “talk about tone deaf.”
A Reddit poster argued that AI flyers and social posts are not just unpopular when people notice them. They are often hard to read, cluttered, and bad at explaining who the business is or what it offers. That means possible conversions leak before anyone reaches the call to action.
One commenter said they find themselves shying away from businesses using AI flyers for ads—or really anything else. The cafe example shows why: the problem is not only visual quality. It is whether the message fits the moment and feels like someone actually thought about the audience.
The cleaner standard is simple: Hook → Your Offer → CTA. A recruiting ad used the contrast “A VP of Marketing Costs $250k a Year” against “Ours Costs Less and Starts This Week,” then ended with “Hire Fractional Senior Marketers.” No visual maze, no clever detour—just a clear reason to care and a clear next step.
Simplicity and clarity beat clutter because people should understand the offer before they have to work to decode it. When an ad is messy, people bounce.
#Entrepreneurship
25
·
--
【Does small-business freedom get easier when you stop deciding alone?】
A laptop, a pricing decision, and no manager to sanity-check it: that is the quiet part of running a small business.
A business owner on Reddit says they built the company from nothing, kept it alive longer than expected, and finally have some money saved. Still, pricing, hiring help, choosing clients, and deciding whether to spend or reinvest can stretch into days because every mistake lands on them.
They don’t regret starting. They just keep the doubt private because everyone expects ownership to look like freedom and confidence.
One commenter suggested finding a group of other owners to soundboard ideas with and explore alongside. They said the most helpful ideas can come from people eons away from your industry.
The second-guessing may not disappear. Having people who understand the weight of the decision, plus people who don’t share your industry blind spots, can make it easier to carry.
#Pricing
【Does small-business freedom get easier when you stop deciding alone?】
A laptop, a pricing decision, and no manager to sanity-check it: that is the quiet part of running a small business.
A business owner on Reddit says they built the company from nothing, kept it alive longer than expected, and finally have some money saved. Still, pricing, hiring help, choosing clients, and deciding whether to spend or reinvest can stretch into days because every mistake lands on them.
They don’t regret starting. They just keep the doubt private because everyone expects ownership to look like freedom and confidence.
One commenter suggested finding a group of other owners to soundboard ideas with and explore alongside. They said the most helpful ideas can come from people eons away from your industry.
The second-guessing may not disappear. Having people who understand the weight of the decision, plus people who don’t share your industry blind spots, can make it easier to carry.
#Pricing
A laptop, a pricing decision, and no manager to sanity-check it: that is the quiet part of running a small business.
A business owner on Reddit says they built the company from nothing, kept it alive longer than expected, and finally have some money saved. Still, pricing, hiring help, choosing clients, and deciding whether to spend or reinvest can stretch into days because every mistake lands on them.
They don’t regret starting. They just keep the doubt private because everyone expects ownership to look like freedom and confidence.
One commenter suggested finding a group of other owners to soundboard ideas with and explore alongside. They said the most helpful ideas can come from people eons away from your industry.
The second-guessing may not disappear. Having people who understand the weight of the decision, plus people who don’t share your industry blind spots, can make it easier to carry.
#Pricing
50
·
--
【Should the first hire wait until the cash is actually in hand?】
A Reddit poster expects to have about $53k in cash after spending $60k on another rental, while two vacant houses still need roughly $45k in materials.
There are also two contracted client projects worth $24k and $48k, with 50% draws available, plus a refinance expected to return at least $100k in about 3.5 months. But a $20k property-tax bill is coming, and a full-time employee would create weekly payroll at an estimated total cost of $40–45 an hour.
One commenter’s answer was direct: wait to hire against the cash already in hand, and leave the future draws and refinance out of the hiring decision until they are real. The practical reserve is therefore the first pile after setting aside the known materials and tax obligations—not a promise based on money that has not arrived yet.
#CashFlow
【Should the first hire wait until the cash is actually in hand?】
A Reddit poster expects to have about $53k in cash after spending $60k on another rental, while two vacant houses still need roughly $45k in materials.
There are also two contracted client projects worth $24k and $48k, with 50% draws available, plus a refinance expected to return at least $100k in about 3.5 months. But a $20k property-tax bill is coming, and a full-time employee would create weekly payroll at an estimated total cost of $40–45 an hour.
One commenter’s answer was direct: wait to hire against the cash already in hand, and leave the future draws and refinance out of the hiring decision until they are real. The practical reserve is therefore the first pile after setting aside the known materials and tax obligations—not a promise based on money that has not arrived yet.
#CashFlow
A Reddit poster expects to have about $53k in cash after spending $60k on another rental, while two vacant houses still need roughly $45k in materials.
There are also two contracted client projects worth $24k and $48k, with 50% draws available, plus a refinance expected to return at least $100k in about 3.5 months. But a $20k property-tax bill is coming, and a full-time employee would create weekly payroll at an estimated total cost of $40–45 an hour.
One commenter’s answer was direct: wait to hire against the cash already in hand, and leave the future draws and refinance out of the hiring decision until they are real. The practical reserve is therefore the first pile after setting aside the known materials and tax obligations—not a promise based on money that has not arrived yet.
#CashFlow
91
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
BinanceReopensWithdrawalsForMoreAssets
18,556 views
546 Discussing
Security Incident | Recovery Update #6: Withdrawals Reopen for More Assets (2026-11-03)
Binance Announcement
·159 Likes
·453.7k views
AppleReportsMixedResults
12,419 views
420 Discussing
BinanceHourlyDepositsExceedWithdrawals
1,436 views
101 Discussing