Someone offered $20,000 to get a public Binance supporter to change his tune and bad-mouth Binance.

The account, signed AB, said the other party contacted him by message and spoke with him in person. They first asked whether he was willing to say bad things about Binance, then assumed he was affiliated with Binance and offered more money for him to switch to another platform. He turned down both offers. His reason was simple: his support for the platform had never been about money.

A few hours earlier, a third-party media outlet had relayed CZ’s account of the offer: $20,000 to $50,000, in the same ballpark as the figure AB gave himself.

The post that really set the tone came from Binance co-founder He Yi. In a post 11 hours ago, she put it bluntly: “Binance’s only competitor is itself. A company with its eyes fixed only on Binance will never surpass Binance.” The post had garnered 575 likes, 1,949 reposts, and 140,000 views, making it the most widely shared official message over the past two days.

For people scrolling through the posts, the takeaway is very practical. When you come across a post attacking a platform by name, first check whether the account’s tone has suddenly shifted over the past three months. Then see whether it offers verifiable data or just emotion. It only takes three posts to tell apart an account that cites sources and methods and corrects its mistakes from one that only shouts slogans. Once opinions can be bought by the post, what you see shouldn’t be determined solely by the other side.

Paying people to bad-mouth you is, in itself, proof of scale. Only three things can sustain that position: deep financial resources, continuous product iteration, and reasons for users to choose to stay.

#中本聪国际社区Baoluo币商资本 #币安推出BinanceIntelligence #Binance #Binance