Can copy trading really make money consistently? This question troubles many ordinary investors who hope to earn a passive income. Instead of listening to influencers make extravagant claims about their returns, let’s look at the results of a real test and use actual data as a reference.

We’ve already conducted a copy trading test once. In the previous test, we copied two trades, and the results weren’t encouraging: one account was completely wiped out, with not a penny of the original capital left. The other lost a full 80%, leaving very little of its original capital intact.

After the results came in, quite a few people left comments suggesting that anyone who wants to make money should copy top traders—of course you’re more likely to lose money if you choose ordinary traders. To be fair, the traders I chose last time were popular picks recommended by other traders, but they weren’t among the platform’s top performers. That’s a very valid point.

So this time, we’ll take your advice and run another test. I’ve selected the three top-ranked traders in the platform’s leading profitability tier. Rather than putting real money on the line, we’ll test them using simulated copy trading. This way, we won’t risk any actual capital and can still give you a more objective result.

To give you a clear picture of how copy trading performs over different periods, we’ll record the results in stages, testing four time frames: one day, three days, ten days, and thirty days. At the end of each period, we’ll report the returns clearly. We’ll follow the test from start to finish and lay out the actual gains and losses for everyone to see.

Finally, let me emphasize once again: this is simply a public test, and the results are for reference only. Based on what we find, you can decide for yourself whether to copy trades and how to choose a trader. This test does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk, so please make your own careful judgment before getting involved.