#vitalik警告ai或将加速削弱密码学安全
Nearly 4 million people watched a post as the crypto world erupted over whether to move all its coins 🦖
🔍 进群聊行情
The post came from Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake. On Wednesday, he called on the entire industry on X to prepare for what he called “bunker mode”—gradually moving funds to new addresses whose public keys have never been exposed. His reasoning: AI-driven advances in mathematics could break the elliptic-curve signatures protecting Bitcoin and Ethereum wallets in months, not years. The evidence he pointed to was a set of 722 mathematical results OpenAI released this week.
The market’s first response was to sell off. Bitcoin briefly dipped to around $82,300 during Asian trading before recovering to about $82,800—roughly 4% below Tuesday’s high of $86,600. The CoinDesk 100 Index fell nearly 2% over 24 hours. When a technical discussion can drag the broader market lower, it shows just how sensitive a nerve it has hit.
But the real drama was in the debate. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik said the risk should be taken seriously, but urged holders not to rush into moving their coins. Samson Mow, CEO of Bitcoin technology company Jan3, was more blunt: one Ethereum researcher said a few foolish things, and there’s no need to panic. Three different answers to the same question from within the industry.
In plain English: cryptography probably won’t be cracked overnight. The real variable is expectations. If the market starts believing signatures can be cracked, the first to act won’t be small retail investors, but whales holding large sums in old addresses 🐋. This isn’t purely a technical issue—it’s about confidence.
The backdrop is worth watching, too. The 30-year Treasury yield rose to 5.71%, and the 10-year yield to 5.32%. A $22 billion 30-year Treasury auction is coming up later. Minutes from the September meeting under Fed Chair Warsh showed that all 19 officials supported the previous rate hike, and most thought there would be another one before year-end. September CPI is due on October 14, and the rate decision comes on October 28. The macro faucet is still running, and crypto’s own security narrative has developed another crack. Investors are likely to grow even more cautious ⚠️
Two signals are worth keeping an eye on. First, are old addresses starting to move their funds en masse? That would be a real sign that people are taking bunker mode seriously. Second, can Bitcoin hold around $82,000? If it breaks below that level, this could shift from a technical debate to a panic-driven sell-off.
If wallet cryptography really were cracked one day, would you rush to move your coins to a new address, or bet that it was just another frightening headline? Share your thoughts in the comments 🦖
Every day, we bring you the latest crypto developments—not just what’s happening, but the logic and opportunities behind it 👀🚀
Tap the profile picture to watch the livestream
Nearly 4 million people watched a post as the crypto world erupted over whether to move all its coins 🦖
🔍 进群聊行情
The post came from Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake. On Wednesday, he called on the entire industry on X to prepare for what he called “bunker mode”—gradually moving funds to new addresses whose public keys have never been exposed. His reasoning: AI-driven advances in mathematics could break the elliptic-curve signatures protecting Bitcoin and Ethereum wallets in months, not years. The evidence he pointed to was a set of 722 mathematical results OpenAI released this week.
The market’s first response was to sell off. Bitcoin briefly dipped to around $82,300 during Asian trading before recovering to about $82,800—roughly 4% below Tuesday’s high of $86,600. The CoinDesk 100 Index fell nearly 2% over 24 hours. When a technical discussion can drag the broader market lower, it shows just how sensitive a nerve it has hit.
But the real drama was in the debate. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik said the risk should be taken seriously, but urged holders not to rush into moving their coins. Samson Mow, CEO of Bitcoin technology company Jan3, was more blunt: one Ethereum researcher said a few foolish things, and there’s no need to panic. Three different answers to the same question from within the industry.
In plain English: cryptography probably won’t be cracked overnight. The real variable is expectations. If the market starts believing signatures can be cracked, the first to act won’t be small retail investors, but whales holding large sums in old addresses 🐋. This isn’t purely a technical issue—it’s about confidence.
The backdrop is worth watching, too. The 30-year Treasury yield rose to 5.71%, and the 10-year yield to 5.32%. A $22 billion 30-year Treasury auction is coming up later. Minutes from the September meeting under Fed Chair Warsh showed that all 19 officials supported the previous rate hike, and most thought there would be another one before year-end. September CPI is due on October 14, and the rate decision comes on October 28. The macro faucet is still running, and crypto’s own security narrative has developed another crack. Investors are likely to grow even more cautious ⚠️
Two signals are worth keeping an eye on. First, are old addresses starting to move their funds en masse? That would be a real sign that people are taking bunker mode seriously. Second, can Bitcoin hold around $82,000? If it breaks below that level, this could shift from a technical debate to a panic-driven sell-off.
If wallet cryptography really were cracked one day, would you rush to move your coins to a new address, or bet that it was just another frightening headline? Share your thoughts in the comments 🦖
Every day, we bring you the latest crypto developments—not just what’s happening, but the logic and opportunities behind it 👀🚀
Tap the profile picture to watch the livestream