$PUMP is real
24-hour agreement revenue: $8.28 million, 24-hour agreement fees: $2.53 million
Agreement fees in the last 7 days: $47.7 million, agreement revenue in the last 7 days: $15.73 million
Recently, Robinhood chain $PONS has grown rapidly, but if you think about it carefully, PONS is still too far from pump. Here are a few simple points:
1. Temperament—also, ambition, or strategic goals. When the Robinhood chain was hot, $UNI of most of its revenue came from PONS contributions. If PONS makes its own swap, wouldn’t that revenue belong to PONS then? Whether to do a swap isn’t really a question of whether you can make money—it’s a strategic question. Clearly, PONS hasn’t figured it out.
2. Team configuration. A tight team does have high productivity. But long-term, high-intensity work requires sustained combat power. Staffing needs a certain degree of resilience to be “anti-fragile.” Pump has managed to withstand this challenge over the past couple of years, while PONS hasn’t yet experienced it.
3. Product lines derived from memes. Besides swap, there’s social, chain-scanning tools, and multi-chain development. Pump stands out across all these areas. You could say it is a leader in each niche.
24-hour agreement revenue: $8.28 million, 24-hour agreement fees: $2.53 million
Agreement fees in the last 7 days: $47.7 million, agreement revenue in the last 7 days: $15.73 million
Recently, Robinhood chain $PONS has grown rapidly, but if you think about it carefully, PONS is still too far from pump. Here are a few simple points:
1. Temperament—also, ambition, or strategic goals. When the Robinhood chain was hot, $UNI of most of its revenue came from PONS contributions. If PONS makes its own swap, wouldn’t that revenue belong to PONS then? Whether to do a swap isn’t really a question of whether you can make money—it’s a strategic question. Clearly, PONS hasn’t figured it out.
2. Team configuration. A tight team does have high productivity. But long-term, high-intensity work requires sustained combat power. Staffing needs a certain degree of resilience to be “anti-fragile.” Pump has managed to withstand this challenge over the past couple of years, while PONS hasn’t yet experienced it.
3. Product lines derived from memes. Besides swap, there’s social, chain-scanning tools, and multi-chain development. Pump stands out across all these areas. You could say it is a leader in each niche.
