Here, you can see the research approach
What’s truly difficult in the crypto world isn’t spotting which coin is going up; it’s judging in advance: whether the project is worth it, whether the current price is expensive, what entry point to participate at, and how to handle things if the fundamentals change after you buy.
What I’ve been doing for the long term is precisely this.
————————
【Each time I conduct research on a project, I will definitely clarify these issues】
Is the project actually worth it? What would be a reasonable valuation range for the token? Given the current market, what kind of response strategy is suitable? What signals indicate that the previous judgment logic has failed?
Finishing a deep-dive research write-up doesn’t mean it’s over. A project’s revenue, product progress, governance proposals, token unlocks, buyback-and-burn, and security risks may all keep changing—so continuous tracking and verification are required.
————————
【Follow this account to get content like this】
I don’t repost scattered news. Everything comes with my own fundamental research judgment:
✅ BTC & ETH market outlook—key ideas
✅ Interpretation of industry hot events
✅ Practical tips to help beginners avoid pitfalls
✅ Recap of changes in project fundamentals
✅ Market recap + deep dive on a single project
For some projects’ deep content, I’ll prioritize updating it on this account first, and then open it up for reading later.
————————
【Research focus 1: Ongoing project tracking】
Project research isn’t something you write once and then put aside. After publishing, I’ll keep following the project’s progress across all dimensions: product delivery status, governance proposal execution, growth in users and revenue, execution of buyback-and-burn, token unlock sell pressure, and security/regulatory risks.
Once the fundamentals change, I will re-evaluate valuation, observation ranges, holding responses, and exit conditions.
In simple terms: one article solves “how to look at this project,” and ongoing tracking solves “how to respond dynamically after holding.”
————————
【Research focus 2: Early-stage project fundamental judgment】
Many opportunities are already being priced in before the official launch. Once the whole market reaches a consensus, the early valuation advantage is often already gone.
Research on early-stage targets focuses on projects that have not yet had TGE, are about to be issued, or are still in the early stage. The priorities are verifying the team’s authenticity, the product’s delivery capability, the token value-capture logic, the valuation for the public sale, initial circulating supply, unlock-related sell pressure, market-making foundation, participation cost, and security risks.
I won’t blindly analyze every new project I see. Only when project quality, valuation, the issuance structure, and potential odds all meet the standard will I produce a complete research report.
If it has research value, I’ll mark a reasonable valuation upper limit, potential observation range, entry prerequisites, and conditions to give up. For assets with excessively high risk, I’ll directly explain why I won’t participate.
————————
【Reading tips】
Time is limited. I prioritize reading the concise research-and-assessment summary first, quickly clarify the response approach for the moment, and confirm whether the original logic has changed.
Preparing to invest funds or to track the target long-term—read the full research in detail first.
If the price hasn’t entered the planned observation range, stay patient and wait. Just because a project is worth researching doesn’t mean every price point is suitable to participate in. If there are major fundamental changes later, rely on the latest recap and research approach.
————————
【My research principles】
I will provide a subjective judgment based on fundamentals, while also acknowledging the possibility of getting things wrong.
For opportunities you can evaluate in advance, organize the logic early. For assets with insufficient evidence, I won’t force strong opinions just to keep updates steady.
If my judgment is correct, I’ll recap the experience. If I’m wrong, I’ll keep a record too, and summarize why I made the mistake.
————————
【Historical market recap cases (for past market review only; not a guarantee of future returns)】
DESE: completes bottom-tracking around $2, followed by a maximum 9x rally.
FOLD: early fundamental tracking; maximum upside of about 788%.
WLD: maximum upside exceeding 218%.
NEAR: maximum upside of about 173%.
HYPE: achieved a double-up行情.
UNI: maximum upside of about 114% after tracking.
FET, ONDO: maximum gains both close to doubling.
FIL: after tracking, maximum upside of about 35%.
Past live trading recaps: started with 7,000 principal, reached a maximum of 600,000. For early long-term tracked targets, some accounts cumulatively achieved 20–30x returns.
Follow me to continuously sync fundamental analysis, market recaps, and project tracking.