The second wave may have started.
On the board, a batch of names—$PONS, $STONK, $MarsCoin, $USELESS , and others—are all strengthening in sync. RH-chain memes are seeing renewed attention in trading volume, while the BSC Chinese chart is also rotating steadily, not like a single-point spike—it looks more like capital is looking for "a story that can still be told."
What’s particularly interesting is the change in rankings: on Binance spot, $MarsCoin has again overtaken $Niu in both market cap and trading volume. On the BSC Chinese meme leader position, MarsCoin has taken it back from Niu. After $Niu landed around 1e8 (near 100 million) on 9/9 spot, it consolidated around that area. MarsCoin, after dropping from a higher position, then regained momentum by pushing volume and narrative—"which one is tougher"—and the market is voting with its order book.
During the same period, the BSC launchpad is also switching topics.
A KOL asked: what’s the difference between genius and Four? The platform has a background, platform tokens, and a strong "Binance in-group" color. But the key focus of doubt is whether platform tokens can actually distribute value, and whether retail investors can actually capture the upside.
The KOL put it even more bluntly: doesn’t Binance really support global developers? Is it only for people with connections to post here? They also mentioned that almost everyone they spoke with told them—don’t invest in projects not tied to Binance.
That statement really punctures the controversy after genius went live: $Gstock, $LORE, $EINSTEIN—a whole string of names rose quickly—but the real argument in the community is: "who can play on the stage, and who can only watch from outside."
For the meme second wave, it’s all about rotation; for the launchpad second wave, it’s all about thresholds.
What’s rising isn’t just the price—there’s also a repricing of "connections / the platform / retail investor returns."
DYOR.
On the board, a batch of names—$PONS, $STONK, $MarsCoin, $USELESS , and others—are all strengthening in sync. RH-chain memes are seeing renewed attention in trading volume, while the BSC Chinese chart is also rotating steadily, not like a single-point spike—it looks more like capital is looking for "a story that can still be told."
What’s particularly interesting is the change in rankings: on Binance spot, $MarsCoin has again overtaken $Niu in both market cap and trading volume. On the BSC Chinese meme leader position, MarsCoin has taken it back from Niu. After $Niu landed around 1e8 (near 100 million) on 9/9 spot, it consolidated around that area. MarsCoin, after dropping from a higher position, then regained momentum by pushing volume and narrative—"which one is tougher"—and the market is voting with its order book.
During the same period, the BSC launchpad is also switching topics.
A KOL asked: what’s the difference between genius and Four? The platform has a background, platform tokens, and a strong "Binance in-group" color. But the key focus of doubt is whether platform tokens can actually distribute value, and whether retail investors can actually capture the upside.
The KOL put it even more bluntly: doesn’t Binance really support global developers? Is it only for people with connections to post here? They also mentioned that almost everyone they spoke with told them—don’t invest in projects not tied to Binance.
That statement really punctures the controversy after genius went live: $Gstock, $LORE, $EINSTEIN—a whole string of names rose quickly—but the real argument in the community is: "who can play on the stage, and who can only watch from outside."
For the meme second wave, it’s all about rotation; for the launchpad second wave, it’s all about thresholds.
What’s rising isn’t just the price—there’s also a repricing of "connections / the platform / retail investor returns."
DYOR.