Another major macro event that many friends seem to have missed: a U.S. House committee advanced H.R. 8957 with a vote of 28:21. The bill would put the Strategic $BTC reserve into law, including at least a 20-year holding period and annual reporting requirements. This creates a strong contrast with the stalled CLARITY Act: on one side, the comprehensive market-structure bill could not move forward, and on the other, issues related to strategic reserves and taxes continue to progress. This is exactly what Ajian has always emphasized: U.S. crypto policy doesn’t move forward or backward as a whole—it follows different paths depending on the specific bill.
So the market will price this separately. Policies favorable to BTC don’t necessarily benefit every token at the same time; this bill is still more directly aimed at BTC. That also explains why when the comprehensive regulatory bill stalls, BTC may still show more policy resilience than altcoins.
So the market will price this separately. Policies favorable to BTC don’t necessarily benefit every token at the same time; this bill is still more directly aimed at BTC. That also explains why when the comprehensive regulatory bill stalls, BTC may still show more policy resilience than altcoins.