About Arc
(1) The platforms are really legit—if you bought the day before, you’d be up today; but if you chase the price today and “hold your nerve,” chances are you’ll lose. Today’s strategy is PvP.
(2) There are too many Arc platforms, so it’s hard to form a unified force like on the RB chain. On the RB chain, the core platforms are only a few; the main storyline tasks are very clear, and each platform’s style is also very clear. The attention and user retention come from coordinated pumping and platform tokens drawing people in. Also, there are several very strong devs that empower platform tokens to create trading pairs. The main narrative is still meme + coin-stock. The investment logic, the pumping logic, and the narrative are all very clear. As for Arc, it currently seems somewhat chaotic—“only the bold get fed, and the timid starve,” and it can even trap the bold.
(3) The RB chain also has its own signal-leading KOL, while Arc currently doesn’t.
(4) The official side of the RB chain likely offers substantial subsidies, whereas Arc’s official side is probably in a wait-and-see mode. It may also be responding to market feedback, and they’ll also watch how each platform performs. I personally lean toward the official taking a wait-and-see approach.
(5) The ceiling on the leader coin is too low. Obviously, even the whales are watching and not committing enough to stabilize it. Most nights it’s just retracing; people don’t dare to hold.
From the above, Arc needs:
Official subsidies + official support + KOL collaboration + a clear main narrative + platform-token utility/empowerment, etc.
(1) The platforms are really legit—if you bought the day before, you’d be up today; but if you chase the price today and “hold your nerve,” chances are you’ll lose. Today’s strategy is PvP.
(2) There are too many Arc platforms, so it’s hard to form a unified force like on the RB chain. On the RB chain, the core platforms are only a few; the main storyline tasks are very clear, and each platform’s style is also very clear. The attention and user retention come from coordinated pumping and platform tokens drawing people in. Also, there are several very strong devs that empower platform tokens to create trading pairs. The main narrative is still meme + coin-stock. The investment logic, the pumping logic, and the narrative are all very clear. As for Arc, it currently seems somewhat chaotic—“only the bold get fed, and the timid starve,” and it can even trap the bold.
(3) The RB chain also has its own signal-leading KOL, while Arc currently doesn’t.
(4) The official side of the RB chain likely offers substantial subsidies, whereas Arc’s official side is probably in a wait-and-see mode. It may also be responding to market feedback, and they’ll also watch how each platform performs. I personally lean toward the official taking a wait-and-see approach.
(5) The ceiling on the leader coin is too low. Obviously, even the whales are watching and not committing enough to stabilize it. Most nights it’s just retracing; people don’t dare to hold.
From the above, Arc needs:
Official subsidies + official support + KOL collaboration + a clear main narrative + platform-token utility/empowerment, etc.