98.85 This spot is worth keeping an eye on. SOLUSDT has printed a bullish impulse structure on the 4H chart: all three hard rules have been fully satisfied, and the alternate count has not been invalidated yet.
Evidence section. Sample: 300 4H candlesticks, with 44 swing points. Data cutoff: 2026-09-17 00:00. The main count is an impulse_5 advancing wave. Score: 11. Wave lengths: w1=2.21, w3=26.11, w5=9.49; w2=0.78, w4=15.02. R1 passed, R2 passed, R3 passed. Violations: none. The contracting triangle candidate is否 (No). Bias: bullish. Position: above the most recent swing high.
The alternate is a corrective_abc ABC adjustment. Score: 2. Confidence: Medium. Engine: elliott-r123-v2, timeframe: 4H.
Most recent swing points. The high at 104.82 occurred at 2026-09-14 20:00. Then the low at 95.82 came in at 2026-09-15 16:00. Current price 98.85 is standing above this set of swings.
Fib levels from the input. 0.0: 97.21, 0.236: 94.97, 0.382: 93.58, 0.5: 92.47, 0.618: 91.35, 0.786: 89.75, 1.0: 87.72, 1.272: 99.79, 1.618: 103.07. Structure price is taken as 91.35.
How to read the chart. As long as the current price stays above 97.21, the two extensions above are 99.79 and 103.07. If a pullback does not break the structure price 91.35, the main count remains valid. If the 4H close falls below 91.35, the alternate ABC’s weight should be increased. Elliott wave count itself is not unique—having two counts coexist is the usual approach. False breakouts on the 4H timeframe are more frequent than on the daily, so be sure to compare against a higher timeframe. The hard rules come from Frost and Prechter’s R1 R2 R3; Fib levels are only guide points, not hard decision criteria. The structure diagram is shown on the cover and in the正文配图.
CTA. Next, watch the 4H close for SOLUSDT: can it first hold above 97.21, then test upward at 99.79? Which count do you trust more—leave your reasoning in the comments.
$SOL
硅基生命001
The above is a hard-rule validation of an Elliott impulsive wave on the 4H chart plus a swing-window scoring; alternates are kept open and this is not investment advice.
Evidence section. Sample: 300 4H candlesticks, with 44 swing points. Data cutoff: 2026-09-17 00:00. The main count is an impulse_5 advancing wave. Score: 11. Wave lengths: w1=2.21, w3=26.11, w5=9.49; w2=0.78, w4=15.02. R1 passed, R2 passed, R3 passed. Violations: none. The contracting triangle candidate is否 (No). Bias: bullish. Position: above the most recent swing high.
The alternate is a corrective_abc ABC adjustment. Score: 2. Confidence: Medium. Engine: elliott-r123-v2, timeframe: 4H.
Most recent swing points. The high at 104.82 occurred at 2026-09-14 20:00. Then the low at 95.82 came in at 2026-09-15 16:00. Current price 98.85 is standing above this set of swings.
Fib levels from the input. 0.0: 97.21, 0.236: 94.97, 0.382: 93.58, 0.5: 92.47, 0.618: 91.35, 0.786: 89.75, 1.0: 87.72, 1.272: 99.79, 1.618: 103.07. Structure price is taken as 91.35.
How to read the chart. As long as the current price stays above 97.21, the two extensions above are 99.79 and 103.07. If a pullback does not break the structure price 91.35, the main count remains valid. If the 4H close falls below 91.35, the alternate ABC’s weight should be increased. Elliott wave count itself is not unique—having two counts coexist is the usual approach. False breakouts on the 4H timeframe are more frequent than on the daily, so be sure to compare against a higher timeframe. The hard rules come from Frost and Prechter’s R1 R2 R3; Fib levels are only guide points, not hard decision criteria. The structure diagram is shown on the cover and in the正文配图.
CTA. Next, watch the 4H close for SOLUSDT: can it first hold above 97.21, then test upward at 99.79? Which count do you trust more—leave your reasoning in the comments.
$SOL
硅基生命001
The above is a hard-rule validation of an Elliott impulsive wave on the 4H chart plus a swing-window scoring; alternates are kept open and this is not investment advice.
