Over the past week, the Gas fees collected by the Robinhood Chain were about around 8M
I pulled the top ten wallets by Gas spend
I also cross-checked the underlying entities behind the corresponding addresses and made this table
FOMO @fomo and the #1 Relay @RelayProtocol have a verified integration relationship
The 2nd place is GMGN
The 3rd is the AA Wallet’s calls
This made me think of two “old friends”
UniversalX and Particle $PARTI
UX, in the previous round, could be considered an “MVP” for a truly full-chain terminal application
The former, as a transaction terminal, is similar to today’s fomo; the latter, as infrastructure, is similar to today’s Relay
Now I can still see many KOLs and smaller players hanging with UX branding
Whenever someone posts about how fast fomo transactions are (sometimes even when it lags and is annoying), UX pops into my mind involuntarily
It’s the same story: solving the problem that users shouldn’t be aware of the chain
For users who have used UX, it isn’t exactly surprising
But right now, there just isn’t much noise in the market
Even it’s hard to make sense of its current status—if it has stopped, there are still occasional movements; if it hasn’t stopped, then this stretch of on-chain market activity has barely moved
From my perspective, UX back then truly秒-killed many other products in terms of the full-chain trading experience
The only annoying part is that AA’s costs are very difficult to bring down from the source
Even today, in terms of experience, it’s still better than many applications doing cross-chain integrations
But there’s simply no noise
The technical direction hasn’t been disproven, and no rug pull has appeared
It just quietly stepped out of the spotlight and into the background—no official announcement of the finale, and no official announcement of a second show
The audience in the stands doesn’t really understand why
......
I pulled the top ten wallets by Gas spend
I also cross-checked the underlying entities behind the corresponding addresses and made this table
FOMO @fomo and the #1 Relay @RelayProtocol have a verified integration relationship
The 2nd place is GMGN
The 3rd is the AA Wallet’s calls
This made me think of two “old friends”
UniversalX and Particle $PARTI
UX, in the previous round, could be considered an “MVP” for a truly full-chain terminal application
The former, as a transaction terminal, is similar to today’s fomo; the latter, as infrastructure, is similar to today’s Relay
Now I can still see many KOLs and smaller players hanging with UX branding
Whenever someone posts about how fast fomo transactions are (sometimes even when it lags and is annoying), UX pops into my mind involuntarily
It’s the same story: solving the problem that users shouldn’t be aware of the chain
For users who have used UX, it isn’t exactly surprising
But right now, there just isn’t much noise in the market
Even it’s hard to make sense of its current status—if it has stopped, there are still occasional movements; if it hasn’t stopped, then this stretch of on-chain market activity has barely moved
From my perspective, UX back then truly秒-killed many other products in terms of the full-chain trading experience
The only annoying part is that AA’s costs are very difficult to bring down from the source
Even today, in terms of experience, it’s still better than many applications doing cross-chain integrations
But there’s simply no noise
The technical direction hasn’t been disproven, and no rug pull has appeared
It just quietly stepped out of the spotlight and into the background—no official announcement of the finale, and no official announcement of a second show
The audience in the stands doesn’t really understand why
......
