The dumbest way, the cruelest result—last year, a fool used a stupid method to make 1 million
Last year, there was a fool in the crypto world who made 1 million using the dumbest approach. The most outrageous part is that 80% of his trading records were losses—yet he survived, and not just survived, but thrived. Why? Because he didn’t care about right or wrong at all. He only did one thing: keep the principal from dying.
He split the principal into multiple parts, set stop-losses properly, and after taking several losing trades in a row, he simply stopped, shut down, and went offline. It sounds like a coward’s move, but it’s a ruthless one—he’s not betting on luck at all; he just avoids every scenario that could blow up.
Are you still studying support levels, drawing lines on K charts? One sentence from him ends it: short-term moving averages are a meat grinder, while long-term moving averages are the real lifeline.
When other people see a massive breakout and rush in driven by FOMO and then lose a lot within three days, he doesn’t even blink. He enters only when the trading volume has shrunk to the extreme—when the community is quiet and nobody is talking, and everyone is still cursing. Other people are fearful and he’s greedy; other people are greedy and he just lies back. Even when adding positions, he only does it when floating gains reach a certain proportion—he stacks upward like a pyramid. While others are still gambling on whether it will go up tomorrow, he has already started locking in profits.
He doesn’t rely on one-shot critical hits—he relies on staying alive. Not making money yet because you’re too desperate to flip everything at once? This year, he keeps using the same old method to lead people for multiple times the returns—dumbest method, cruelest result.
This stuff was never explained in detail in public. If you get it, you get it. One wooden log can’t make a boat; a single sail won’t take you far—if you want to learn, come find me.
Last year, there was a fool in the crypto world who made 1 million using the dumbest approach. The most outrageous part is that 80% of his trading records were losses—yet he survived, and not just survived, but thrived. Why? Because he didn’t care about right or wrong at all. He only did one thing: keep the principal from dying.
He split the principal into multiple parts, set stop-losses properly, and after taking several losing trades in a row, he simply stopped, shut down, and went offline. It sounds like a coward’s move, but it’s a ruthless one—he’s not betting on luck at all; he just avoids every scenario that could blow up.
Are you still studying support levels, drawing lines on K charts? One sentence from him ends it: short-term moving averages are a meat grinder, while long-term moving averages are the real lifeline.
When other people see a massive breakout and rush in driven by FOMO and then lose a lot within three days, he doesn’t even blink. He enters only when the trading volume has shrunk to the extreme—when the community is quiet and nobody is talking, and everyone is still cursing. Other people are fearful and he’s greedy; other people are greedy and he just lies back. Even when adding positions, he only does it when floating gains reach a certain proportion—he stacks upward like a pyramid. While others are still gambling on whether it will go up tomorrow, he has already started locking in profits.
He doesn’t rely on one-shot critical hits—he relies on staying alive. Not making money yet because you’re too desperate to flip everything at once? This year, he keeps using the same old method to lead people for multiple times the returns—dumbest method, cruelest result.
This stuff was never explained in detail in public. If you get it, you get it. One wooden log can’t make a boat; a single sail won’t take you far—if you want to learn, come find me.
