Sun Yuchen’s piece titled “My Girlfriend Jing Tian” has cornered all the trending topics on the entire Chinese internet. My first reaction was to laugh; and as I kept laughing, I thought—this is just too “Sun Yuchen.”
A man with a net worth of $8.5 billion, for more than $30 million in bride price, lays out details of his ex-girlfriend’s private life for the whole internet to watch. You say he’s short on money? No way. You say he’s deeply devoted? Even the ending has a line that says, “This article is entirely fictional.”
It’s like the pump-and-dump tactics commonly seen in the crypto circle—you think it’s value discovery, but in reality it’s attention being cashed out. Sun Yuchen has always understood this: the Buffett lunch was filmed and then he didn’t go, using the heat for two waves; he paid $6.2 million for a banana and ate it publicly, getting headlines everywhere. His life is a continuous “market-making” of attention—every incident is like an “on-chain” moment, turning controversy, gossip, and shock value into traffic and exposure.
But you need to see the essence clearly: attention can pump prices, and it can also dump them. The most worth-guarding in this incident isn’t the melodramatic plot—it’s that the founder’s public-opinion risk is now transmitting to related assets. Tron TRX, HTX, and the Trump coin he’s deeply tied to are, in essence, “Sun Yuchen concept stocks.” When the founder’s public image shifts from “the king of crypto marketing” to “the male lead in a relationship dispute,” the fragility of the chip structure gets amplified.
More subtly, there’s the detail that’s been mentioned again and again: when Jing Tian asked him, “Can you come to Beijing?” he went silent. Behind that silence lie questions about travel restrictions, regulatory risk, and asset liquidity. For someone who can’t even get back to the capital, how much of his wealth is paper glory, and how much is real cash in hand—let the market weigh it.
Gossip is for looking at, not for paying for the story. The iron rules of the crypto world have never changed: the more noisy the founder is, the more calmly you must think. He’s cashed in all that attention—yet you might end up becoming the cost of the attention economy.
The person who bought $SOL at 75, today their face is finally smiling 😂 From 75.39 (Sell Avg) to 108.44 — that means a 43% move! And this isn’t some random pump—it's a STEADY climb: • 7 Days: +32% • 30 Days: +43% • 90 Days: +31% BUT — 1 Year: -44% — which means old holders are still in the “waiting to come to breakeven” mode 💀 Look at the chart—the pattern shows consistent higher lows and consistent higher highs. This has a “recovery” vibe, not a “pump and dump” vibe. Funny part: People who entered at 75 and saw it drop to 65 thinking “Should I sell?”—today are seeing a 40% profit. And people buying at 108 right now will have to think, “Wasn’t the top last week?” In the order book, there are 47.78% sellers—so the “booking profit” mode is strong. When so many people are selling at the top, what happens next? This is what happens with Solana too—slow recovery ↗️, then a crash in a day or two ↘️, then back to recovery 😅 Did someone recently enter with SOL? Or are you still waiting for the recovery to complete? 👇 #SOL #solanAnalysis #RecoveryStory #CryptoReality
Imagine one basket filled with Airdrops, Red Packets, Trading Rewards, Token Vouchers, CreatorPad rewards, Write-to-Earn opportunities and VIP benefits. 🚀
That’s what makes the Binance ecosystem exciting — it’s not only about trading, but also about discovering new opportunities, participating in campaigns and sharing rewards with the community.
And today, Shaheen69 is opening the gift basket for YOU! 🎉
I’m sharing Red Packet rewards with all of you as a small thank-you for your continued support and love. ❤️
“Reuters” reveals Meta’s predicament after AI layoffs: Cybersecurity incidents up 40%, time spent cleaning up up 70%
In recent months, social media giant Meta has repeatedly carried out mass layoffs to develop AI. In a follow-up report published by Reuters on August 26, it noted that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg had already proposed an AI transformation plan as early as January this year. The initiative, code-named Organization Transformation (OT), aims to move Meta toward an “AI-native” operating model, where AI takes over much of the daily work originally handled by employees, leaving only smaller teams with higher talent density to oversee operations. After news of Meta’s layoffs plan leaked in March, employee morale was hit hard, and supervisors were even told to play down the handling—only informing teams that their future roles would “evolve” because of AI.
According to an internal post by Meta’s CTO Andrew in June, the amount of code written by employees using AI has grown year over year by up to 220%, but the number of new features or upgrades that were actually deployed to benefit users has grown by only 36%. Instead of improving performance, the wave of AI-assisted coding has raised concerns about reliability, leading to “large-scale, disruptive AI agent behavior.” As a result, major technical and cybersecurity incidents increased by 40% compared with the same period last year, and the time employees spent “cleaning up” issues surged by 70%.$AAPL.US
Let me say something that might get me criticized:
If you’re going all-in around the $80,000 BTC level, you’re either a real pro or a real rookie.
From $62,000 to $79,000—up 27% in two weeks.
It moves fast, but the risk isn’t small either.
At the $80,000 level, there’s resistance from the previous highs above, and selling pressure from profit-takers below—no matter how you look at it, it doesn’t seem like a place for “safe full allocation.”
But I also understand those who are fully allocated:
After being sidelined for more than half a month, you finally chased in—while everyone around you is making money. It creates anxiety. You believe the bull market just started. To you, $80,000 is only the foot of the mountain.
With trading, though, position management matters more than directional judgment.
If you get the direction wrong, with a lighter position you can still hold on;
If you get the direction right, with a heavy position one pullback can wipe you out.