路人1688-luren

There was once a sincere love placed before me, but I didn’t cherish it. If Heaven were to give me another chance, I would like to tell her that my love for you is like the surging, unending Yangtze River, flowing endlessly…

To live a sweet life, you need to stock up on some BNB. Stay upright in mind and invest with value. $GOOGL.US

Hello everyone

Hello everyone

In what year did the flowers bloom at their most splendid, yet you couldn’t see me…

Even if my wife is as beautiful as a flower, I can’t stand being played around with. That’s human nature: wanting this and wanting that… $AAPLB

There are many beautiful landscapes. The road ahead will be smooth, with wealth and prosperity close by. Let’s encourage each other.

When you feel like nothing matters, you can go out and take a walk. After all, different environments hold different people and different things. Experience different life scripts—after all, we’re just here to experience… why take it so seriously?

Hello everyone. Please pay attention to each other and repost it. $NVDAB

Good evening everyone.

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk #dusk $ACE $APR $DUSK @Dusk
I've been thinking: if I buy a copy of XSC security with Moonlight DUSK, then the entire transaction should probably inherit the same kind of visibility settings. On one side, Moonlight handles payments.
But Dusk doesn’t make the payment side and the asset side fully align in this respect—“agreement,” so to speak.
Moonlight can show the sender, recipient, amount, and the movement of the public account balances for DUSK. That’s normal for Moonlight. Then on the XSC side, it’s carried by Zedger, and that confidential security ownership doesn’t become public just because a payment occurs.
So, wait.
In the same transaction, with the same underlying settlement, there are still two separate visibility rules?
That’s the part I’ve been circling around, because my brain wants that after DuskDS settlement, what Moonlight sees should look the same as what XSC sees: Moonlight’s DUSK moves here, and XSC’s ownership moves there—since both sides have settled, visibility should match too.
But obviously it doesn’t.
On the Moonlight side, you could say:
“Yes, all these DUSK have already moved.”
And on Zedger’s side, it can keep the XSC holder’s position within the confidential ownership. Selective disclosure can reveal the information the XSC side actually needs to reveal, without completely opening up the entire XSC holding positions in Zedger to everyone who’s already watching the Moonlight payment.
So then, who can see the XSC side?
It won’t automatically be the same people who can track the public DUSK movements.
It still makes me feel a bit like, “something’s broken,” because the Moonlight DUSK might be obvious, while the XSC ownership held by Zedger is still not.
Both sides run on the same DuskDS settlement.
And it seems like they were completed together, yet it didn’t make them visible and aligned.
#dusk @Dusk