#dusk $DUSK @Dusk #dusk $ACE $APR $DUSK @Dusk
I've been thinking: if I buy a copy of XSC security with Moonlight DUSK, then the entire transaction should probably inherit the same kind of visibility settings. On one side, Moonlight handles payments.
But Dusk doesn’t make the payment side and the asset side fully align in this respect—“agreement,” so to speak.
Moonlight can show the sender, recipient, amount, and the movement of the public account balances for DUSK. That’s normal for Moonlight. Then on the XSC side, it’s carried by Zedger, and that confidential security ownership doesn’t become public just because a payment occurs.
So, wait.
In the same transaction, with the same underlying settlement, there are still two separate visibility rules?
That’s the part I’ve been circling around, because my brain wants that after DuskDS settlement, what Moonlight sees should look the same as what XSC sees: Moonlight’s DUSK moves here, and XSC’s ownership moves there—since both sides have settled, visibility should match too.
But obviously it doesn’t.
On the Moonlight side, you could say:
“Yes, all these DUSK have already moved.”
And on Zedger’s side, it can keep the XSC holder’s position within the confidential ownership. Selective disclosure can reveal the information the XSC side actually needs to reveal, without completely opening up the entire XSC holding positions in Zedger to everyone who’s already watching the Moonlight payment.
So then, who can see the XSC side?
It won’t automatically be the same people who can track the public DUSK movements.
It still makes me feel a bit like, “something’s broken,” because the Moonlight DUSK might be obvious, while the XSC ownership held by Zedger is still not.
Both sides run on the same DuskDS settlement.
And it seems like they were completed together, yet it didn’t make them visible and aligned.
#dusk @Dusk
I've been thinking: if I buy a copy of XSC security with Moonlight DUSK, then the entire transaction should probably inherit the same kind of visibility settings. On one side, Moonlight handles payments.
But Dusk doesn’t make the payment side and the asset side fully align in this respect—“agreement,” so to speak.
Moonlight can show the sender, recipient, amount, and the movement of the public account balances for DUSK. That’s normal for Moonlight. Then on the XSC side, it’s carried by Zedger, and that confidential security ownership doesn’t become public just because a payment occurs.
So, wait.
In the same transaction, with the same underlying settlement, there are still two separate visibility rules?
That’s the part I’ve been circling around, because my brain wants that after DuskDS settlement, what Moonlight sees should look the same as what XSC sees: Moonlight’s DUSK moves here, and XSC’s ownership moves there—since both sides have settled, visibility should match too.
But obviously it doesn’t.
On the Moonlight side, you could say:
“Yes, all these DUSK have already moved.”
And on Zedger’s side, it can keep the XSC holder’s position within the confidential ownership. Selective disclosure can reveal the information the XSC side actually needs to reveal, without completely opening up the entire XSC holding positions in Zedger to everyone who’s already watching the Moonlight payment.
So then, who can see the XSC side?
It won’t automatically be the same people who can track the public DUSK movements.
It still makes me feel a bit like, “something’s broken,” because the Moonlight DUSK might be obvious, while the XSC ownership held by Zedger is still not.
Both sides run on the same DuskDS settlement.
And it seems like they were completed together, yet it didn’t make them visible and aligned.
#dusk @Dusk