Crypto Industry PAC Dumps $2 Million, But Won’t Mention Crypto
In a Florida congressional primary, a pro-crypto political action committee splashed $2 million on ads.
Strangely, the ads almost never mention crypto at all—everything is about the price of living, jobs, and inflation, the usual issues.
The money was spent; the words “crypto” weren’t said even once. This isn’t stupidity—it’s cleverness.
The crypto industry has learned: spend money on positions, not slogans.
After all, the polls are right there. Regular voters don’t really care about crypto, but they’re very sensitive to the cost of living. Calling for “crypto” slogans can backfire.
Get your people elected first, then talk policy—that’s the grown-up way to play.
This tactic has already been proven in Michigan, Ohio, and Nevada: the win rate for pro-crypto lawmakers backed by this strategy isn’t low.
Only after the lawmakers they paid for take seats in Congress—once the Clarity Act and the stablecoin bill become realistic prospects—can real implementation hope to happen.
In the past, the crypto industry in Washington only got hit. Now it’s learned to spend money to make friends. In politics—which is a business—the tuition finally hasn’t been paid in vain.
The data is right in front of you: over the past two election cycles, crypto-related political donations have multiplied several times, and the effects are slowly starting to show.
Do you think paying money to win policy is a workable path? Let us know in the comments—I bet many people can’t wait to see the results.
Click the profile avatar to watch the livestream.
Every day, I’ll take you to track crypto political hot topics—not just what happened in the news, but also the logic and opportunities behind it 👉🦖
#加密政治 #US election
In a Florida congressional primary, a pro-crypto political action committee splashed $2 million on ads.
Strangely, the ads almost never mention crypto at all—everything is about the price of living, jobs, and inflation, the usual issues.
The money was spent; the words “crypto” weren’t said even once. This isn’t stupidity—it’s cleverness.
The crypto industry has learned: spend money on positions, not slogans.
After all, the polls are right there. Regular voters don’t really care about crypto, but they’re very sensitive to the cost of living. Calling for “crypto” slogans can backfire.
Get your people elected first, then talk policy—that’s the grown-up way to play.
This tactic has already been proven in Michigan, Ohio, and Nevada: the win rate for pro-crypto lawmakers backed by this strategy isn’t low.
Only after the lawmakers they paid for take seats in Congress—once the Clarity Act and the stablecoin bill become realistic prospects—can real implementation hope to happen.
In the past, the crypto industry in Washington only got hit. Now it’s learned to spend money to make friends. In politics—which is a business—the tuition finally hasn’t been paid in vain.
The data is right in front of you: over the past two election cycles, crypto-related political donations have multiplied several times, and the effects are slowly starting to show.
Do you think paying money to win policy is a workable path? Let us know in the comments—I bet many people can’t wait to see the results.
Click the profile avatar to watch the livestream.
Every day, I’ll take you to track crypto political hot topics—not just what happened in the news, but also the logic and opportunities behind it 👉🦖
#加密政治 #US election