I was watching to a single DUSK detail that looks small on paper user fees do not just pay for network activity, part of that flow also feeds the 10% development share.
At first I treated block emission as the obvious metric. That is too shallow.
DUSK can fund development from two behaviors: scheduled issuance and actual usage. One is subsidy. The other is users creating enough economic activity to help fund the system themselves.
That is the real test for me. As emission falls, does fee-funded development become a larger share of total development revenue? Does fee revenue per DUSK emitted rise because settlement activity is genuinely growing, or simply because subsidy is shrinking?
The 19.8574 DUSK block figure also looks cleaner than the underlying schedule probably is. If multiplying that rounded rate does not exactly reproduce the published four-year total, that is not a scandal. Still, precision matters when people model supply.
There is another split people miss 500M vested supply and 500M scheduled emission are completely different sources of DUSK.
What I am watching now is whether usage gradually replaces subsidy. If it does not, development funding stays more dependent on issuance than the surface story suggests.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK #dusk $DUSK @Dusk
At first I treated block emission as the obvious metric. That is too shallow.
DUSK can fund development from two behaviors: scheduled issuance and actual usage. One is subsidy. The other is users creating enough economic activity to help fund the system themselves.
That is the real test for me. As emission falls, does fee-funded development become a larger share of total development revenue? Does fee revenue per DUSK emitted rise because settlement activity is genuinely growing, or simply because subsidy is shrinking?
The 19.8574 DUSK block figure also looks cleaner than the underlying schedule probably is. If multiplying that rounded rate does not exactly reproduce the published four-year total, that is not a scandal. Still, precision matters when people model supply.
There is another split people miss 500M vested supply and 500M scheduled emission are completely different sources of DUSK.
What I am watching now is whether usage gradually replaces subsidy. If it does not, development funding stays more dependent on issuance than the surface story suggests.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK #dusk $DUSK @Dusk
