My department head at the company just sold a plot of land and wants to set aside about 5,000 USD to trade coins. Since he’s not yet familiar with P2P, he asked me to sit next to him to guide him in buying USDT on Binance. After reviewing the partner’s profile, completion rate, and terms, he places the Order, copies the payment information to the banking app, and then hands me his phone to show me before he transfers.

I reopen the Order and place two screens side by side. The bank, account number, recipient name, and the amount shown on the banking app are read out again in the exact order shown in the Order. He asks why he needs to copy directly from Binance and then check again; I tell him to just look at the banking app screen, because it’s the data there that will be used when he taps to transfer.

I have this habit after reading Binance’s warning about clipper malware that can interfere with the clipboard—for example, changing the copied crypto address. That warning doesn’t say that the information in a P2P Order is altered; instead, I use the Order as a reference point to verify the data after it has gone through the device. If the two screens are off by even one detail, I won’t pay.

When I can’t verify, I go back to the exact Order, exchange in the P2P Chat, and I don’t accept a different account via any external channel to speed things up. If there’s still a problem, the Order ID and proof of payment are kept for an Appeal or to request help from Binance; that way, the handling remains tied to the Order while the crypto is protected under the Escrow mechanism.

That day everything matched, so he only tapped to transfer after confirming. I didn’t give him an extra long list after the transaction; I just reminded him to keep the same steps for the next time: after copying, look back at the correct banking app screen once more. The money only goes when that screen matches the Order.

#BinanceP2PAnToan @Binance Vietnam $CYS $BLUAI