Binance Square
橙子Joyce
810 Posts

橙子Joyce

价值投资者:以十年为单位投资美股及BTC.ETH.BNB.SOL.推特X:@Joyce88ai
BNB Holder
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
8.6 Years
631 Following
28.8K+ Followers
31.8K+ Liked
Posts
PINNED
·
--
AI companies reach out for help: OpenAI records computer actions, while Google uses uploaded content to train AI. Axios begins investigating what user data AI companies are actually collecting. The findings show that chat logs aren’t enough anymore. Now they also want to know what you click on your computer, what photos you upload, and what content you’ve viewed—then use that data for memory, personalization, and advertising. OpenAI has added Computer History. Once Mac users manually enable it, ChatGPT and Codex can record your clicks, inputs, and switches within specific apps and websites, gradually building a long-term work memory about you. The feature is turned off by default; it doesn’t record your screen or audio. OpenAI says temporary action logs won’t be used to train its models. Google is even more aggressive. A new Search Services History will save images, documents, and audio/video that users upload through services like Lens, Search Live, and Translate—and it can also be used to train generative AI. For accounts that meet the criteria, it’s enabled by default; if you want to opt out, you have to do it yourself. Even some data that is later unlinked from an account may be retained for up to 4 years after entering the training process. Advertising has kept up too. Meta will use users’ interactions with Meta AI to adjust the content and ads on Facebook and Instagram; OpenAI and Google are also exploring ad models for chatbots. The better AI understands you, the more detailed the “portrait” the ad system has in its hands. What used to be a concern was that chat logs would be used for training. Now, even how you work on your computer—and what you throw into Google—has started to become data in the hands of AI companies.
AI companies reach out for help: OpenAI records computer actions, while Google uses uploaded content to train AI.

Axios begins investigating what user data AI companies are actually collecting.

The findings show that chat logs aren’t enough anymore. Now they also want to know what you click on your computer, what photos you upload, and what content you’ve viewed—then use that data for memory, personalization, and advertising.

OpenAI has added Computer History. Once Mac users manually enable it, ChatGPT and Codex can record your clicks, inputs, and switches within specific apps and websites, gradually building a long-term work memory about you. The feature is turned off by default; it doesn’t record your screen or audio. OpenAI says temporary action logs won’t be used to train its models.

Google is even more aggressive. A new Search Services History will save images, documents, and audio/video that users upload through services like Lens, Search Live, and Translate—and it can also be used to train generative AI. For accounts that meet the criteria, it’s enabled by default; if you want to opt out, you have to do it yourself. Even some data that is later unlinked from an account may be retained for up to 4 years after entering the training process.

Advertising has kept up too. Meta will use users’ interactions with Meta AI to adjust the content and ads on Facebook and Instagram; OpenAI and Google are also exploring ad models for chatbots. The better AI understands you, the more detailed the “portrait” the ad system has in its hands.

What used to be a concern was that chat logs would be used for training. Now, even how you work on your computer—and what you throw into Google—has started to become data in the hands of AI companies.
PINNED
Verified
Article
No matter whether open-source AI wins or closed-source AI wins, cybersecurity will be the ultimate winner! Palo Alto and CrowdStrike seize the windfall of the AI inference era!The Wall Street financial giant Wells Fargo Bank recently released a research report stating that cybersecurity supergiant $CrowdStrike (CRWD.US)$ and $Palo Alto Networks (PANW.US)$ are seeing momentum in growth of orders for cybersecurity software products driven by the rapid expansion of the AI inference market. After AI moves into the stage of large-scale, massive inference and AI intelligent agent-style workflows (Agentic AI), cybersecurity demand is not simply likely to accelerate growth by “updating and iterating alongside cutting-edge AI technologies.” Instead, it may see a structural incremental expansion far beyond traditional IT spending.

No matter whether open-source AI wins or closed-source AI wins, cybersecurity will be the ultimate winner! Palo Alto and CrowdStrike seize the windfall of the AI inference era!

The Wall Street financial giant Wells Fargo Bank recently released a research report stating that cybersecurity supergiant $CrowdStrike (CRWD.US)$ and $Palo Alto Networks (PANW.US)$ are seeing momentum in growth of orders for cybersecurity software products driven by the rapid expansion of the AI inference market. After AI moves into the stage of large-scale, massive inference and AI intelligent agent-style workflows (Agentic AI), cybersecurity demand is not simply likely to accelerate growth by “updating and iterating alongside cutting-edge AI technologies.” Instead, it may see a structural incremental expansion far beyond traditional IT spending.
PANWUS-0.12%
CRWDUS-0.44%
ZSUS+0.73%
橙子Joyce
·
--
No matter whether open-source AI wins or closed-source AI wins, cybersecurity will be the ultimate winner! Palo Alto and CrowdStrike seize the windfall of the AI inference era!
The Wall Street financial giant Wells Fargo Bank recently released a research report stating that cybersecurity supergiant $CrowdStrike (CRWD.US)$ and $Palo Alto Networks (PANW.US)$ are seeing momentum in growth of orders for cybersecurity software products driven by the rapid expansion of the AI inference market. After AI moves into the stage of large-scale, massive inference and AI intelligent agent-style workflows (Agentic AI), cybersecurity demand is not simply likely to accelerate growth by “updating and iterating alongside cutting-edge AI technologies.” Instead, it may see a structural incremental expansion far beyond traditional IT spending.
橙子Joyce
·
--
No matter whether open-source AI wins or closed-source AI wins, cybersecurity will be the ultimate winner! Palo Alto and CrowdStrike seize the windfall of the AI inference era!
The Wall Street financial giant Wells Fargo Bank recently released a research report stating that cybersecurity supergiant $CrowdStrike (CRWD.US)$ and $Palo Alto Networks (PANW.US)$ are seeing momentum in growth of orders for cybersecurity software products driven by the rapid expansion of the AI inference market. After AI moves into the stage of large-scale, massive inference and AI intelligent agent-style workflows (Agentic AI), cybersecurity demand is not simply likely to accelerate growth by “updating and iterating alongside cutting-edge AI technologies.” Instead, it may see a structural incremental expansion far beyond traditional IT spending.
大仁Jaron
·
--
On August 18, MaxForAI disclosed that an AI project called J-Space Cognition Suite, which has gone viral on the X platform today, is facing criticism from the community. The claim is that the DeepSeek V4 test results promoted by the project cannot be reproduced. The project previously stated that with V4 Flash combined with J-Space, it could match GLM-5.3, and that V4 Pro could surpass Fable 5 on multiple Agent Benchmarks while improving speed by 2.53x and token efficiency by 2.21x.

GitHub user GoForceX used the 87-question subset from Terminal Bench 2.1 to perform high-concurrency re-tests and confirmed that the J-Space related modules were loaded. The results showed that after adding J-Space, the benchmark scores actually dropped slightly, while token usage and cost both increased—opposite to the performance, speed, and token-efficiency improvement directions claimed by the project.

The community subsequently requested that the project release the complete evaluation configuration, per-question results, run logs, original runtimes, and data such as token consumption. So far, the project has mainly published aggregated results and has not provided complete raw experimental records sufficient to verify the precise data mentioned above. Notably, in response to the criticisms, the project’s authors previously said that the relevant data were “indeed exaggerated,” adding that the real improvements are roughly in the range of 1.6x to 3x. As of now, the author has not issued an official response to the community’s concerns, and some related Issues have been deleted.

🧧🧧🧧Reply 221 gets $SOL 🧧🧧🧧
🎁🎁🎁👇👇👇🎁🎁🎁
从0开始1688
·
--
Meta’s "life-or-death trial" begins today: Attorneys general from 29 states team up to hold it accountable—if it loses, it may face a "sky-high" fine of $1.4 trillion
The lawsuit alleges that Facebook and Instagram were deliberately designed as "addictive products," harming tens of millions of underage users. Meta estimates its maximum fine exposure could be as high as $1.4 trillion, nearing its current market value. Zuckerberg will personally testify in court, and the ruling could reshape the business model of the entire social media industry.
Meta’s highest-risk legal battle to date officially began on Tuesday. The lawsuit, filed jointly by the attorneys general of 29 U.S. states, could not only force the social media giant to pay a record-breaking economic price, but also fundamentally change how its platforms operate.
橙子Joyce
·
--
AI companies reach out for help: OpenAI records computer actions, while Google uses uploaded content to train AI.

Axios begins investigating what user data AI companies are actually collecting.

The findings show that chat logs aren’t enough anymore. Now they also want to know what you click on your computer, what photos you upload, and what content you’ve viewed—then use that data for memory, personalization, and advertising.

OpenAI has added Computer History. Once Mac users manually enable it, ChatGPT and Codex can record your clicks, inputs, and switches within specific apps and websites, gradually building a long-term work memory about you. The feature is turned off by default; it doesn’t record your screen or audio. OpenAI says temporary action logs won’t be used to train its models.

Google is even more aggressive. A new Search Services History will save images, documents, and audio/video that users upload through services like Lens, Search Live, and Translate—and it can also be used to train generative AI. For accounts that meet the criteria, it’s enabled by default; if you want to opt out, you have to do it yourself. Even some data that is later unlinked from an account may be retained for up to 4 years after entering the training process.

Advertising has kept up too. Meta will use users’ interactions with Meta AI to adjust the content and ads on Facebook and Instagram; OpenAI and Google are also exploring ad models for chatbots. The better AI understands you, the more detailed the “portrait” the ad system has in its hands.

What used to be a concern was that chat logs would be used for training. Now, even how you work on your computer—and what you throw into Google—has started to become data in the hands of AI companies.
橙子Joyce
·
--
No matter whether open-source AI wins or closed-source AI wins, cybersecurity will be the ultimate winner! Palo Alto and CrowdStrike seize the windfall of the AI inference era!
The Wall Street financial giant Wells Fargo Bank recently released a research report stating that cybersecurity supergiant $CrowdStrike (CRWD.US)$ and $Palo Alto Networks (PANW.US)$ are seeing momentum in growth of orders for cybersecurity software products driven by the rapid expansion of the AI inference market. After AI moves into the stage of large-scale, massive inference and AI intelligent agent-style workflows (Agentic AI), cybersecurity demand is not simply likely to accelerate growth by “updating and iterating alongside cutting-edge AI technologies.” Instead, it may see a structural incremental expansion far beyond traditional IT spending.
橙子Joyce
·
--
AI companies reach out for help: OpenAI records computer actions, while Google uses uploaded content to train AI.

Axios begins investigating what user data AI companies are actually collecting.

The findings show that chat logs aren’t enough anymore. Now they also want to know what you click on your computer, what photos you upload, and what content you’ve viewed—then use that data for memory, personalization, and advertising.

OpenAI has added Computer History. Once Mac users manually enable it, ChatGPT and Codex can record your clicks, inputs, and switches within specific apps and websites, gradually building a long-term work memory about you. The feature is turned off by default; it doesn’t record your screen or audio. OpenAI says temporary action logs won’t be used to train its models.

Google is even more aggressive. A new Search Services History will save images, documents, and audio/video that users upload through services like Lens, Search Live, and Translate—and it can also be used to train generative AI. For accounts that meet the criteria, it’s enabled by default; if you want to opt out, you have to do it yourself. Even some data that is later unlinked from an account may be retained for up to 4 years after entering the training process.

Advertising has kept up too. Meta will use users’ interactions with Meta AI to adjust the content and ads on Facebook and Instagram; OpenAI and Google are also exploring ad models for chatbots. The better AI understands you, the more detailed the “portrait” the ad system has in its hands.

What used to be a concern was that chat logs would be used for training. Now, even how you work on your computer—and what you throw into Google—has started to become data in the hands of AI companies.
橙子Joyce
·
--
No matter whether open-source AI wins or closed-source AI wins, cybersecurity will be the ultimate winner! Palo Alto and CrowdStrike seize the windfall of the AI inference era!
The Wall Street financial giant Wells Fargo Bank recently released a research report stating that cybersecurity supergiant $CrowdStrike (CRWD.US)$ and $Palo Alto Networks (PANW.US)$ are seeing momentum in growth of orders for cybersecurity software products driven by the rapid expansion of the AI inference market. After AI moves into the stage of large-scale, massive inference and AI intelligent agent-style workflows (Agentic AI), cybersecurity demand is not simply likely to accelerate growth by “updating and iterating alongside cutting-edge AI technologies.” Instead, it may see a structural incremental expansion far beyond traditional IT spending.
橙子Joyce
·
--
No matter whether open-source AI wins or closed-source AI wins, cybersecurity will be the ultimate winner! Palo Alto and CrowdStrike seize the windfall of the AI inference era!
The Wall Street financial giant Wells Fargo Bank recently released a research report stating that cybersecurity supergiant $CrowdStrike (CRWD.US)$ and $Palo Alto Networks (PANW.US)$ are seeing momentum in growth of orders for cybersecurity software products driven by the rapid expansion of the AI inference market. After AI moves into the stage of large-scale, massive inference and AI intelligent agent-style workflows (Agentic AI), cybersecurity demand is not simply likely to accelerate growth by “updating and iterating alongside cutting-edge AI technologies.” Instead, it may see a structural incremental expansion far beyond traditional IT spending.
橙子Joyce
·
--
No matter whether open-source AI wins or closed-source AI wins, cybersecurity will be the ultimate winner! Palo Alto and CrowdStrike seize the windfall of the AI inference era!
The Wall Street financial giant Wells Fargo Bank recently released a research report stating that cybersecurity supergiant $CrowdStrike (CRWD.US)$ and $Palo Alto Networks (PANW.US)$ are seeing momentum in growth of orders for cybersecurity software products driven by the rapid expansion of the AI inference market. After AI moves into the stage of large-scale, massive inference and AI intelligent agent-style workflows (Agentic AI), cybersecurity demand is not simply likely to accelerate growth by “updating and iterating alongside cutting-edge AI technologies.” Instead, it may see a structural incremental expansion far beyond traditional IT spending.
橙子Joyce
·
--
AI companies reach out for help: OpenAI records computer actions, while Google uses uploaded content to train AI.

Axios begins investigating what user data AI companies are actually collecting.

The findings show that chat logs aren’t enough anymore. Now they also want to know what you click on your computer, what photos you upload, and what content you’ve viewed—then use that data for memory, personalization, and advertising.

OpenAI has added Computer History. Once Mac users manually enable it, ChatGPT and Codex can record your clicks, inputs, and switches within specific apps and websites, gradually building a long-term work memory about you. The feature is turned off by default; it doesn’t record your screen or audio. OpenAI says temporary action logs won’t be used to train its models.

Google is even more aggressive. A new Search Services History will save images, documents, and audio/video that users upload through services like Lens, Search Live, and Translate—and it can also be used to train generative AI. For accounts that meet the criteria, it’s enabled by default; if you want to opt out, you have to do it yourself. Even some data that is later unlinked from an account may be retained for up to 4 years after entering the training process.

Advertising has kept up too. Meta will use users’ interactions with Meta AI to adjust the content and ads on Facebook and Instagram; OpenAI and Google are also exploring ad models for chatbots. The better AI understands you, the more detailed the “portrait” the ad system has in its hands.

What used to be a concern was that chat logs would be used for training. Now, even how you work on your computer—and what you throw into Google—has started to become data in the hands of AI companies.
大仁Jaron
·
--
On August 18, MaxForAI disclosed that an AI project called J-Space Cognition Suite, which has gone viral on the X platform today, is facing criticism from the community. The claim is that the DeepSeek V4 test results promoted by the project cannot be reproduced. The project previously stated that with V4 Flash combined with J-Space, it could match GLM-5.3, and that V4 Pro could surpass Fable 5 on multiple Agent Benchmarks while improving speed by 2.53x and token efficiency by 2.21x.

GitHub user GoForceX used the 87-question subset from Terminal Bench 2.1 to perform high-concurrency re-tests and confirmed that the J-Space related modules were loaded. The results showed that after adding J-Space, the benchmark scores actually dropped slightly, while token usage and cost both increased—opposite to the performance, speed, and token-efficiency improvement directions claimed by the project.

The community subsequently requested that the project release the complete evaluation configuration, per-question results, run logs, original runtimes, and data such as token consumption. So far, the project has mainly published aggregated results and has not provided complete raw experimental records sufficient to verify the precise data mentioned above. Notably, in response to the criticisms, the project’s authors previously said that the relevant data were “indeed exaggerated,” adding that the real improvements are roughly in the range of 1.6x to 3x. As of now, the author has not issued an official response to the community’s concerns, and some related Issues have been deleted.

🧧🧧🧧Reply 221 gets $SOL 🧧🧧🧧
🎁🎁🎁👇👇👇🎁🎁🎁
Verified
Article
Global Super-Rich Pile Into SpaceX (SPCX.US) Collectively—More Than a Dozen Family Offices Hold at Least $3.8 Billion!Super-rich families of billionaires in the United States and across the globe are making large bets on SpaceX (SPCX.US). The latest regulatory filings show that several family offices from the Americas, Europe, and the Middle East have already built SpaceX holdings worth billions of dollars, indicating that ultra-wealthy investors—backed by strong capital—are increasingly occupying an important position in popular investment opportunities. According to an aggregation of media reports on second-quarter 13F regulatory filings, as of the end of June, the family office of Nick Pritzker, the heir to the Hyatt Hotels fortune, held about $1.8 billion worth of SpaceX shares. At that time, it had been only a few weeks since SpaceX completed its initial public offering, and the company’s business spans rocket launches, satellite communications, and artificial intelligence, among other areas. Other super-rich individuals have also built substantial positions.

Global Super-Rich Pile Into SpaceX (SPCX.US) Collectively—More Than a Dozen Family Offices Hold at Least $3.8 Billion!

Super-rich families of billionaires in the United States and across the globe are making large bets on SpaceX (SPCX.US). The latest regulatory filings show that several family offices from the Americas, Europe, and the Middle East have already built SpaceX holdings worth billions of dollars, indicating that ultra-wealthy investors—backed by strong capital—are increasingly occupying an important position in popular investment opportunities. According to an aggregation of media reports on second-quarter 13F regulatory filings, as of the end of June, the family office of Nick Pritzker, the heir to the Hyatt Hotels fortune, held about $1.8 billion worth of SpaceX shares. At that time, it had been only a few weeks since SpaceX completed its initial public offering, and the company’s business spans rocket launches, satellite communications, and artificial intelligence, among other areas. Other super-rich individuals have also built substantial positions.
SPCXB-1.47%
TSLAUS-0.78%
AMZNUS-0.47%
Article
An Apple research team ran a reinforcement learning experiment with 9 models and 11 languages to find out: if the training data is only in one language, can the model’s problem-solving abilities be applied to questions in other languages?The answer is yes, and the effect is quite noticeable. Training with only one language still makes the model stronger across many other languages as well. For example, on a French test, training directly in French improved the average score by 25.6 percentage points. If you don’t train in French at all and only use Spanish questions for practice, you can still improve the score on the French test by 24.6 percentage points—just a 1-point difference. What the model learns isn’t only problem-solving for a single language; it also learns some problem-solving methods that can be transferred and continued to be used in other languages. So in the future, if you want to strengthen the model’s Chinese reasoning, you may not need to remake all reinforcement learning data into Chinese.

An Apple research team ran a reinforcement learning experiment with 9 models and 11 languages to find out: if the training data is only in one language, can the model’s problem-solving abilities be applied to questions in other languages?

The answer is yes, and the effect is quite noticeable. Training with only one language still makes the model stronger across many other languages as well.
For example, on a French test, training directly in French improved the average score by 25.6 percentage points. If you don’t train in French at all and only use Spanish questions for practice, you can still improve the score on the French test by 24.6 percentage points—just a 1-point difference.
What the model learns isn’t only problem-solving for a single language; it also learns some problem-solving methods that can be transferred and continued to be used in other languages. So in the future, if you want to strengthen the model’s Chinese reasoning, you may not need to remake all reinforcement learning data into Chinese.
Partly True
Article
In a report published by Goldman Sachs on August 14, it said that during this year’s second-quarter earnings season, only 2% of the constituents of the $S&P 500 Index (.SPX.US)$ had quantified the specific impact of AI on earnings!Goldman Sachs strategist Ben Schneidau said that companies are increasing their investments in artificial intelligence (AI) at an unprecedented pace, yet for most firms, this technology has not yet translated into tangible improvements in earnings. In a report published by Goldman Sachs on August 14, it said that during this year’s second-quarter earnings season, only 2% of the constituents of the $S&P 500 Index (.SPX.US)$ had quantified the specific impact of AI on earnings. Another 11% said they had observed measurable productivity gains in specific areas such as software programming and customer support. However, the companies that have implemented these efficiency improvements have not significantly outperformed overall market levels in terms of profit growth. Data shows that their median year-over-year profit growth was 17%, while companies that have not quantified the contribution of AI efficiencies were at 14%. Goldman Sachs noted that this gap is not statistically significant.

In a report published by Goldman Sachs on August 14, it said that during this year’s second-quarter earnings season, only 2% of the constituents of the $S&P 500 Index (.SPX.US)$ had quantified the specific impact of AI on earnings!

Goldman Sachs strategist Ben Schneidau said that companies are increasing their investments in artificial intelligence (AI) at an unprecedented pace, yet for most firms, this technology has not yet translated into tangible improvements in earnings.
In a report published by Goldman Sachs on August 14, it said that during this year’s second-quarter earnings season, only 2% of the constituents of the $S&P 500 Index (.SPX.US)$ had quantified the specific impact of AI on earnings. Another 11% said they had observed measurable productivity gains in specific areas such as software programming and customer support.
However, the companies that have implemented these efficiency improvements have not significantly outperformed overall market levels in terms of profit growth. Data shows that their median year-over-year profit growth was 17%, while companies that have not quantified the contribution of AI efficiencies were at 14%. Goldman Sachs noted that this gap is not statistically significant.
只会呐喊的尖刀手
·
--
May everything go smoothly, not only today.

Your account stays on the rise, 🔥🔥🔥

May your body stay healthy and your emotions stay at peace.

May every step you take be on an easy path, and may every encounter be kind.

One day goes well, and every day goes well.
Lucky雨
·
--
Back view is a side sketch left for the world
A silhouette is a profile left to the world
路人1688-luren
·
--
When you feel like nothing matters, you can go out and take a walk. After all, different environments hold different people and different things. Experience different life scripts—after all, we’re just here to experience… why take it so seriously?
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs