Many technology systems are designed to delay consequences. Risks are placed far behind the scenes, as if they will never truly emerge. Dusk is not built on such assumptions. It considers consequences as something that is certain to come, not a possibility that can be ignored.
Within the Dusk framework, every design decision carries clear implications. Privacy is not treated as an absolute shield, and verification is not positioned as a formality. Both work in a mutually constraining relationship, leaving no room to escape responsibility when the system is tested.
This approach makes Dusk not feel 'light' in the popular sense. It does not offer instant security. Instead, it presents a structure that forces every actor to understand their role from the beginning. There are no surprises that emerge from the gray areas that are deliberately left ambiguous.
In this way, Dusk does not try to protect its users from reality. It places them within a system that demands full awareness of what is being executed.
