🚨Why do people say SpaceX’s future can’t really be suppressed?

I’m so focused on $SPCX —actually, it’s more because Cathie Wood got into Musk’s car, which reminds me of what happened back when BTC was around 30K: Cathie Wood blindly bottom-fished, and now the same scene is showing up again!

This morning I finished reading SpaceX’s first Q2 earnings report after going public, and one thought crossed my mind: the show is only just beginning.

Many people still view it as “a rocket-selling company,” but what Wall Street is pricing this at isn’t really a “space exploration company.”

Look closely at the logic behind how these three business units are assembled, and you’ll understand Old Ma’s strategy:
1. Starlink: a heavily undervalued cash-cow goldmine that generates its own “blood”
➫ In the entire report, there’s no doubt the most eye-catching piece is Starlink.
1,200万 users, doubling directly year over year. In a single quarter, the communications business pulled in $4.291 billion in revenue and $1.656 billion in operating profit, becoming the company’s most solid cash-flow machine overnight.
The most obvious thing is its pricing: even though monthly ARPU fell from $85 to $66 (about 470 RMB), when you compare it with the domestic situation, the logic clicks instantly.
In China, everyone uses fiber from the three telecom operators—whether it’s 100 Mbps or 1 Gbps, it’s only about 70–100 RMB per month. That means these 12 million global users are paying roughly 6 to 7 times the cost of ordinary broadband in China, and are constantly recharging Starlink like crazy!
For coastal lines, no-man’s-land areas, polar routes, remote mines, and even aircraft at ten-thousand-meter altitudes—anywhere without fiber—Starlink is an absolute hard currency, and pricing is up to it.

2. The “trinity” model: when you play with this kind of “heavy-asset” setup, others can’t even copy it. Let’s break down Old Ma’s big moves:
❶ Rockets (loss of $542 million)
➥ It looks like they’re losing money, but in reality it’s the company’s own “private logistics team,” minimizing satellite launch/transportation costs.
❷ Starlink (profit of $1.656 billion)
➥ Pulling in ultra-high-margin cash flow through high ARPU, continuously “re-fueling” and funding the whole group.
❸ AI business (revenue 2.561 billion, CapEx splurge of $15.8 billion)
➥ Burning cash like crazy to seize the future’s second growth curve.

What do you call this?
When the “weight” reaches its extreme, it’s absolute monopoly.
With a business structure like this, how could its future possibly be uncertain?