The answer has more than one dimension and is not a coincidence.
------------------------
๐ธ 1๏ธโฃ Philosophy of PEPE from the beginning
PEPE coin was created as a pure Meme Coin:
Without technical promises
Without an official roadmap
Without long-term commitments
๐ Therefore, the decision not to burn was intentional, so it would not be considered an investment project with future promises.
------------------------
โ๏ธ 2๏ธโฃ Avoiding legal issues
Burning mechanisms:
It may be interpreted as deliberate price raising
Or an indirect promise of making profits
โ Many meme coins teams avoid burning to not fall under the definition of securities, especially in America.
-----------------------
๐ง 3๏ธโฃ PEPE relies on "momentum" not scarcity
Instead of burning, PEPE relies on:
The trend
Media noise
High liquidity
Quick trading
๐ The price moves by demand, not by reducing supply.
----------------------
๐งฎ 4๏ธโฃ The burn in the case of PEPE has a weak effect
With a supply of 420 trillion:
Burning millions or even billions changes nothing
Significant burning requires trillions to be burned continuously
โก๏ธ And this is unrealistic without an income system or transaction taxes.
----------------------
๐ฅ 5๏ธโฃ Who has the ability to burn anyway?
Smart contract is closed
No trading taxes
No official treasury
โ There is no permanent source for burning
____________________________
๐งฉ Can burning happen in the future?
Theoretically:
โ๏ธ Only if a new version is released
Or an external initiative from the community (buy and burn)
But: โ There is no obligation or official announcement
