—— From tightening regulations to a paradigm shift towards strategic support
I. Policy evolution: From restrictions to a national strategy transformation
1. Establishment of a regulatory framework (2020-2024)
South Korea launched the Digital Asset Act in 2020, incorporating cryptocurrencies into the financial regulatory system for the first time, requiring exchanges to implement strict KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) procedures. The Virtual Asset User Protection Act (VAUPA), effective in 2024, further strengthens requirements for user asset segregation and platform risk control, aiming to prevent systemic risks similar to the Terra/Luna incident.
2. Policy turning point in 2025
After the new president, Lee Jae-myung, took office, cryptocurrency was elevated to a national strategic height, proposing three core reforms:
◦ Promoting the legalization of spot cryptocurrency ETFs: Allowing ETFs for mainstream assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum to be listed on Korean exchanges, lowering investment thresholds and attracting institutional funds.
◦ Opening up to institutional investors: Plans to allow the national pension fund (with a scale of approximately $884 billion) to allocate funds to cryptocurrencies, with expected inflows reaching $7 billion.
◦ Developing the Korean won stablecoin market: Curbing capital outflows to dollar stablecoins and promoting compliant stablecoins pegged to the Korean won (such as KRW69).
II. New opportunities for blockchain projects under policy dividends
1. Restructuring of the exchange landscape
◦ Benefits for leading platforms: Upbit (with over 70% market share) is expected to further expand its advantages under the graded licensing system due to its early establishment of a compliant real-name account system.
◦ Survival challenges for small and medium platforms: Strict asset review and risk reserve requirements may force small and medium exchanges such as Probit and GOPAX to exit the market.
2. Repatriation of domestic projects and international competition
◦ Policies attracting overseas projects back: Projects that previously moved to Singapore and the UAE due to regulatory uncertainty (such as Nexpace and Klaytn) are reassessing the South Korean market.
◦ Localization efforts by global giants: Public chains like Avalanche and Solana are accelerating the establishment of developer communities in Korea, integrating into the local ecosystem through hackathons and technical collaborations.
3. Government investment in Web3 infrastructure
The government under Lee Jae-myung plans to invest 12 trillion won (approximately $8.7 billion) over three years to develop an 'Asian Crypto Valley', focusing on zero-knowledge proofs and cross-chain technology research, promoting the integration of blockchain and public services (such as digital identity verification and smart contracts).
III. Challenges and concerns: Balancing innovation and risk
1. Challenges of regulatory coordination
◦ Discrepancies in the regulatory authority over stablecoins between the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the central bank of South Korea may delay the launch of the Korean won stablecoin.
◦ Increasing scrutiny from the global anti-money laundering organization (FATF) on aggressive ETF policies.
2. Structural risks in the market
◦ Retail-driven speculative culture: Investors under 35 account for 41% in South Korea, with 80% of trading volume on Upbit coming from altcoins; relaxed policies may exacerbate market volatility.
◦ Risks of 'Kimchi premium': Local exchange prices being long-term higher than the global average may trigger arbitrage shocks after capital controls are relaxed.
3. Talent drain and industrial hollowing
Strict licensing systems for virtual asset service providers (VASP) and high corporate taxes still lead some startups to prefer settling in Japan or Hong Kong, where regulations are more flexible.
IV. Global positioning of South Korean blockchain
With Singapore tightening overseas digital token services and Hong Kong's approval process being slow, South Korea is expected to become a new crypto hub in Asia due to its policy openness and technological investment:
• Regional regulatory benchmark: If the second stage of the Digital Asset Basic Law legislation succeeds, South Korea could provide a 'regulatory sandbox' model for East Asia.
• Geopolitical safe-haven value: Amid rising tensions between North and South Korea, the 'digital gold' properties of cryptocurrencies may attract more safe-haven funds.
------
Conclusion: Institutional crossroads
South Korea's crypto policy is shifting from 'passive regulation' to 'active shaping', and blockchain projects need to seize the policy window: focusing on ETF and stablecoin dividends in the short term, and participating in national Web3 infrastructure in the medium to long term. However, whether a true transformation from a 'speculative market' to an 'innovative ecosystem' can be achieved depends on whether the government can find a dynamic balance between capital openness and risk prevention.