🔊 Bitcoin Amsterdam 2024: The consequences of BTC misinformation!

- 🗣️ Andrew Bailey (Yale-NUS): Misleading academic research on BTC is highly misleading. "The unit error in the chart has not been fixed, but it is still cited as fact."

- 📰 Bradley Rettler (University of Wyoming): Journalists lack time to check sources, leading to the spread of misinformation. "When you start with garbage, you end up with garbage."

- 📜 Craig Warmke (Bitcoin Policy Institute): Policy and regulation are affected by misinformation, especially in Sweden with the BTC mining tax.

- 🔍 Conclusion: It's time for academia to support Bitcoin instead of against it.

👉 What do you think about the role of academia in shaping perceptions of BTC? Comment! 🚀